Reply With Quote
80 points in a half given up by the great d of dallas
Washington 20 20 38 42 120 Final
Dallas 40 33 28 36 137
they give up 38 and 42 points in quarters to wizzards
nice d aj
80 points in a half given up by the great d of dallas
AJ can't implement a system, he can only work with what Nellie gives him. If he ever gets the job for real, you will see changes there.
Isn't Nellie coaching tonight? I thought that AJ was starting after tonight's game.
AJ gets the win.
It's all good.
I think nelson coached his last game
be intersting to see how long he will stay as gm though
Nellie is done. They just haven't buried the body yet.
Arenas had 43 points. I guess his 0-for last night pissed him off.
AJ the Traitor??
What about him.
coached his last game wtf are you talking about?
Dallas wore green, WAS orange, Dirk goin balla with a headband, but he obviously hasn't got a clue how to wear a headband. Dirk needs some put "Adrienne Eye for a German Guy".
too bad not enought to beat mavs dagnabitArenas had 43 points. I guess his 0-for last night pissed him off.
I can see ducks sitting at home, obsessively following scores online, with a little bag of confetti to throw the moment a Mavs opponent passes 100.
The Mavs gave up 120. The Wizards gave up a season/league-high 137.
Mavs' 137 = 2+ x Spurs's 67.
WAS had a very successful swing thru TX.
from http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=250118006
Did You Know ...
The Mavericks, who had four players score at least 25 points in a game, are the third team since the NBA-ABA merger (1976-77 season) to accomplish such a feat.
Jan. '05 Mavericks (vs. Washington): Jerry Stackhouse (29), Dirk Nowitzki (28), Jason Terry (26), Michael Finley (25)
Jan. '90 Warriors (at Boston): Chris Mullin (30), Mitch Richmond (26), Terry Teagle (26), Tim Hardaway (25)
April '88 Nuggets (vs. Houston): Danny Schayes (32), Fat Lever (28), Alex English (26), Michael Adams (26)
It's 3+ not 2+
Don't feel bad. He also does that anytime LeBron has a turnover.
On my abacus, Spurs' 67 x 2 = 134
Spurs 134 "+" (crumbs) = DAL's 137.
For most of us, a mathematical expression with consecutive operators, "+ x", is obviously invalid, so what else could I have meant with my shorthand pseudo-expression? how about:
DAL's 137 is (more than 2x) Spurs' 67
Your insistence on mathematical precision (where none was intended) is exemplary.
they still did not give up 80 points in one half like the mavs
Well, if I get nit picked for a coma, then I can nit pick a formula that is wrong.
When you write out a formula you are implying the intention of having "mathematical precision". I would also subs ute accuracy for the term precision.
Just to clear things up. AJ did not coach against Washington, Nellie did. AJ will coach the NEXT 20 games.
"nit picked for a coma"
it's either "nitpick" or "nit-pick", so you get nitpicked for a space.
"write out a formula"
which is obviously invalid, but let's not over-nitpick, because you'd have no substance left.
"write out a formula" is valid.
" "write out a formula" is valid. "
the _formula_ I wrote out was invalid, not my quote of your dreck.
NM
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
