Reply With Quote
sad to say, but this is typical spurstalk.....you shouldve seen it here in the regular season, geez
Most bi-polar fans in the NBA by far. Against the Hornets, you sucked games 1 and 2 because timmmmmay was "ill" then when you guys are embarrassed in games 1 and 2 in LA it was because manu was magically injured. There were threads saying he sucks and is a liability. He blows up for a game, and holy he is the lord jesus christ in a Spurs jersey. I have never seen so many sickening "fans" in the NBA in my life. I just wonder how many excuses will be sure to show up after you guys lose the next two games. That should be fun.
sad to say, but this is typical spurstalk.....you shouldve seen it here in the regular season, geez
You should change your username, only thing Bonzi's killing now is CiCi's pizza's revenues.
Sacramento: Where winning no championships happens
Heres a good link for you:
Enjoy
www.basspro.com/
PZWN3D
[/THREAD]
if you think it is so sickening the why show up here?
look who typed bipolar...........go spurs go
Oh, and thank Bonzi for his usual general boneheaded play and poor shot selection. They really "killed" the Spurs against the Hornets.
But they do have a good young prospect at point guard.
Can ANY spurs fans who have posted in this thread deny or discredit anything in the original post?
Let me get this straight.
The OP criticizes the fanbase because of its propensity to , whine, moan and offer excuses for every loss. He points out that the fanbase is never one to admit that the team got worked or outplayed. It's always because of some form of injury. Woe is me. One and half days later, that same "injured" player blows up and scores 30. All of a sudden, he's god in a sperm jersey.
And you respond by making fun of Bonzi Wells because it's part of the guy's moniker?
That's effin' brilliant.
WTF is with Sacramento fans and their intense craving for Laker again? I guess LA ed them until they loved them or something back from '00 to '02.
I have a strange feeling people don't give a about your credibility.
They can't. Basically what they're saying is "Yeah, you're right. We're a bunch of whiny, excuse making beeatches. But Sacto and Bonzi suck."
Something like that.
Those players sucked, then they didn't.
Spurs won.
Bonzi didn't.
Nothing to do with the Lakers at all, it has to do with the Spurs and more specifically spurs fans on this forum and how ing sickening they are. Thanks for changing the subject at hand here.
What else would we argue? When players suck fans talk about how much they suck. When they play well fans talk about how well they played. What exactly was so ground breaking about his analysis?
Nice and eloquent.
He talk about fans. Responses didn't. Me Tarzan. You Jane.
So why are you here?
man, you are called bonzi_isaspurskiller.
you should probably change it if you want have some credit around here ...
anything but "shaq_owns_tim" , "nash_beats_spurs" or "cp3_destroy_spurs" will do.
Last edited by gwidlon; 05-26-2008 at 02:37 PM.
The fans said the players sucked.
Then they didn't.
Spurs won.
Bonzi lost.
When a player plays poorly, fans here talk about their poor play. When a player plays well, fans here talk about how well they played.
If you consider this a difficult concept to grasp then i feel for you.
It's something like Stockholm Syndrome, I guess.
Don't try to backpeddle now. It was never "oh, timmmy is playing so poorly" , it was more like "if timmy was healthy" or "we should have won if timmmy wasn't ill" type of bull . Then everybody pulled the Manu is injuired card when he was a non factor in the first two games and everyone was ready to throw him under the bus after the huge role he played in the second round. Most di able fans ing ever. When the Spurs lose in a couple games I hope at least a couple dozen of you jump off some bridges.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
