Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. 02-26-2008 #1
    sribb43
    In Dirk We Trust sribb43's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    6,849
    http://realgm.com/src_wiretap_archiv...most_had_kidd/


    Star-Ledger -
    The Trailblazers very nearly acquired Jason Kidd, according to the Star-Ledger.

    Rod Thorn would only identify the team as "a midlevel team out west," but several league officials confirmed it as Portland.

    The Blazers were to send Jarrett Jack and Raef LaFrentz to the Nets along with other cap-fillers for Kidd, but Kidd sabotaged the deal by publicly requesting a deal on Jan. 28.

    When Kidd said he no longer wanted to play in New Jersey, Portland's management concluded that he wouldn't want to play for their club either since they aren't yet a le contender. [READ]
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote sribb43 is offline
  2. 02-26-2008 #2
    stretch
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    Were the nets actually about to take a deal with Jack, Lafrentz, and fillers? Why the did we have to give up as much as we did then?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote stretch is offline
  3. 02-26-2008 #3
    ludda
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    895
    Kidd would migraine his way out of going to Portland.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote ludda is offline
  4. 02-26-2008 #4
    ludda
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    895
    Also I remember reading that OUtlaw was part of the deal and picks.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote ludda is offline
  5. 02-26-2008 #5
    sribb43
    In Dirk We Trust sribb43's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    6,849
    Quote Originally Posted by stretch
    Were the nets actually about to take a deal with Jack, Lafrentz, and fillers? Why the did we have to give up as much as we did then?
    bc Lafrentz has a massive expiring contract, something the mavs dont have
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote sribb43 is offline
  6. 02-26-2008 #6
    stretch
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    Quote Originally Posted by sribb43
    bc Lafrentz has a massive expiring contract, something the mavs dont have
    I thought KVH's contract was pretty big as well?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote stretch is offline
  7. 02-26-2008 #7
    sribb43
    In Dirk We Trust sribb43's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    6,849
    Quote Originally Posted by stretch
    I thought KVH's contract was pretty big as well?
    its complicated but KVH cost cuban more money than using any player on the current roster...thats why he wasnt included in the first trade
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote sribb43 is offline
  8. 02-26-2008 #8
    Bob Lanier
    Luck the Fakers Bob Lanier's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Post Count
    6,425
    Jack > Kidd.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Bob Lanier is offline
  9. 02-26-2008 #9
    dirk4mvp
    Based dirk4mvp's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    24,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Lanier
    Jack > Kidd.
    L
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote dirk4mvp is offline
  10. 02-26-2008 #10
    dirk4mvp
    Based dirk4mvp's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    24,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Lanier
    Jack > Kidd.
    O
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote dirk4mvp is offline
  11. 02-26-2008 #11
    dirk4mvp
    Based dirk4mvp's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    24,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Lanier
    Jack > Kidd.

    L
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote dirk4mvp is offline
  12. 02-26-2008 #12
    hater
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    74,105
    Quote Originally Posted by stretch
    Were the nets actually about to take a deal with Jack, Lafrentz, and fillers? Why the did we have to give up as much as we did then?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote hater is offline
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules