FBI re-opens Hillary Email investigation

[Winehole23]

Damn son

1011423708651687936Mike Pompeo called Julian Assange a "hostile non-state intelligence agency," what's your take, Chris?

[Reck]

Why's he a bad guy?

Besides running from rape charges (which by the way have now been dropped) he’s basically a tool for Russia and their misinformation campaign.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-did-wikileaks-become-associated-with-russia/

They used to do good work before they sold themselves.

[Chucho]

Besides running from rape charges (which by the way have now been dropped) he’s basically a tool for Russia and their misinformation campaign.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-did-wikileaks-become-associated-with-russia/

They used to do good work before they sold themselves.

Oh shit, didn't know he was accused of being a Cosby.

[Spurtacular]

:cry Assange :cry

#StillWithHer

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

Besides running from rape charges (which by the way have now been dropped)

Cos they were bull shit to make idiots like you think he's a terrible person even though you're not all that worried about rapist in the first place.

[Spurtacular]

Why's he a bad guy?

He told the truth about Hillary.

[Spurtacular]

After surrendering, derp tries repeating his new buzzword after being called out for using the old ones.

And still won't name a crime, defending Hillary Rodham Clinton to the death.

It's astounding what a huge influence we have on you.

lol

Not mere "buzzwords", sorry. You obviously have a pathological disorder. The people in your life could even be in real danger. Tests would have to be conducted to know to what extent.

[Pavlov]

No, you obviously have a pathological disorder. The people in your life could even be in real danger. Tests would have to be conducted to know to what extent.lol derp lashing out

[Spurtacular]

:depressed

If you should stop posting here, I think we'll all know why. :lol

[Pavlov]

If you should stop posting here, I think we'll all know why. :lol
Oh? What's that?

Do tell.

[Spurtacular]

Oh? What's that?

Do tell.

I diagnosed your condition. Feel free to extrapolate.

[Pavlov]

I diagnosed your condition. Feel free to extrapolate.

Damn, you even backed down from that?

lol poor derp

[Pavlov]

:lmao derp even had to edit his back down post.

[Spurtacular]

Damn

Get help before you hurt someone, honestly though.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao derp even had to edit his back down post.

Unraveling won't get you well.

[Pavlov]

Get help before you hurt someone, honestly though.

Is that what you say is going to happen, derp?

Step up.

[Pavlov]

Unraveling won't get you well. I'm mocking you, derp.

[Spurtacular]

Is that what you say is going to happen, derp?

Step up.

I don't need to be putting ideas into your pathological head.

[Spurtacular]

https://i.imgflip.com/2cw5yn.jpg

You do a lot of cuck Blake (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=3460) level posting like this, tbh. :lmao

[TSA]

Damn son

1011423708651687936

Comey didn’t want the Russia hacked the DNC story to crumble.

“Not included in the written proffer was an additional offer from Assange: He was willing to discuss technical evidence ruling out certain parties in the controversial leak of Democratic Party emails to WikiLeaks during the 2016 election. The U.S. government believes those emails were hacked by Russia; Assange insists they did not come from Moscow.

"Mr. Assange offered to provide technical evidence and discussion regarding who did not engage in the DNC releases," Waldman told me. "Finally, he offered his technical expertise to the U.S. government to help address what he perceived as clear flaws in security systems that led to the loss of the U.S. cyber weapons program."

[Chris]

Mike Pompeo called Julian Assange a "hostile non-state intelligence agency," what's your take, Chris?

That's factually incorrect. He specifically said WikiLeaks. As for my take on Assange, he's no angel.

[Chris]

Comey didn’t want the Russia hacked the DNC story to crumble.

“Not included in the written proffer was an additional offer from Assange: He was willing to discuss technical evidence ruling out certain parties in the controversial leak of Democratic Party emails to WikiLeaks during the 2016 election. The U.S. government believes those emails were hacked by Russia; Assange insists they did not come from Moscow.

"Mr. Assange offered to provide technical evidence and discussion regarding who did not engage in the DNC releases," Waldman told me. "Finally, he offered his technical expertise to the U.S. government to help address what he perceived as clear flaws in security systems that led to the loss of the U.S. cyber weapons program."

Yup. Assange was in talks with the DOJ to testify.

[Pavlov]

You do a lot of cuck Blake (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=3460) level posting like this, tbh. :lmao
You just countered with a fabbs meme.

lol

[Pavlov]

Comey didn’t want the Russia hacked the DNC story to crumble.

“Not included in the written proffer was an additional offer from Assange: He was willing to discuss technical evidence ruling out certain parties in the controversial leak of Democratic Party emails to WikiLeaks during the 2016 election. The U.S. government believes those emails were hacked by Russia; Assange insists they did not come from Moscow.

"Mr. Assange offered to provide technical evidence and discussion regarding who did not engage in the DNC releases," Waldman told me. "Finally, he offered his technical expertise to the U.S. government to help address what he perceived as clear flaws in security systems that led to the loss of the U.S. cyber weapons program."


Yup. Assange was in talks with the DOJ to testify.
So what's stopping him now?

[Spurtacular]

You just countered with a fabbs meme.

lol

You just salty that you got called out proper on your abundance of shitty posts. :lmao

[Pavlov]

You just salty that you got called out proper on your abundance of shitty posts. :lmao
No, I just told you that you copied fabbs.

I didn't think you could get any more pathetic. You proved me wrong.
:bobo

[Spurtacular]

No, I just told you that you copied fabbs.

I didn't think you could get any more pathetic. You proved me wrong.
:bobo

You copying cuck Blake's style. :lmao

[Pavlov]

You copying cuck Blake's style. :lmaoActually TSA is more likely to bobo a reply. I'd much rather be accused of ripping off either compared to fabbs.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Actually TSA is more likely to bobo a reply. I'd much rather be accused of ripping off either compared to fabbs.

lol

Of course. You emulate cucks at the end of the day. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Of course. You emulate cucks at the end of the day. :lmaoYou called TSA a cuck?

lol OK

[Spurtacular]

You called TSA a cuck?

lol OK

You're trying to talk circles around the fact that you were posting at a cuck Blake level. :lmao

[Pavlov]

You're trying to talk circles around the fact that you were posting at a cuck Blake level. :lmaosame ol derp crutches

lol

[Blake]

same ol derp crutches

lol

I hope he'll be including this fabbs go-to move into his everyday repertoire

[Spurtacular]

Oh, look. Your cuck mentor is supporting you, chump. :lmao

[Winehole23]

That's factually incorrect. He specifically said WikiLeaks. As for my take on Assange, he's no angel.Hair splitting. Julian Assange is the CEO and founder of Wikileaks.

What's preventing him from testifying now?

[Blake]

Oh, look. Your cuck mentor is supporting you, chump. :lmao

I'm actually encouraging you, derp

[Winehole23]

Damn son

1011423708651687936the tweet and you both fail to mention that Comey's attempt failed


Waldman couldn’t believe a U.S. senator and the FBI chief were sending a different signal, so he went back to Laufman, who assured him the negotiations were still on. “What Laufman said to me after he heard I was told to ‘stand down’ by Warner and Comey was, ‘That’s bullshit. You are not standing down and neither am I,’” Waldman recalled.http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/394036-How-Comey-intervened-to-kill-Wikileaks-immunity-deal

[TSA]

the tweet and you both fail to mention that Comey's attempt failed

http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/394036-How-Comey-intervened-to-kill-Wikileaks-immunity-deal

But the source acknowledges that Warner consulted Comey and passed along the “stand down” instructions to Waldman: “That did happen.”

Multiple sources tell me the FBI’s counterintelligence team was aware and engaged in the Justice Department’s strategy but could not explain what motivated Comey to send a different message around the negotiations through Warner. A lawyer for Comey did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

While the negotiations survived the Warner-Comey intervention, the episode sowed distrust in Assange’s camp.

“The constructive, principled discussions with DOJ that occurred over nearly two months were complicated by the confusing ‘stand down’ message,” Waldman recalled.

[Pavlov]

But the source acknowledges that Warner consulted Comey and passed along the “stand down” instructions to Waldman: “That did happen.”

Multiple sources tell me the FBI’s counterintelligence team was aware and engaged in the Justice Department’s strategy but could not explain what motivated Comey to send a different message around the negotiations through Warner. A lawyer for Comey did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

While the negotiations survived the Warner-Comey intervention, the episode sowed distrust in Assange’s camp.

“The constructive, principled discussions with DOJ that occurred over nearly two months were complicated by the confusing ‘stand down’ message,” Waldman recalled.Nothing stopping the Trump DOJ from giving him full immunity for nothing.

[Spurtacular]

I'm actually encouraging you, derp

Cuck making stuff up.

[Spurtacular]

Waiting until 10 days before the election when Trump desperately needs a swing. Rigged, corrupt FBI.

And then.... Post November 8, 2016, FBI good now. :lmao

[spurraider21]

And then.... Post November 8, 2016, FBI good now. :lmao
That was sarcasm you dumb fuck

[Spurtacular]

That was sarcasm you dumb fuck

No, you had more than one post like that that you were lashing out against the FBI for re-opening the investigation 10 days before the election. And you were using the words rigged and corrupt.

:lmao Nice try, chump lite.

[Pavlov]

No, you had more than one post like that that you were lashing out against the FBI for re-opening the investigation 10 days before the election. And you were using the words rigged and corrupt.

:lmao Nice try, chump lite.lol derp doesn't understand anything despite his hours of late night research.

[Chris]

1025119610939625476

[Pavlov]

1025119610939625476And no one is going to read any of them.

:lol

[Chris]

I'm not going to read any of them. Hillary did nothing wrong!

[Pavlov]

How many have you read, Chris?

[spurraider21]

No, you had more than one post like that that you were lashing out against the FBI for re-opening the investigation 10 days before the election. And you were using the words rigged and corrupt.

:lmao Nice try, chump lite.
the "corrupt, rigged" language was tongue in cheek

[Spurtacular]

the "corrupt, rigged" language was tongue in cheek

Lite, you put more than one post with the same language in a non-joking manner.

But, so you're saying it was perfectly okay for the FBI to reopen the investigation ten days before the election?

[Pavlov]

Lite, you put more than one post with the same language in a non-joking manner.

But, so you're saying it was perfectly okay for the FBI to reopen the investigation ten days before the election?Derp, you're being incredibly stupid here.

Even more than usual.

He's saying the re-opening of the case hurt Clinton -- and that blows any thought the FBI was working for Clinton out of the water.

[koriwhat]

Derp, you're being incredibly stupid here.

Even more than usual.

He's saying the re-opening of the case hurt Clinton -- and that blows any thought the FBI was working for Clinton out of the water.

i think your side of losers believes such nonsense. i fucking hated the bitch prior to to campaign run and i know a bunch others who did too. i also didn't vote even after the case was reopened. it's just a cop out to claim that's what made her lose the presidential seat. she's a hack and most of us saw right through her bs years ago.

[Pavlov]

i think your side of losers believes such nonsense. i fucking hated the bitch prior to to campaign run and i know a bunch others who did too. i also didn't vote even after the case was reopened. it's just a cop out to claim that's what made her lose the presidential seat. she's a hack and most of us saw right through her bs years ago.Thank you for that show of emotion.

[koriwhat]

Thank you for that show of emotion.

so i reply and your only response is "emotion...."? every fucking time? yall claim everyone is a nazi but yall but stifling conversation with your shtick of "emotion..." when i simply replied is fascism. you don't like what i say and you have no rebuttal so you claim what you claim to try and shut me up. there's no back and forth with those like you because you're a bitch straight up.

[Pavlov]

so i reply and your only response is "emotion...."? every fucking time? yall claim everyone is a nazi but yall but stifling conversation with your shtick of "emotion..." when i simply replied is fascism. you don't like what i say and you have no rebuttal so you claim what you claim to try and shut me up. there's no back and forth with those like you because you're a bitch straight up.I encourage you to post more emotional outbursts.

[Chris]

I encourage you to post more emotional outbursts.

Pavlov trollin'.

[koriwhat]

I encourage you to post more emotional outbursts.

you're such a bitch pavTHETIC and even you know it's true.

[Pavlov]

you're such a bitch pavTHETIC and even you know it's true.As long as you know I'm not trying to shut you up.

[koriwhat]

As long as you know I'm not trying to shut you up.

So emotional. I encourage you to post more emotional outbursts.

[Pavlov]

So emotional. I encourage you to post more emotional outbursts.What derogatory names would you like me to call you?

[koriwhat]

What derogatory names would you like me to call you?

Man you're so emotional pavTHETIC. why is that?

[Monostradamus]

It’s pretty funny whenever kw tries to use someone’s schtick against them, but fails miserably because he’s stupid :lol

fat jokes incoming.

[dabom]

1025119610939625476


And no one is going to read any of them.

:lol

:lmao

[Chris]

1062872603713589248

[Spurtacular]

1062872603713589248

Chumpettes not gonna like this. :lol

[Pavlov]

Chumpettes not gonna like this. :lolI'm fine with it.

Sorry, derp.

[Spurtacular]

I'm fine with it.

Sorry, derp.

You're not a chumpette.

:lmao Compulsive sociopath

[Pavlov]

You're not a chumpette.

:lmao Compulsive sociopathYou named them for me, correct?

[Spurtacular]

You named them for me, correct?

Correct.

[Pavlov]

Correct.And you named them that because you claim they say the same things I say, correct?

[Spurtacular]

And you named them that because you claim they say the same things I say, correct?

We gonna be hitting a point any time soon?

[Pavlov]

We gonna be hitting a point any time soon?Right after you answer this yes or no question, derp.

And you named them that because you claim they say the same things I say, correct?

Yes or no.

[spurraider21]

Chumpettes not gonna like this. :lol
nothings wrong with it. im just curious as to the number of further responses she has to give

[Spurtacular]

Right after you answer this yes or no question, derp.

And you named them that because you claim they say the same things I say, correct?

Yes or no.

You're like gremlins. The differences are subtle. Blake is a the dumber cuck gremlin. Reck is the one in the dress and big bright red lipstick. But otherwise about the same....

[Reck]

This is what's going to happen:

Hillary's army of attorneys get this request, they answer it with the automatic canned responses that has been well established and that's the end. She won't even be consulted about it most likely. :lol

[ElNono]

This is the 2nd best that can happen to the Democratic party, tbh... the best is Shillary getting thrown in jail...

[Pavlov]

You're like gremlins. The differences are subtle. Blake is a the dumber cuck gremlin. Reck is the one in the dress and big bright red lipstick. But otherwise about the same....And you named them that because you claim they say the same things I say, correct?

Yes or no.

[The Closer]

This is what's going to happen:

Hillary's army of attorneys get this request, they answer it with the automatic canned responses that has been well established and that's the end. She won't even be consulted about it most likely. :lol

See the 10 hours of testimony. :lol

[Chris]

Chumpettes not gonna like this. :lol

1062759067867848704

:lol

[Pavlov]

1062759067867848704

:lollol keep hope alive!

[spurraider21]

This is what's going to happen:

Hillary's army of attorneys get this request, they answer it with the automatic canned responses that has been well established and that's the end. She won't even be consulted about it most likely. :lol
well she'd have to sign a verification that each of the answers are true and correct to her best knowledge under penalty of perjury... so typically the attorneys will prepare it but give the client an opportunity to read over the responses and make sure they look fine

[ElNono]

well she'd have to sign a verification that each of the answers are true and correct to her best knowledge under penalty of perjury... so typically the attorneys will prepare it but give the client an opportunity to read over the responses and make sure they look fine

- Don't recall

- Don't recall

- Don't recall

- Don't recall

Looks good to me

[Spurtacular]

And you named them that because you claim they say the same things I say, correct?

Yes or no.

That's one way of looking at it.

[Pavlov]

That's one way of looking at it.:lol you even run away from your own attempts at insults.

derp

[Spurtacular]

:lol you even run away from your own attempts at insults.

derp

Pav not getting the setup he wants :cry

[Pavlov]

Pav not getting the setup he wants :cryYou ran away again. That's all anyone can expect from you.:lol

[Spurtacular]

:cry You didn''t lob it over the plate, daddy. :cry

:lol

[Pavlov]

:lol:lmao you're actually proud of being afraid of me.

[DMC]

:lmao you're actually proud of being afraid of me.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/0724cf4adf22ca687f346553b3a9842b/tenor.gif

[koriwhat]

:lmao you're actually proud of being afraid of me.

i doubt spurtacular is afraid of you. shit, i doubt anyone is afraid of you tbh.

[Pavlov]

https://media1.tenor.com/images/0724cf4adf22ca687f346553b3a9842b/tenor.gif:lol fat.

[Pavlov]

i doubt spurtacular is afraid of you. shit, i doubt anyone is afraid of you tbh.You duck out on almost as many simple questions as he does.

I don't know what you guys are afraid of; only that you are afraid.

[koriwhat]

You duck out on almost as many simple questions as he does.

I don't know what you guys are afraid of; only that you are afraid.

no one is afraid and definitely not of you.

i think you're a bitch and with that being said i will go back and forth with you when i like and not when you demand me to. i don't give one fuck about you or your demands tbh.

as well, you claim i don't answer your questions but you choose not to accept my answers so it's really not my fault that you're fucking slow. i've grown tired of your shtick and your ego and don't give a fuck what you ask of me anymore.

as far as i'm concerned, you're just another loser with an ego that doesn't match his weak and brittle spine that's almost non-existent.

[Pavlov]

no one is afraid and definitely not of you.

i think you're a bitch and with that being said i will go back and forth with you when i like and not when you demand me to. i don't give one fuck about you or your demands tbh.

as well, you claim i don't answer your questions but you choose not to accept my answers so it's really not my fault that you're fucking slow. i've grown tired of your shtick and your ego and don't give a fuck what you ask of me anymore.

as far as i'm concerned, you're just another loser with an ego that doesn't match his weak and brittle spine that's almost non-existent.I make no demands.

I just like watching you lose your shit so easily then deny it.

[koriwhat]

I make no demands.

I just like watching you lose your shit so easily then deny it.

no one is losing their shit over anything you have to say pussy. every reply is deemed a meltdown or angry or whatever when in reality you're just wanting to pat yourself on the back. you think we all haven't noticed this by now? we're not all fucking retards like you.

[Pavlov]

no one is losing their shit over anything you have to say pussy. every reply is deemed a meltdown or angry or whatever when in reality you're just wanting to pat yourself on the back. you think we all haven't noticed this by now? we're not all fucking retards like you.No, not every reply.

A lot of your replies are meltdowns though.

Sorry.

[koriwhat]

No, not every reply.

A lot of your replies are meltdowns though.

Sorry.

not one pertaining to you. like i said, your ego plays games with you and since you're already playing make believe as a "man" then it's not too far fetched that you'd believe you're getting people to "meltdown" on the internet over anything your pussy ass has to say here.

[Pavlov]

not one pertaining to you. like i said, your ego plays games with you and since you're already playing make believe as a "man" then it's not too far fetched that you'd believe you're getting people to "meltdown" on the internet over anything your pussy ass has to say here.And yet, there you are.

lol kori

[koriwhat]

And yet, there you are.

lol kori

another reply, another meltdown.... right? that's how it works huh? lmao at your tally of make believe brownie points you've acquired. shove them all up your ass faggot!

[Pavlov]

another reply, another meltdown.... right? that's how it works huh? lmao at your tally of make believe brownie points you've acquired. shove them all up your ass faggot!Well, when you get on these streaks of spewing rants about me that have nothing at all to do with the thread topic -- it's pretty strong evidence you're melting down.

Sorry.

lol kori

[koriwhat]

Well, when you get on these streaks of spewing rants about me that have nothing at all to do with the thread topic -- it's pretty strong evidence you're melting down.

Sorry.

lol kori

where's the rants at exactly? i'm merely replying to you with a couple sentences each time. you're a bitch who's a bitch in real life too. we get it pavTheFag.

btw, from here on out i'll just refer to all your replies to me as meltdowns too. we'll make it a level playing field.

[Pavlov]

where's the rants at exactly? i'm merely replying to you with a couple sentences each time. you're a bitch who's a bitch in real life too. we get it pavTheFag.That's a rant that has nothing to do with the thread topic right there.

Now count all the others like that up for yourself.

lol kori

[koriwhat]

That's a rant that has nothing to do with the thread topic right there.

Now count all the others like that up for yourself.

lol kori

if this is what you want to propose then we'd have to do the same with you... your track record says you better shut the fuck up because your foot is already in your cocksucking mouth.

[Pavlov]

if this is what you want to propose then we'd have to do the same with you... your track record says you better shut the fuck up because your foot is already in your cocksucking mouth.Ok, do the same for me. I'll certainly reply to your rants.

[Chris]

1064679820766965760


tick tock

[Chris]

1064722658812514306

[Pavlov]

1064679820766965760


tick tockIf JW says it's a major scandal, it's definitely a nothingburger.

[Chris]

:cry#StillWithHer:cry

[Pavlov]

:cry
What is Hillary going to be charged with, Chris?

Call your shot.

I say there will be no charges.

[Chris]

What is Hillary going to be charged with, Chris?

Call your shot.

I say there will be no charges.

I predict Trump will continue to drain the swamp particularly the FBI and the DOJ before throwing the book at Hillary. Then we can see what sticks if it hasn't been destroyed with BleachBit.

[Spurtacular]

What is Hillary going to be charged with, Chris?

Call your shot.

I say there will be no charges.

Happy times for a Hillary sperm shielder, eh?

[Pavlov]

Happy times for a Hillary sperm shielder, eh?What crimes do you say she committed, derp?

[Pavlov]

I predict Trump will continue to drain the swamp particularly the FBI and the DOJ before throwing the book at Hillary. Then we can see what sticks if it hasn't been destroyed with BleachBit.throw the book at her for what?

[Chris]

Happy times for a Hillary sperm shielder, eh?

She might run again. Pavlov is torn on whether to #StillWithHer or get on the Beto bandwagon :lol

[Pavlov]

She might run again. Pavlov is torn on whether to #StillWithHer or get on the Beto bandwagon :lolNah. Glad they both trigger you tho.

[Chris]

throw the book at her for what?

Conspiracy to conceal documents from government computers

Espionage

Perjury

That's just the emails. Her past is sordid and riddled with dead witnesses.

[Chris]

Nah. Glad they both trigger you tho.

Who are you rooting for? Call your shot.

[ElNono]

Conspiracy to conceal documents from government computers

Espionage

Perjury

That's just the emails. Her past is sordid and riddled with dead witnesses.

https://media.tenor.com/images/ee723f8c27888ee75a2f4a56447081bf/tenor.gif

[Pavlov]

https://media.tenor.com/images/ee723f8c27888ee75a2f4a56447081bf/tenor.gif:lol

[Spurtacular]

:lol

Hillary sperm shielder delighted. :lol

[Chris]

Who are you rooting for? Call your shot.


http://i66.tinypic.com/243hwzb.jpg

[ElNono]

I don't get the hate for Shillary, tbh, is like libs being consistently triggered by Mitt Romney... her ugly ass basically handed them back the executive....

[djohn2oo8]

Conspiracy to conceal documents from government computers


Can you point me to this criminal statute?

[Chris]

Can you point me to this criminal statute?

Up to 3 years in prison and no, find it yourself.

[djohn2oo8]

Up to 3 years in prison and no, find it yourself.
What criminal statute is that the sentence for?

[Pavlov]

Who are you rooting for? Call your shot.

The eventual Democratic candidate.

[boutons_deux]

Can you point me to this criminal statute?

any port in the Repug shit storm

[Chris]

The eventual Democratic candidate.

This is you tapping out.

[Pavlov]

This is you tapping out.This is me saying I will support the eventual Democratic candidate.

[Chris]

1065049858808123393

Lawdy!

[Reck]

1065049858808123393

Lawdy!

:lol getting your hopes up.

[Pavlov]

1065049858808123393

Lawdy!So Huber won't be undercover?

lol Chris

[Will Hunting]

Conspiracy to conceal documents from government computers.
:lmao made up criminal charges

[Chris]

:lmao made up criminal charges

no :lmao

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Records_Act

Here's your sign ; )

[Chris]

1065335307372032000

[Pavlov]

1065335307372032000No.

[spurraider21]

http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/2817947/billbored.gif

[Will Hunting]

no :lmao

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Records_Act

Here's your sign ; )
Not seeing anything regarding the criminal charges you claim exist.

[Chris]

Not seeing anything regarding the criminal charges you claim exist.

3 years per document; look it up

[Will Hunting]

3 years per document; look it up
Why not give me a link?

[Chris]

1065234584189710336

[Will Hunting]

https://www.justice.gov/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1663-protection-government-property-protection-public-records-and

If you’re referring to this, Hillary isn’t guilty of that. Being a reckless idiot who wanted to use her personal email for convenience doesn’t exactly meet the requirement to show willful intent.

Im also confused how she’s guilty of a “conspiracy”. Who else was involved in this conspiracy?

[Pavlov]

1065234584189710336Obama looks really chill tbh.

Why is Mitchell nervously spouting new conspiracy theories like Trump intentionally lost the house to pwn the Dems?

[Chris]

Obama looks really chill tbh.

:lmao

[ElNono]

talking about conspiratard loons...

[Pavlov]

:lmao
https://ewedit.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/gettyimages-917650632.jpg

lol Chris

[Chris]

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bookwormroom.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F12%2FObama-looking-stupid.jpg&f=1
“The reason we don't invest in climate change policies is because we are still confused, blind, shrouded with hate, anger, racism — mommy issues.”

[Pavlov]

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bookwormroom.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F12%2FObama-looking-stupid.jpg&f=1
“The reason we don't invest in climate change policies is because we are still confused, blind, shrouded with hate, anger, racism — mommy issues.”lol Chris massively triggered by the mommy issues line.

[djohn2oo8]

https://www.justice.gov/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1663-protection-government-property-protection-public-records-and

If you’re referring to this, Hillary isn’t guilty of that. Being a reckless idiot who wanted to use her personal email for convenience doesn’t exactly meet the requirement to show willful intent.

Im also confused how she’s guilty of a “conspiracy”. Who else was involved in this conspiracy? Chris

[Chris]

That's obvious. :lol

The DNC and Paul Combetta of Platte River Networks. Also God knows who else. You'll find Paul pleaded the 5th.

[ElNono]

Pleading the 5th is no admission of guilt.

[Chris]

1065418563031363584

[AaronY]

If you’re referring to this, Hillary isn’t guilty of that. Being a reckless idiot who wanted to use her personal email for convenience doesn’t exactly meet the requirement to show willful intent.

Im also confused how she’s guilty of a “conspiracy”. Who else was involved in this conspiracy?
The deepstate silly.

And if this doesnt reek of Soros I dont know what does

[Chris]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DskNrSuU0AAkr15.jpg:large

[Chris]

1066793504804913152

tick tock

[Pavlov]

1066793504804913152

tick tock:lol what are the donations to the Trump Foundation these days?

[Spurs Homer]

1066793504804913152

tick tock

This must be what happens when you are open to your financial records being made public.

Thank god our president opened his and we are able to see how squeaky clean his finances are...


oh shit - wait!

[Chris]

Double Trump ding for Team #StillWithHer

[Chris]

1064956970724151297

:lmao

[Reck]

We all know you already bought tickets to that, Chris.

[Pavlov]

Double Trump ding for Team #StillWithHerSorry, Chris -- it's the Trump Foundation that is involved in an actual court case.

Did you even know that?

[Spurtacular]

1064956970724151297

:lmao

:lmao Hillary piggybacking

[Chris]

1066858262925111298
1066859042038038528
1066860115540799489
1066861793304289280
1066863188745117697
1066865025787277312
1066866093048954880
1066867023983140865

[Spurs Homer]

1066858262925111298
1066859042038038528
1066860115540799489
1066861793304289280
1066863188745117697
1066865025787277312
1066866093048954880
1066867023983140865


Criminals projecting their crimes onto others - again.

[boutons_deux]

Trump adviser stuns Fox News' Chris Wallace by admitting there's a ‘vast right-wing conspiracy’ against the Clintons

“Chris, there was an effort by the conservative movement to undermine President Clinton.”

the former deputy campaign manager of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential run admitted that

conservatives engaged in a “vast right-wing conspiracy” to undermine the Clintons just as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton charged.

“There is a vast left-wing conspiracy that has been going on since the president [Trump] won this election,” :lol :lol

David Bossie, it should be noted, was behind the Citizens United case, which was based on a movie attacking Hillary Clinton.

https://www.alternet.org/watch-trump-adviser-stuns-fox-news-chris-wallace-admitting-theres-vast-right-wing-conspiracy-against

Bossie, an ultimate Repug insider and hero for C-U

All the shit Repugs have thrown at since early 90s, and are throwing at the Clintons was all fabricated, slanderous bullshit paid for by the oligarchy.

And it worked, First Black President impeached, and Hillary/emails lost to an orange criminal turn.

[Chris]

:lmao Hillary piggybacking

1067637779587391488

:lmao

[ElNono]

http://i63.tinypic.com/2di3ynd.jpg

http://i66.tinypic.com/fteg69.jpg

Yeah, looks pretty dead...

Reminds me of the last presidential inauguration, tbh...

[Spurtacular]

1067637779587391488

:lmao

:lmao Starting their get the USA better tour in Canada.

[Chris]

:lmao Starting their get the USA better tour in Canada.

1067852242299088897

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

1067852242299088897

:lmao

:lmao The 2020 Democratic nominee.

[Chris]

1067993452896382981

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F26n6xBp xNXExDfuKc%2Fgiphy.gif&f=1

[Pavlov]

1067993452896382981

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F26n6xBp xNXExDfuKc%2Fgiphy.gif&f=1How big are the team and budget, Chris?

[Chris]

How big are the team and budget, Chris?

Huge.

[Pavlov]

Huge.How huge?

Give us the numbers -- the team and the budget.

[Chris]

1068349717132861440

[Pavlov]

1068349717132861440Sounds like he isn't a whistleblower at all and just has a bunch of documents he shouldn't have tbh.

[Spurtacular]

Sounds like he isn't a whistleblower at all and just has a bunch of documents he shouldn't have tbh.


“The [whistleblower act] authorizes employees of contractors to take government property and give it to the two intelligence committees confidentially,” Socarras told TheDCNF.

[Pavlov]

If the complaint is found credible, the law protecting whistleblowers, which covers employees of government contractors, requires the IG to share such information with the attorney general — who at the time was Jeff Sessions.
Sounds like it wasn't found credible.

[Chris]

1068725504537186309

https://media.giphy.com/media/rl0FOxdz7CcxO/giphy.gif

[Pavlov]

1068725504537186309

https://media.giphy.com/media/rl0FOxdz7CcxO/giphy.gif

Was it the same guy the FBI raided?

[Spurtacular]

Was reading first six pages....

Classic tranny reck meltdown thread.

:lmao

[Chris]

1068994448258928640

[Spurs Homer]

1068994448258928640

Not too late to get Ivanka's emails - probably a lot of Saudi and Russian offers $$$ -

Hurry!

[Chris]

Not too late to get Ivanka's emails - probably a lot of Saudi and Russian offers $$$ -

Hurry!

This thread is about Hillary Clinton.

[Spurs Homer]

This thread is about Hillary Clinton.


It is also about those horrible illegal email practices, no?

About what a crook anyone who practices illegal email crimes is amirite?

[koriwhat]

It is also about those horrible illegal email practices, no?

About what a crook anyone who practices illegal email crimes is amirite?

well if you read any of the articles about ivankas emails you'd know nothing classified or of nat'l sec was compromised but we can't say the same for that bitch satan herself hrc.

both were dumb but hrc was very nefarious.

[Spurs Homer]

well if you read any of the articles about ivankas emails you'd know nothing classified or of nat'l sec was compromised but we can't say the same for that bitch satan herself hrc.

both were dumb but hrc was very nefarious.

how do we know this?
because the honest trump family tells us?

are we that stupid that we believe hrc was a crook but ivanka is just squeaky clean?

crofl

[Lonnie Walker IV]

how do we know this?
because the honest trump family tells us?

are we that stupid that we believe hrc was a crook but ivanka is just squeaky clean?

crofl

:lol

[koriwhat]

how do we know this?
because the honest trump family tells us?

are we that stupid that we believe hrc was a crook but ivanka is just squeaky clean?

crofl

you are that stupid; articles playboy... time to brush up on them comprehension skills. when did trump become a journalist(activist) btw?

[Chris]

1070090487258849280

[Pavlov]

1070090487258849280Explain how that conspiracy theory works, Chris.

In your own words, please.

[Winehole23]

anytime you see a question mark in a headline, the answer is almost certainly no.

[Chris]

anytime you see a question mark in a headline, the answer is almost certainly no.

Good thing a tweet isn't an article, and Bill Mitchell's opinion isn't a headline.

[Winehole23]

Good thing a tweet isn't an article, and Bill Mitchell's opinion isn't a headline.not newsworthy?

good to know.

[Chris]

1070776808994422786

[Pavlov]

1070776808994422786Nothingburger.

[TSA]

Nothingburger.

1070769814577254401

:lol nothingburger

[Pavlov]

1070769814577254401

:lol nothingburgerGreat, TSA.

What are you saying Clinton will be charged with?

Call your shot.

I say nothing will happen.

[Chris]

1070994718320939008

[Pavlov]

1070994718320939008Yeah, he already spoke to the FBI a year ago, Chris.

lol your hopes

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1073022134002376704?s=21
https://media1.tenor.com/images/2ea0c9c23bd1c33b0e80c31722422298/tenor.gif?itemid=3536191

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepRatcliffe/status/1075230263997882370

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/RepRatcliffe/status/1075230263997882370So why hasn't Trump's DOJ prosecuted her, Qhris?

Explain.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1075466620494077953?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1075466620494077953?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfwlol Republicans are so cowardly.

[TSA]

discovery should be interesting

FBI General Counsel Talked to Hillary Clinton’s Lawyer about Comey’s Letter on Weiner Laptop Clinton Emails

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received 215 pages of records from the U.S. Department of Justice revealing former FBI General Counsel James Baker discussed the investigation of Clinton-related emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop with Clinton’s lawyer, David Kendall. Baker then forwarded the conversation to his FBI colleagues.

The documents also further describe a previously reported quid pro quo from the Obama State Department offering the FBI more legal attaché positions if it would downgrade a redaction in an email found during the Hillary Clinton email investigation “from classified to something else.”

The newly obtained emails came in response to a May 21 order in a January 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed after the DOJ failed to respond to a December 4, 2017 FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00154)). Judicial Watch seeks:

All records of communications, including but not limited to, emails, text messages and instant chats, between FBI official Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page;
All travel requests, travel authorizations, travel vouchers and expense reports of Peter Strzok.
All travel requests, travel authorizations, travel vouchers and expense reports of Lisa Page.

On October 28, 2016, the day that Comey sent a letter to Congress regarding the FBI’s discovery that the Weiner laptop contained Clinton’s emails. Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer David Kendall, within hours, emails Baker requesting a call “ASAP” about the Comey letter. Baker describes his follow-up call to senior FBI officials:

I received the email below from David Kendall and I called him back. Before doing so I alerted DOJ via email that I would do that.

[Redacted paragraph]

He said that our letter was “tantalizingly ambiguous” and made statements that were “inchoate and highly ominous” such that what we had done was worse than transparency because it allows people to make whatever they want out to make out of the letter to the prejudice of Secretary Clinton.

I told him that I could not respond to his requests at this time but that I would discuss it with others and get back to him.

I suggest that we have some kind of follow up meeting or phone call with this group either this evening or over the weekend to address this and probably other issues/questions that come up in the next 24 hours. Sound reasonable?

Baker’s heads up on the Kendall call was sent to:

Then-Director James Comey; since fired;
Then-Associate Deputy Director David Bowdich, who later replaced Andrew McCabe as deputy director;
Michael Steinbach, the F.B.I.’s former executive assistant director for national security;
Then-Assistant Director of Counterintelligence E.W. Priestap, now retired;
James Rybicki, former chief of staff to Comey;
FBI intelligence analyst Jonathan Moffa;
Former Acting Assistant Director Jason V. Herring;
Michael Kortan, FBI assistant director for public affairs, now retired;
Former principal deputy general counsel Trisha Anderson;
Strzok and Page

The emails show that a conference call for the above senior officials was set up for the next day by Peter Strzok. (Two days before the election, on November 6, Comey sent a second letter reporting that the FBI’s review of the Weiner laptop material would not change his “conclusion” that Hillary Clinton should not be prosecuted.)

On October 13, 2016, former FBI attorney Lisa Page sent an email, which apparently references a related Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit and further discusses a previously reported quid pro quo offer from the State Department:

Jason Herring will be providing you with three 302s of current and former FBI employees who were interviewed during the course of the Clinton investigation. These 302s are scheduled to be released to Congress in an unredacted form at the end of the week, and produced (with redactions) pursuant to FOIA at the beginning of next week. As you will see, they describe a discussion about potential quid pro quo arrangement between then-DAD in IOD [deputy assistant director in International Operations Division] and an Undersecretary at the State Department whereby IOD would get more LEGAT [legal attaché] positions if the FBI could change the basis of the FOIA withhold re a Clinton email from classified to something else. [Emphasis added]

The lawsuit also forced the release of a November 6, 2016, email by then-FBI official Peter Strzok telling Bowdich, Priestap, Rybicki, Page, former FBI General Counsel James Baker and others: “[Redacted], Jon and I completed our review of all of the potential HRC work emails on the [Anthony Weiner] laptop. We found no previously unknown, potentially classified emails on the media.”

As Judicial Watch previously reported, there were at least 18 classified emails found on the Weiner laptop by the FBI. Paul Sperry’s RealClear Investigations report revealed that only 3,077 of the 340,000 emails “were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information.”

The new records also include a September 2, 2016, email that Comey forwards containing a press release issued that day by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), in which Grassley criticized the FBI for not publicly releasing many unclassified records related to the Clinton email-server investigation, as demanded by Congress. In his cover note responding to Grassley’s charge, Comey tells his top aides, “To be great is to be misunderstood.” Page then responds with, “Outstanding.”

On October 23, 2016, Strzok forwarded to Page and others the Wall Street Journal article revealing that Andrew McCabe’s wife had received a half million dollars for her Democratic state senate campaign. Page responded that the article, “shaded or omitted or mischaracterized” facts “in order to get out the story [the reporter] wanted to tell.” She claimed the WSJ story was just “another depressing chapter in this whole post-investigation saga.”

“It is big news that, just days before the presidential election, Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer pressured the top lawyer for the FBI on the infamous Weiner laptop emails,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These documents further underscore that the fix was in for Hillary Clinton. When will the Justice Department and FBI finally do an honest investigation of the Clinton email scandal?”

Last month, United States District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that discovery can begin in Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, and Clinton aides will now be deposed under oath. Senior officials — including Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, and FBI official E.W. Priestap — will now have to answer Judicial Watch’s written questions under oath. The court rejected the DOJ and State Department’s objections to Judicial Watch’s court-ordered discovery plan.(The court, in ordering a discovery plan last month, ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”) :lol

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-fbi-general-counsel-talked-to-hillary-clintons-lawyer-about-comeys-letter-on-weiner-laptop-clinton-emails/

[Trill Clinton]

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/515/105/d95.gif

[Trill Clinton]

Crazy