well, what do you know?
sorry obama.
Ralph Nader is running for President.
Should John Edwards not be selected for VP, my vote will go for Nader.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032608/
well, what do you know?
sorry obama.
The man responsible for the Bush Presidency and everything that sprang from it.
Maybe some Dems remember the mortal damage Nader did to Gore in 2000, delivering the WH to criminals.
Quit being a sore pussy . Ross perot took 19 percent from GHWB.
How many Dems remember that their visionary leader, one Michael Moore, endorsed that same Ralph Nader...in that same election.
He also played a role in why you guys didn't win in 04.
He's not very smart and neither are you.
I am so happy for you SA210. Now your life will be complete
again.
I disagree with you, and dissapointed by your statement. John Edwards was my choice, and the current candidates running STOLE his issues that they are running on, flat out. Nader represents more of what I believe than the other 3 phony candidates. If John Edwards is someones VEEP candidate, then I will vote for that ticket, whether it be phony Obama or Clinton.
But if not, it is my right as an American to vote for who I choose, and not for what society tells me to do. I think it wouldn't be smart for me to vote for something against my principles. I'm not sold on Obama just cause the media chose him and thousands of people are fooled that he's the next JFK or RFK or because it's the cool thing to do, or some other bologna like that. I don't think those people are smart.
So you like McCain.
That's cool, I'm fine with his being president too.
What if Obama chose Edwards as a running mate?
It is interesting to see how people rationalize a vote for someone that gets his kicks from being a footnote in history. It is the arrogance of privilege which compels Nader, not a call from patriots to save the country from social or political apathy. This is simply a case of a guy that takes himself too seriously.
Invariably, a vote for Nader only confirms what real power brokers already know. There is a significant percentage of the electorate that can be programmed to flip votes as a result of coding candidates, issues, and word phrases. It is particularly useful when they perceive the organized chaos with which they manipulate to be marginalized by some unforseen factor or convergence of cir stances. For them, Nader unwittingly is an attempt to neutralize those uncontrollable factors.
The country is at a crossroad of sorts. Sometimes what we see, is authentically real.
![]()
No, of course I don't like McCain.
And I said that I would vote for Edwards if he were to be anyone's running mate.
But you are voting for him.
No, I am not. With respect, that is how You see it. I am voting for someone who best represents my beliefs. The button I press will not be McCains name.
Believe me, I am hoping everyday that Edwards is selected as Hillary's or copycat Obama's running mate. That's my first choice.
W is eternally grateful to Nader voters.
McCain thanks you in advance.
Or you could thank the corporate media for choosing our candidates for us. For deciding who gets coverage and who doesn't.
Thank Edwards for making his hair the only thing people remember about him.
![]()
I see your one of the ones that bought into to it.
He's the one with the compact.
You guys act like it matters in Texas...
I may just vote for Nader in this next one for the of it. He's an authentic crackpot...
He's the one that came up with Obamas and Hillary's campaign issues and speeches before they did.
Well, of course Hillary wanted the hair issue. She's a woman.
Lets not rule out Huckabee, he still has a shot, if McCain falls over with a heart attack and dies. Good possibility probably about 70 percent chance.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)