Reply With Quote
I'm sure we won't have the #1 after March is over...
see the "Next fifteen" thread for explanation..
it's been MANY years since the #1 seed in the west won the NBA le let alone came out of the west
and the Spurs luck as the #1 seed isn't very good
and what happened to the Official Scola thread? Was Scola's great play too much on the mods to bear?
I'm sure we won't have the #1 after March is over...
see the "Next fifteen" thread for explanation..
The Scola thread is in NBA Central.
Kori got tired of it here and moved it.
Does the phrase "Let it go" exist in your vocabulary? Seriously, man, what do you hope to accomplish with the constant Scola BS? You can't travel back in time without A) A DeLorean, B) a flux capacitor, and C) 1.21 Jiggawatts.
Scola is way too overrated.
They replaced the Scola thread with a much more important one. Perhaps you should take a look at it...
Refer to my signature.......
Yeah those 8 and 8 games were just killing us all....Was Scola's great play too much on the mods to bear?
Spurs Dynasty 21....
boy have i missed your input into this forum.
with the way the Spurs are playing, and especially with Parker coming into form with his fresh legs, I doubt the Spurs are going to stumble much
Well I don't think getting the first seed is an automatic curse for the team. It just goes to show you that having the first seed in the West means absolutely nothing. I don't think the Spurs should tank to a lower seed unless the first seed causes a dangerous matchup for them.
By the way, do you want to know the last 1st seed team in the West to win the le? Yours truly!
See 2003
end of thread
Last edited by ATXSPUR; 03-03-2008 at 09:20 PM.
So you complain because they aren't doing so good, and now you complain because they're doing too good?
.
#1 seed this year won't mean as much as it has in the past. In recent years, the closest any 8 has been to the 1 seed is 15 games back. Right now, Golden State is #8 and they're only five games back of 1.
Spurs can do it more so than anyone so I wouldn't be so concerned with that stat.
See 1999 & 2003.
See 1995
Seed doesn't mean much if you don't come through in the playoffs. This is our deepest team since 1999 so I think we'll be in good shape.
#1 seed just means I have to spend more money on home games... i hope they win it from the 8th seed.
I never buy into stuff that because it happened before it is doomed to happen again. Spurs getting the number 1 seed puts them in the best position to win and would likely see to it they don't have to see the Lakers until the West Finals. They are the only team in the West i fear right now. I want to see them prove they can beat Dallas or the Suns in a 7 game series before they play us. I kow we can beat the Suns or Mavs, they have both regressed and we are just as good as we were last year if not better.
If it were to be Lakers vs Spurs in the Final round, I think the team with HCA wins...in fact, whichever team takes the #1 seed this year is the team I'm betting will be the West Champ.
Being #3 on down sucks because you're going against some excellent teams. #7 and #8 are deadly but not nearly as deadly as #3,4,5,6 will be.
I think either the Lakers or the Spurs could win without HCA. All they would need to do is steal one of the first two. Both are excellent home teams however.
If the Mavs stay in 7th, yes
Then again, the whole even years thing... these amount of supers ions are getting ridiculous - of course we want the first seed in the west.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
