Reply With Quote
Good God, shut the up.
Thread: Official Duncan > Jordan thread
This is the requested thread where you argue that Duncan > Jordan.
I will start off the debate:
Duncan > Jordan because Duncan is a better rebounder and shotblocker. Jordan was also a guard, not tall enough to dominate like a big man. There was also a conspiracy by the NBA to have the refs give Jordan tons of gift calls.
There you have it!
Duncan > Jordan
Good God, shut the up.
Jordan>Duncan
Because he can also play baseball. There's my theory. If you add together the amount of sports they played, then if they were a dominant player in one of those professional leagues, then you square the total amount of sports they played. 2^2 = 4.
4>1!
uh yikes
-Mars
why was Sam Bowie drafted before Jordan? Explain that?
LMFAO this might be the greatest post not written by Spursdynasty
Why is every thread official these days?
How the should I know, ask Portland.
Why didn't your mother tell you that she dropped you on your head multiple times?
Seriously Mr.Bottomtooth, that formula just might revolutionize the way people choose great players.
*backs out of thread quietly*
Uh oh, either someone deleted their post or they're on all ignore. I won't say any names.
That's what I was about to mention.
-Mars
I'm very disappointed in the a ude of the Spurs fans here. I may pack up my bags and go back to Wisconsin! :-(
you're a mavs fan, o.
spurs > mavs
While not a center, Jordan still put up very good shot blocking and rebounding numbers, at one point he averaged 1.6 blocks, and at another averaged 8.0 rebounds.
The fact that Jordan did infact dominate like a big man while not being one is actually a plus, not a minus..
Also, you forgot that Duncan can swim...
Lmao
I also heard that Duncan is pretty good at foosball. We should definately adjust the equation to factor that in.
Duncan also swam, as someone else in this thread noted. Duncan was also the Wake Forest tetherball champion, finished 2nd in box hockey, and third in the pinewood derby compe ion. He was also very good in archery golf.
6 squared = 36
Yea! You just pwned him!!!
You're dissappointed we don't believe your crazy ass theories?
Well according to my theory, there's an average of 14 threads in all of SpursTalk per day that interests a member, as taken by a study experimented over the past month. And for everyday that you post your crazy ass theories that result in about 4 threads, that is about 4 threads that people are dissappointed in. And to the average 20 threads made in the Spurs Forum, 20+14/2 = 17 damns given. And square the threads you make, which is 4, = 16. 17-16 = 1.
Which means 1 member actually gives a damn about your formulas.
Waste the rest of your life trying to figure out who it is. My guess is Louis.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
