Activity Stream

I'd be happy with Castle and Reed with 4+8

The institution of marriage has been surely dying since WWII. ended. And America has suffered greatly from this death.

On the other hand, it makes sense for WAS to realize that no one on their team is good enough to stop them from taking whoever they feel is the best player available (much like the Spurs should, outside of Wemby). If they do take Risacher, I'd be curious as to their appetite to move some of...

Shooting is more important than defense when measuring a player's worth unless it a potential elite rim protector like Sarr. Gotta take a shooter at 4 and swing on a defender with no jumper at 8. Supply and demand really plays a role in who to take at 4 VS 8.

Also a China doll

Spurs issues shooting and defense Topic's weaknesses shooting and defense

The Spurs won’t be able to help themselves, lol.

Topic also has the durability concerns already early on in his career. Hopefully its just bad luck and nothing more, but definitely something GM's and scouts will have to consider while scouting him.

The ROI is a joke. :rollin We're not at war with Russia or maybe you wouldn't mind that. You talk so tough when it's not Americans fighting...

Nope. Agree with you there, cause Castle ain't making it to 8. Think the Spurs would definitely take Castle over Topic if both are available at 4. Neither can shoot the ball right now, but at least Castle offers great if not elite Defense right off the bat, as well as versatility on that end to...

tbh im not sure how that would work. maybe some big windfall or large cap increase at the beginning of the next CBA. but the 10% rule is locked in as far as i know. it doesnt always happen year over year. i think 24-25 will only see something like a 3-4 % increase from this past season

No, you keep correcting him over and over. Why?

Of course I do.:lmao Absolutely.:tu You're just hot to surrender. Very small minded and afraid.

I made perfect sense. You're either completely unintelligent or in denial.

And you didn't even know we had $35 trillion in debt. :lol But you think hundreds of billions more is "Cheap" and a great "ROI" :rollin

You don't make sense. That's on you. :lol

:rollin I spelled it out for you and you still can't understand.

No, that's a perfectly reasonable take. No chance Castle goes past Hornets. Topic is a bad defender with questionable shot and all those teams already have a playmaker. I think they wouldn't pick him even if he was healthy. It would be really upsetting if Spurs took Topic with #4.

And you have zero ideas except letting bending over for Putin. :lmao

Huh??? :lol

Debt = $35,000,000,000,000 :lol And NO end in sight. :lol

:lmao you think the USA is on the verge of going broke. Your confidence only highlights your stupidity. You have no clue what you're talking about... :lmao retroactively wanting Ukraine to provoke Russia :lmao

Is it possible that the league starts raking in so much money that even if the cap goes up 10% every year it still wouldn't catch the percentage of BRI the players are entitled to? If so, the next CBA might allow for increases bigger than 10% in the future.

I don't care about Russian oil refineries. Who in American really gives a sh*t? :lol This country is deep in debt and spending like it's an NBA all-star at the tail end of his career unknowingly on the verge of going broke. Your confidence only highlights your stupidity. You have no clue...

Am I crazy thinking topic has a higher chance to drop to 8 than Castle does? I don’t see Topic as a piston, Hornet, or trailblazer kinda player could be wrong tho

We’re getting Topic aren’t we? Lots of mocks now having Dillingham at 3. As much as I like Castle, I don’t think they’ll take him with 4. They be OK seeing if he falls to 8. In this world I think they go: Topic + Castle Topic + Williams Topic + Saluan Topic + Matas

Him and Sengun would not work well together.

i dont think bigger blake wesley is really what the team needs right now

No, Bonnerific is living rent free between your ears as I am not him. Try again.

the closer we get to the draft, the more I think the team make-up needs to be: PG who can get the ball where it needs to go SG - 3&D (minimum) SF - 3&D (minimum) PF - 3&D (minimum) C - Wemby It makes me pray for Risacher to fall to us at #4. Topic may be best for getting the ball where it...