... the Sacramento Kings.
Anyone that has any cool videos of that amazing team, its beautiful passing and shooting, should share them with the rest of us
Last edited by endrity; 06-11-2008 at 08:43 AM.
You're stupid
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...205240LAL.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...205280SAC.html
nice +27 free throw disparity for the Kings there. The Lakers were screwed in games 3 and 5. Series would have been over long before game 6 ever took place if it the series was ref'd fairly.
Webber choked on his own per usual in game 7 too boot. Kings were a bunch of mentally weak es who never won anything because they weren't good enough.
one of the best team this decade to not win a nba championship.
as one of the rockets fans, i can feel the pain of the loyal kings fans on this board. we got robbed big time, too.
What game is there a +27 free throw disparity for the Kings?
And maybe the Kings shot 20 more free throws because the Lakers were too busy shooting 31 three's that game.
Yep yep.
Glad to know the NBA fan base will not recognize the Lakers as a 3peat. Sucks to be a fan of LA, knowing this ref scandal is hurting you the worst.
Actually it isn't. Donaghy claimed a bunch a bull that he has no proof of, yet he has admitted to have cheated during the Spurs/Suns and is the main reason why the Spurs advanced. Dumbass.
So, wait, you recognize the NBA is fixed, but refuse to see the evidence that the 2002 series was fixed as well?
Who's the real Dumbass?
What evidence? Donaghy's actions were rogue, got caught.
Theres no proof to his allegations of the 2002 series though. I'm just pointing out that the Lakers were screwed that series in two games that happened before game 6.
So, wait, the 2002 series was rigged for the Kings?
The refs just sucked at rigging it?
It's tough having two fake dynasties in the same city.
USC and LA Lakers.
Both games combined. Learn math.
Here he goes with the usual -erotic undertones again..........
2 Games combined? lol....so 2 games combined should be equal to 1 game? Maybe you didnt watch the game. Its obvious that the game was fixed. Just like the lakers fans are crying that game 2 of these finals were fixed. Im still curious how Kobe gives Mike Bibby an elbow in the face and Bibby gets called for a foul.
He actually did not admit to cheating during the game he reffed during that series - it was only speculated that because he had been cheating on other accounts, he may have. Its doubtful considering he had no questionable calls that game.
So enjoy your 2002* championship.
rofl, so 27-9 FTs in the fourth quarter of one game somehow compares to +27 over two games?
What was special about Game 6 was not merely the free throw differential. It was the manner in which the game really was slipping away from the Lakers until abruptly the officials started making multiple phantom calls to bring them back into it, and the way the Kings knew what was going on and would jump two feet away from the nearest Laker and still get fouls called on them. Even with all that the Kings still had the lead until the final seconds when Kobe Bryant injured the opposing player and still got the foul call. Mike Bibby had a bloody nose and got a foul called on his nose. The Lakers needed every single last crooked call to eke out the win, so thoroughly superior were the Kings on that night.
There are cases where a questionable call here and there changes the flow and sometimes the outcome of a game. Game 5 of that series was an example of that. Game 6 was an example of the officials dragging the desired outcome upstream against a strong current. It was just too obvious. The Kings would have won by 15-20 points without referee intervention. Maybe those 'company men' thought they were helping the league, but they overplayed their hand and fans have suspected fixes behind every controversial call ever since. The mediocre ratings of the best possible NBA Finals matchup this year have something to do with the loss of trust brought about by that game six years ago.
im glad that u know the 27+ is the combined FT number of TWO games.
Typical Laker hatred. You guys are like clockwork.
Of course nobody mentions Game 5 of the 2002 WCF, where the Kings were the benefactors of several dubious calls that allowed them to ultimately win the game. Do you not remember Shaq's famous words after that game?
"It's starts with a C and ends with a T".
You see what you want to see. And if we selectively pick and choose games we can make it seem like any number of teams were the benefactors of an NBA conspiracy.
Typical DazedAndConfused. You're like clockwork.
Of course you don't show up until after the fakers win. No matter, David Stern giftwrapped you at least one championship this decade, so even if you lose this series, no problems.
Let me just mention this about the dubious game 5 calls you speak of: do they translate into 16 of the final 18 King's points directly? Yeah, didn't think so.
Also - Shaq, the almighty paintcamper, can suck a left nut if he has ANY qualms against officiating, ever. This guy should be called for three seconds every possession. Additonally, his game is one of the ugliest ever. He has no shot oncesoever, and cannot even shoot a freethrow. I will never understand why he gets so much attention when hes nothing but a baffoon.
I think this Donaghy thing pretty much ends any question whether that series was fixed. I was cynical before, but now Im convinced.
Now when I'm sitting there with a woman, and all she can talk about is sex, I'm usually not interested. But when I'm ready for something, I just surprise them. It's best because you don't have to see their face. I usually think about David Robinson or Chris Isaak
Now when I'm sitting there with a woman, and all she can talk about is sex, I'm usually not interested. But when I'm ready for something, I just surprise them. It's best because you don't have to see their face. I usually think about David Robinson or Chris Isaak
Now when I'm sitting there with a woman, and all she can talk about is sex, I'm usually not interested. But when I'm ready for something, I just surprise them. It's best because you don't have to see their face. I usually think about David Robinson or Chris Isaak
Now when I'm sitting there with a woman, and all she can talk about is sex, I'm usually not interested. But when I'm ready for something, I just surprise them. It's best because you don't have to see their face. I usually think about David Robinson or Chris Isaak
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
