View Full Version : ESPN Radio Rumor: Rasheed for fab and finley (and others)
WildcardManu
02-13-2009, 05:10 AM
this still going strong?
EricB
02-13-2009, 07:52 AM
For people that think this thread is a waste of time, they sure talk alot of trash in it...
Ice009
02-13-2009, 07:59 AM
Just a thought.
If, for one year, we're not afraid to pay the lux-tax, why don't we sign and trade Horry for the entire amount (minus the necessary amount for put Detroit under the lux - tax) of Wallace and put on the three milllions and a pair of 2 draft choices or "other names"?
We have some "euro" names...at the moment the best value we have are the rifghts of Splitter and Javtokas...and none of them is good for a signing this season.
However, I think Javtokas is plaiyng really well and his name coukld be the one of more interest, also for his style of game, for the Pistons...
Good stuff. I never thought of Javtokas. Anyone think he holds any value in a trade?
tp2021
02-13-2009, 09:34 AM
Good stuff. I never thought of Javtokas. Anyone think he holds any value in a trade?
Nope
rascal
02-13-2009, 09:46 AM
Rasheed can put the spurs over the top. They need to make this work.
If this goes through for that crap (no offense!), i'm going to stop watching the Pistons.
hater
02-13-2009, 09:53 AM
If this goes through for that crap (no offense!), i'm going to stop watching the Pistons.
not gonna happen. don't even worry
tp2021
02-13-2009, 09:58 AM
not gonna happen. don't even worry
why so serious?
hater
02-13-2009, 09:59 AM
why so serious?
I'm the voice of reason in this thread
phyzik
02-13-2009, 10:01 AM
I'm the voice of Laker fans in this thread
fixed
ManuTP9
02-13-2009, 10:02 AM
Haha^
phyzik
02-13-2009, 10:02 AM
Rasheed is going to leave Detroit after the end of the season anyway, they might as well get what they can while they have him. He said he wants to play in S.A. so they are trying to appease him.
I dont see how its that big of a stretch that he comes here.
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 10:05 AM
I'm the voice of reason in this thread
No one needs a voice of reason. Stop talking. Shhhhhhhhhh.
hater
02-13-2009, 10:08 AM
I dont see how its that big of a stretch that he comes here.
so what in your mind, would it take for SPurs to get Sheed? and use logic.
IMO it would have to take Mason or Hill or both. That won't happen because Pop is not an idiot.
SO this would leave a trade of Finley/Bowen/KT/Oberto/Vaughn. trash players.
This trade would beat the Gasol trade in lopsideness. Pleae think, do you really think this has a chance of happening??? :rolleyes
stxspurs
02-13-2009, 10:13 AM
this had a nice run of 22 pgs but i woke up realizing the spurs aint gonna do shit!
phyzik
02-13-2009, 10:14 AM
so what in your mind, would it take for SPurs to get Sheed? and use logic.
IMO it would have to take Mason or Hill or both. That won't happen because Pop is not an idiot.
SO this would leave a trade of Finley/Bowen/KT/Oberto/Vaughn. trash players.
This trade would beat the Gasol trade in lopsideness. Pleae think, do you really think this has a chance of happening??? :rolleyes
Again, sheed is GONE after this year... no way he re-signs. You get what you can before he leaves and you get nothing, I know its not going to be just Finley and Oberto, thats fucking crazy, but its not crazy that the Spurs DO have a chance at getting him. Rasheed has already said he wants to play for the Spurs, why wouldnt the Pistons do everything they can to try and make that happen for him?
BG_Spurs_Fan
02-13-2009, 10:14 AM
so what in your mind, would it take for SPurs to get Sheed? and use logic.
IMO it would have to take Mason or Hill or both. That won't happen because Pop is not an idiot.
SO this would leave a trade of Finley/Bowen/KT/Oberto/Vaughn. trash players.
This trade would beat the Gasol trade in lopsideness. Pleae think, do you really think this has a chance of happening??? :rolleyes
Generally you're right, but you don't take a couple of things into account IMO. The Pistons are losing Sheed anyway and they're over the lux tax, so they'd rather trade him and get under the threshold, rather than just letting his contract expire. In both cases they'd still make the playoffs but most likely wouldn't go too far. 4/5M profit is a good enough reason to do this trade unless there's something better on the table, which is why FOs sometimes leak some information to notify other clubs who would eventually make a better offer. I find this scenario pretty realistic.
Now if, and that's a big if, Pistons don't get a better offer, I believe they do this trade with the Spurs.
hater
02-13-2009, 10:22 AM
that's just my point. I am sure Pistons have a better offer on the table already, if not multiple better offers.
Again, if they want to unload Sheed they will get something of value back. Other teams can offer a whole lot more than SPurs.
phyzik
02-13-2009, 10:28 AM
that's just my point. I am sure Pistons have a better offer on the table already, if not multiple better offers.
Again, if they want to unload Sheed they will get something of value back. Other teams can offer a whole lot more than SPurs.
True, but that doesnt change the fact that Rasheed said he wants to play for the Spurs and the current rumor is that it might happen that way. I havnt heard of any other rumors involving Rasheed to any other team. We will see, Im not going to believe it either until it happens but the fact remains that the Spurs can get Rasheed if they want to.
BG_Spurs_Fan
02-13-2009, 10:28 AM
Depends on what the Pistons might want. IMO there is no way they get equal value talent wise, and no way they get proper picks for him, because effectively he'd be a 5 month loan, so I don't see other teams offer too much. Besides I don't see him going somewhere like Memphis, he's probably going to a contender , or at least a team with a chance to do well this season, which greatly narrows the possible offers. Teams like Bobcats or Clippers have no need to go for Sheed right now whatsoever so even if they have better chips to trade they wouldn't be offering them for 5 months of an unhappy Sheed.
jdev82
02-13-2009, 10:34 AM
And they only said Finley and Fab? Did they reference that money doesn't much up (or logically - Detroit doesn't benefit)?
well both (i beleive) have expiring one year deals with not much money. my guess is joe dumars will see how the next year goes, and maybe tank and play for the draft. but with finley and fab, finley would help as a shooter, but also he would really help them a: avoid luxury tax when they dump him and b: get amare or some other 2010er
tp2021
02-13-2009, 10:36 AM
that's just my point. I am sure Pistons have a better offer on the table already, if not multiple better offers.
Again, if they want to unload Sheed they will get something of value back. Other teams can offer a whole lot more than SPurs.
And while I think Steins comment about Sheed wanting to play in SA has been made bigger than it is, do keep in mind that Billups asked Dumars if he was to be traded, Denver would be the place he'd be happiest. So Joe does take his players desires into consideration.
jdev82
02-13-2009, 10:38 AM
IMO we get sheed, we win the title. thats it. floor spreader, knock down shooter, GREAT defender, when hes giving effort, hes an incredible rebounder(something the spurs need more than one of, no offense to KT, but cmon!) and clutch player. tone down the t's and we cant lose! At least thats my hope.
coyotes_geek
02-13-2009, 10:41 AM
so what in your mind, would it take for SPurs to get Sheed? and use logic.
IMO it would have to take Mason or Hill or both. That won't happen because Pop is not an idiot.
SO this would leave a trade of Finley/Bowen/KT/Oberto/Vaughn. trash players.
This trade would beat the Gasol trade in lopsideness. Pleae think, do you really think this has a chance of happening??? :rolleyes
Logically, I can't see the Spurs being able to swing a deal to land Sheed. But just for sake of discussion here's an attempt at trying to inject some logic into a dream.
In order for this to work there needs to be a third team involved. That third team needs to meet the following criteria:
1. They need to be in a pure cash dumping mode. Be it for avoiding the luxury tax this year, trying to clear cap room for 2010 or whatever. Clearing cash is important, getting talent in return isn't.
2. They need to have a good young player on a reasonable contract that they could send to Detroit. Detroit won't move Sheed unless they get talent in return and the Spurs roster fodder won't cut it. The primary piece of return talent for Detroit would have to come from the third team.
3. They need to be a team who doesn't care about the Spurs or Pistons getting better. For example, New Orleans is facing some financial trouble and needs to dump some payroll, but they're not going to be a part of any deal that helped the Spurs out. So realistically this third team needs to be a borderline playoff team, or worse.
4. They're probably going to have an undesireable contract or two that the Spurs would need to agree to take back.
So the basic framework of the deal would look like this:
Detroit trades Sheed away in return for Player X.
Third team trades Player X for cap/tax relief.
Spurs pick up Sheed in return for helping Third team get cap/tax relief.
So is there such a 3rd team? Who knows. Even if there were what are the odds that both them and the Pistons feel the Spurs are the only ones who can help them out?
AA2120
02-13-2009, 10:43 AM
sheeeeeeeed!
Blake
02-13-2009, 10:44 AM
Logically, I can't see the Spurs being able to swing a deal to land Sheed. But just for sake of discussion here's an attempt at trying to inject some logic into a dream.
In order for this to work there needs to be a third team involved. That third team needs to meet the following criteria:
1. They need to be in a pure cash dumping mode. Be it for avoiding the luxury tax this year, trying to clear cap room for 2010 or whatever. Clearing cash is important, getting talent in return isn't.
2. They need to have a good young player on a reasonable contract that they could send to Detroit. Detroit won't move Sheed unless they get talent in return and the Spurs roster fodder won't cut it. The primary piece of return talent for Detroit would have to come from the third team.
3. They need to be a team who doesn't care about the Spurs or Pistons getting better. For example, New Orleans is facing some financial trouble and needs to dump some payroll, but they're not going to be a part of any deal that helped the Spurs out. So realistically this third team needs to be a borderline playoff team, or worse.
4. They're probably going to have an undesireable contract or two that the Spurs would need to agree to take back.
So the basic framework of the deal would look like this:
Detroit trades Sheed away in return for Player X.
Third team trades Player X for cap/tax relief.
Spurs pick up Sheed in return for helping Third team get cap/tax relief.
So is there such a 3rd team? Who knows. Even if there were what are the odds that both them and the Pistons feel the Spurs are the only ones who can help them out?
coyotes geek is sheer greatness.
Dr. Gonzo
02-13-2009, 10:46 AM
As much as I would love for this to happen, I have loved Sheeds game since his Tarheel days but couldn't be a fan of his because he has never been a Spur, I seriously doubt this happens. Usually the Spurs make trades without any rumor being thrown out before hand. I would really be shocked if it goes down.
AA2120
02-13-2009, 10:48 AM
Logically, I can't see the Spurs being able to swing a deal to land Sheed. But just for sake of discussion here's an attempt at trying to inject some logic into a dream.
In order for this to work there needs to be a third team involved. That third team needs to meet the following criteria:
1. They need to be in a pure cash dumping mode. Be it for avoiding the luxury tax this year, trying to clear cap room for 2010 or whatever. Clearing cash is important, getting talent in return isn't.
2. They need to have a good young player on a reasonable contract that they could send to Detroit. Detroit won't move Sheed unless they get talent in return and the Spurs roster fodder won't cut it. The primary piece of return talent for Detroit would have to come from the third team.
3. They need to be a team who doesn't care about the Spurs or Pistons getting better. For example, New Orleans is facing some financial trouble and needs to dump some payroll, but they're not going to be a part of any deal that helped the Spurs out. So realistically this third team needs to be a borderline playoff team, or worse.
4. They're probably going to have an undesireable contract or two that the Spurs would need to agree to take back.
So the basic framework of the deal would look like this:
Detroit trades Sheed away in return for Player X.
Third team trades Player X for cap/tax relief.
Spurs pick up Sheed in return for helping Third team get cap/tax relief.
So is there such a 3rd team? Who knows. Even if there were what are the odds that both them and the Pistons feel the Spurs are the only ones who can help them out?
new york??
david lee??
dogzofwar
02-13-2009, 11:08 AM
I guess I am one of the few that would dread a deal like this. I'm sorry but Sheed to Spurs would be like Owens to the Cowboys....great on paper but just not the piece they really need. The man would have been suspended for tech fouls in the playoffs for goodness sake...and yall want to bring that into our house...Pass. If you are going to give up some of your future for a big man now...go after Camby. Much more proficient on offense, leaps ahead of Sheed on defense, and knows his role in a system. Oh yeah...you don't have to worry about him giving free points to the other team because of temper.
dogzofwar
02-13-2009, 11:11 AM
Sorry...efficient not proficient.
DBMethos
02-13-2009, 11:12 AM
Maybe Sheed is the smokescreen for Camby? There's still 6 days until the trade deadline...I doubt that Pop & RC will have showed all their cards this early.
coyotes_geek
02-13-2009, 11:18 AM
new york??
david lee??
JMO, but I don't think the Knicks move David Lee unless someone takes Eddy Curry with him. Under the scenario I described it would be the Spurs who would have to take Curry and I can't see them wanting any part of that contract.
Cry Havoc
02-13-2009, 11:29 AM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v116/whisperingstorm/SheedtoSpurs.jpg
New York also gets picks in the deal.
Bowen and Finley come back to SA.
I think this works in favor of all three teams and makes everyone better.
RandomGuy
02-13-2009, 11:29 AM
Logically, I can't see the Spurs being able to swing a deal to land Sheed. But just for sake of discussion here's an attempt at trying to inject some logic into a dream.
In order for this to work there needs to be a third team involved. That third team needs to meet the following criteria:
1. They need to be in a pure cash dumping mode. Be it for avoiding the luxury tax this year, trying to clear cap room for 2010 or whatever. Clearing cash is important, getting talent in return isn't.
2. They need to have a good young player on a reasonable contract that they could send to Detroit. Detroit won't move Sheed unless they get talent in return and the Spurs roster fodder won't cut it. The primary piece of return talent for Detroit would have to come from the third team.
3. They need to be a team who doesn't care about the Spurs or Pistons getting better. For example, New Orleans is facing some financial trouble and needs to dump some payroll, but they're not going to be a part of any deal that helped the Spurs out. So realistically this third team needs to be a borderline playoff team, or worse.
4. They're probably going to have an undesireable contract or two that the Spurs would need to agree to take back.
So the basic framework of the deal would look like this:
Detroit trades Sheed away in return for Player X.
Third team trades Player X for cap/tax relief.
Spurs pick up Sheed in return for helping Third team get cap/tax relief.
So is there such a 3rd team? Who knows. Even if there were what are the odds that both them and the Pistons feel the Spurs are the only ones who can help them out?
Jeez, this thread got long quick. I have only read a few pages, but this is obviously the best take on it I have seen.
If Sheed were willing to take a pay cut, that would help, too. Hell, I think every Spur on the roster would be willing to take a pay cut to be virtually guaranteed to get another ring, if not two or three.
This would be the decade of the Spurs... (wipes drool from chin)
RandomGuy
02-13-2009, 11:33 AM
Originally Posted by hater
I'm the voice of Laker fans in this thread
fixed
:lmao
RandomGuy
02-13-2009, 11:35 AM
I'm the voice of reason in this thread[, this trade won't happen.]
Man, we can dream can't we?
Don't take that away, Grinchy McScroogepants.
JudynTX
02-13-2009, 11:36 AM
coyotes geek is sheer greatness.
+1
benefactor
02-13-2009, 11:37 AM
New York also gets picks in the deal.
Bowen and Finley come back to SA.
I think this works in favor of all three teams and makes everyone better.
There is no need to send Bowen if we sign and trade Horry for 4 million. :tu
coyotes_geek
02-13-2009, 11:44 AM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v116/whisperingstorm/SheedtoSpurs.jpg
New York also gets picks in the deal.
Bowen and Finley come back to SA.
I think this works in favor of all three teams and makes everyone better.
If New York were truly willing to trade away David Lee for just Mahinmi and picks then the Spurs should just forget about Sheed and Detroit and go make that deal. I'd even be willing to sweeten the pot for the Knicks by tossing in Ime Udoka. But what can I say? I'm a sucker for charity.
TDMVPDPOY
02-13-2009, 11:45 AM
if it costs us our bench to get sheed, do it
if some of the traded players arent bought out by the other team,
we can just sit and wait till marbury is bought out, we sign him to minimum see if he wants to win a ring b4 he bolts to europe.....
FreeMason
02-13-2009, 11:47 AM
I would be willing to give up Bowen, Finley, and..................damnit.......maybe even Hill :(
dogzofwar
02-13-2009, 12:11 PM
I would hate to see Bowen in any kind of trade talks...if he was planning on returning to Spurs or not. Anyone who has watched the games can see when he steps on the floor how much our D shores up with Bowen just being there. It is an entirely different team with him out there. And I wouldn't gamble that when we have other meat shields we can throw at the deal makers (sorry Fab/Finley/Vaughn/Hairston/Udoka/and yes...even Bonner or Hill).
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 12:16 PM
Logically, I can't see the Spurs being able to swing a deal to land Sheed. But just for sake of discussion here's an attempt at trying to inject some logic into a dream.
In order for this to work there needs to be a third team involved. That third team needs to meet the following criteria:
1. They need to be in a pure cash dumping mode. Be it for avoiding the luxury tax this year, trying to clear cap room for 2010 or whatever. Clearing cash is important, getting talent in return isn't.
2. They need to have a good young player on a reasonable contract that they could send to Detroit. Detroit won't move Sheed unless they get talent in return and the Spurs roster fodder won't cut it. The primary piece of return talent for Detroit would have to come from the third team.
3. They need to be a team who doesn't care about the Spurs or Pistons getting better. For example, New Orleans is facing some financial trouble and needs to dump some payroll, but they're not going to be a part of any deal that helped the Spurs out. So realistically this third team needs to be a borderline playoff team, or worse.
4. They're probably going to have an undesireable contract or two that the Spurs would need to agree to take back.
So the basic framework of the deal would look like this:
Detroit trades Sheed away in return for Player X.
Third team trades Player X for cap/tax relief.
Spurs pick up Sheed in return for helping Third team get cap/tax relief.
So is there such a 3rd team? Who knows. Even if there were what are the odds that both them and the Pistons feel the Spurs are the only ones who can help them out?
I already posted that I thought the Thunder can be this team. They have stated they have an interest in Amir amongst others and have the picks, players and relationship to help.
SequSpur
02-13-2009, 12:18 PM
This is total bullshit.
xtremesteven33
02-13-2009, 12:21 PM
I get a good hunch about this.
But i chose to remain skeptical.
EricB
02-13-2009, 12:25 PM
I'm the voice of reason in this thread
Save it for somewhere else.
PDXSpursFan
02-13-2009, 12:25 PM
Yes to Sheed or Camby, no to VC
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 12:29 PM
Ya, I do not think anyone is saying this is guaransheed*, but it did not just come from no where. Teams talk all the time, does not mean there is any thing real. But it is nice to discuss.
SanAntonioSpurs23
02-13-2009, 12:32 PM
I hate getting my hopes up.... :(
EricB
02-13-2009, 12:35 PM
Ya, I do not think anyone is saying this is guaransheed*, but it did not just come from no where. Teams talk all the time, does not mean there is any thing real. But it is nice to discuss.
Eh I don't think theres BS here. I think theres truely smoke there because I don't think Chris Duel is a liar and he wouldn't BS.
We shall see.
Budkin
02-13-2009, 12:41 PM
Please God let this happen. Tim and Sheed in the post = 5th championship
urunobili
02-13-2009, 12:44 PM
Kaman>>> Sheed as a Spur
xtremesteven33
02-13-2009, 12:44 PM
Please God let this happen. Tim and Sheed in the post = 5th championship
3 more championships.:lobt2::lobt2::lobt2:
EricB
02-13-2009, 12:46 PM
Kaman>>> Sheed as a Spur
:lmao
Gigantic fail
Budkin
02-13-2009, 12:47 PM
Kaman>>> Sheed as a Spur
No way. I'll take Sheed any day. He would be a model citizen playing with Timmy.
StoneBuddha
02-13-2009, 12:49 PM
Kaman>>> Sheed as a Spur
Kaman lacks Rasheed's range on offense and his mobility on defense. Age is a concern but there's not a better fit than Rasheed for the Spurs.
BlackSwordsMan
02-13-2009, 12:51 PM
Kaman>>> Sheed as a Spur
:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:l ol
urunobili
02-13-2009, 12:53 PM
:lmao
Gigantic fail
No way. I'll take Sheed any day. He would be a model citizen playing with Timmy.
Kaman lacks Rasheed's range on offense and his mobility on defense. Age is a concern but there's not a better fit than Rasheed for the Spurs.
Sheed has always had attitude issues on every team he has played on... I don;t know why you sound so surprised with my statement... Talent wise he definitively is >>>>>>> Kaman...
But to work under the Spurs dynamic as a role player.... i still believe Kaman works better than Sheed on a Spurs squad... did i mention Pop LOVES Kaman... there is a reason why... :p:
Supergirl
02-13-2009, 12:53 PM
kaman lacks rasheed's range on offense and his mobility on defense. Age is a concern but there's not a better fit than rasheed for the spurs.
+1
dbestpro
02-13-2009, 12:56 PM
I am proud to announce that I am one of the few who has not posted on this topic.....................................
Oh, oh.
xtremesteven33
02-13-2009, 12:57 PM
No one. and I mean no one fits better with this current Spurs team than Rasheed Wallace at this time....
Cry Havoc
02-13-2009, 12:58 PM
I am proud to announce that I am one of the few who has not posted on this topic.....................................
Oh, oh.
Isn't this precisely what a message board* is for? Analysis and speculation?
*non-porn
EricB
02-13-2009, 12:58 PM
Sheed has always had attitude issues on every team he has played on... I don;t know why you sound so surprised with my statement... Talent wise he definitively is >>>>>>> Kaman...
But to work under the Spurs dynamic as a role player.... i still believe Kaman works better than Sheed on a Spurs squad... did i mention Pop LOVES Kaman... there is a reason why... :p:
He doesn't have attitude issues. He has issues during the game of staying cool.
Two TOTALLY different things.
td4mvp21
02-13-2009, 12:59 PM
I wish I wouldn't have seen this thread, it's all I can think about now.
Bender
02-13-2009, 01:01 PM
aren't duncan & rasheed friendly? seems like I remember them talking and joking around on the court when they play each other
urunobili
02-13-2009, 01:12 PM
No one. and I mean no one fits better with this current Spurs team than Rasheed Wallace at this time....
I know sheed would be gr8 and he spaces the floor etc.. but Sheed can't shoot the rock as Bonner can... :wakeup... therefor... the spcing big man is already on our roster... we need a shot blocer / tough presence inside more than any other thing... that lead us to Kaman/Sheed for our needs...
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 01:13 PM
Eh I don't think theres BS here. I think theres truely smoke there because I don't think Chris Duel is a liar and he wouldn't BS.
We shall see.
No I agree. That is what I was saying. The guy would not bs us. He is just doing his job. That does not mean a deal is 100%, sometimes things just do not work out, thats all.
EricB
02-13-2009, 01:14 PM
I know sheed would be gr8 and he spaces the floor etc.. but Sheed can't shoot the rock as Bonner can... :wakeup... therefor... the spcing big man is already on our roster... we need a shot blocer / tough presence inside more than any other thing... that lead us to Kaman/Sheed for our needs...
Did you miss the Spurs Pistons game earlier this year?
Rasheed won the game on his shooting and offense alone.
I've yet to see Matt Bonner win a game on his offense like that.
AA2120
02-13-2009, 01:14 PM
I know sheed would be gr8 and he spaces the floor etc.. but Sheed can't shoot the rock as Bonner can... :wakeup... therefor... the spcing big man is already on our roster... we need a shot blocer / tough presence inside more than any other thing... that lead us to Kaman/Sheed for our needs...
word.
but still sheed would be allsome.
HarlemHeat37
02-13-2009, 01:15 PM
I don't understand where this bullshit about Rasheed being a "bad teammate" or whatever comes from..he hasn't had any problems in years..he always plays hard when he's being coached by a guy he respects, and playing for a team he respects..
the Pistons are a class organization, just like ours, and they didn't have problems with him..
LOL @ Kaman..one of the most overrated players in the NBA..
EricB
02-13-2009, 01:15 PM
No I agree. That is what I was saying. The guy would not bs us. He is just doing his job. That does not mean a deal is 100%, sometimes things just do not work out, thats all.
Let me clarify his source's job isn't sports related, Chris was just passing this along.
Just so others don't get confused..
xtremesteven33
02-13-2009, 01:15 PM
I know sheed would be gr8 and he spaces the floor etc.. but Sheed can't shoot the rock as Bonner can... :wakeup... therefor... the spcing big man is already on our roster... we need a shot blocer / tough presence inside more than any other thing... that lead us to Kaman/Sheed for our needs...
???
So youre saying Sheed is not necessary but yet is??
hater
02-13-2009, 01:15 PM
uru, Sheed can do it all. He's a better defender than Kaman, not to mention better at everything else. plus he's got championship experience. no contest
BILLYE
02-13-2009, 01:16 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=bhlwbg
i have no idea how to actually post the trade like some others have done....my trade works for Rasheed, but im sure i will be torn to shreds for this, oh well.
crc21209
02-13-2009, 01:17 PM
Damn I hope something happens, PLLLLLEEEEAAASE LET IT HAPPEN! And this sucks I'm gonna be gone for the wkend hopefully I can still log on or catch sportscenter for some breaking news about sheed to the Spurs while I'm gone!
Vinnie_Johnson
02-13-2009, 01:18 PM
I don't understand where this bullshit about Rasheed being a "bad teammate" or whatever comes from..he hasn't had any problems in years..he always plays hard when he's being coached by a guy he respects, and playing for a team he respects..
the Pistons are a class organization, just like ours, and they didn't have problems with him..
LOL @ Kaman..one of the most overrated players in the NBA..
Spot on.:toast
EricB
02-13-2009, 01:18 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=bhlwbg
i have no idea how to actually post the trade like some others have done....my trade works for Rasheed, but im sure i will be torn to shreds for this, oh well.
Nah, thats actually one of the more reasonable trades I've seen.
Don't sell yourself short :tu
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 01:20 PM
That would be a good trade for everyone and an ideal scenario.
Steve-O-Matic
02-13-2009, 01:21 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=bhlwbg
i have no idea how to actually post the trade like some others have done....my trade works for Rasheed, but im sure i will be torn to shreds for this, oh well.
Impossible. That would leave the Spurs with a 10-man roster, only 8 of whom would have been with the team since the beginning of the season. That would improve the center position, but completely blow out the team's depth.
BILLYE
02-13-2009, 01:23 PM
i understand, but wouldnt Detroit buyout Bowen and Finley?
it was worth a shot
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 01:25 PM
Yes, that is the understanding. They would use either a combo of cash considerations or luxury tax sharing money to buy out players.
EricB
02-13-2009, 01:25 PM
Impossible. That would leave the Spurs with a 10-man roster, only 8 of whom would have been with the team since the beginning of the season. That would improve the center position, but completely blow out the team's depth.
The players traded weren't playing that many minutes, so the depth thing is moot. Also Bowen would be bought out most likely and would come back.
cool hand
02-13-2009, 01:26 PM
I would hate to lose bowen.
Manufan909
02-13-2009, 01:27 PM
Impossible. That would leave the Spurs with a 10-man roster, only 8 of whom would have been with the team since the beginning of the season. That would improve the center position, but completely blow out the team's depth.
Meh, only 2 get any minutes at all, and with Sheed, there'd be no smallball, so the wings could concentrate soley on the 2 and 3. I think Manu, Mason, and Hairston could hold the fort for a month. JV, Ime, Ian, and Fab don't see the court anyways, so that doesn't matter. Fuck, I really don't want to lose Tiago or Ian for Sheed, maybe Chandler, but not for a 35yr old.
Impossible. That would leave the Spurs with a 10-man roster, only 8 of whom would have been with the team since the beginning of the season. That would improve the center position, but completely blow out the team's depth.
Not a problem. They'd sign Pops Mensah and someone else, then wait for the fellas to get cut and come back around.
Steve-O-Matic
02-13-2009, 01:30 PM
i understand, but wouldnt Detroit buyout Bowen and Finley?
it was worth a shot
That trade makes absolutely no sense for Detroit. They would be giving up one of their top trade assets (Wallace) with an expiring contract, as well as a good young player that they like (Johnson), and they'd get back four spares, two of whom need to be bought out or otherwise paid for next season. In other words they would be taking a huge net-loss in talent and a equally huge net-increase in salary beyond this season.
HarlemHeat37
02-13-2009, 01:37 PM
if Detroit gets a better offer for Sheed, they'll probably take it instantly over ours..I think ours will be a last option kind of thing..
regardless, this trade depends on 2 things IMO..
-another team being involved..OKC like DPG said..
-Sheed asking for a trade, behind the scenes..Pistons are a classy org. so they might accomadate him with the trade he wants..it wouldn't hurt them if they don't have any other good trade options, since they would be getting the same cap room in the off-seson..
I'm in the boat that our trade is probably one of their last options, unless nobody is going after 'Sheed right now..
KaiRMD1
02-13-2009, 01:42 PM
Man, I feel so bad for Detroit. I loved this team when they have that awesome five but now, if Sheed comes to San Antonio, they are just going to be done. But I wonder if Sheed will work well under the Spurs system. If he does then great but I don't know, I'm worried about trades.
xtremesteven33
02-13-2009, 01:43 PM
if Detroit gets a better offer for Sheed, they'll probably take it instantly over ours..I think ours will be a last option kind of thing..
regardless, this trade depends on 2 things IMO..
-another team being involved..OKC like DPG said..
-Sheed asking for a trade, behind the scenes..Pistons are a classy org. so they might accomadate him with the trade he wants..it wouldn't hurt them if they don't have any other good trade options, since they would be getting the same cap room in the off-seson..
I'm in the boat that our trade is probably one of their last options, unless nobody is going after 'Sheed right now..
I agree. Thats why maybe this rumor has come out cause maybe it is true. Maybe the best offers theyve gotten are from Eastern Conference teams and they dont want to trade within thier own conference.
I hope it happens. I still remain skeptical but I do hope this happens.:hat
mardigan
02-13-2009, 01:50 PM
Dont know if this has been posted yet.
http://blogs.mysanantonio.com/weblogs/courtside/2009/02/rasheed-to-spur.html
Rasheed to Spurs? Don't hold your breath
By
Jeff McDonald
on Feb 13, 2009 11:32 AM
There seems to be a substantial amount of wind being blown these days, in cyberspace and on radio airwaves, about a possible Spurs trade for Rasheed Wallace.
The rumor probably had its genesis with this ESPN.com column, in which Marc Stein reports "rumbles" that Wallace would have interest in joining the Spurs at some time.
OK, well, that's fine and good. The part people seem to be missing in the Wallace-induced fervor, is the next paragraph Stein writes, the one that begins "Don't see a real trade possibility here." That's the money paragraph. Because there isn't a real trade possibility there.
Wallace makes nearly $14 million, and Detroit GM Joe Dumars appears intent on accepting only expiring contracts in any deal for any player. Dumars also reportedly hasn't given up hope in joining the Amare Stoudemire sweepstakes, of which Wallace would be a required part. Put together, these factors would make it very, very difficult for the Spurs to do the math neccesary to nab Wallace.
The Spurs have only two players with expiring contracts -- Jacque Vaughn ($1.2 million) and Ime Udoka ($1.08 million). That's a long, long way off from the $14 million they'd need to clear from their payroll to make a deal for Wallace legal. As far as hurdles go, it's the Great Wall of China.
We're not saying it's impossible. Just highly improbable.
With a dearth of expiring contracts -- the golden chips in these salary-dump deals -- the Spurs are likely facing a quiet trading season. It is well-known that they would like to add another big man, but it also well-known they probably don't have the pieces to land anyone of consequence.
A sign-and-trade with Robert Horry could open more doors, but as of last night, Horry hadn't heard word one from the Spurs.
So if, you're holding your breath waiting for Wallace to don silver and black, you're likely to be blue until July at the earliest. Wallace will be a free agent then, and if he were willing to work for substantially less than $14 million, the Spurs would surely listen.
ManuTP9
02-13-2009, 01:54 PM
Dont know if this has been posted yet.
http://blogs.mysanantonio.com/weblogs/courtside/2009/02/rasheed-to-spur.html
Rasheed to Spurs? Don't hold your breath
By
Jeff McDonald
on Feb 13, 2009 11:32 AM
There seems to be a substantial amount of wind being blown these days, in cyberspace and on radio airwaves, about a possible Spurs trade for Rasheed Wallace.
The rumor probably had its genesis with this ESPN.com column, in which Marc Stein reports "rumbles" that Wallace would have interest in joining the Spurs at some time.
OK, well, that's fine and good. The part people seem to be missing in the Wallace-induced fervor, is the next paragraph Stein writes, the one that begins "Don't see a real trade possibility here." That's the money paragraph. Because there isn't a real trade possibility there.
Wallace makes nearly $14 million, and Detroit GM Joe Dumars appears intent on accepting only expiring contracts in any deal for any player. Dumars also reportedly hasn't given up hope in joining the Amare Stoudemire sweepstakes, of which Wallace would be a required part. Put together, these factors would make it very, very difficult for the Spurs to do the math neccesary to nab Wallace.
The Spurs have only two players with expiring contracts -- Jacque Vaughn ($1.2 million) and Ime Udoka ($1.08 million). That's a long, long way off from the $14 million they'd need to clear from their payroll to make a deal for Wallace legal. As far as hurdles go, it's the Great Wall of China.
We're not saying it's impossible. Just highly improbable.
With a dearth of expiring contracts -- the golden chips in these salary-dump deals -- the Spurs are likely facing a quiet trading season. It is well-known that they would like to add another big man, but it also well-known they probably don't have the pieces to land anyone of consequence.
A sign-and-trade with Robert Horry could open more doors, but as of last night, Horry hadn't heard word one from the Spurs.
So if, you're holding your breath waiting for Wallace to don silver and black, you're likely to be blue until July at the earliest. Wallace will be a free agent then, and if he were willing to work for substantially less than $14 million, the Spurs would surely listen.
damnit, i know the sheed trade probably wont work now but you never know anything can happen in the NBA.
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 01:54 PM
He obviously does not understand luxury tax, cash compensation and buyouts.
urunobili
02-13-2009, 01:55 PM
thanks for the update mardigan... damn sheed would scare the whole flakers fanbase really bad... they'd be ranting on insecure bitching forever....
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 01:55 PM
Detroit fans are saying it is more likely that the Pistons just keep Wallace than trade him to the Spurs. They think that is better.
xtremesteven33
02-13-2009, 01:56 PM
So this Jeff Mcdonald guy isnt too popular here on Spurstalk is he???
haha
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 01:59 PM
He is right at face value. But he is not taking into account that they can buy guys out, keep their space, involve a 3rd team, get an asset and be under the luxury tax. There are some incentives to trade.
Someone before mentioned other teams being able to offer better, but the only teams Sheed helps are contenders. So that narrows down the list quite a bit.
StoneBuddha
02-13-2009, 02:01 PM
He obviously does not understand luxury tax, cash compensation and buyouts.
Well, it's bad news that Horry hasn't been approached about this possibility.
On the other hand, there aren't many people who would turn down free money, so maybe Horry is the last person you talk to in this deal.
Damn, if this goes through, I don't think it'll happen right before the deadline. Dumars isn't a dummy like Chris Wallace so he's got to at least wait to the very end see if anybody sweetens the offer.
I''ve got to stop checking this site and ESPN every 15 minutes.
ss1986v2
02-13-2009, 02:02 PM
i still dont see it. why are the pistons taking non-expirings for sheed? to net some marginal assets? hell, in the okc versions ive seen here, they dont even net the marginal assets. i dont get it...
Well, it's bad news that Horry hasn't been approached about this possibility.
On the other hand, there aren't many people who would turn down free money, so maybe Horry is the last person you talk to in this deal.
Damn, if this goes through, I don't think it'll happen right before the deadline. Dumars isn't a dummy like Chris Wallace so he's got to at least wait to the very end see if anybody sweetens the offer.
I''ve got to stop checking this site and ESPN every 15 minutes.
It was true ,,do u really think he would tell all to fuck it up?
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 02:04 PM
Well, it's bad news that Horry hasn't been approached about this possibility.
On the other hand, there aren't many people who would turn down free money, so maybe Horry is the last person you talk to in this deal.
Damn, if this goes through, I don't think it'll happen right before the deadline. Dumars isn't a dummy like Chris Wallace so he's got to at least wait to the very end see if anybody sweetens the offer.
I''ve got to stop checking this site and ESPN every 15 minutes.
I just find it odd that Horry just had an interview claiming he wants to play. Why would he say that? Maybe he just wants to play, but the fact it is being mentioned at all leads me to believe that he has some knowledge that it can happen.
But yes, it is probably not going to happen soon if at all. They will weigh their options until they have to decide.
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 02:12 PM
Eric Park: did you get a text from Duel with any updates? Did he talk to his soucre and ask when such a deal would be complete if at all?
BILLYE
02-13-2009, 02:12 PM
in my trade proposal there are at worst only a few players that have 2 years remaining on their contracts...everyone else only had one. I think all of the teams still would maintain cap flexability this summer and next summer. I am no GM though and its probably a very good thing too.
By Randy Hill
San Antonio Spurs
Needs: I'm R.C. Buford and I need a makeover for Gregg Popovich, a post player with a pulse and some length, and someone to shoot me if the reported temptation to acquire Vince Carter is real.
Our current inside players not named Tim Duncan are Matt Bonner, who actually plays outside (where he shoots the blood out of the ball), Kurt Thomas and Fabricio Oberto. All three are incapable of handling Odom off the dribble and will be cooked on the post when matched against Gasol (if Bynum has returned in time for a Lakers-Spurs hayride).
I have read that Rasheed Wallace would like to play on our team, but (aside from the obvious irony) we lack the give-back salary. Putting together a multi-player package that includes rookie George Hill and sharpshooter Roger Mason would deplete the youthful gains we've made on the perimeter.
What about Carter? Gee, he's guaranteed more than $33 million over the next two seasons, and with Pop cryin' about a legitimate drop in defensive efficiency, that move wouldn't make much sense, would it?
Plan of Attack: Pop believes we (if healthy) can win it all again this season and I'm inclined to agree. I'm not callin' a bookie on this, but until Duncan is unable to put up 20 and 10 on a regular basis, our window remains open.
While it's true that not updating the dynasty (in terms of personnel) can turn a franchise into the Boston Celtics of the pre-KG days, we also believe the Western Conference (looking beyond the Lakers) may not be this open for a while.
I would reveal a bit more, but it also has been suggested that not showing your hand often makes it easier to complete a deal.
xtremesteven33
02-13-2009, 02:16 PM
I still think this "SOURCE" from Detroit may actually have some credibility.
Or maybe its wishful thinking....idk....stop the drama!!
HarlemHeat37
02-13-2009, 02:17 PM
can people stop saying they can't handle Odom off the dribble? LOL..Odom couldn't even get past Oberto off the dribble last year, he was a NON-FACTOR in isolation situations..
Ghost Writer
02-13-2009, 02:37 PM
Strange...
Last night before bed, I was thinking about Rasheed to the Spurs, but thought that San Antonio still would be gun shy after Rodman.
Wallace's contract is up at year's end.
Barkley insists that Rasheed is the most talented big man in the league.
We all know he's a headcase.
But times like these require calculated risks, which is why I coveted Ron Artest last year at this time.
Trade for him if you can!
DBMethos
02-13-2009, 02:37 PM
The more I read of this the more I'm convinced it ain't gonna happen.
completely deck
02-13-2009, 02:39 PM
I still think this "SOURCE" from Detroit may actually have some credibility.
Or maybe its wishful thinking....idk....stop the drama!!
Sweet, great contribution! :toast
ClingingMars
02-13-2009, 02:56 PM
wow...what a thread.
-Mars
Borosai
02-13-2009, 03:26 PM
I had another conversation with my contact in Detroit, and he said we should definitely hold our collective breath on this one. If you pass out, there's a 50/50 chance you'll have a nice surprise waiting for you when you wake up... guaranteed.
Not my words.
Duncan2177
02-13-2009, 03:43 PM
I had another conversation with my contact in Detroit, and he said we should definitely hold our collective breath on this one. If you pass out, there's a 50/50 chance you'll have a nice surprise waiting for you when you wake up... guaranteed.
Not my words.
Are you kidding?
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 03:49 PM
Are you kidding?
Yes.
BlackSwordsMan
02-13-2009, 03:55 PM
trade duncan for sheed and then hope pistons cut duncan and spurs re-sign him
GENIUS!
Ditty
02-13-2009, 03:56 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=cn4pvd
this is how i see it going down and detroit gets some good players sorta with expiring contracts
and we trade fin and bowen to friendly oklahoma where they would get bought out and for doing that we send them a second round pick and we spice it up sending splitter to detroit
i see this going down please RC see this
Manufan909
02-13-2009, 03:57 PM
Damnit, I'm waiting for PB's update, come on man!!!
rayray2k8
02-13-2009, 03:57 PM
Dont know if this has been posted yet.
http://blogs.mysanantonio.com/weblogs/courtside/2009/02/rasheed-to-spur.html
Rasheed to Spurs? Don't hold your breath
By
Jeff McDonald
on Feb 13, 2009 11:32 AM
There seems to be a substantial amount of wind being blown these days, in cyberspace and on radio airwaves, about a possible Spurs trade for Rasheed Wallace.
The rumor probably had its genesis with this ESPN.com column, in which Marc Stein reports "rumbles" that Wallace would have interest in joining the Spurs at some time.
OK, well, that's fine and good. The part people seem to be missing in the Wallace-induced fervor, is the next paragraph Stein writes, the one that begins "Don't see a real trade possibility here." That's the money paragraph. Because there isn't a real trade possibility there.
Wallace makes nearly $14 million, and Detroit GM Joe Dumars appears intent on accepting only expiring contracts in any deal for any player. Dumars also reportedly hasn't given up hope in joining the Amare Stoudemire sweepstakes, of which Wallace would be a required part. Put together, these factors would make it very, very difficult for the Spurs to do the math neccesary to nab Wallace.
The Spurs have only two players with expiring contracts -- Jacque Vaughn ($1.2 million) and Ime Udoka ($1.08 million). That's a long, long way off from the $14 million they'd need to clear from their payroll to make a deal for Wallace legal. As far as hurdles go, it's the Great Wall of China.
We're not saying it's impossible. Just highly improbable.
With a dearth of expiring contracts -- the golden chips in these salary-dump deals -- the Spurs are likely facing a quiet trading season. It is well-known that they would like to add another big man, but it also well-known they probably don't have the pieces to land anyone of consequence.
A sign-and-trade with Robert Horry could open more doors, but as of last night, Horry hadn't heard word one from the Spurs.
So if, you're holding your breath waiting for Wallace to don silver and black, you're likely to be blue until July at the earliest. Wallace will be a free agent then, and if he were willing to work for substantially less than $14 million, the Spurs would surely listen.
This pretty much proves what I was saying earlier..
Lets see you idiots go bitch at this guy..
I'm done...
Thread closed. :rolleyes
Duncan2177
02-13-2009, 03:57 PM
trade duncan for sheed and then hope pistons cut duncan and spurs re-sign him
GENIUS!
:jack
PDXSpursFan
02-13-2009, 04:00 PM
This deal can only happen if we:
1) Include Bowen and Horry (re-sign)
2) Include cash for Detroit to buy out both
3) Add some additonal talent (Hill?, Mahimi?, Splitter-rights?)
4) Detroit doesn't find a better deal anywhere else
Ditty
02-13-2009, 04:03 PM
This pretty much proves what I was saying earlier..
Lets see you idiots go bitch at this guy..
I'm done...
Thread closed. :rolleyes
if oklahoma gets in this where they want to get rid of chris wilcox and earl watson and send them to detroit and just send ime over there to detroit it works i bet the spurs are talking to oklahoma to get on it
amare is not going to detroit so i beleive detorit wants something in return and thats when we give them splitter damn i wish i worked in the spurs front office
coyotes_geek
02-13-2009, 04:07 PM
I get the impression that OKC is fine with just standing pat and letting Wilcox expire. Otherwise, wouldn't they be playing him?
Jayem2
02-13-2009, 04:08 PM
we all know this trade isn't gonna happen! pop and rc are too pussy to make it go down!
Ditty
02-13-2009, 04:09 PM
I get the impression that OKC is fine with just standing pat and letting Wilcox expire. Otherwise, wouldn't they be playing him?
i know but they will have to pay the luxury tax if they dont get rid of them
ss1986v2
02-13-2009, 04:11 PM
i know but they will have to pay the luxury tax if they dont get rid of them
no. okc is well below the tax line.
coyotes_geek
02-13-2009, 04:11 PM
i know but they will have to pay the luxury tax if they dont get rid of them
They're way under the tax threshold.
Ditty
02-13-2009, 04:16 PM
thats what that guy from sportcenter said about a hour ago when they were talking about th jermain oneal and shawn marion trade that oklahoma is looking to get rid of watson and/or wilcox for luxary tax reason im just postin what i heard
EricB
02-13-2009, 04:16 PM
This pretty much proves what I was saying earlier..
Lets see you idiots go bitch at this guy..
I'm done...
Thread closed. :rolleyes
Except your 100% wrong in the complete subject.
Take it somewhere else jackass.
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 04:18 PM
I get the impression that OKC is fine with just standing pat and letting Wilcox expire. Otherwise, wouldn't they be playing him?
It is weird? I think they may be trying to get something for him. The latest reports confirmed that OKC has interest in trading w/ Detroit for Amir Johnson.
coyotes_geek
02-13-2009, 04:24 PM
thats what that guy from sportcenter said about a hour ago when they were talking about th jermain oneal and shawn marion trade that oklahoma is looking to get rid of watson and/or wilcox for luxary tax reason im just postin what i heard
OKC may be looking to get rid of watson & wilcox, but it won't have any affect on their tax situation. Tax threshold is $71.15 mil, their team payroll is like $65 mil.
Most announcers and writers don't understand how all that stuff works to begin with.
Duncan2177
02-13-2009, 04:26 PM
I wonder if a 3 team trade is in the works? Rasheed to the spurs?
coyotes_geek
02-13-2009, 04:26 PM
It is weird? I think they may be trying to get something for him. The latest reports confirmed that OKC has interest in trading w/ Detroit for Amir Johnson.
They very well may be. I just find it odd that they've basically buried Wilcox on the bench and haven't been all that active on the trade buzz, despite having loads of draft picks, young talent and expiring contracts.
Matches Malone
02-13-2009, 04:28 PM
When I saw the thread heading, I yelled "Sheeeeeeed" load enough for one of my co-workers to peep into my office.
Then I saw the page count, and I said if reading through 24 pages is what it takes for the FO to pull this one up, I'll do it...gladly.
One hour and 27 minutes later, I finished reading the whole thread and....
"if reading through 26 pages is what it take for the FO to pull this one up, I'll do it again..."
I usually don't post. Not that I don't like, but I can not find myself to write as eloquently and knowledgably as some of the ST posters. So why put crap like this in every thread, but I think that this is a special one. I think that Sheed will get us over the top. I used to live in Detroit and my company has season tickets as well as a corporate lounge. I've seen him playing quite often and Sheed is what we are missing: a defensive anchor to help Tim lock the paint both with rebounds and blocks. As bonuses, he comes with a deadly 3-point shooting, a winning mentality, and an intimidating stance (people really think twice before attacking his side).
So take it at face value...this is my contribution and vote of hope to make this real.
You know, eventually, if everybody put their grain of hope...it might happen. So, do it!
Worse thing that can happen is just the empty feeling that all Spurs fan already know when blockbusters trades are being talked about. So all of you should be used to by now.
Go Spurs Go!
Cry Havoc
02-13-2009, 04:30 PM
no way in hell they trade Lee for Ian. no way.
And why not?
New York is currently paying out $97 million in salary.
David Lee's contract expires this year at $1.7 mil.
He's going to get at LEAST $9-10 mil per season.
No way in HELL the Knicks can afford that. They're $39,000,000 OVER the cap right now. Add Lee's salary after this year and you're talking a 30-40 million dollar contract. Lee is going somewhere else. Why not get a potentially decent post player and some picks for him?
ss1986v2
02-13-2009, 04:34 PM
And why not?
New York is currently paying out $97 MILLION in salary.
David Lee's contract expires this year at $1.7 mil.
He's going to get at LEAST $9-10 mil per season.
No way in HELL the Knicks can afford that. They're $39,000,000 OVER the cap right now. Lee is going somewhere else. Why not get a potentially decent post player and some picks for him?
ny can and will pay the tax to keep talent (97 mil is actually one of their lower figures in recent years). they may look to move lee after signing him (to maximize their 2010 cap space), but they arent moving him for scraps just because.
coyotes_geek
02-13-2009, 04:40 PM
And why not?
New York is currently paying out $97 million in salary.
David Lee's contract expires this year at $1.7 mil.
He's going to get at LEAST $9-10 mil per season.
No way in HELL the Knicks can afford that. They're $39,000,000 OVER the cap right now. Add Lee's salary after this year and you're talking a 30-40 million dollar contract. Lee is going somewhere else. Why not get a potentially decent post player and some picks for him?
Because they can do much better than that.
JamStone
02-13-2009, 04:40 PM
Joe Dumars said the other day that he would not make a trade unless it made the team better, and not just for the future. So, yes, it would require a third team. He's also not trying to add salary. Both Oberto and Bowen have contracts next season, even if they do expire for 2010. There hasn't been any rumors here in Detroit about a trade with the Spurs. Dumars would have to get a big man back that can help now. Who would that be?
I still say there's no chance of a trade where Rasheed goes to the Spurs could happen, but more and more talk of the rumor appears to be giving it some legs.
SpursDynasty
02-13-2009, 04:42 PM
I really hate trade rumor threads. 99% of the time, the trade doesn't happen.
And if we really need a big (I don't think we do), then they should just trade Manu already. Yes we all love him and he's the reason we have 3 championships, but if we can give up one of the Big Three, then he's the one.
If not, then lets stop the trade rumor threads and stick with what we have because a trade isn't going to happen.
Kermit
02-13-2009, 04:47 PM
Joe Dumars said the other day that he would not make a trade unless it made the team better, and not just for the future. So, yes, it would require a third team. He's also not trying to add salary. Both Oberto and Bowen have contracts next season, even if they do expire for 2010. There hasn't been any rumors here in Detroit about a trade with the Spurs. Dumars would have to get a big man back that can help now. Who would that be?
I still say there's no chance of a trade where Rasheed goes to the Spurs could happen, but more and more talk of the rumor appears to be giving it some legs.
Rome just covered it with Reggie. This rumor is killing me.
Ice009
02-13-2009, 04:50 PM
that's just my point. I am sure Pistons have a better offer on the table already, if not multiple better offers.
Again, if they want to unload Sheed they will get something of value back. Other teams can offer a whole lot more than SPurs.
And Rasheed can turn around and do what he did to get to Detroit and say he's not playing for the team he is traded to.
Buddy Holly
02-13-2009, 04:52 PM
This trade works for SA, PHX and DET.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=cttxeo
TD4THREE
02-13-2009, 04:52 PM
Was watching jim rome who had Reggie Miller on the show,and rome brought up the possibility of the Spurs trading for Wallace and asked Miller if the Spurs should make the trade. Miller of course said yes, and that it would be our pau gasol type trade. So there's some truth to this rumor. Hope they make it happen.
xtremesteven33
02-13-2009, 04:55 PM
Its like the media doesnt want to talk about it so it doesnt get any kind of legs and it will just go away, knowing if they do get Wallace thats it for the NBA....
Cry Havoc
02-13-2009, 04:55 PM
This trade works for SA, PHX and DET.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=cttxeo
The only thing I see about that is that no one wants Amare right now. If Detroit got Amare the fans there would kill themselves, because it would be the last they see of post defense for a while in Detroit.
Buddy Holly
02-13-2009, 04:57 PM
You seriously believe that?
Cry Havoc
02-13-2009, 04:59 PM
You seriously believe that?
Well, they did trade for Iverson. :lol
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 05:12 PM
Joe Dumars said the other day that he would not make a trade unless it made the team better, and not just for the future. So, yes, it would require a third team. He's also not trying to add salary. Both Oberto and Bowen have contracts next season, even if they do expire for 2010. There hasn't been any rumors here in Detroit about a trade with the Spurs. Dumars would have to get a big man back that can help now. Who would that be?
I still say there's no chance of a trade where Rasheed goes to the Spurs could happen, but more and more talk of the rumor appears to be giving it some legs.
I am pretty sure that both Oberto and Bowen are not guaranteed for next year.
ss1986v2
02-13-2009, 05:15 PM
I am pretty sure that both Oberto and Bowen are not guaranteed for next year.
no, they are partially guaranteed for 1/2 their salary. again, i cant see detroit taking non expirings for sheed...
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 05:17 PM
no, they are partially guaranteed for 1/2 their salary. again, i cant see detroit taking non expirings for sheed...
Ok, so if they save millions in luxury tax by doing a deal, negotiate a buyout (which would be very cheap) then they are expired contracts, no?
ss1986v2
02-13-2009, 05:23 PM
Ok, so if they save millions in luxury tax by doing a deal, negotiate a buyout (which would be very cheap) then they are expired contracts, no?
the luxury tax impact this year has nothing to do with their cap figures next years (detroit wants to maximize cap space, especially considering the impact the current economic state may have on the cap).
for them to become expiring, they would have to accept a very small buyout, which is very, very uncommon (dice took a significant cut to return to detroit though). and i cant see bowen doing this, considering all the pay cuts he took through his years on the spurs.
angelbelow
02-13-2009, 05:31 PM
im guessing this wont go thru until the trade deadline. sucks that this thread was created so early because now i cant wait..
AA2120
02-13-2009, 05:33 PM
ehh??
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=bhvb7v
coyotes_geek
02-13-2009, 05:36 PM
ehh??
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=bhvb7v
Detroit gets a little crowded at SG/SF with Vince, Prince & Hamilton all on the same team. I'm guessing Detroit would want a PF, C or PG if they were going to make a move.
SpursDynasty
02-13-2009, 05:37 PM
This trade is not going to happen. Can we get a lock on this thread?
DPG21920
02-13-2009, 05:37 PM
the luxury tax impact this year has nothing to do with their cap figures next years (detroit wants to maximize cap space, especially considering the impact the current economic state may have on the cap).
for them to become expiring, they would have to accept a very small buyout, which is very, very uncommon (dice took a significant cut to return to detroit though). and i cant see bowen doing this, considering all the pay cuts he took through his years on the spurs.
There contracts are so small, what is a standard buyout? 50%?
coyotes_geek
02-13-2009, 05:38 PM
As much as I hate to say it as a Spurs fan, if I were Pistons fan the thing that would sound best to me would be to just hang on to Sheed, let him and AI walk at the end of the year and go make a run at Carlos Boozer this offseason.
ThriveForFive
02-13-2009, 05:41 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b2jr89
Bowen gets brought back. Pistons receive quality as well as expiring contracts.
Thunder gets some good locker room guys, and they have connections with us;)
AA2120
02-13-2009, 05:42 PM
Detroit gets a little crowded at SG/SF with Vince, Prince & Hamilton all on the same team. I'm guessing Detroit would want a PF, C or PG if they were going to make a move.
true true..
this new trade machine is awsome :lol
coyotes_geek
02-13-2009, 05:45 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b2jr89
Bowen gets brought back. Pistons receive quality as well as expiring contracts.
Thunder gets some good locker room guys, and they have connections with us;)
Desmond Mason and Joe Smith count as quality for Detroit???
EricB
02-13-2009, 05:45 PM
As much as I hate to say it as a Spurs fan, if I were Pistons fan the thing that would sound best to me would be to just hang on to Sheed, let him and AI walk at the end of the year and go make a run at Carlos Boozer this offseason.
I don't know if they would have the ability to give Boozer the max or not.
xtremesteven33
02-13-2009, 05:46 PM
Its gonna be a long week....haha
ThriveForFive
02-13-2009, 05:47 PM
With Iverson, Hamilton, and Prince on that team they don't really need a star in return. I know it's reaching, but I can dream.
Taking it to the Hole
02-13-2009, 08:34 PM
I just don't see why Detroit would agree to a trade that will make them worse when they are in the playoff hunt. Just does not seem to add up.
Manufan909
02-13-2009, 09:14 PM
It's not like they're going far with him anyways, might as well save some money.
Kindergarten Cop
02-13-2009, 09:50 PM
As much as I would LOVE for this to trade to go down, a much more likely scenario is being reported right now with Phoenix sending Stoudemire to Detroit for Wallace and Amir Johnson.
http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=11508
BlackSwordsMan
02-13-2009, 09:54 PM
can this thread be burned
Borosai
02-13-2009, 10:02 PM
I just got off the phone with my source in Detroit, and I'm sure he was about to tell me that Wallace is headed to San Antonio, but he had to hang up to wipe. So... more waiting I guess.
tp2021
02-13-2009, 10:34 PM
If Amare goes to Cleveland or Chicago as rumored, I will be so happy, because it increases our shot at Sheed.
Moreso if he goes to Chi-town. The Cleveland rumor has him going for chips (Hickson and Wally world).
Ditty
02-14-2009, 12:54 AM
intersting week coming
Thomas82
02-14-2009, 12:56 AM
intersting week coming
It definately is.
PuttPutt
02-14-2009, 01:01 AM
intersting week coming
Which will probably lead to nothing. I want to believe, but given the past Spurs "deadline" deals, I'm not getting my hopes up.
coyotes_geek
02-14-2009, 01:03 AM
Which will probably lead to nothing. I want to believe, but given the past Spurs "deadline" deals, I'm not getting my hopes up.
Exactly. The smart money is on the Spurs not making a deal (not because they didn't try) and picking up some big oaf out of the d-league.
Thompson
02-14-2009, 01:15 AM
How many options does Detroit have to unload Wallace? Especially if he is adamant that he only wants to come to San Antonio?
Maybe the V. Carter talks aren't serious (at least on the Spurs' end), but they're trying to give Detroit a little push; 'either give us 'Sheed for what we're currently offering, or we trade with someone else and you lose your chance to net $5 million, not to mention tank a little more for a better draft pick this year. Wallace will walk and you'll have gained nothing.' Putting pressure on the Pistons in this manner would make it harder for them to hold out until the deadline, hoping the Spurs would throw in a little more.
coyotes_geek
02-14-2009, 01:26 AM
There's no way to pressure the Pistons though. They're going to have cap room this offseason. A lot. If Sheed leaves they just take their cap space and go get someone else. They don't need to give away Sheed at pennies on the dollar because they'll have the resources to go get a replacement.
Thompson
02-14-2009, 01:40 AM
There's no way to pressure the Pistons though. They're going to have cap room this offseason. A lot. If Sheed leaves they just take their cap space and go get someone else. They don't need to give away Sheed at pennies on the dollar because they'll have the resources to go get a replacement.
Yes, but if they deal with the Spurs they could have the same cap space and $5 million net gained (not having to pay lux. tax this year plus they get a part of the divided luxury tax from everyone who pays it). Also, they can tank more easily. I don't think many in Detroit see them with a great chance at a championship this year. Maybe the Spurs throw in Golden State's 2nd rounder this year (around the 36th overall pick in the draft).
ss1986v2
02-14-2009, 01:41 AM
Yes, but if they deal with the Spurs they could have the same cap space and $5 million net gained (not having to pay lux. tax this year plus they get a part of the divided luxury tax from everyone who pays it). Also, they can tank more easily. I don't think many in Detroit see them with a great chance at a championship this year. Maybe the Spurs throw in Golden States 2nd rounder this year (around the 36th overall pick in the draft).
we dont have enough expirings (even with horry) for them to net the same cap space.
coyotes_geek
02-14-2009, 01:50 AM
Yes, but if they deal with the Spurs they could have the same cap space and $5 million net gained (not having to pay lux. tax this year plus they get a part of the divided luxury tax from everyone who pays it). Also, they can tank more easily. I don't think many in Detroit see them with a great chance at a championship this year. Maybe the Spurs throw in Golden State's 2nd rounder this year (around the 36th overall pick in the draft).
But they wouldn't have the same cap space. Oberto, Bowen, Finley all have another year. The only true expirings the Spurs could offer are Ime & Vaughn. If Horry is willing to play ball he could be another one, but do we know whether he's willing?
Dodging the luxury tax would be a benefit for them, but there's plenty of other teams out there who can assist them in doing that. And it won't cost them Rasheed to do it.
Thompson
02-14-2009, 01:55 AM
But they wouldn't have the same cap space. Oberto, Bowen, Finley all have another year. The only true expirings the Spurs could offer are Ime & Vaughn. If Horry is willing to play ball he could be another one, but do we know whether he's willing?
Dodging the luxury tax would be a benefit for them, but there's plenty of other teams out there who can assist them in doing that. And it won't cost them Rasheed to do it.
Ah, I was thinking if we sent them the money to waive Oberto and Bowen it wouldn't affect the cap space. Even so, they might prefer saving $5 million and losing a little cap space, unless they're planning on turning around and using that space immediately. They're in rebuilding mode, and they might want to hold off until 2010. I guess I'm also hoping they'll have some desire to do Rasheed a solid since he helped them win a title. Oh well.
ss1986v2
02-14-2009, 02:02 AM
Ah, I was thinking if we sent them the money to waive Oberto and Bowen it wouldn't affect the cap space. Even so, they might prefer saving $5 million and losing a little cap space, unless they're planning on turning around and using that space immediately.
my math may be a bit off, but the pistons should only be between 600K and 1.6 mil over the tax line. so all they would have to do is find a team willing to take some fodder off their books for nothing and they get below the tax line (choose whoever of acker, bynum, and herrmann it would take).
no need to trade sheed to get below the tax line.
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:12 AM
my math may be a bit off, but the pistons should only be between 600K and 1.6 mil over the tax line. so all they would have to do is find a team willing to take some fodder off their books for nothing and they get below the tax line (choose whoever of acker, bynum, and herrmann it would take).
no need to trade sheed to get below the tax line.
Yes, but IF they can trade sheed and keep their cap space (which is a possibility) and get under the luxury tax in doing so, you have to consider that they might grant Sheed his wish of being traded (if there is one). Especially if they can get a player (probably on an expiring contract or rookie scale contract) as well.
ss1986v2
02-14-2009, 02:16 AM
Yes, but IF they can trade sheed and keep their cap space (which is a possibility) and get under the luxury tax in doing so, you have to consider that they might grant Sheed his wish of being traded (if there is one). Especially if they can get a player (probably on an expiring contract or rookie scale contract) as well.
but the base trade being discussed here (horry + filler contracts + marginal assets) doesnt give them all of the above. we can give them tax relief, and other assets (limited picks, splitter, mahinmi). we cant give them sufficient expirings.
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:20 AM
but the base trade being discussed here (horry + filler contracts + marginal assets) doesnt give them all of the above. we can give them tax relief, and other assets (limited picks, splitter, mahinmi). we cant give them sufficient expirings.
No, but as already discussed, there would be buyouts involved that with the money saved and perhaps cash considerations (which can also be up to 3 million) then that does essentially give them that.
With contracts this small individually, I cannot believe that the buyouts would be that large.
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:22 AM
Not only is this contingent on finding a 3rd team probably, but it also has to factor in how much Sheed is actually pressing to be traded. If Sheed is not pressing, there is probably very little chance.
coyotes_geek
02-14-2009, 02:22 AM
Buyouts still count against the cap.
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:22 AM
Buyouts count against the cap.
For the following year?
coyotes_geek
02-14-2009, 02:23 AM
Yes. Whatever the buyout amount is gets prorated across all remaining years of the contract.
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:27 AM
Yes. Whatever the buyout amount is gets prorated across all remaining years of the contract.
How does that work for partially guaranteed contracts such as Oberto and Bowen?
ss1986v2
02-14-2009, 02:35 AM
No, but as already discussed, there would be buyouts involved that with the money saved and perhaps cash considerations (which can also be up to 3 million) then that does essentially give them that.
With contracts this small individually, I cannot believe that the buyouts would be that large.
again, the players in question would have to waive a large portion of the money that they would be owed.
and whatever money we give the pistons has nothing to do with the buyouts. whatever amount of money the pistons pay to buyout the players contracts stays on their books as a cap hit. they dont spend the theoretical 3 mil and the contracts simply go away. thats not how buyouts work.
there is the issue of right of set-off. but its a bit complicated, so im just going to ignore it. but if you are interested, heres the bit from larry coon:
If another team signs a released player who had a guaranteed contract (as long as the player has cleared waivers -- see question number 54), the player's original team is allowed to reduce the amount of money they still owe the player (and lower their team salary) by a commensurate amount (this is called the right of set-off). This is true if the player signs with any professional team -- it doesn't even have to be an NBA team. The amount the original team gets to set off is limited to one-half the difference between the player's new salary and the minimum salary for a one-year veteran (if the player is a rookie, then the rookie minimum is used instead).
For example, suppose a fifth-year player is waived during the 2005 offseason, with one guaranteed season remaining on his contract. If this player signs a $1 million contract with another NBA team for the 2005-06 season, his original team gets to set off $1 million minus $641,748 (the minimum for a one-year veteran in 2005-06), divided by two, or $179,126. If this player had a $5 million salary with his prior team, then his prior team would be responsible for the remaining $4,820,874. Note that between his prior team and new team the player will earn a combined $5,820,874, which was more than he made prior to being waived.
again, its a bit complicated, but it doesnt equate to all that much, so i simply ignore it.
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:38 AM
The money we give them helps them eat the buyout "cost", albeit more indirectly.
coyotes_geek
02-14-2009, 02:39 AM
How does that work for partially guaranteed contracts such as Oberto and Bowen?
You just take the guaranteed money and figure out what percentage of that is due in each remaining year of the contract. Then you take the buyout amount and divvy it up across the remaining years based on those percentages. For example if you're buying out a guy who has 2 years left and 60% of the guaranteed money remaining on his deal is owed this year and 40% next year then 60% of the buyout hits this year and 40% next year.
ss1986v2
02-14-2009, 02:39 AM
The money we give them helps them eat the buyout "cost", albeit more indirectly.
yes it helps with the cost, but it does absolutely nothing to the cap hits they would take. so it doesnt matter when it comes to their cap space.
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:44 AM
yes it helps with the cost, but it does absolutely nothing to the cap hits they would take. so it doesnt matter when it comes to their cap space.
I guess the question comes down to which is more enticing to the Pistons:
A) Have 34 million in cap space (Sheed and Iverson expiring) and pay luxury tax
or
B) Have ~30 million (assuming buyout cap hit) + young player (Ian or Tiago) or solid player with expiring from 3rd team + avoid the luxury tax + get money from luxury tax pool + possible draft pick (s) + cash considerations.
Ditty
02-14-2009, 02:45 AM
he's coming
trust me
i heard from a little bird :)
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:46 AM
Like I said, I think how much Sheed is pushing for a trade will determine the outcome. If he is cool with just playing it out, then not a good chance. If he really is pushing for a trade, it might help the odds.
ss1986v2
02-14-2009, 02:48 AM
I guess the question comes down to which is more enticing to the Pistons:
A) Have 34 million in cap space (Sheed and Iverson expiring) and pay luxury tax
or
B) Have ~30 million (assuming buyout cap hit) + young player (Ian or Tiago) or solid player with expiring from 3rd team + avoid the luxury tax + get money from luxury tax pool + possible draft pick (s) + cash considerations.
those arent their only options though. they could make a minor deal (dump acker or herrmann), still maximize their cap space, avoid the luxury tax, and get their piece of the pie. they dont have to move sheed to get below the tax line.
Ditty
02-14-2009, 02:49 AM
jut wait till tuesday no later than thursday
i havent been this excited ever
lets just say that i found out one my friends dads works for the spurs
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:51 AM
those arent their only options though. they could make a minor deal (dump acker or herrmann), still maximize their cap space, avoid the luxury tax, and get their piece of the pie. they dont have to move sheed to get below the tax line.
True, but that does not land them a quality player with an expiring contract, or draft picks, or a young prospect on a rookie scale.
But you are right. They do have options.
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:52 AM
jut wait till tuesday no later than thursday
i havent been this excited ever
lets just say that i found out one my friends dads works for the spurs
Quit it!
Ditty
02-14-2009, 02:58 AM
Quit it!
yup but im not promissing anything and my friends dad is good friends with RC i heard and he dosen't bullshit about really important things but he said its about a 75% chance it goes down right it will probably get higher during the week he said that discussing more about salary cap issues then the trade itself so my guess is that dumars already agreed to trade rasheed to san antonio thats what i heard don't get too hard :lol
ace3g
02-14-2009, 02:59 AM
are you telling the truth , spursowntexas? if so it will be a good move by the Spurs,
its funny, but the last couple of years at the trade deadline the Spurs have traded for a PF/C as the main piece
2005 - Nazr
2008 - Kurt Thomas
2009 - Rasheed?
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 03:00 AM
yup but im not promissing anything and my friends dad is good friends with RC i heard and he dosen't bullshit about really important things but he said its about a 75% chance it goes down right it will probably get higher during the week he said that discussing more about salary cap issues then the trade itself so my guess is that dumars already agreed to trade rasheed to san antonio thats what i heard don't get too hard :lol
The fact that you used absolutely no punctuation leads me to believe you are lying to us:lol
Ice009
02-14-2009, 03:03 AM
yup but im not promissing anything and my friends dad is good friends with RC i heard and he dosen't bullshit about really important things but he said its about a 75% chance it goes down right it will probably get higher during the week he said that discussing more about salary cap issues then the trade itself so my guess is that dumars already agreed to trade rasheed to san antonio thats what i heard don't get too hard :lol
Don't go bullshitting us.
Ditty
02-14-2009, 03:05 AM
The fact that you used absolutely no punctuation leads me to believe you are lying to us:lol
look at all my postings i never use punction where not getting a grade on this or anything i actually made a B last semester in Freshman Compostition at SAC ha
but yah thats what i heard it seemed like dumars really wants to shake up this team and see how good his yound talent is, but he didn't mention anything about who's getting traded but i guess spurs did something to kinda change his mind and he didn't say that there will be another team involved i guess his dad can't really talk to much about it but im just posting what i heard
Ditty
02-14-2009, 03:12 AM
so i just got to wait and see liek everybody else but if he's wrong ill punch him in the balls cuz ill be pissed myself
ill keep up with any updates im not the best of friends with this guy but he knows that i love the spurs so he just broke the story to me 30 minutes ago
i hope it's true ill pray tonight
later guys
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 03:15 AM
I was just messing with you about the punctuation. It was a joke.
Ice009
02-14-2009, 03:28 AM
so i just got to wait and see liek everybody else but if he's wrong ill punch him in the balls cuz ill be pissed myself
ill keep up with any updates im not the best of friends with this guy but he knows that i love the spurs so he just broke the story to me 30 minutes ago
i hope it's true ill pray tonight
later guys
Do you think he is bullshitting you then? Or was he straight up serious? Maybe the Spurs told him to say that to avert attention from another player they are going after?
xellos88330
02-14-2009, 03:30 AM
ok, i think i am going to stay away from ST until after the trade deadline. all of these posts fill me with hope, then dash them, then bring them back again. You are all cruel people. :lol
PuttPutt
02-14-2009, 03:38 AM
ok, i think i am going to stay away from ST until after the trade deadline. all of these posts fill me with hope, then dash them, then bring them back again. You are all cruel people. :lol
+1.
My problem is I want & almost have to keep checking back here. Speculation SUCKS!!!
Thomas82
02-14-2009, 03:38 AM
ok, i think i am going to stay away from ST until after the trade deadline. all of these posts fill me with hope, then dash them, then bring them back again. You are all cruel people. :lol
I'm with you on that one.
there was a thread in the basketball section that porters was fired by the suns a few days ago. then the same radio station reported it was false. there was another thread where someone said a "reliable source" indicated that amare was to be traded to the cavs. that turned out to be false as well. i try not to be excited until a spurs trade is actually confirmed.
ace3g
02-14-2009, 05:53 AM
I'm sure most of you have noticed, but we play the Pistons on Thursday, the trade deadline, so maybe that is a good omen that the trade will work out,
bigfan
02-14-2009, 11:39 AM
My sources tell me we dont need any guys like Rasheed on our team. Pop would bench his azz the first time he smarted off or started sulking. The guy can play but he brings too much baggage.
Cant_Be_Faded
02-14-2009, 11:48 AM
29 pages? Seriously? You do realize the only trade we've ever made of significance in this era was Malik Rose for Nazr Mohammed, right?
You guys are all on crack.
lotr1trekkie
02-14-2009, 12:08 PM
Exactly how does Sheed work into whatever's left of the current rotation? I assume he comes off the bench to replace Tim and then at crunchtime Tim plays center and Sheed power forward. Sounds awesome.
Vinnie_Johnson
02-14-2009, 12:10 PM
Exactly how does Sheed work into whatever's left of the current rotation? I assume he comes off the bench to replace Tim and then at crunchtime Tim plays center and Sheed power forward. Sounds awesome.
Tim at Center with Sheed at PF they both need to start.
Ghost Writer
02-14-2009, 12:12 PM
29 pages? Seriously? You do realize the only trade we've ever made of significance in this era was Malik Rose for Nazr Mohammed, right?
You guys are all on crack.
Dude's an @ssh0le, but he's got a point.
The Spurs can't attract talent outside the draft and even then, they need lottery balls (Duncan and Robinson).
Manu and Parker in the past 20 years is not enough.
phxspurfan
02-14-2009, 01:59 PM
Man, if we get Wallace for nothing.
Not likely to happen, but man.........
That would be a big " In Your Face, Lakers! "
I wonder if that would be what this is all about...league conspiracy/revenge against that awful Laker trade.
phxspurfan
02-14-2009, 02:04 PM
How many championships does this buy us? 2? 3?
EricB
02-14-2009, 02:05 PM
Dude's an @ssh0le, but he's got a point.
The Spurs can't attract talent outside the draft and even then, they need lottery balls (Duncan and Robinson).
Manu and Parker in the past 20 years is not enough.
So Roger Mason has no talent?
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:05 PM
Considering the Pau trade did not buy the Lakers a championship (yet), 0.
Slinkyman
02-14-2009, 02:08 PM
Considering the Pau trade did not buy the Lakers a championship (yet), 0.
But the KG trade has already bought Boston one.
phxspurfan
02-14-2009, 02:09 PM
Considering the Pau trade did not buy the Lakers a championship (yet), 0.
Everything is barring major injury. Bynum is a major injury against a team with the best front line in the league last year (C's). Actually second-best to the Lakers w/Bynum.
phxspurfan
02-14-2009, 02:13 PM
This trade works for SA, PHX and DET.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=cttxeo
Suns won't do trades involving the Spurs.
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:40 PM
But the KG trade has already bought Boston one.
Boston had to give up a franchise player in Al Jefferson, not the same as the Gasol trade.
Thomas82
02-14-2009, 02:47 PM
Boston had to give up a franchise player in Al Jefferson, not the same as the Gasol trade.
I didn't think Al Jefferson was considered a franchise player for Boston.
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 02:48 PM
I didn't think Al Jefferson was considered a franchise player for Boston.
Are you trying to say they did not know how good he was? He is clearly a franchise player.
de Soto
02-14-2009, 02:57 PM
The original poster is only repeating what was said on Chris Duel's show on ESPN Radio. Duel had a source on his show on Thursday with connection to the Pistons who said that the Spurs were talking about a deal with the Pistons that involved Finley and Fab (PLUS MORE) for Rasheed.
Duel is a blithering idiot.
Thomas82
02-14-2009, 04:34 PM
Are you trying to say they did not know how good he was? He is clearly a franchise player.
No I'm not. I just thought with Paul Pierce already there, and they had traded for Ray Allen, that other than the Celtics not too many people looked at him as a franchise player. I will agree with you, yes he is a franchise player for the T-Wolves.
DrHouse
02-14-2009, 04:39 PM
Rasheed Wallace does not guarantee the Spurs a championship.
All it does is even the playing field against the Lakers, assuming Bynum gets back. You people are delusional.
DrHouse
02-14-2009, 04:54 PM
Not really.
Wallace isn't nearly the player he was even a year ago. His defense has slipped, rebounding has slipped, and his post game is non existent.
Obviously he'll make the Spurs better, but the notion that he'll put the Spurs above and beyond the rest of the league is ludicrous.
Spurtacus
02-14-2009, 05:03 PM
Eh, not sure about giving up Finley. As much as I hated him last year and offseason, he's done a great job this season.
I'd rather us package Oberto/Udoka/cash for Wallace...somehow, if it can be done...
xtremesteven33
02-14-2009, 05:04 PM
Not really.
Wallace isn't nearly the player he was even a year ago. His defense has slipped, rebounding has slipped, and his post game is non existent.
Obviously he'll make the Spurs better, but the notion that he'll put the Spurs above and beyond the rest of the league is ludicrous.
IF SOMEHOW we do land Wallace.
Spurs over Lakers in 6....and you can quote me on that.
daslicer
02-14-2009, 05:12 PM
I think if the spurs get Sheed they beat LA simply because Gasol is a big pussy. Gasol melts against physical players like Sheed. I count on a big meltdown like he did in his grizzly days which will take him out of the equation. It will be a bigger meltdown then what Dirk experienced against Jax back in '07. That in return forces the Lakers to rely on Bynum to be the man which I don't think he's ready to do consistently. I just don't see Bynum being able to throw down 20-10 every game in a 7 game series against the spurs if they get Sheed.
sprrs
02-14-2009, 05:15 PM
Not really.
Wallace isn't nearly the player he was even a year ago. His defense has slipped, rebounding has slipped, and his post game is non existent.
Obviously he'll make the Spurs better, but the notion that he'll put the Spurs above and beyond the rest of the league is ludicrous.
Lack of motivation does that to a player. See Billups before the Denver trade.
Bruno
02-14-2009, 05:31 PM
Getting Sheed would be huge. The problem is that I don't really see a straight trade that makes sense for Detroit.
The only ways I see Spurs getting Sheed is Detroit making a block buster trade (like for Amare) and Spurs being a part of it. Detroit can also trade Sheed with his expiring contract to a rebuilding team for a vet. In this case, the rebuilding team can waive him and Spurs can try to sign him as a FA.
Spurs will definitely need some luck to get Sheed.
td4mvp21
02-14-2009, 05:32 PM
I don't think Sheed would mean an automatic victory over the Lakers in a playoff series. The Lakers are pretty good and the defending West champions so....yeah, Spurs would still have a tough series. It would definitely help to have Sheed against them, it would give us a really good opportunity to beat them in the playoffs.
DrHouse
02-14-2009, 06:39 PM
I don't think Sheed would mean an automatic victory over the Lakers in a playoff series. The Lakers are pretty good and the defending West champions so....yeah, Spurs would still have a tough series. It would definitely help to have Sheed against them, it would give us a really good opportunity to beat them in the playoffs.
I think with a healthy Bynum the Lakers are clearly a step above the Spurs. Rasheed Wallace would level the playing field IMHO and make for one hell of a WCF.
DPG21920
02-14-2009, 06:40 PM
I dont think this is going to happen. I want it to, but it does not add up.
coyotes_geek
02-14-2009, 06:42 PM
I think with a healthy Bynum the Lakers are clearly a step above the Spurs. Rasheed Wallace would level the playing field IMHO and make for one hell of a WCF.
Sadly, I have to agree with you.
Duncan2177
02-14-2009, 06:43 PM
Eh, not sure about giving up Finley. As much as I hated him last year and offseason, he's done a great job this season.
I'd rather us package Oberto/Udoka/cash for Wallace...somehow, if it can be done...
Finley hasnt been that great the last spurs game against toronto he was open for a 3 in the final seconds of the game and passed the ball.
phxspurfan
02-14-2009, 08:06 PM
Not really.
Wallace isn't nearly the player he was even a year ago. His defense has slipped, rebounding has slipped, and his post game is non existent.
Obviously he'll make the Spurs better, but the notion that he'll put the Spurs above and beyond the rest of the league is ludicrous.
Are you kidding? Wallace in playoffs >> Bynum in playoffs.
K-State Spur
02-14-2009, 08:32 PM
Rasheed Wallace does not guarantee the Spurs a championship.
All it does is even the playing field against the Lakers, assuming Bynum gets back. You people are delusional.
of course it wouldn't guarantee it. but it would make the Spurs the favorites.
that said, i still don't expect it to happen.
Condemned 2 HelLA
02-14-2009, 08:35 PM
You people are delusional.
Pot, meet kettle.
xtremesteven33
02-14-2009, 11:59 PM
These are some of the rumored deals before Thursday's trade deadline, which means probably none of them will happen and one about which you never heard a peep will:
• Phoenix All-Star Amare Stoudemire to Chicago for Drew Gooden's expiring contract, Tyrus Thomas and Thabo Sefolosha. Oklahoma City, Memphis and perhaps Portland are other possible destinations for Stoudemire, whose contract the Suns owner wants to dump to slash costs in this failing economy.
• Detroit dealing Rasheed Wallace, perhaps to San Antonio, for expiring contracts.
• Charlotte and Indiana swapping point guards -- restricted free agent Raymond Felton and exiled Jamaal Tinsley -- in a multiplayer deal.
• Cleveland dealing Wally Szczerbiak's expiring $13 million salary slot for what it considers the final piece -- Vince Carter? -- to the LeBron James championship jigsaw.
• Former Timberwolf Mike James and Etan Thomas from Washington to Chicago for Larry Hughes.
http://www.startribune.com/sports/wolves/39591762.html?elr=KArksi8cyaiUo8cyaiUiD3aPc:_Yyc:a ULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr
Thompson
02-15-2009, 12:00 AM
Dr. House, what is your sig supposed to mean? I don't get the LWO, the numbers, etc.
HarlemHeat37
02-15-2009, 12:00 AM
a "healthy" Bynum doesn't exist..
if we somehow get 'Sheed, we probably beat LA in 5 or 6..quote me on that..
BlackSwordsMan
02-15-2009, 12:03 AM
Rasheed Wallace does not guarantee the Spurs a championship.
.
he guaransheed's a spurs championship :lobt2:
daslicer
02-15-2009, 12:09 AM
a "healthy" Bynum doesn't exist..
if we somehow get 'Sheed, we probably beat LA in 5 or 6..quote me on that..
Agreed Bynum just looks like he's going to be an injury prone bigman in the mold of Danny Manning. I feel the same way if the spurs can get sheed they take out LA in 5 or 6 games. Got to factor in that Gasol is soft as tissue and would melt with Sheed out there on the court.
anjlbitz
02-15-2009, 12:12 AM
• Detroit dealing Rasheed Wallace, perhaps to San Antonio, for expiring contracts.
Isn't Rasheed Wallace's contract an expiring contract as well?
ss1986v2
02-15-2009, 12:13 AM
Isn't Rasheed Wallace's contract an expiring contract as well?
yes, and we dont even have enough expiring contracts to match sheeds expiring...
ss1986v2
02-15-2009, 12:40 AM
Horry! He can sign for what ever amount and retire again, hes a blank check. I would love to see S Kerr take Horry for Shaq, Hell they wanna save money, we get Shaq and we win the next two titles!!!
no. if we sign him for anything more than about 4.25 mil, he becomes BYC. and then making a functioning trade becomes even more complicated...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.