Reply With Quote
Tucker Carlson brainwashes the world
Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths
by CB_Brooklyn
(mirrored @ checktheevidence.com)
From the moment people thought that planes crashed in the World Trade Center, the brainwashing had begun.
The “official” account of Boeing 767s striking the North and South Towers, at 400+MPH and 500+MPH respectively, became glued in peoples’ minds as “fact” because of the “tee-vee”. Good ol’ tee-vee. We all trust the media.
Even in 1938, when Orson Welles directed a special Halloween radio broadcast of the novel “War of the Worlds”, millions of Americans believed Martians were invading earth. Everyone trusts the media! (As a side note, I’d like to advertise a new article by Andrew Johnson: “Mars Anomalies”)
It should come to no surprise how the media affects peoples’ minds and our culture, and the media’s reporting of 9/11 is no exception.
The 9/11 coverup perpetrators had their deceptive propaganda well planned. With their total control over the media they successfully conditioned most into believing their “19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims” story. People were overwhelmed; their brains saturated with the propaganda.
November 10, 2001 - George W Bush brainwashes the world into thinking the idea of “inside job” is crazy: ”Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty.”
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0011110-3.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K5M0xtxQVQ
But the propaganda didn’t stop there. The coverup perps, the experts they are, knew some people would see through their “boxcutter” deception, so they crafted an alternate propaganda… specifically targeting those already su ious of the “official” story.
Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
http://www.realnews247.com/fascism_d..._democracy.htm
This alternate propaganda is promoted by government plants within the “truth movement”, along with its fabricated evidence (such as molten metal). Of course, the media carefully publicize this “evidence” as a “wacky conspiracy theory”…
November 14, 2005 - Tucker Carlson brainwashes the world into thinking the idea of an “inside job” theory is offensive. Steven Jones promotes the “alternate propaganda”:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10053445
Yet, the coverup perpetrators use ridicule to keep the “REAL” version hidden…
December 6, 2006 - Steven E Jones brainwashes the 9/11 “truth movement” into thinking the idea of directed energy weapons and no planes is “crazy disinfo”: “Of late, [Jim Fetzer] refers often to his association now with Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds. These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.”
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm
Jones is one of many in and around the “truth movement” associated with Los Alamos where Directed Energy Weapons are researched. See here to learn how the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media. Jones also suppressed free energy research in ways that mirror his 9/11 coverup:
9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
By CB_Brooklyn
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cm...=151&Itemid=60
Timeline of Events Involving Steve Jones, Crockett Grabbe and Steve Koonin
By Russ Gerst
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cm...=162&Itemid=60
If no-planes/TV-Fakery were “crazy disinfo”, why didn’t the media use it to discredit the “truth movement”? Here’s a video of Dr Morgan Reynolds on FOX News: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8
Certainly if no-planes/TV-Fakery were “crazy disinfo”, the media would have invited Dr Reynolds back. Why didn’t they?
On top of that, why didn’t the media report Reynolds’ or Wood’s court cases, represented by Attorney Jerry Leaphart?
Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?pag...1=federal_case
Docket No. 1:07-cv-04612-GBD
le: Dr. Morgan Reynolds ex rel. USA vs. Science Applications International Corp. et al.
Venue: United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Judge: George B. Daniels
Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
Docket No. 1:07-cv-03314-GBD
le: Dr. Judy Wood ex rel. USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al.
Venue: United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Judge: George B. Daniels
=================================================
UPDATE!!! While composing this article the author became aware of the following:
New York Times
“For Engineer, a Cloud of Litigation After 9/11”
By Jim Dwyer
February 23, 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/nyregion/23about.htm
The relevant quote is as follows (emphasis added):
”… one man has sued on behalf of the United States, claiming that Mr. Gilsanz is part of a vast conspiracy to cover up the truth about 9/11, including the “so-called building failures.” The lawsuit maintains that exotic weaponry actually destroyed the buildings, and that the airplanes were mass psychological trickery.”
Wood and Reynolds have filed two separate lawsuits.
No mention of Wood/Reynolds/Leaphart’s names in the Times article.
=================================================
Let us review…
The media (i.e. MSNBC):
promote the “official” version as “the truth”
ridicule the “alternate” version as the “offensive wacky conspiracy theory”
shun the “REAL” version and court cases
Plants in the ”truth movement” (i.e. Steven Jones):
promote the “alternate” version as “the truth”
ridicule the “REAL” version as “offensive wacky conspiracy theory”
We can now understand why many “truthers” shy away from no-planes/TV-Fakery. Seems the 9/11 coverup perps tricked the “truth movement” with a well orchestrated plan of deception! Will these theories really “damage” the “truth movement”, or has the movement merely been tricked into thinking so?
Many “truthers” often wonder why the mainstream media hasn’t broken the “inside job” story yet. The reason is simple: The 9/11 perps have not been exposed. (Check the “Suppression Timeline” linked above.)
Only after the real 9/11 perpetrators are widely exposed with the media break!
Will “truthers” finally start promoting no-planes/TV-Fakery? If the “truth movement” can’t admit their mistakes, why should the average person? People will simply continue believing what they feel most comfortable with: the “boxcutter” story. They don’t care about the evidence. Why should they? After all, the “truth movement” doesn’t. Or do they???
How many “truthers” have looked at the no-planes/TV-Fakery evidence lately… evidence that anyone can understand?
Below you will find a ton of evidence. Look it through… you maybe surprised!
================================================== ====
================================================== ====
================================================== ====
This article is quite extensive. A few points covered:
Click here for full article.
- Learn of the 1999 Washington Post article detailing the military's hologram project.
- Learn of the NYPD official who said the South Tower strike "looked like an evil magician's trick".
- Learn of the FDNY official who said “I never actually saw a plane hit the building. I never saw that. I saw it on television, but I never saw it while I was standing there”.
- Learn that very few people reported seeing airplanes, and even fewer reported hearing them.
- Learn of the mainstream media articles detailing how the military and TV Networks broadcast fake footage to deceive the public.
- Learn of the no-plane / directed energy weapon court cases in the US District Court, Southern District of New York
- Watch the ABC video of Peter Jennings. He knew the airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC played the clip back in slow motion.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cm...=163&Itemid=60
Tucker Carlson brainwashes the world
CB. I try to be respectful and nice to people here. However...
Go yourself!
I have seen both sides of the issue. The consriracy theorists are flat out wrong, and at times overtly lying.
I have absolutey no respect for those of you who continue this disgraceful propaganda.
I saw no planes striking buildings. What I saw were merely holographs covering up the evidence of the government's use of some super-secret weapon from some unknowable location. These aren't the droids I'm looking for.
I hate to burst the new guys junk mail, but I happen to know
a person who survived the WTC and saw the plane coming in
that hit the building. Their description of setting in an office
and watching the plane approaching and screaming at the top of
their lungs for it to turn is not what you would call good listening.
Nor was their description of standing in front of the WTC and
watching the towers collapse and seeing the bodies of those
that jumped.
I have to agree with WC statement to CB about self abuse.
I wonder what they think of Morgan Reynolds at the A&M economics department these days. I just missed having him as a professor when I was there.
You forgot personal bias.
As Bill Maher said, dubya couldn't have possibly been behind the 9/11 attacks, because the attacks succeeded.
I wish I were alive in 1938. That would have been awesome to see the country freaking out about Aliens! haha
I think the people who believe thiese conspiracies should be sent to Baghdad without any weapons food or water.
Lee Harvey Oswald shot Kennedy. There was no "magic bullet". Oswald shot from the sixth floor and hit Kennedy. That's it.
We are alone. There are no UFO's. Everything is identified by somebody. Most are military test craft.
Elvis Presley is DEAD.
Jim Morrison is DEAD.
Airplanes hit the towers and the Pentagon. That is fact.
Conspiracy theorists suck.
Now ghosts and Bigfoot may be another story!
How do we know the World Trade Center ever existed in the first place? How do we know those "skyscrapers" weren't holograms?
How do we even know that "Manhattan" is actually there and isn't just virtual reality?
Also, how do we know that the "9/11 truther" movement isn't part of the real conspiracy to hide the real conspiracy? Maybe the "Ground Zero" site is a hologram and the towers are still there, and Bushco is hiding Elvis, Amelia Earhart, Kurt Cobain, the portal to the Bermuda Triangle, the UFO's from Area 51, John F. Kennedy, blueprints for the directed-energy death ray weapon, the green car engine that gets 150 mpg on just water, the original second and third installments of The Matrix which didn't suck, and the tapes from the 0.4 game which show Derek Fisher didn't beat the buzzer after all, inside?
I just knew that damn green car existed. I knew it. I heard it
all my life that Detroit had it and it ran off water and got
150 MPG. And those mean old oil companies wouldn't let them
build it.
Thanks ES for the inside "dope".
why do they call it "country gravy"?
because its white?
Nice place you guys have here.
Last edited by PixelPusher; 03-10-2008 at 09:31 PM.
I guess there were no eye witnesses..... Odd for a city with 20 million plus residents... Particularly because most of them were looking at the towers when the second 'plane' hit....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
