Definition #1 is close enough.
The looters are the ones with loot.
In Waco, who -- besides you of course -- could tell who exactly had weapons or who was fighting at that moment? My guess is the ones who got on the ground immediately weren't the ones who got killed.
Definition #1 is close enough.
So how were the cops being treacherous?
In theory I support police and military snipers but everything they do is based on whacking unsuspecting people from a hidden position. It is good tactics but by definition is unexpected and treacherous.
Where were they hiding in the mall parking lot?
Honest question. I haven't seen anything to indicate their presence was a secret at all.
Snipers are trained to shoot from a protected position. It's what they do. If you expect me to deliver specific detailed positioning that information hasn't been released.
This.
The blatant racism from the left is disgusting.
That's some weak deflecting, tbh.
You can't even say what guns were used at this point, but you do go on.
lol faux outrage
It was sarcasm. CC's conspiracy is pretty clear.
As for the bikers being hardened criminals only three of the nine killed had minor criminal records...a DWI, an assault that one served 45 days in jail for, and one for carrying a gun in a bar.
Well the police found 118 handguns there, so chances are that law was broken a little bit that day.
How many guns did the Ferguson protesters have?
Do I think the police got trigger happy? Yes. I suspect when the forensic evidence is finally released they will find that the majority of the fatalities were from police bullets.
Do I think the prosecutor overstepped charging 190 people and setting bail at one million each? Yes. It is wrong to hold innocent people on false charges for days and days while police "sort things out".
Do you seriously disagree with either statement?
From 1000 down to 118?
Having a handgun in Texas isn't necessarily breaking the law. Most were probably found in vehicles which is legal.
As for the Ferguson protesters...who knows?. They didn't get arrested and sarched.
Walkback Mountain II
This is why it's so fun.
I don't think any bounds were overstepped because we have allowed the bounds to be set out too far in the first place. Police and prosecutors do what we allow them to do. It's good that you are getting on a high horse about it now, I guess -- but this has been going on for decades. It just took an incident almost devoid of black people to get some whites riled up about it.
So be it.
So 118 is OK with you.
What is this probably ?Having a handgun in Texas isn't necessarily breaking the law. Most were probably found in vehicles which is legal.
There were about 200 arrests. How many of those arrested had handguns on them?As for the Ferguson protesters...who knows?. They didn't get arrested and sarched.
I'm talking about Ferguson, genius.probably few if any. Po Po said "weapons" were hidden everywhere
But why would those in Waco try to hide their guns if they were legal and law abiding charity workers with cherubic faces and peace in their hearts?
Ok, that's funny.
lol responsible gun owners trying to flush their guns down toilets and hiding them in bags of chips
Maybe because they just saw police gun down a half dozen bikers and SWAT was coming in the front door with M16's?
So putting the gun on the ground and assuming a prone position is out of the question? The first instinct of the legal responsible gun owner is to run to the john and flush the gun down the toilet?
lol
Which gun safety course teaches flushing, CC?
First 2 out of 3 comments were about Waco and you didn't say you were switching to Ferguson on the third, genius. English is a very specific language and you weren't.
You were explicitly commenting about Ferguson. You either lied or were completely ignorant about the number of arrests that were made there.
Now that you know more people were arrested and searched in Ferguson -- do you think more or fewer than 118 guns were discovered in the Ferguson arrests?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)