PDA

View Full Version : RJ-haters roll-call!



Pages : 1 [2]

RuffnReadyOzStyle
04-30-2011, 12:26 AM
And where are all the RJ lovers who heaped so much shit on me for even suggesting that re-signing the guy to an albatross contract wouldn't help us to get anywhere? Where are they right now? Crying in their beer like the rest of us. I hope they're happy that our cap is hamstrung and we'll have this guy around for another 2-3 seasons... :rolleyes :depressed

TDMVPDPOY
04-30-2011, 12:34 AM
lol rjs contribution same with bonner < splitter in his limited time grizz series....

MI21
04-30-2011, 12:36 AM
Sadly, Ruff was correct and seen what many couldn't.

His early season shooting and that's all it was - not form, not improved play, just improved shooting - was fool's gold and the same weaknesses were still there once the perimeter shooting dried up.

ElNono
04-30-2011, 12:38 AM
:cry :cry :cry But there was nobody else to sign :cry :cry :cry

Memphis waited and got Tony Allen and Battier...

Aggie Hoopsfan
04-30-2011, 12:41 AM
Sadly, Ruff was correct and seen what many couldn't.

His early season shooting and that's all it was - not form, not improved play, just improved shooting - was fool's gold and the same weaknesses were still there once the perimeter shooting dried up.

There were more folks than just Ruff who saw this for the colossal mistake it was last summer. Unfortunately, our dipshit coach wasn't one of them.

Brutalis
04-30-2011, 12:44 AM
Ruff pwnd some of you guys.

I'll sign off on this I hate RJ stuff. This guy is a complete waste. Soft... omg soft.

MI21
04-30-2011, 12:48 AM
There were more folks than just Ruff who saw this for the colossal mistake it was last summer. Unfortunately, our dipshit coach wasn't one of them.

Oh, for sure. But Ruff is definitely leader of the pack, this thread is testament to it.

DPG21920
04-30-2011, 12:55 AM
Haters fan club is not referring to literally hating RJ. The expected suckiness is not just pessimism considering we have seen what RJ can do in the Spurs system.

Could he improve and does everyone want that (or most everyone)? Yes. Is there any real strong indication of that at this point? Not really.


Ecomoically speaking, the Spurs made a terrible move by investing this kind of money in RJ & Bonner. There is no side stepping that. You may understand the logic of the moves, but essentially the choose the lesser of two evils. That does not mean they did something good. They were able to side step the LT (which could change even this season) for one year. But it's coming next year, especially if they re-sign TP which IMO is likely.

They robbed Peter to pay Paul, and even if it makes some sense, it was still a bad move. They very easily could have kept RJ as an expiring and been no worse off basketball wise and better off financially long term. Instead they choose the 1-year reprieve.


He didn't have us all fooled.

Chomag
04-30-2011, 12:57 AM
Fucking useless and a waste of Space and money. Sorry for the language.

RuffnReadyOzStyle
04-30-2011, 01:02 AM
Sadly, Ruff was correct and seen what many couldn't.

His early season shooting and that's all it was - not form, not improved play, just improved shooting - was fool's gold and the same weaknesses were still there once the perimeter shooting dried up.

Thanks mate, kinda... just as I was happy to be proven wrong early in the season (he did look like a better much better fit for the first month), I'm sad to be proven right at the end of the season.

Once most athletes are past 25 you know exactly what you will get from them, and there was no reason to believe RJ would be any different. How he blinded the Spurs to this axiom and duped them out of 40mil is the surprising part.


There were more folks than just Ruff who saw this for the colossal mistake it was last summer. Unfortunately, our dipshit coach wasn't one of them.

Yup, it wasn't just me, there were a few others, but few people had my back in this thread or elsewhere at the time. Most towed the party line. Regardless of anything else, that contract should never have made any sense to anyone looking at the big picture.

RuffnReadyOzStyle
04-30-2011, 01:34 AM
His contract is a huge albatross. I can't imagine any team being stupid enough to take him in a trade. The Spurs are most likely stuck with him and he should only be playing about 10-12 minutes a game, but he will probably continue to start.

...and that was the original reason for the thread. We have now come full circle. :lol

MaNu4Tres
04-30-2011, 02:03 AM
This was posted 10/23/2010.


This thread is just :lol

To defend myself and friends I associate with that were for R.J being resigned:

-Did we think RJ's play was worthy of the 40 million dollar deal? No we didn't.

-Was RJ the most realistic option for the Spurs this off-season? Yes he was. That is the realistic reality that took place. Not only was he was the best option, but his new deal saved Holt roughly 25 million.

-Do we think he has the chance to improve in his second season? Sure we do. His three point shooting was non-existent from February to the end of the year last year. Any amount of 3 point shooting will be an improvement.

-Does RJ's contract effect the Spurs from adding a significant (more than the MLE) free agent in the near future? No it doesn't. Not with Tim and Manu still on this team for two more seasons. Spurs would have just around the MLE to add anyone significant in the off-season via free agency if either scenario played out.

-Does his deal effect the Spurs from resigning Blair and Hill when their contracts are up? No it doesn't. Their deals are up when Manu's contract is off the books. Spurs will have plenty of money that off-season (30+million in cap room) and will have the nice 11 million dollar expiring contact to use in a trade from that off-season til February. How is that a bad rebuilding situation?


These are the reasons why I was for the R.J signing. I thought from the very get go, he would be the most realistic and best option since the majority of the MLE was going to go to Splitter anyway. Realizing this reality and the fact that R.J's contract doesn't necessarily effect the Spurs rebuilding process and doesn't effect the Hill or Blair being extended whenever that day comes in 3 years is why I was for it. His contract also doesn't necessarily effect Parker being resigned if Parker's new deal is front-loaded (which 95% of contracts are), since Tim's contract is off the books 2 years from now.

If Parker is resigned then yeah R.J's contract might effect Hill and Blair to be both extended. But you have to remember Manu's and Tim's contracts will be off the books by then and if Parker is resigned then I don't think Hill will be a Spur that much longer anyway.


My whole debate wasn't if R.J would improve or not in his second season. It was solely based off the reality of the situation now and the near future.


Even though R.J showed some improvements this year, he was absolutely pathetic the past 3 games and much of late in the year. Which obviously contributed to the Spurs abrupt demise this post-season. Spurs need to do what they can to get rid of him. I personally believe packaging Blair and a late first round pick can get some negotiations going. (For those who are asking why Blair--Blair's contract will be up in 2 years anyway; his salary value will go up 500-600%. Meaning it's highly doubtful Spurs would consider resigning an undersized big at that price anyway. Therefore trading him now should be easy. Especially if they are rebuilding, which most likely will be the case. Therefore sweetening a RJ deal with Blair has to be considered now.)

If they can get rid of Rasho and Malik's contract, I'm hoping they can get rid of R.J's. Only time will tell.

But yeah, R.J was fucking pathetic the past 3 games. Jesus. Ultimately, Ruff, Nono, benefactor, HH, DPG and many others were right on him not improving. (Even though that never was my main argument against them.)

It's been a fun ride guys. But the championship window is sealed shut for a while tbh..

Obstructed_View
04-30-2011, 02:14 AM
I didn't see any posts in here predicting that he'd show us how good he could have been, only to fade into oblivion when we needed him most. His expiring contract would have brought something pretty nice when he was playing as great as he was halfway through the season, though. That should have been the plan when he showed no improvement as a defender, and is further indictment of the decision to give him a new contract.

And I'm still unsure how the math works where people say that RJ's contract "saved" money. It "saved" luxury tax, but the total cost of the new contract was more actual dollars than the original contract. It also saddled the Spurs with an overpaid, aging player who has zero market value.

It's pretty clear that the Spurs violated the spirit of the rules if not the letter in resigning RJ, so I guess this is karma saying "thanks for playing".

bongraider
04-30-2011, 02:19 AM
damn this guy. he used to be in attack mode all the time in jersey, shat on everyone. now he's like shit stuck on the hardwood, barely moves. i didnt know people would fall off that quick.

TJastal
04-30-2011, 02:25 AM
This was posted 10/23/2010.




Even though R.J showed some improvements this year, he was absolutely pathetic the past 3 games and much of late in the year. Which obviously contributed to the Spurs abrupt demise this post-season. Spurs need to do what they can to get rid of him. I personally believe packaging Blair and a late first round pick can get some negotiations going. (For those who are asking why Blair--Blair's contract will be up in 2 years anyway; his salary value will go up 500-600%. Meaning it's highly doubtful Spurs would consider resigning an undersized big at that price anyway. Therefore trading him now should be easy. Especially if they are rebuilding, which most likely will be the case. Therefore sweetening a RJ deal with Blair has to be considered now.)

If they can get rid of Rasho and Malik's contract, I'm hoping they can get rid of R.J's. Only time will tell.

But yeah, R.J was fucking pathetic the past 3 games. Jesus. Ultimately, Ruff, Nono, benefactor, HH, DPG and many others were right on him not improving. (Even though that never was my main argument against them.)

It's been a fun ride guys. But the championship window is sealed shut for a while tbh..

Just out of curiousity, knowing what you know now about RJ, would you still say he was the best option at the time?

(I'm willing to bet you think so). :lol

MaNu4Tres
04-30-2011, 02:29 AM
Just out of curiousity, knowing what you know now about RJ, would you still say he was the best option at the time?
l

Judging by the critical past 4 games? Hell no.

Judging by 80-85% of the regular season and the first 2 playoff games-- Yes he was.

ElNono
04-30-2011, 02:36 AM
Need to look forward at this point... the CBA officially expires at season's end, and there doesn't seem to be any deal in sight. If there's a shortened season, there might not be even time to ship his ass off, so I suspect he'll stick around. Spurs should actively try to trade his ass though...

RuffnReadyOzStyle
04-30-2011, 02:46 AM
This was posted 10/23/2010.

Even though R.J showed some improvements this year, he was absolutely pathetic the past 3 games and much of late in the year. Which obviously contributed to the Spurs abrupt demise this post-season. Spurs need to do what they can to get rid of him. I personally believe packaging Blair and a late first round pick can get some negotiations going. (For those who are asking why Blair--Blair's contract will be up in 2 years anyway; his salary value will go up 500-600%. Meaning it's highly doubtful Spurs would consider resigning an undersized big at that price anyway. Therefore trading him now should be easy. Especially if they are rebuilding, which most likely will be the case. Therefore sweetening a RJ deal with Blair has to be considered now.)

If they can get rid of Rasho and Malik's contract, I'm hoping they can get rid of R.J's. Only time will tell.

But yeah, R.J was fucking pathetic the past 3 games. Jesus. Ultimately, Ruff, Nono, benefactor, HH, DPG and many others were right on him not improving. (Even though that never was my main argument against them.)

It's been a fun ride guys. But the championship window is sealed shut for a while tbh..

Fair enough. :toast


I didn't see any posts in here predicting that he'd show us how good he could have been, only to fade into oblivion when we needed him most. His expiring contract would have brought something pretty nice when he was playing as great as he was halfway through the season, though. That should have been the plan when he showed no improvement as a defender, and is further indictment of the decision to give him a new contract.

And I'm still unsure how the math works where people say that RJ's contract "saved" money. It "saved" luxury tax, but the total cost of the new contract was more actual dollars than the original contract. It also saddled the Spurs with an overpaid, aging player who has zero market value.

It's pretty clear that the Spurs violated the spirit of the rules if not the letter in resigning RJ, so I guess this is karma saying "thanks for playing".

Yeah, karma eh? We kinda cheated to get something we shouldn't have desired in the first place and got fucked on the deal both ways. Serves us right. Act with pure intent.

Oh yeah, and we paid the guy 25mil more than we had to - he would have been a nice expiring contract to deal, or at the very least a lot of space under the lux tax or whatever the cap is in the next CBA.

Obstructed_View
04-30-2011, 02:56 AM
Yep, he should take a page from the Greeks and base his game on a complete lack of athleticism.

Aggie Hoopsfan
04-30-2011, 03:03 AM
I didn't see any posts in here predicting that he'd show us how good he could have been, only to fade into oblivion when we needed him most. His expiring contract would have brought something pretty nice when he was playing as great as he was halfway through the season, though. That should have been the plan when he showed no improvement as a defender, and is further indictment of the decision to give him a new contract.

And I'm still unsure how the math works where people say that RJ's contract "saved" money. It "saved" luxury tax, but the total cost of the new contract was more actual dollars than the original contract. It also saddled the Spurs with an overpaid, aging player who has zero market value.



Yep, imagine RJ playing the way he was at the trade deadline :depressed

Woulda found a taker no problem.

The whole 'saving' thing is that we would have been over the luxury tax this year on his original deal, and it would have been about $10 million worth.

It's a flawed argument. Go ask Peter Holt how much he made off the Spurs last championship run. Because he pissed that down the drain when he let Pop bring back Air Gay.

1Parker1
04-30-2011, 03:05 AM
:lol @ Air Gay....that's actually a suitable nick name for him.

Hoops Czar
04-30-2011, 03:22 AM
Stop bumping bullshit threads. RJ is the player who put a nail through the Duncan's coffin. His ballbusting contract was a huge gamble and the Spurs front office just didn't do their homework.

Aggie Hoopsfan
04-30-2011, 03:26 AM
All that said, someone will be willing to take him.

My thoughts:

Cleveland. Might have to take Antawn's contract and something else back thought.

Charlotte. Have Tim call Buckets and have him start being even more of a frustrated punk than he has been about how things have shaken out in Charlotte. Salaries are close enough. Stephen Jackson, come on down.

Detroit. They are a mess, Tayshaun is a free agent this summer, and they want to get rid of Rip this summer. Why not...

Golden State. Nellie owes us, because his crack induced lineup methodology has been embraced by Pop. Bonus, RJ loves to run, and could play third wheel to Ellis and Curry.

NJ. Rod Thorn is a dick so it probably wouldn't happen, but I'd happily trade for Outlaw.

Orlando. Way over the cap and have $30 million tied up at the PG position :lol This would sound crazy, but I'd actually be okay with the Spurs swapping RJ for a slightly higher paid Hedo Turkoglu and hoping the guy can find the magic again from his last deep playoff run. Or maybe a Jameer/Brandon Bass for RJ/Hill swap (still saves a little cash for them).

Philly. Only if we could get Brand from them. Another play for cap savings here (for them, not us).

Washington. Hold your nose, send them RJ, Bonner, and Dice's contract for Rashard Lewis and hope he has two more serviceable years left while you're paying him $45 million.

timtonymanu
04-30-2011, 03:28 AM
Fuck Richard Jefferson! Bonner, Finley > RJ

objective
04-30-2011, 03:29 AM
The jury already returned their verdict and found RJ guilty of being a massively overpaid, underperforming contract albatross who could cost the Spurs retaining current players and the opportunity costs of future players acquired through trade while being a poor playoff performer.

RJ is free to appeal the decision at the end of the season.

The end of the season has come. Still guilty of being TRASH.

And, no surprise, I was correct.

But he was even worse than last playoffs. WHEN HE WAS AWFUL.

Signing him was a gigantic nightmare. All the evidence as to why they shouldn't sign him was right there staring everybody in the face and broken down numerous times.

And yes, a second rounder or undrafted free agent or whoever that hasn't demonstrated awfulness would have been better than Jefferson.

It's not changing, except that he'll get worse.

The best thing for this franchise is for him to not be in uniform. It's a pipedream to hope to dump him in a deal with Blair or even both Blair and Hill, though that would make me incredibly happy.

Even if he's still under contract with the Spurs, he can not be allowed into uniform. Make him like Tinsley or Eddy Curry, just get him away from a jersey and pay him to stay on the partyboat.

Hoops Czar
04-30-2011, 03:37 AM
Detroit. They are a mess, Tayshaun is a free agent this summer, and they want to get rid of Rip this summer. Why not...



Your right... The Spurs should look to get older. Maybe the Spurs should open up a senior care center right outside the locker room so its close and convenient. They need youth, not more has beens.

They tried dumping RJ once and there were no takers. The Spurs would have to eat half his contract in any trade. He's a Spur for life.

objective
04-30-2011, 03:55 AM
All that said, someone will be willing to take him.

My thoughts:

Cleveland. Might have to take Antawn's contract and something else back thought.

I can't imagine they'd add three years of Jefferson's trash. Even Blair and Hill couldn't help.


Charlotte. Have Tim call Buckets and have him start being even more of a frustrated punk than he has been about how things have shaken out in Charlotte. Salaries are close enough. Stephen Jackson, come on down.

I wish.

Maybe Jordan is insane enough to take the Jefferson disease to get both Blair and Hill.

I wish.


Detroit. They are a mess, Tayshaun is a free agent this summer, and they want to get rid of Rip this summer. Why not...


I can't imagine them wasting money on Jefferson. Besides, who needs Blair when they have Maxiell? Why get Hill when they have Stuckey?


Golden State. Nellie owes us, because his crack induced lineup methodology has been embraced by Pop. Bonus, RJ loves to run, and could play third wheel to Ellis and Curry.

Nelson's not with GS anymore. Nobody's going to do the Spurs any favors, though I wish they would.


NJ. Rod Thorn is a dick so it probably wouldn't happen, but I'd happily trade for Outlaw.

Rod Thorn isn't with NJ anymore if I remember right. I think they'd rather have a cheaper Outlaw. Besides, the whole reason RJ opted out was because he thought he'd get more money from NJ. If they had wanted him, he'd be in NJ already.


Orlando. Way over the cap and have $30 million tied up at the PG position :lol This would sound crazy, but I'd actually be okay with the Spurs swapping RJ for a slightly higher paid Hedo Turkoglu and hoping the guy can find the magic again from his last deep playoff run. Or maybe a Jameer/Brandon Bass for RJ/Hill swap (still saves a little cash for them).

As sick as I was of Hedo's choking garbage in the playoffs . . . this could work. I'd take Hedo over RJ, sick as that makes me feel. This might actually be doable with Hill and/or Blair included.


Philly. Only if we could get Brand from them. Another play for cap savings here (for them, not us).


Brand had a very good season and Doug Collins LOVES him. Jefferson meanwhile is worthless trash.


Washington. Hold your nose, send them RJ, Bonner, and Dice's contract for Rashard Lewis and hope he has two more serviceable years left while you're paying him $45 million.

I'm pessimistic that the Wizards would do it.

But if they would do it I would hope the Spurs would too, even with Hill and/or Blair thrown in. Lewis combines the awful PF 3-point bricking of Bonner with the soft, lazy SF garbage of Jefferson.

Which would be better in one body on the court than two.

I'm all for it.

Man In Black
04-30-2011, 03:57 AM
He looks like this porn star girl right here:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_sDGqgInrAPc/S9Pe-0pB7UI/AAAAAAAABQo/-09sHKgYpKQ/s1600/Nikki+Fairchild.jpg

I'm of the opinion that she could post him up and he'd back away.

Harry Callahan
04-30-2011, 08:14 AM
Jefferson is stealing money from SA. If it looked like he gave a crap about this team, he'd be in a better position.

He was worse than I could have imaged in 2011 after he was pretty good the first couple of months this season.

What a waste. Mr. Holt does not like paying non-contributors like RJ an above average salary.

I'm afraid he'll be back next year along with Bonner, who's offensive contributions are more that offset by his lack of defense. This series just pointed that out.

Right now, the Spurs would be best served by shedding salary of non-hackers and gearing up for a lottery pick in 2012 (if there is a season).

spurspokesman
04-30-2011, 08:25 AM
:lol @ Air Gay....that's actually a suitable nick name for him.
ive called him r gay for the longest. nice 1up:toast

spurspokesman
04-30-2011, 08:40 AM
RJ only looked great in nj because of kidd

DieHardSpursFan1537
04-30-2011, 10:25 AM
I'd just prefer if he got traded because he has shown such little life in his 2 seasons at San Antonio. But I highly doubt we'll actually trade him.

wildbill2u
04-30-2011, 11:50 AM
Absolutely blanked off the stat sheet for last two games and three of the games in the playoffs were among his lowest scoring games in his career.

And folks think Bonner choked. At least Bonner was out busing his butt and trying. RJ played like a dog without fire or effort. Three more years!

superbigtime
04-30-2011, 12:21 PM
RJ was far from a difference maker this year. Great start the first month followed by steady decline in productivity and ending up as a huge disappointment. I am more disappointed in him than anyone and that might even include Pop. I've thought Pop is a moron since 06, and I expected him to fuck it up this year. But RJ really had me fooled. I remember how excited I was when the Spurs traded for him (hoping that Bruce would return), he had his shitty first year but I gave him a pass. His monstrous contract was unsettling, but given circumstances at the time seemed acceptable. It is now clear that he is a nice guy, but a perennial underachiever who cannot produce when it counts. I put some blame on Pop on RJ's play too. RC and Pop fucked this organization with that four year deal, along with Bonner's. RJ is too talented to suck this bad. Hopefully somebody wants him.

Man In Black
04-30-2011, 12:34 PM
He's mental. He has no fortitude.

He looks like this chick and he plays like one in a C level youth league.
http://a2.l3-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/23/daeff7a86cfa4dab800ff0d52afed953/m.jpg