Assholes. Clean block my ass, you suckers.
ing eat and die you zebras.
Don't matter UCLA is better regardless.. *fuels the fire*...
Yeah, especially when they dribble the ball off their leg and the zebra calls it out off A&M.
All three of those assholes should be fired. ing UCLA sucking fest.
That sucks, but the Ags had their chances. They took a 1 seed down to the wire in front of their fans.
I would have preferred going for the win in that scenario.
I agree Holt. I wanted Dom or Josh to take the last shot from three. Still, given the alternative, how can the zebras not call the foul in that situation? ing bull .
Now I understand what Stanford fans were ing about a couple of weeks ago, looks like there's a different set of rules for UCLA. There wasn't one foul on this play, but two.
this .
Man that's bull . But you can't be too surprised, just like any other sport...the bigger market gets the favors.
Wonder if he could have made the freethrows.
I just wanted to see him have the chance.
If you've got money laying around, put it down on UCLA. Between this play, the bull shot against Cal going over the backboard, and the phantom foul on Stanford last week to save UCLA's ass, it makes you wonder if anyone can get a fair shake against UCLA...
there were a lot of fouls inside on Love and ucla that weren't called. Still, AM had their chances and a little better offensive efficiency would have won the game going away.
What was sloan doing? He should have gotten a whistle. But driving wildly into 3 trees, his only hope was to get bailed out by a whistle.
A&M should of score more than 3 points the last 9 minutes of the game.
He shouldn't of wildly tried to drive into the lane. Believe it or not the refs view the game in full speed, if a player goes into the lane with no control and the ball comes out you cannot call that foul. At full speed there first time you cannot be %100 sure he was fouled. That's how it is in college and nba
That's very true. I think i jinxed A&M. I changed it, saw them up, started ranting about big twelve dominance, then later saw that they didn't score but 5 more points, and there were like 9 minutes left.
Damn, I saw the game online so couldn't tell how clean the block was, but now I can clearly see. I know refs miss some close calls in games, but that was a pretty obvious foul. Aggies got screwed there, but they took UCLA to the wire regardless.
But like the previous poster said, bigger markets are going to get the calls unfortunately.
Apparently the play was designed to be a 3 pointer for Kirk with Carter as a decoy. I would have liked to see that develop.
Ags still need to learn to shoot FTs before next season.
Choke!
I don't think it has anything to do with bigger markets. The other side of the coin is always going to complain. If it had been UCLA going for the layup and Collison was fouled, the atm fans would be saying, "Let them play," and, "I hate when the refs decide the game at the last second." atm dominated the 2nd half, they should not have been in a situation to lose.
not that it matters, but UCLA's last dunk should have been waved off too...he clearly had the ball in his hand when the red light went on.
Aggies really only lost by 2.
They actually corrected the score last night. That angered me too.
We probably wouldn't have said that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
