Dang Al Franken is a gropy creeper too

[boutons_deux]

Let the voters decide ( which is the Repug tactic for Moore )

OR

Franken resigns when Trash resigns

in fact, NO Dem should resign for sexual stuff unless Trash resigns.

[Chucho]

If the Right would condemn Moore, they'd actually have the "moral upper hand" in the whole "more sexual predators on your side" argument.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/06/gillibrand-calls-on-franken-to-resign-282112?lo=ap_a1

Franken is looking to be resigning tomorrow and pretty much all Senate Dems are calling for it.

So much for that GOP excuse for pedophilia.

[AaronY]

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/06/gillibrand-calls-on-franken-to-resign-282112?lo=ap_a1

Franken is looking to be resigning tomorrow and pretty much all Senate Dems are calling for it.

So much for that GOP excuse for pedophilia.
Should have called for it weeks ago like I was telling everyone in this thread right from the start

[rjv]

whether or not franken is the casualty of bad timing and political posturing the call to resign is the right thing to do, a place that the GOP seems to be incapable of arriving at.

[boutons_deux]

Trash remains, Moore is supported for the Senate, but Dems have to resign?

[koriwhat]

Dudes mouth looks blown out from sucking all that dick.

[koriwhat]

Trash remains, Moore is supported for the Senate, but Dems have to resign?

Lmao boohooboutons

[Chris]

Trash remains, Moore is supported for the Senate, but Dems have to resign?

Solly Cholly! You picked the wrong team :lol

[Chris]

Lmao boohooboutons

:lmao

[FuzzyLumpkins]

calf tats like DMC seems fixated on homoerotic imagery. They don't seem to realize how it looks of them.

[monosylab1k]

Let the voters decide ( which is the Repug tactic for Moore )

OR

Franken resigns when Trash resigns

in fact, NO Dem should resign for sexual stuff unless Trash resigns.

Or Democrats should simply do the right thing, regardless of all the evil shit Republicans do.

[Chris]

Or Democrats should simply do the right thing, regardless of all the evil shit Republicans do.

You calling anyone evil is laughable.

[monosylab1k]

You calling anyone evil is laughable.

:lmao

[Will Hunting]

You calling anyone evil is laughable.
Why? Is he a globalist who’s paid by George Soros?

[spurraider21]

Why? Is he a globalist who’s paid by George Soros?
Also luciferian

[Will Hunting]

Also luciferian
Maybe he’s into spirit cooking and pizza restaurant basements too (not sure if that one is Chris or TSA or both)

[AaronY]

Maybe he’s into spirit cooking and pizza restaurant basements too (not sure if that one is Chris or TSA or both)
Chris thinks Bin Ladens still alive. He thinks Nicki Minaj and Serena Williams are possessed by demons he calls "Alters". Plus a vaccine truther too. Also, he likes pro wrestling. I mean the last ones not a conspiracy I just like to point it out when talking about him

[AaronY]

Grim business these "Alters"

I think it's like 60% of serial killers are former military as well? It's all about desensitizing the individual at an early age to create multiple personalities or 'alters'. You hear people like Serena Williams and Nicki Minaj talking about their other personalities. This is what they are referring to. It goes deeper though at a spiritual level - willingly letting yourself get possessed by demons and sacrificing your family members. Grim business...

[monosylab1k]

Maybe he’s into spirit cooking and pizza restaurant basements too (not sure if that one is Chris or TSA or both)

He’s the one who thinks elitists like Hillary and Obama are devil worshippers who get high by drinking the blood of raped babies.

[AaronY]

Wonder why he chose Nicki Minaj and Serena Williams like what was the deal there that made then threatening and scary? Seem like two nice girls

[Will Hunting]

Grim business these "Alters"
:lmao Jesus christ

Do you think his mommeh and daddeh know Chris spends all day in his room doing this shit?

[DarrinS]

Losing two Dems in a week. And for sexual harassment. That’s unfortunate.

[Trill Clinton]

props to the dems for not excusing this vile, demonic behavior and calling for franklin to step down.

[DarrinS]

props to the dems for not excusing this vile, demonic behavior and calling for franklin to step down.

Lol

[Trill Clinton]

dang autocorrect

[AaronY]

Alls I know is Nicki Minaj can gain sole possession of my dick if she wants it I know that much. I don't care about surgeries or the fakeness or whatever that bish is hot as fuck as far as I'm concerned

[AaronY]

Yes.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/23134bb5a5a04607ce040e07b14d7421/tenor.gif?itemid=4575931
https://assets-auto.rbl.ms/801116950453921901936cee5358f8a5130bebc63f78c12ff2 055cbde8831fcc
Would go full Al Franken on her if she came within three feet of me. Plus it would be my first three way if her alter made an appearance. I'd do some grim business on dat azz that's fa sho

[baseline bum]

He’s the one who thinks elitists like Hillary and Obama are devil worshippers who get high by drinking the blood of raped babies.

So there is a Roy Moore connection you're saying?

[AaronY]

Gd I hope Nicki Minaj makes a sex tape

[AaronY]

dang autocorrect
Who are your hottest black girls in your view? Nicki Minaj is up there right? like who else do you think

[DarrinS]

Who are your hottest black girls in your view? Nicki Minaj is up there right? like who else do you think

Maxine Waters, for sure

[koriwhat]

Maxine Waters, for sure

James brown wannabe

[AaronY]

Maxine Waters, for sure
LOL. wonder if she was hot like 90 years ago

[Trill Clinton]

Who are your hottest black girls in your view? Nicki Minaj is up there right? like who else do you think

if we're talking celebrities, then its beyonce hands down for me.

[Will Hunting]

Who are your hottest black girls in your view? Nicki Minaj is up there right? like who else do you think
Megan Good is my choice tbh.

[Trill Clinton]

Megan Good is my choice tbh.

mmmmmm yes

[Spurminator]

Maxine Waters, for sure

You sure bring her up a lot, so is there a hint of truth in the joke?

Maybe it's some kind of Freudian hate-crush?

[Trill Clinton]

for whatever reason the alt right has decided to take jabs at ms. waters every chance they get. its weird.

[Spurminator]

Anyway, the chick that slept with the eunuch in Game of Thrones is up there.

[DarrinS]

You sure bring her up a lot, so is there a hint of truth in the joke?

Maybe it's some kind of Freudian hate-crush?


:lol

[DarrinS]

Leslie Jones?

[Pavlov]

LOL. wonder if she was hot like 90 years agoTo make a contemporary reference, she looked like the child of Florence Johnston and Huggy Bear.

[Chucho]

for whatever reason the alt right has decided to take jabs at ms. waters every chance they get. its weird.

Because she's god-awful. And a hypocrite. And a poverty pimp. And a career back-peddling panderer that gets taken to task by even the most biased of Left-leaning media. It's not because she's black and It's not just the Right that finds her repugnant, she is just repugnant by nature.

[monosylab1k]

Leslie Jones?

:lol Darrin can’t seriously name one black woman he finds attractive.

[Quadzilla99]

If the Right would condemn Moore, they'd actually have the "moral upper hand" in the whole "more sexual predators on your side" argument.
Current president is more important to people than Clinton who's been out of office for almost 20 years. At least probably to swing voters

[Quadzilla99]

938464933787918336

[The Gemini Method]

Megan Good is my choice tbh. Gotta side with the Goods on this one.

[Chucho]

Current president is more important to people than Clinton who's been out of office for almost 20 years. At least probably to swing voters

I agree. I wasn't even talking Clintons though, I was talking more recent political figures, including Conyers and Franken.

[spurraider21]

Gimme Gabrielle union

[baseline bum]

I'll go with Aurora Jolie, though from ten years ago

[Chucho]

A whole lotta big-assed, big breasted sistas in the real world wreck on the famous black broads tbh.

[RandomGuy]

Should have called for it weeks ago like I was telling everyone in this thread right from the start

They did shortly after the second woman came forward.

Now both Democrats accused in Congress stepped down.

President Pussy-grabber still in office, and Pedo Roy could very well win it.

Fuck the Republican party.

[Chucho]

The Dems earning some respect doing the right thing. Time to make right the wrong of allowing Clinton to remain in office. Moore needs to be DQ'd and maybe start another investigation onto Trump about pussy grabbing. Franken being petty was lolzy, he totally didn't want to step down, again glad the Dems forced him out.

[RandomGuy]

The Dems earning some respect doing the right thing. Time to make right the wrong of allowing Clinton to remain in office. Moore needs to be DQ'd and maybe start another investigation onto Trump about pussy grabbing. Franken being petty was lolzy, he totally didn't want to step down, again glad the Dems forced him out.

"Maintaining the moral high ground isn’t always easy. It means you have to hold your party to a higher standard than the other party. It means you sometimes have to make real trade-offs. But it can also pay political dividends and mitigate political risks. Democrats just lost an election in 2016 against a historically unpopular candidate because their candidate was disliked nearly as much. The political environment is favorable for Democrats in 2018, but perhaps the easiest way that Democrats could blow their opportunity is if voters conclude that as bad as Republicans are, Democrats are no better. With Democrats coming around to a tougher stance on Franken and Conyers while Republicans equivocate on Moore and restore funding to his campaign, they’ll be able to draw a clearer distinction for voters."
-Nate Silvers

[Chucho]

"Maintaining the moral high ground isn’t always easy. It means you have to hold your party to a higher standard than the other party. It means you sometimes have to make real trade-offs. But it can also pay political dividends and mitigate political risks. Democrats just lost an election in 2016 against a historically unpopular candidate because their candidate was disliked nearly as much. The political environment is favorable for Democrats in 2018, but perhaps the easiest way that Democrats could blow their opportunity is if voters conclude that as bad as Republicans are, Democrats are no better. With Democrats coming around to a tougher stance on Franken and Conyers while Republicans equivocate on Moore and restore funding to his campaign, they’ll be able to draw a clearer distinction for voters."
-Nate Silvers

The Dems need a candidate that will appeal to everyone and not divide everyone, like we saw with both sides this past election. Don't pander, appeal. Don't pander to micro-interests and micro-minority groups, appeal to them. Don't alienate one group to capture another.

[Chucho]

That's what I want basically.

[RandomGuy]

Don't alienate one group to capture another.

Not even sure that is possible these days.

[Reck]

If the Right would condemn Moore, they'd actually have the "moral upper hand" in the whole "more sexual predators on your side" argument.

Both party are equally morally banrupt when it comes to harrassment of women so I dont think they'd get off the hook.

Besides, things like this just makes that point even harder to make for the republicans. Nevermind harboring a pedo. Then there's this.

938894073242570753

[vy65]

I'll go with Aurora Jolie, though from ten years ago

Thoughts on Misty Stone?

[Chucho]

Both party are equally morally banrupt when it comes to harrassment of women so I dont think they'd get off the hook.


I agree, I meant more in regard to the pettiness of the argument.

[baseline bum]

Thoughts on Misty Stone?

Second choice :lol

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Franken the twat
:lmao "I resign, effective not immediately"
:lmao Trump's locker room talk is same as muh sexual assault"
:lmao "I'm a champion for women"
:lmao "I am resigning cos I've done nothing wrong "

[AaronY]

:lmao Franken the twat
:lmao "I resign, effective not immediately"
:lmao Trump's locker room talk is same as muh sexual assault"
:lmao "I'm a champion for women"
:lmao "I am resigning cos I've done nothing wrong "
thats telling him

[Pavlov]

:lmao Franken the twat
:lmao "I resign, effective not immediately"
:lmao Trump's locker room talk is same as muh sexual assault"
:lmao "I'm a champion for women"
:lmao "I am resigning cos I've done nothing wrong "Do you think Trump was lying when he said he grabbed women by the pussy?

Yes or no.

[AaronY]

Do you think Trump was lying when he said he grabbed women by the pussy?

Yes or no.
its different because hes more of a star. when youre a star they let you do it no problemo

[rmt]

Why don't you guys just come out and say that harassment crosses political/racial lines? - some of you pretend that any one party is better than the other in this. Power corrupts and if someone thinks they can get away with it, they'll do it. How many centuries/decades are people getting away with stuff like this? And it's not just men, lest you call me sexist - women in positions of power probably do it so (maybe in other ways) - it's just that there are much fewer females in positions of power than males.

[SpursforSix]

Why don't you guys just come out and say that harassment crosses political/racial lines? - some of you pretend that any one party is better than the other in this. Power corrupts and if someone thinks they can get away with it, they'll do it. How many centuries/decades are people getting away with stuff like this? And it's not just men, lest you call me sexist - women in positions of power probably do it so (maybe in other ways) - it's just that there are much fewer females in positions of power than males.

Thanks hon.

[rmt]

Thanks hon.

You're welcome. That's the nicest name I've been called on this board.

[Chris]

Big difference is if Trump grabbed them by the pussy without their 'consent'. This is the difference between an alpha like Trump and the typical beta male Al Franken. Franken likes to justify his actions by comparing them to Trump and Moore, but this typical whataboutism and false equivalence that the Left fully embraces to hammer out their propaganda. Trump grabs them by the pussy and they love it :lol Franken does it while they are sleeping :lmao

[AaronY]

Big difference is if Trump grabbed them by the pussy without their 'consent'. This is the difference between an alpha like Trump and the typical beta male Al Franken. Franken likes to justify his actions by comparing them to Trump and Moore, but this typical whataboutism and false equivalence that the Left fully embraces to hammer out their propaganda. Trump grabs them by the pussy and they love it :lol Franken does it while they are sleeping :lmao
Are you a virgin, bro?

[Chris]

Are you a virgin, bro?

Shut up faggot.

[AaronY]

Shut up faggot.
Doesn't answer the question

[Pavlov]

Are you a virgin, bro?
:lmao

[Splits]

Thanks cunt.

[Spurtacular]

:cry Say it's not so, Al! :cry

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Faggots sad about Al.

[Pavlov]

:lolDo you think Trump was lying when he said he grabbed women by the pussy?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Do you think Trump was lying when he said he grabbed women by the pussy?

Yes or no.

Come to terms with your hero leaving, bruh.

[Pavlov]

Come to terms with your hero leaving, bruh.Seeing as I called for his resignation, :lol.

Do you think Trump was lying when he said he grabbed women by the pussy?

Yes or no.

[Blake]

some of you pretend that any one party is better than the other in this.

That's rich

[Clipper Nation]

Shut up faggot.
:lol So you're an incel, then.

[Pavlov]

Why don't you guys just come out and say that harassment crosses political/racial lines? - some of you pretend that any one party is better than the other in this. Power corrupts and if someone thinks they can get away with it, they'll do it. How many centuries/decades are people getting away with stuff like this? And it's not just men, lest you call me sexist - women in positions of power probably do it so (maybe in other ways) - it's just that there are much fewer females in positions of power than males.So you believe Trump's accusers?

[Chris]

:lmao Faggots sad about Al.

:lol

[rmt]

So you believe Trump's accusers?

Why do you want to know the opinion of someone you think is disingenuous?

[Chris]

:lol So you're an incel, then.

Another faggot concerned about my sex life :lol Grabbin' em by the pussy :tu

[Chris]

Why do you want to know the opinion of someone you think is disingenuous?

It's his "schtick" because he's a "troll". SAD!

[Reck]

939287243755311104

:lol DarrinS Chris

[Spurtacular]

^^^
:lmao Today's closet tranny!

[Reck]

^^^
:lmao Today's closet tranny!

Dodging. :lol

Also, trannies and shemales is all this faggot thinks about. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Why do you want to know the opinion of someone you think is disingenuous?It's a simple yes or no question of your opinion.

Do you believe Trump's accusers?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Dodging. :lol

Also, trannies and shemales is all this faggot thinks about. :lmao

Not one time have I said the term shemale.

#FreudianReveal

Would you rather that designation?

[Spurtacular]

It's a simple yes or no question of your opinion.

Do you believe Trump's accusers?

Yes or no.

On a scale of 1-10, how sad are you about Al's resignation?

[Pavlov]

On a scale of 1-10, how sad are you about Al's resignation?1.

Do you believe Trump's accusers?

Yes or no.

[Reck]

Not one time have I said the term shemale.

#FreudianReveal

Would you rather that designation?

Half your posting history is devoted to the words tranny, faggot and shemale.

Search yourself, cucktacular.

[Spurtacular]

1.


So, you have no regard for your liberal puppets, or you lie.

#ParForTheCourse

[Spurtacular]

Half your posting history is devoted to the words tranny, faggot and shemale.

Search yourself, cucktacular.

I regarded one word. Don't conflate, tranny.

[Reck]

I regarded one word. Don't conflate, tranny.

Facts are facts, pedo.

[Pavlov]

So, you have no regard for your liberal puppets, or you lie.

#ParForTheCourseYou asked, I answered.

Do you believe Trump's accusers?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

You asked, I answered.

Do you believe Trump's accusers?

Yes or no.

Why you been sperm shielding so hardcore for al?

[Pavlov]

Why you been sperm shielding so hardcore for al?I said he should resign and he resigned.

Do you believe Trump's accusers?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Facts are facts, pedo.

You're basically a retard who doesn't understand you've lost.

[Spurtacular]

I said he should resign and he resigned.

Do you believe Trump's accusers?

Yes or no.

Yet this entire thread (like evey other), you've tried to make it about your Trump (daddy) issues.

[Reck]

You're basically a retard who doesn't understand you've lost.

What did I lose?

:lol resident laughingstock #2
:lol calling anyone a retard.
:lol pedolandia

[Spurtacular]

What did I lose?

:lol resident laughingstock #2
:lol calling anyone a retard.
:lol pedolandia

Tranny Retard thinks I'm sparring wit her :lmao

[rmt]

It's a simple yes or no question of your opinion.

Do you believe Trump's accusers?

Yes or no.

That is not an answer to my question.

Look, I try to answer people's questions in good faith. I'll respond to almost any post as long as it doesn't contain vulgar language or crosses the lines. You keep asking the same questions over and over to trap people and then declare me disingenuous? I'm not going to answer your tedious questions.

[Pavlov]

That is not an answer to my question.

Look, I try to answer people's questions in good faith. I'll respond to almost any post as long as it doesn't contain vulgar language or crosses the lines. You keep asking the same questions over and over to trap people and then declare me disingenuous? I'm not going to answer your tedious questions. Your being disingenuous about facts makes no difference when I ask your opinion.

[boutons_deux]

Nixon's Dirty Trickster playing dirty 45 years later

=====================

But when it comes out in the Post that Roger Stone engineered this, and all the pieces were in plain sight, and

Leann Tweeden admits that she was actually awake in that pic, and

fully playing along with the gag,

it won’t be forgotten that “believing the women” came at the cost of examining the evidence.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/7/1722387/-So-When-It-Comes-Out-That-Tweeden-Was-a-Stone-Plant

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Franken the twat
:lmao "I resign, effective not immediately"
:lmao Trump's locker room talk is same as muh sexual assault"
:lmao "I'm a champion for women"
:lmao "I am resigning cos I've done nothing wrong "


On a scale of 1-10, how sad are you about Al's resignation?


So, you have no regard for your liberal puppets, or you lie.

#ParForTheCourse

Since you feel no sting for Al. Apparently not a fan/supporter, go ahead and follow-up on the funnies.

[Pavlov]

Since you feel no sting for Al. Apparently not a fan/supporter, go ahead and follow-up on the funnies.
wut

[Spurtacular]

wut

Nothing? Too bitter after all?

[Pavlov]

Nothing? Too bitter after all?

Oh, like all your Trent Frank jokes.

Those were hilarious!

Waiting for more of those from you!

[Spurtacular]

Oh, like all your Trent Frank jokes.

Those were hilarious!

Waiting for more of those from you!

Yea, looks like you have a bad case of butthurt after all.

:lmao "1"

[Pavlov]

Yea, looks like you have a bad case of butthurt after all.

:lmao "1"

Yep. 1.

[Spurtacular]

:cry But what about this Trent guy. Why no funnies on him, too? :cry

:lmao Butthurt

[Pavlov]

:lmao ButthurtNah. Doesn't move the needle since I wanted him to resign. Do you think your posts are funny?

[Spurtacular]

Nah. Doesn't move the needle since I wanted him to resign. Do you think your posts are funny?

You didn't want to battle against a resignation. But you never "wanted" a resignation. A little piece of you dieded.

[Pavlov]

You didn't want to battle against a resignation. But you never "wanted" a resignation. A little piece of you dieded.Nope. Wanted him to resign. That's all. Sorry to make a little piece of you die after you got so excited.

[Spurtacular]

Nope. Wanted him to resign. That's all. Sorry to make a little piece of you die after you got so excited.

You have no qualms against Franken. You were just okay with putting him on the liberal altar. But a piece of you dieded, and you can't laugh at Franken's obtuse actions in the aftermath.

[Pavlov]

You have no qualms against Franken. You were just okay with putting him on the liberal altar. But a piece of you dieded, and you can't laugh at Franken's obtuse actions in the aftermath.
I wanted him to resign and he resigned.

It's all good for me. That burns you up inside.

[Spurtacular]

I wanted him to resign and he resigned.

It's all good for me. That burns you up inside.

And for why did you "want" him to resign?

[Pavlov]

And for why did you "want" him to resign?"for why"?

:lol

To make the Republicans the party that defends and rewards sexual harassment, sexual assault and pedophilia.

[Spurtacular]

"for why"?

:lol

To make the Republicans the party that defends and rewards sexual harassment, sexual assault and pedophilia.

That's exactly what I said, genius. I said you were okay with putting him on the liberal altar and that you had no qualms against Franken.

[Pavlov]

That's exactly what I said, genius. I said you were okay with putting him on the liberal altar and that you had no qualms against Franken.It's no altar. It's strategy. Happening in Texas too. It's a gamble but zero tolerance looks like the way things are going. I think Franken would've survived whatever ethics hearing that would've transpired, but it's a new era. You're going to be dodging a lot of questions about Trump's accusers in the future, so get your deflections ready now. :lol

[Spurtacular]

:cry I want zero-tolerance now that Trump is president. :cry


:cry It's not an altar, it's a strategy. :cry

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:lmaoIt's not because Trump is president, but good luck defending all the sexual harassers, assaulters and pedophiles. Looks like you actively want to defend them tbh.

Do you actively want to defend them, Spurtacular?

[Spurtacular]

It's not because Trump is president, but good luck defending all the sexual harassers, assaulters and pedophiles. Looks like you actively want to defend them tbh.

Do you actively want to defend them, Spurtacular?

I don't have daddy issues like you. I'm not too bothered by women looking for a payoff.

[Pavlov]

I don't have daddy issues like you. I'm not too bothered by women looking for a payoff.So you're saying every accuser is lying?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

So you're saying every accuser is lying?

Yes or no.

I don't make dumb blanket answers. You should get help for your daddy issues.

[Pavlov]

I don't make dumb blanket answers.You just made a dumb blanket accusation.


I'm not too bothered by women looking for a payoff.

[Spurtacular]

You just made a dumb blanket accusation.

As tends to be the case. Doesn't mean I need to say legitimate voices shouldn't be heard. But I don't think you give a damn about legitimacy as you've pretty much presented in your zeal. Get help for your daddy issues, bruh.

[Pavlov]

As tends to be the case. That's a dumb blanket statement.
Doesn't mean I need to say legitimate voices shouldn't be heard.Which voices that accuse Trump and Moore do you consider to be legitimate?


But I don't think you give a damn about legitimacy as you've pretty much presented in your zeal.Presented where? Quote my presentation.

[Spurtacular]

^^^

You already been exposed. Take care of your daddy issues.

[Pavlov]

^^^

You already been exposed.Where?

Quote the passage.

[Spurtacular]

Where?

Quote the passage.


I'm okay with sacrificing Franken in the pursuit of the big bad Trump.

:lmao #DaddyIssues

[Pavlov]

:lol Linking fake quote. That's some desperation right there.

[Spurtacular]

:lol Linking fake quote. That's some desperation right there.

The "fake quote" doesn't contradict your position.

#Gyst

[Pavlov]

The "fake quote" doesn't contradict your position.

#GystSure it does.

Sorry I ruined your night.

You had such high hopes.

[Spurtacular]

Sure it does.

Sorry I ruined your night.

You had such high hopes.

Same fucking meaning, dickhole:


"for why"?

:lol

To make the Republicans the party that defends and rewards sexual harassment, sexual assault and pedophilia.


I'm okay with sacrificing Franken in the pursuit of the big bad Trump.

[Pavlov]

Same fucking meaning, dickhole:Nope.

Do you really say "for why" to people? Because that would be incredibly stupid -- like baby talk.

[Spurtacular]

Nope.

Do you really say "for why" to people? Because that would be incredibly stupid -- like baby talk.

Dispersion... Same meaning, dickhole.

[Pavlov]

Dispersion... Same meaning, dickhole.
Yeah, you mad.

Not the same. This is bigger than that. Only the small minded could not see that.

[Spurtacular]

^^^

Unraveled. :lmao

[Pavlov]

^^^

Unraveled. :lmaoNah, if you want to see someone unravel check out the guy melting down about attribution for an article that was fully attributed. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

Nah, if you want to see someone unravel check out the guy melting down about attribution for an article that was fully attributed. :lmao

An article interspersed with OP commentary is suddenly attribution. :lmao

[Pavlov]

An article interspersed with OP commentary is suddenly attribution. :lmaoLinking the article before posting the article has always been attribution. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

Linking the full article has always been plagiarism.

FIFY

[Pavlov]

Wait, are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Wait, are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?

Yes or no.

Having someone else write your OP for him, bruh. What you think plagiarism is? :lmao

[Pavlov]

Having someone else write your OP for him, bruh. What you think plagiarism is? :lmaoYou didn't answer the question, bruh.

Are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?

[Spurtacular]

You didn't answer the question, bruh.

Are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?

Go ask your college professors, bruh.

[Pavlov]

Go ask your college professors, bruh.:lol pretending a message board is a dissertation.

I'm asking you, bruh.

Directly.

Are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

:lol pretending a message board is a dissertation.

I'm asking you, bruh.

Directly.

Are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?

Yes or no.

So, you know it's plagiarism and you still want to ask me the same stupid question?

:lmao

#Dumbfuck

[Pavlov]

So, you know it's plagiarism and you still want to ask me the same stupid question?

:lmao

#DumbfuckNo, it wasn't plagiarism at all. I was mocking you. You couldn't discern that either.

Are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

No, it wasn't plagiarism at all. I was mocking you. You couldn't discern that either.

Are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?

Yes or no.

Yea, you were mocking me for properly verifying it was plagiarism, and then you still want to ask if it's plagiarism. I discerned all of that.

:lmao

#Dumbfuck

[Pavlov]

Yea, you were mocking me for properly verifying it was plagiarism, and then you still want to ask if it's plagiarism. I discerned all of that.

:lmao

#DumbfuckNo, I was mocking you for comparing a message board post to a college dissertation.

It's still not plagiarism and your dodging this question proves that:

Are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

No, I was mocking you for comparing a message board post to a college dissertation.

It's still not plagiarism and your dodging this question proves that:

Are you saying his linking the full article is plagiarism and doing that has always been plagiarism?

Yes or no.

I see. So, you posted full works in your college papers without fears of appraisals of plagiarism?

[Pavlov]

I see. So, you posted full works in your college papers without fears of appraisals of plagiarism?See, SpursTalk is a message board.

A message board isn't college.

A SpursTalk post isn't a college paper.

Do you see the difference?

Yes or no.

Providing a link before posting an article on a message board = not plagiarism. That's all.

[Spurtacular]

See, SpursTalk is a message board.

A message board isn't college.

A SpursTalk post isn't a college paper.

Do you see the difference?

Yes or no.

Providing a link before posting an article on a message board = not plagiarism. That's all.

So, you posted full works in your college papers without fears of appraisals of plagiarism?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

So, you posted full works in your college papers without fears of appraisals of plagiarism?

Yes or no.


See, SpursTalk is a message board.

A message board isn't college.

A SpursTalk post isn't a college paper.

Do you see the difference?

Yes or no.

Providing a link before posting an article on a message board = not plagiarism. That's all.

[AaronY]

excellent debate

[Spurtacular]

It's no altar. It's strategy. Happening in Texas too. It's a gamble but zero tolerance looks like the way things are going. I think Franken would've survived whatever ethics hearing that would've transpired, but it's a new era. You're going to be dodging a lot of questions about Trump's accusers in the future, so get your deflections ready now. :lol

Ben calling out your moral relativism to put Franken on the altar in the first minute. :lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GToZRBqu3OA

[Pavlov]

:lol mad you had a whatabout taken away.

Sorry.

[Spurtacular]

:lol mad you had a whatabout taken away.

Sorry.

That's how you operate; not something I was even worried about, bruh.

[pgardn]

Reversing course:

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/18/manchin-franken-senate-resign-300843

You know it is possible Franken does not want to go through hearings now.
Or maybe the democrats want to have a chance to bring out the Republican organization(s) that hired people to falsely accuse him and want to bring this forward. And then drag Franken along through the viable accusations. So they feign outrage while allowing Al to get grilled because they have some business to take care of with Republican hate organizations.

Politics is so nasty.

[boutons_deux]

The fake Franken takedown by dirty trickster prick Stone has the Dems suckered like they were with the fake ACORN takedown, and the Repug takedown of that black lady quoted out of context. Dems never learn OVER AND OVER AND OVER.

And there's the Repug scamming of PP, whose defunding is more Repug voluntary manslaughter for Christ.

[Blake]

Having someone else write your OP for him, bruh. What you think plagiarism is? :lmao

Lol what you think it is

[AaronY]

Finally set a date thank God (January 2nd) was beginning to worry this phaggot was gonna back out
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/20/al-franken-finally-sets-date-for-his-senate-exit.html

[pgardn]

Finally set a date thank God (January 2nd) was beginning to worry this phaggot was gonna back out
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/20/al-franken-finally-sets-date-for-his-senate-exit.html


Boots ths will tell you he is basically a good guy(D)
The only people who make power plays and think with their pants are Republicans.

[boutons_deux]

As with perennials Hillary, Obama, etc, I'm sure the rightwingnutjobs will be "What About Franken?" for years.

[AaronY]

Boots ths will tell you he is basically a good guy(D)
The only people who make power plays and think with their pants are Republicans.
One of my favorite boo meltdowns was during Hurricane Harvey when all the good deeds was happening he was literally having a nervous breakdown that people weren't recognizing that the city voted Democrat so the liberals should have been getting the brownie points and credit for the life saving deeds and heroism and such.

[boutons_deux]

Robertson is a gropy creeper, too

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/cbn_700club_dog_weddings_150219e-800x430.jpg

[boutons_deux]

White nationalists and Twitter bots fueled the war against Al Franken — and the Democrats fell for it

Agroup of fake news sites, white nationalists and far-right fake Twitter accounts were reportedly behind the campaign against Sen. Al Franken (D-MN), and Democrats fell for it.

According a report from Unhack the Vote (https://medium.com/@unhackthevote/the-voty-twitter-botnet-and-the-attack-on-senator-al-franken-by-the-alt-right-army-36860deebea8), while everyone was focused on the Russian meddling of the 2016 election,

another campaign was being run out of Japan. Leeann Tweeden’s initial allegation against Franken was quickly turned into propaganda after being

hinted at by Trump ally Roger Stone.

A group of Japan-based sites were created the day before Tweeden came forward with her allegations and several Twitter bots ensured the stories about it went viral. The news was then picked up and fueled by Mike Cernovich and his fans, who issued thousands of tweets causing “FrankenFondels and “Franken is a groper” to gain traction. Meanwhile, eight former female staffers of Franken’s defended their old boss, but their voices were completely drowned out.

Beginning Nov. 15, Stone used one of his accounts that hasn’t been banned by Twitter to spread his message.

“Roger Stone says it’s Al Franken’s ‘time in the barrel.’

Franken next in long list of Democrats accused of ‘grabby’ behavior,” the account tweeted.

That day,

RealUSA.site was created by a Japanese developer named Atsufumi Otsuka. A fake news site was grown and a second site popped up a few days later.
Tweeden’s story

was promoted within hours by right wing media from Infowars and Breitbart to The Hill and KABC-LA,

where Tweeden’s radio show is broadcast.

The Alliance for Securing Democracy explained that

Russia Intelligence operations then ensured (https://twitter.com/mollymckew/status/931329640639197184?lang=en) “Al Franken” was trending

by Nov. 17 using a group of 600 fake accounts.

Right-wing troll Charles Johnson tweeted, “Thinking of offering money to people who go on tv and say Al Frank is a predator,” just days later. Cernovich wasn’t far behind.



(https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/932864278456975360)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/957377432918507521/fhZt8Lgn_bigger.jpgMike Cernovich https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f1fa-1f1f8.png (https://twitter.com/Cernovich)


(https://twitter.com/Cernovich)✔@Cernovich (https://twitter.com/Cernovich)


I will fully cover the legal expenses of any VICTIM of a Congressman who wants to come forward to tell her story. Break the secrecy. #UnsealTheDeals (https://twitter.com/hashtag/UnsealTheDeals?src=hash)
12:52 AM - Nov 21, 2017 (https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/932864278456975360)




While Johnson was tweeting out his message, Otsuka was starting another domain in Japan and building the second fake news site. The Google analytics account ID And Apple app ID both match name servers and registration for the sites, according to researchers.

Just days prior to Democrats calling for Franken to step down,

the fake news sites republished a article from a smaller site by Ijeoma Oluo, urging women and activists to stop their defenses from Franken.

“Dear Al Franken, I’ll Miss You But You Can’t Matter Anymore,” was its title. Thousands of fake Twitter accounts then ensured the article spread.

From there, Senate Democrats, lead by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) went on the attack and demanded Franken resign. :lol

“We began to suspect that this legitimate opinion piece had been weaponized for political gain by dozens of twitter accounts, all of them repeatedly tweeting links to the two domains registered in Japan in late November,” Unhack the Vote’s Mike Farb wrote (https://medium.com/@unhackthevote/the-voty-twitter-botnet-and-the-attack-on-senator-al-franken-by-the-alt-right-army-36860deebea8).

“Strong similarities between the accounts combined with clear connection to the two recently-established Japanese websites verified our suspicions.”

[B]He discovered that they had “stumbled upon a sophisticated botnet being used to spread alt-right propaganda.”

That botnet is still active today,

though they’re not talking about any political propaganda. More than 400 accounts exist in the group, continuing to promote propaganda and ready to go on the attack again at any moment.

“We know this because

Twitter has suspended some spam accounts that follow our Voty bots,”

Farb told Newsweek in an interview (https://www.newsweek.com/alt-right-trump-franken-mueller-twitter-810355).

“This shows that Twitter is aware that these ‘follower’ accounts are not legitimate.

But if you look at the ‘who to follow’ suggestion window when you are on a Voty botnet account, the suggestions are almost always other Voty Twitter bot accounts. This shows that Twitter is aware that these accounts are interrelated.”

It’s unclear who’s paying for the campaign, but whoever it was successfully manipulated Democrats and scored the resignation from Franken.

“We estimate dozens of hours of initial development time and at least one person working full time to produce and distribute content,”

another researcher told Newsweek. “Additionally it’s likely that an existing bot farm of compromised computers is basically being rented as a distributed host for these accounts.”

No coordinated network of bots exists on the left that is funded by Democratic donors.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/02/white-nationalists-twitter-bots-fueled-war-al-franken-democrats-fell/

Fuck Alex Jones to hell, forever

but as was predicted decades ago, wars have become Information Wars

My guess is the Nixon's Dirty Trickster Roger Stone was involved in hiring the Japanese bot farm to take down Franken

Will Gillibrand apologize for being ignorantly weaponized against a Dem Senator?

Instagram, Facebook, Twitter all guilty of being weaponized in Information Warfare.

[AaronY]

He's a piece of shit. We didn't fall for anything

[Chucho]

Oh man, now everything is going to be blamed on Twitter bots. If your opinion is formed by tweets, you're a twit. Or your name is dJohn or Chris.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao This is the book he released a few months before the sh** storm:

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51tsg6mBFIL._SX329_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

[RandomGuy]

Which stories are consistent? That he liked young women? Or that he raped someone? And, if it's that he liked young women, I think you also need to look at what was acceptable at the time. My Grandfather was 32 when he married my Grandmother at 18. Such relationships weren't unheard of. So, again, I think the accusations need to be vetted and, if any criminal act is verified, he should not be in the Senate; if elected expelled but, hopefully just lose the election.


I'm not defending him. I'm suspect of the stories. Especially when the most serious accuser is called a liar by her stepson and the yearbook inscription is suspicious. Everything else are 40 year old stories.


Meh, I'm just suspicious of the timing. If any of the criminal activity is proven true, he should rot.

Same fucking lines.

Same bullshit defenses.

Wow.

[RandomGuy]

Why don't you guys just come out and say that harassment crosses political/racial lines? - some of you pretend that any one party is better than the other in this. Power corrupts and if someone thinks they can get away with it, they'll do it. How many centuries/decades are people getting away with stuff like this? And it's not just men, lest you call me sexist - women in positions of power probably do it so (maybe in other ways) - it's just that there are much fewer females in positions of power than males.

One party calls on their harassers to resign and gives women deference in making accusations.

The other UNIFORMLY cries "the women are all lying and making stuff up" or "it was year ago/harmless fun"

Not equivalent at all.

[johnsmith]

One party calls on their harassers to resign and gives women deference in making accusations.

The other UNIFORMLY cries "the women are all lying and making stuff up" or "it was year ago/harmless fun"

Not equivalent at all.

Do you only post with hyperboles now?

[boutons_deux]

Repugs are so fucking transparent, legendary hypocrisy

Franken FAKES a grope photo with girl in on the joke, Repugs say he must resign

multiple women claim MUCH worse and much more repeated from Trash and K, no problem, the women are hysterical, are lying, fuck 'em

[koriwhat]

Repugs are so fucking transparent, legendary hypocrisy

Franken FAKES a grope photo with girl in on the joke, Repugs say he must resign

multiple women claim MUCH worse and much more repeated from Trash and K, no problem, the women are hysterical, are lying, fuck 'em

cry some more you weeping pussy

[RandomGuy]

Do you only post with hyperboles now?

Not really. I just don't see that "both parties are the same" as valid.

Name one time where Republicans mostly called on someone accused to step down after being accused of some form of sexual assault. After Trump came out in support of Moore, there was a rather deafening silence on the right.

This is one instance where there is not a moral/intellectual equivalence, and it's not even close.

[RandomGuy]

Do you only post with hyperboles now?

In fact, go back through this thread.

Find one conservative making any excuse for the accused, or disbelieving any of Frankens accusers as being opportunists.

Go on.

[johnsmith]

In fact, go back through this thread.

Find one conservative making any excuse for the accused, or disbelieving any of Frankens accusers as being opportunists.

Go on.

RG, I have a lot of time for your posts....they’ve typically been well thought out and you ALWAYS back up your shit.....but I know you don’t think ALL republicans or ALL conservatives are even slightly represented on Spurstalk. You can’t pigeon hole an entire swath of Americans based on what you read here.....or really anywhere on the Internet. I don’t need to go back through this thread to know you’re absolutely correct, but I also don’t have to go through any thread on spurstalk to know that the only thing represented on here is radical and far left or radical and far right.


Basically what I’m saying is, stop being “Boutons” in your use of the broad brush.

[johnsmith]

Or tell me to go fuck myself....up to you, but I will still read your posts regardless because like I said, I have a lot of time for your thoughts and opinions.

[RandomGuy]

RG, I have a lot of time for your posts....they’ve typically been well thought out and you ALWAYS back up your shit.....but I know you don’t think ALL republicans or ALL conservatives are even slightly represented on Spurstalk. You can’t pigeon hole an entire swath of Americans based on what you read here.....or really anywhere on the Internet. I don’t need to go back through this thread to know you’re absolutely correct, but I also don’t have to go through any thread on spurstalk to know that the only thing represented on here is radical and far left or radical and far right.


Basically what I’m saying is, stop being “Boutons” in your use of the broad brush.

Here's the thing, the polls say it is pretty uniform at this point. I can paint with a pretty broad brush, because it is a widely held belief, and attitudes on who to believe is based on party affiliation.

https://www.npr.org/2018/09/26/651647131/poll-nearly-6-in-10-to-closely-watch-kavanaugh-ford-hearing-many-undecided-on-tr

The difference between the parties though is beginning to widen, especially when it comes to this.

Republicans believe the men when it is one of their own, and invariably think the women, all dozens of them, are lying. Trump, Moore, etc.

I have come to simply generally believe the women, no matter who the party of the accused is. Women almost never make shit up, according to all the data we have.

Personally I think that it says something damning in and of itself that conservatives "go to" is that the women are lying for political purposes. The general way humans think is that we tend to think others thought processes are similar to our own, which would imply that "conservative" and "regard for the truth" is not really a good correlation.

[koriwhat]

I have come to simply generally believe the women, no matter who the party of the accused is. Women almost never make shit up, according to all the data we have.

ding ding ding we got ourselves a new age male feminist here on ST. lmao!

[RandomGuy]

Or tell me to go fuck myself....up to you, but I will still read your posts regardless because like I said, I have a lot of time for your thoughts and opinions.


While pluralities of both men (39 percent) and women (45 percent) are unsure who is telling the truth, among those who have an view on the question, there is notably a big gender gap. Thirty-two percent of men believe Kavanaugh and 28 percent believe Ford. Thirty-five percent of women believe Ford and 20 percent believe Kavanaugh. That's a 19-point gender gap, and the spread is even further apart by gender and party: Republican men overwhelmingly believe Kavanaugh (61 percent to 5 percent) and Democratic women believe Ford (56 percent to 4 percent).

Not going to tell you to do anything, other than realize that this is one thing where few seem to be relying on anything but their own inherent confirmation bias.

[spurraider21]

misclicked

[koriwhat]

Why should I care SR? Just because you want me to down this or that doesn't mean I'm beholden to your dumbass or anyone else. IDGAF what you want out of me bro. Go cry some more in your safe space you fucking pussy.

You're bigMad btw. :lmao

[koriwhat]

When asked to describe flaws of conservatism, totally nonpartisan koriwhat turns that into a long winded rant about liberalism. I'm shocked

I'm not beholden to you fuck face arrogant leftists and never will be either. Cry harder you pussy! :cry:lmao

[koriwhat]

misclicked

Nice edit pussy!

[CosmicCowboy]

At least Randomguy believes me!

https://static.independent.co.uk/2022/05/05/23/22247aad2e74955bbfbb3f60c8c5927bY29udGVudHNlYXJjaG FwaSwxNjUxODY2NTA2-2.66722611.jpg?quality=75&width=990&auto=webp&crop=982:726,smart

[spurraider21]

Nice edit pussy!
i took what i posted here and moved it to the other thread :lol. i didnt mean to bump this one

did you show your gangster friend this comment too?

[koriwhat]

i took what i posted here and moved it to the other thread :lol. i didnt mean to bump this one

did you show your gangster friend this comment too?

My friend could take all you bitches out tbh. All of you! Yall are weak sons of bitches tbh and yall know it. Stay smug and bigMad you fucking pussy. :tu

[ChumpDumper]

My friend could take all you bitches out tbh. All of you! Yall are weak sons of bitches tbh and yall know it. Stay smug and bigMad you fucking pussy. :tuBoth of you come up here and say that to my face.

[koriwhat]

Look it's that worthless whale fucker CumDumpster again... No one fucking gives a damn about your worthless ass you fucking puto!

[ChumpDumper]

Look it's that worthless whale fucker CumDumpster again... No one fucking gives a damn about your worthless ass you fucking puto!:lol you and your gangsta friend are pussies!

[koriwhat]

Whale fucker!

[ChumpDumper]

Whale fucker!
You have never seen pictures of me or anyone close to me.

[koriwhat]

^
Your 600lb wife... life... wait...

[ChumpDumper]

^
Your 600lb wife... life... wait...What a weird little fantasy life you have.

[koriwhat]

I can do this all day bro without even opening one of your replies.

How fat is that bitch btw? Does she get disability because she refuses to work and instead eats herself to death?

Bet you both live off disability you fucking losers.

[ChumpDumper]

I can do this all day bro without even opening one of your replies.

How fat is that bitch btw? Does she get disability because she refuses to work and instead eats herself to death?

Bet you both live off disability you fucking losers.
She's about your size tbh.

I have no doubt she could end you.

[koriwhat]

You truly are worse than those lowIQ Indian scammers you whale fucking retard.

[ChumpDumper]

You truly are worse than those lowIQ Indian scammers you whale fucking retard.
Again, you fail to simply ignore me. You're pretty weak-willed.

[koriwhat]

Don't care you whale fucking retard.

[ChumpDumper]

Don't care you whale fucking retard.

:lol of course you do. Look at all your replies.

[Joseph Kony]

Nice edit pussy!
kinda like that time you were so triggered by people bumping your original calf tats thread that you went back months/years later and literally editted every single post you made? :lmao

you are the definition of a bitchmade hypocrite. your dead granny would be ashamed of what a worthless sack of shit you are. she'd have made sure your mama swallowed you if she knew what an abortion you turned out to be tbh

[SpursforSix]

good discussion in here