Amy Coney Barrett Is A Breath Of Fresh Air

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

Why you bunker bitching, derp?

[ChumpDumper]

Why you bunker bitching, derp??

I think an actual deadline should be set in presidential election years but if you want to leave it up to Democrats, so be it.

[Trainwreck2100]

Amy Covid Barret stole all the fresh air

[Spurtacular]

?

I think an actual deadline should be set in presidential election years but if you want to leave it up to Democrats, so be it.

So, you're for the confirmation vote of ACB being held before the election?

Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

So, you're for the confirmation vote of ACB being held before the election?

Yes or no.Don't really care.

Sorry.

[Spurtacular]

https://64.media.tumblr.com/1d9d81f101ef14ed26e57604e08290d6/tumblr_mgyllz0zJl1rb8odjo1_500.gif

:lol

[ChumpDumper]

:lol?

I'm right here.

If you want to ask me something I care about, go ahead.

[Spurtacular]

?

I'm right here.

If you want to ask me something I care about, go ahead.

I asked you a question.

This was you:

https://i.gifer.com/JeW8.gif

[ChumpDumper]

I asked you a question.

This was you:

https://i.gifer.com/JeW8.gifMore like:

https://media.giphy.com/media/SvRuvlSEa67wNNHuHy/giphy.gif

Sorry.

[Spurtacular]

https://media1.tenor.com/images/6c52ab850b348ecab3dc13eeb0b41f9c/tenor.gif?itemid=6011012

[ChumpDumper]

:cry:lol you've been pissing yourself all day because I didn't read your question.

Now you find out I don't give a shit about it and you're going to cry all night.

Proceed....

[Spurtacular]

:lol you've been pissing yourself all day because I didn't read your question.

Now you find out I don't give a shit about it and you're going to cry all night.

Proceed....

Board psychopath falling silent when asked directly where he draws the line.

It is what it is.

[ChumpDumper]

Board psychopath falling silent when asked directly where he draws the line.

It is what it is.I said I want an actual line.

I don't much care where it is.

Currently there is no line.

Where do you draw the line exactly, derp?

[Spurtacular]

I said I want an actual line.

I don't much care where it is.

Currently there is no line.

Where do you draw the line exactly, derp?

When did you ever talk about a line in this thread?

[ChumpDumper]

When did you ever talk about a line in this thread?:lmao you didn't even read my answer.

Thanks for letting everyone know you don't care about any of this, derp.

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

:lmao you didn't even read my answer.

Thanks for letting everyone know you don't care about any of this, derp.

:lmao

BlakeBlaking it won't save you.

You never defined a said line in this thread before I used the word.

[ChumpDumper]

BlakeBlaking it won't save you.

You never defined a said line in this thread before I used the word.
:lol Why do you lie every single time, derp?

Everyone can see that's not what you said.

When did you ever talk about a line in this thread?

Give me a mention when you decide which lane you're going to take.

[Spurtacular]

:lol Why do you lie every single time, derp?

Everyone can see that's not what you said.

Were talking about what you said, not what I said.

You spoke as if you had already defined a line in this thread.

That's fucking pathetic, psychopath.

[ChumpDumper]

Were talking about what you said, not what I said. :lmao you lied about what I said, derp.

You have all my answers.

Now answer my question.

Where do you draw the line exactly, derp?

[Spurtacular]

:lmao you lied about what I said, derp.

You have all my answers.

Now answer my question.

Where do you draw the line exactly, derp?

You always delve into nonsensical sh** when you are avoiding the real issue.

Why do you suddenly not care about expediency in SC confirmations?

[DMC]

slap fight in prog

[ChumpDumper]

You always delve into nonsensical sh** when you are avoiding the real issue.

Why do you suddenly not care about expediency in SC confirmations?derp folds

[Spurtacular]

derp folds

You're trying.

Why do you suddenly not care about expediency in SC confirmations?

[ChumpDumper]

You're trying.

Why do you suddenly not care about expediency in SC confirmations?I asked you directly about your issue.

Where do you draw the line exactly with supreme court nominations, derp?

[Spurtacular]

I asked you directly about your issue.

Where do you draw the line exactly with supreme court nominations, derp?

I brought up the line and then you said this.


I said I want an actual line.

Are you saying you were the first to explicitly bring up the line in this thread?

Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

:cryderp folds

You have all my answers, derp.

Now answer this one (1) question or fold on this subject forever.


I said I want an actual line.

I don't much care where it is.

Currently there is no line.

Where do you draw the line exactly, derp?

[Spurtacular]

derp folds

You have all my answers, derp.

Now answer this one (1) question or fold on this subject forever.

So, we've determined that I brought up the line and that you are being dishonest.

Sky is still blue is all.

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?

[ChumpDumper]

So, we've determined that I brought up the line and that you are being dishonest.

Sky is still blue is all.

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?derp folds forever.

:lol too easy to get Ws from you

[Spurtacular]

derp folds forever.

:lol too easy to get Ws from you

You're the one avoiding the subject.

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?

[ChumpDumper]

You're the one avoiding the subject.

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?derp you haven't answered my question.

If you're going to fold forever you need to say you fold forever.

Where do you draw the line exactly for the nomination and confirmation of SCOTUS justices, derp?

You have all my answers.

Step up or fold forever.

[Spurtacular]

derp you haven't answered my question.

If you're going to fold forever you need to say you fold forever.

Where do you draw the line exactly for the nomination and confirmation of SCOTUS justices?

You have all my answers.

Step up or fold forever.

President Trump nominated ACB. I support the Senate doing a timely confirmation vote.

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?

[ChumpDumper]

President Trump nominated ACB. I support the Senate doing a timely confirmation vote.What's your deadline for nominations?

[Spurtacular]

What's your deadline?

I answered your question. Your turn.

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?

[ChumpDumper]

I answered your question. :lol your line is whenever a president nominates someone it should be voted on ASAP?

Did you feel this way in 2016?

[Spurtacular]

:lol your line is whenever a president nominates someone it should be voted on ASAP?

Did you feel this way in 2016?

Still your turn.

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?

[ChumpDumper]

Still your turn.

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?I have already answered these questions.

If you're too stupid to figure it out, just say so. I'll spoon feed you.

Did you want an expedient vote on Garland?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

I have already answered these questions.

If you're too stupid to figure it out, just say so. I'll spoon feed you.

Did you want an expedient vote on Garland?

Yes or no.

I wouldn't ask if I thought you had given an answer.
And even if I thought you had given an unclear answer, I would say so.
I'm not a bitch like you. I don't play those kind of games.

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?

[ChumpDumper]

I wouldn't ask if I thought you had given an answer.
And even if I thought you had given an unclear answer, I would say so.
I'm not a bitch like you. I don't play those kind of games.

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?False premise.

Go back and read my answer, then if you still can't figure it out beg me to spoon feed you.

I'll spoon feed you if you beg.

[Spurtacular]

False premise.

Go back and read my answer, then if you still can't figure it out beg me to spoon feed you.

I'll spoon feed you if you beg.

Okay. Which post are you calling your "answer"?

[ChumpDumper]

Okay. Which post are you calling your "answer".They are clearly labeled as my answers.

You can beg to be spoon fed a link.

I'll give you a link if you beg.

[Spurtacular]

They are clearly labeled as my answers.

You can beg to be spoon fed a link.

I'll give you a link if you beg.

:lol Your answers aren't "labeled" as "answers".

And :lmao at transitioning from bitchy teenaged girl to scorned woman. :rollin

[ChumpDumper]

:lol Your answers aren't "labeled" as "answers".Of course they are. I say these are the answers and then quote the actual answers.

If you can't follow this simple conversation you started, just say so.

[ChumpDumper]

I do thank you for saying you wanted a vote on Garland, derp.:tu

[Spurtacular]

Of course they are. I say these are the answers and then quote the actual answers.

If you can't follow this simple conversation you started, just say so.

I didn't see any answer to the question because there wasn't one.

[ChumpDumper]

You've made yourself clear, derp.

You wanted a vote on Obama's nominee in 2016.:tu

[Spurtacular]

Of course they are. I say these are the answers and then quote the actual answers.

If you can't follow this simple conversation you started, just say so.

Sure. I don't follow you.

Go ahead and quote your answer.

[ChumpDumper]

Sure. I don't follow you.

Go ahead and quote your answer.I got what I needed.

You wanted a timely vote on all of Black President's nominees.:tuj

[Spurtacular]

I got what I needed.

You wanted a timely vote on all of Black President's nominees.:tuj

:lol So, I follow your lame procedure and you still hideaway cos there's no answer.

:lmao Fucking psychopath

[Spurtacular]

ChumpDumper

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1313351384545271810?s=19

Ted has been pretty savage lately tbh He should run for POTUS in 2024 and Trump could endorse :tu

[Spurtacular]

https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1313351384545271810?s=19

Ted has been pretty savage lately tbh He should run for POTUS in 2024 and Trump could endorse :tu

We knew it was coming.

Kamala should retire if she's scared.

[Chris]

We knew it was coming.

Kamala should retire if she's scared.

Killing babies is business, and business is good!

[Spurtacular]

ChumpDumper (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=153)

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?

You know you're in checkmate. You can't answer these questions. :lmao

ChumpDumper (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=153)

[boutons_deux]

It's not about Barrett's religion:

It's about the cover-up of how extreme and unqualified she is

a larger problem:

Barrett has been actively trying to cover-up her association with People of Praise and

her fundamentalist beliefs, and

People of Praise have been helping. while Barrett has disclosed "serving on the board of a network of private Christian schools affiliated with the group," People of Praise will not confirm that she is a member.

Why are her ties to the group being scrubbed and who is helping her do that?

That goes along with Barrett's failure in 2017 and again this year to disclose that

she had signed on to a newspaper ad (https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-politics-amy-coney-barrett-judiciary-us-supreme-court-5d587c3aa43a459c9c2459787eed6b26) in 2006 taking the most extreme position on abortion possible,

advocating for the overturning of Roe v. Wade and going further, saying

she opposed "abortion on demand" and

defended "the right to life from fertilization to the end of natural life."

That's leaving the door open for

banning types of birth control and

for investigation and potential prosecution of women who've had miscarriages,

the furthest forced birth extremists tend to go.

Of course she doesn't want that information in front of the Judiciary Committee or the American public, which supports abortion rights.

It's not about her religion: It's about why she is trying to cover up her religion!

serious questions about her fitness to serve.

First and foremost, Barrett accepted the nomination in the first place,

Then she participated willingly and knowingly in what turned out to be a coronavirus superspreader event that violated the rules the District of Columbia has in place for public gatherings.

questions about her actual ability to judge (https://www.law360.com/articles/1316104).

She actually authored a Seventh Circuit opinion last year "that threatened to hurl corporate insurance policies into chaos" and

was quickly and quietly withdrawn to allow the lower court judgement she had initially overturned stand.

an "episode that stunned attorneys and raised questions about her judgment."

she made an extremely basic and big mistake. She ignored state law, in this case Indiana’s, in her initial ruling.

"Her opinion, absolutely, 100 percent, ignored Indiana law with respect to how those things would be decided,"

Barrett got this nomination not for her legal qualifications but because of her ideological ones.

What's remarkable is the extent to which Republicans are still committed to covering up her background.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1984450

[Spurtacular]

ChumpDumper (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=153)

Why do you not care about expediently confirming Supreme Court judges?

Have you always been apathetic on this matter?

One last chance to come clean, ChumpDumper.

[boutons_deux]

Barrett is the most unpopular Supreme Court nominee,

so Democrats have nothing to lose in this fight (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/10/7/1984405/-Schumer-and-Judiciary-Democrats-need-a-battle-plan-on-Supreme-Court-and-need-it-now)

we've got the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, and

an electorate not giving her (https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/07/politics/cnn-poll-scotus-aca-october/index.html) the benefit of the doubt as to qualifications.

CNN reports:

"Initial reactions to Barrett are among the worst in CNN and Gallup polling on 12 potential justices dating back to Robert Bork,

who was nominated by Ronald Reagan and rejected by the Senate."

Barrett has the distinction, along with Kavanaugh, of being

"the only two for whom opposition outweighed support in initial polling on their nominations."

A plurality does not want her confirmed, 46% to 42%, and

56% say she should recuse herself from any cases resulting from the 2020 election,

including 32% of Republicans.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/10/7/1984405/-Schumer-and-Judiciary-Democrats-need-a-battle-plan-on-Supreme-Court-and-need-it-now?detail=emaildkre

[CosmicCowboy]

Barrett is the most unpopular Supreme Court nominee,

so Democrats have nothing to lose in this fight (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/10/7/1984405/-Schumer-and-Judiciary-Democrats-need-a-battle-plan-on-Supreme-Court-and-need-it-now)

we've got the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, and

an electorate not giving her (https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/07/politics/cnn-poll-scotus-aca-october/index.html) the benefit of the doubt as to qualifications.

CNN reports:

"Initial reactions to Barrett are among the worst in CNN and Gallup polling on 12 potential justices dating back to Robert Bork,

who was nominated by Ronald Reagan and rejected by the Senate."

Barrett has the distinction, along with Kavanaugh, of being

"the only two for whom opposition outweighed support in initial polling on their nominations."

A plurality does not want her confirmed, 46% to 42%, and

56% say she should recuse herself from any cases resulting from the 2020 election,

including 32% of Republicans.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/10/7/1984405/-Schumer-and-Judiciary-Democrats-need-a-battle-plan-on-Supreme-Court-and-need-it-now?detail=emaildkre

It's got nothing to do with qualifications. It's blue v red.

:lmao at classic DailyKook copy/paste from Boukaki.

[CosmicCowboy]

https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1313351384545271810?s=19

Ted has been pretty savage lately tbh He should run for POTUS in 2024 and Trump could endorse :tu

:lmao

Ted going in raw.

[RandomGuy]

:lmao

Ted going in raw.

2%

I would love it if Ted actually did get the GOP nomination. That would be hilarious. :clap

[CosmicCowboy]

2%

I would love it if Ted actually did get the GOP nomination. That would be hilarious. :clap

Yeah, he is generally unlikeable but that was a Jordan quality slam dunk

[RandomGuy]

Yeah, he is generally unlikeable but that was a Jordan quality slam dunk

True that.

Rare for a conservative politician these days to have a quick wit. Sounds almost like AOC.

[CosmicCowboy]

True that.

Rare for a conservative politician these days to have a quick wit. Sounds almost like AOC.

AOC is flavor of the month. If she ever gets Nancy's job you guy can expect a huge backlash. Just my opinion.

[koriwhat]

True that.

Rare for a conservative politician these days to have a quick wit. Sounds almost like AOC.

there's absolutely nothing witty about aoc. nada!

[Spurtacular]

Psycho Derp 2016


I'm all for appointees' getting an up or down vote in a couple months' time, regardless of which party's president does the appointing.

Board Republicans fall silent when asked directly where they draw the line; probably because supporting the current Republican strategy will sound pretty absurd.

Pscyho Derp 2020


:cry Don't really care. :cry

:cry Sorry. :cry


koriwhat (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=10674) DMC (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20665) FrostKing (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=51741) tholdren (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=29395) ducks (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=13) Nathan89 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20260) hater (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7609) Mikeanaro (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=44789) Thread (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=19320) SnakeBoy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=12109) whottt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=171) rmt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=4593) Wild Cobra (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8523) Cosmored (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=18886) Galileo (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=9641) Nbadan (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=78) LnGrrrR (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14319) CosmicCowboy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=207) DarrinS (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2042) SA210 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2902) Yonivore (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=48) ObiwanGinobili (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1707) Chris

[Spurtacular]

^^^

Oh, also TheGreatYacht (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=43719)

Dem Double takes. :lol

[Ef-man]

Only a matter of time before derp and crew call Amy a whore or bitch or traitor on any ruling they dislike.

[boutons_deux]

Republicans are nervous of letting voters know Amy Coney Barrett’s views

she would support restricting, if not outright overturning, the landmark decision that guarantees a woman’s right to an abortion,”

“But as her nomination fight unfurls in an increasingly heated election season, top Republicans — from President Trump to individual senators — appear to be playing down the impact Barrett’s confirmation would have on the fate of abortion rights in the United States,”

Trump and Vice President Pence danced around the question of the law and abortion access — a stark contrast to then-candidate Trump’s explicit promise four years ago to nominate only justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade,

an upstart conservative Republican’s push to confirm justices who view Roe as wrongly decided is causing visible discomfort among his

GOP colleagues who believe Supreme Court nominees should face no such litmus test in their confirmation process.” :lol

Americans oppose overturning the nearly 50-year-old decision by a wide margin,

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/10/republicans-are-nervous-of-letting-voters-know-amy-coney-barretts-views-washington-post

Repugs don't GAF about citizens' preferences, and will approve this member of a fringe, extremist patriarchal cult (women are to be subservient) that even Catholic priests say really isn't Catholic at all

[DMC]

Only a matter of time before derp and crew call Amy a whore or bitch or traitor on any ruling they dislike.

You're saying she's a shoo-in?

[Ef-man]

You're saying she's a shoo-in?

No, I am saying that derp and company eat there own.

[ChumpDumper]

Psycho Derp 2016



Pscyho Derp 2020




:lol derp proved my point

I'm fine with whatever line is drawn for nominees of any party. I just want a line.

derp does not.

[RandomGuy]

Psycho Derp 2016



Pscyho Derp 2020



You don't really even see how dumb this is. Another own goal. smh.

The fact you are screaming for attention here, because you think you got one over on Chump, that's just sad. I really do feel sorry for you here.

[Spurs Homer]

Psycho Derp 2016



Pscyho Derp 2020




koriwhat (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=10674) DMC (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20665) FrostKing (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=51741) tholdren (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=29395) ducks (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=13) Nathan89 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20260) hater (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7609) Mikeanaro (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=44789) Thread (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=19320) SnakeBoy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=12109) whottt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=171) rmt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=4593) Wild Cobra (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8523) Cosmored (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=18886) Galileo (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=9641) Nbadan (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=78) LnGrrrR (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14319) CosmicCowboy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=207) DarrinS (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2042) SA210 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2902) Yonivore (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=48) ObiwanGinobili (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1707) Chris (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1656)





RIP

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/hanneflower/status/1314613177351499776?s=19

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/hanneflower/status/1314613177351499776?s=19
tell us all about your common sense abortion control

when would it be allowed in your common sense system?

[Leetonidas]

lol at anyone trying to pump up Ted Cuck after he was emasculated by Trump and kowtows behind him like a good little boy now :lol

[koriwhat]

Psycho Derp 2016



Pscyho Derp 2020




koriwhat (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=10674) DMC (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20665) FrostKing (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=51741) tholdren (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=29395) ducks (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=13) Nathan89 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20260) hater (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7609) Mikeanaro (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=44789) Thread (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=19320) SnakeBoy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=12109) whottt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=171) rmt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=4593) Wild Cobra (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8523) Cosmored (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=18886) Galileo (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=9641) Nbadan (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=78) LnGrrrR (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14319) CosmicCowboy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=207) DarrinS (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2042) SA210 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2902) Yonivore (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=48) ObiwanGinobili (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1707) Chris

CumDumpster is a bitch so what's new?

must suck cuddling up with jabba the hut nightly but someone has to do it and there's no better candidate than CumDumpster to take one for the team.:tu

[Chris]

tell us all about your common sense abortion control

when would it be allowed in your common sense system?

did you hear the whoosh sound as you were typing this?

[Spurtacular]

RIP

Yea, Disability Derp trying to have his cake and eat it too. :lol

Chump indeed did that, sadly.

[Spurtacular]

CumDumpster is a bitch so what's new?

must suck cuddling up with jabba the hut nightly but someone has to do it and there's no better candidate than CumDumpster to take one for the team.:tu

:lol That's a sensitive subject for him.

[ChumpDumper]

Yea, Disability Derp trying to have his cake and eat it too. :lol

Chump indeed did that, sadly.:lol I said I want a clear line for all nominees.

Do you want a clear line for all nominees, derp?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

tell us all about your common sense abortion control

when would it be allowed in your common sense system?

Does "Governor" Northam espouse a common sense system here?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z88SabQ2JAA

[Winehole23]

1314675660019822592

Originalism

[Spurtacular]

:lol I said I want a clear line for all nominees.

Do you want a clear line for all nominees, derp?

Yes or no.

Your position was clear. You want up/down votes within a couple months.

Has that somehow changed?

[Mikeanaro]

:cry Consurvativs herz ma felenz.

[ElNono]

:cry Consurvativs herz ma felenz.

How's Macri's cepo doing, tbh...

[Mikeanaro]

How's Macri's cepo doing, tbh...
Macri left the government in December...
The cepo was a kirchnerist thing, Macri had no cepo until the last 60 days because since the Kakas won the election so the dolar went sky high.

Even so Macri gato let you buy $10000 per month, now you can buy only $200, having in mind you are not using Neflix, Steam or digital stuff like that, if you do it they discount that from your monthly limit.

Macri had a dolar at 40 pesos until the Pasos, then it went to 65 because nobody wants those leftist fuckers, 10 months later (right now) it is 167 so I want to know where are those Kakas right now, I think DAF86 or something was one of them.

[ElNono]

Macri left the government in December...
The cepo was a kirchnerist thing, Macri had no cepo until the last 60 days because since the Kakas won the election so the dolar went sky high.

Even so Macri gato let you buy $10000 per month, now you can buy only $200, having in mind you are not using Neflix, Steam or digital stuff like that, if you do it they discount that from your monthly limit.

Macri had a dolar at 40 pesos until the Pasos, then it went to 65 because nobody wants those leftist fuckers, 10 months later (right now) it is 167 so I want to know where are those Kakas right now, I think DAF86 or something was one of them.

So he had a cepo, ok... nice debt he left too, tbh...

I'm not a fan of Alfredo, but you don't have to look too far to see why Macri got severely cucked, tbh...

[Mikeanaro]

So he had a cepo, ok... nice debt he left too, tbh...

I'm not a fan of Alfredo, but you don't have to look too far to see why Macri got severely cucked, tbh...
Nice debt?
The other guys were there almost 13 years and left pus and shit, and now you want to blame it on the guy who was there 4 years?

Have you been here in Capital to see all the stuff he did? soterramientos to cross the train without waiting, hydraulic plans so we have no floods anymore, lots of stuff in GBA so they look more human, Im talking about cloacas so they dont shit in a fucking bag.

Macri was bad in one thing, economy but at least investors trusted him.
Kakas are bad at everything, you have no clue at all, who the fuck tries to keep people 200 days in quarantine while trying to change the whole Supreme Court system, the Justice system?


If Trump does that you would be jumping and crying.

Funny how you bolded the ¨until the last 60 days¨, and not the $10000 per month part.

Double funny how during Macri days there were no villeros trying to steal private property under the ¨look at me Im poor¨ excuse.
But you dont know that, dont you?

Triple funny you never said anything about Kakas leaving a shithole country to Macri gato.

Quad funny, after 40 years of Kirchnerism in Santa Cruz, its Uganda.

Penta funny, all those places like the North, or even GBA after 40 years of Peronism are Pakistan, but hey lets blame it on Vidal and her 4 years...

Have you seen Macri´s people throwing money bags at convents during midnight with Machine guns? sure you did.

[Ringside Announcer]

Psycho Derp 2016

I'm all for appointees' getting an up or down vote in a couple months' time, regardless of which party's president does the appointing.

Board Republicans fall silent when asked directly where they draw the line; probably because supporting the current Republican strategy will sound pretty absurd.

Pscyho Derp 2020

:cry Don't really care. :cry

:cry Sorry. :cry

koriwhat (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=10674) DMC (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20665) FrostKing (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=51741) tholdren (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=29395) ducks (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=13) Nathan89 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20260) hater (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7609) Mikeanaro (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=44789) Thread (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=19320) SnakeBoy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=12109) whottt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=171) rmt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=4593) Wild Cobra (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8523) Cosmored (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=18886) Galileo (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=9641) Nbadan (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=78) LnGrrrR (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14319) CosmicCowboy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=207) DarrinS (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2042) SA210 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2902) Yonivore (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=48) ObiwanGinobili (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1707) Chris (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1656)

Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper!

[ChumpDumper]

:lol derp's alts

Where do you want the line drawn, derp?

[Ef-man]

Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper!

Brokeback Derp just does what comes naturally, brokebackderping, nothing new, nothing funny, and nothing but brokeback.

:tu

[Spurtacular]

:cry I'm all for appointees' getting an up or down vote in a couple months' time, regardless of which party's president does the appointing. :cry

Say it, derp.

Say you're all for Amy Comey Barret getting an up or down vote in a couple months' time.

[Spurtacular]

Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper!

:lmao That's good whoever did that. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Say it, derp.

Say you're all for Amy Comey Barret getting an up or down vote in a couple months' time.Already did.

Just like Garland.:tu

Where do you want the line drawn, derp?

Say it.

[ElNono]

Nice debt?
The other guys were there almost 13 years and left pus and shit, and now you want to blame it on the guy who was there 4 years?

Have you been here in Capital to see all the stuff he did? soterramientos to cross the train without waiting, hydraulic plans so we have no floods anymore, lots of stuff in GBA so they look more human, Im talking about cloacas so they dont shit in a fucking bag.

Macri was bad in one thing, economy but at least investors trusted him.
Kakas are bad at everything, you have no clue at all, who the fuck tries to keep people 200 days in quarantine while trying to change the whole Supreme Court system, the Justice system?


If Trump does that you would be jumping and crying.

Funny how you bolded the ¨until the last 60 days¨, and not the $10000 per month part.

Double funny how during Macri days there were no villeros trying to steal private property under the ¨look at me Im poor¨ excuse.
But you dont know that, dont you?

Triple funny you never said anything about Kakas leaving a shithole country to Macri gato.

Quad funny, after 40 years of Kirchnerism in Santa Cruz, its Uganda.

Penta funny, all those places like the North, or even GBA after 40 years of Peronism are Pakistan, but hey lets blame it on Vidal and her 4 years...

Have you seen Macri´s people throwing money bags at convents during midnight with Machine guns? sure you did.

Worldwide record loan from the IMF to try to prop up Macri and lost like it was nobody's business, tbh...

I've never been a fan of peronachos and the penguin came after I left, so it's not my role to defend anything there, I share your disgust, tbh... and I spoke plenty about it, including DAF, back when Kichiloff didn't want to pay the debt.

That said, Macri was an absolute epic fail. There's nobody else to blame for getting all the peronchos back in there.

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao That's good whoever did that. :lmao:lmao that was you derp

How many alts do you have?

[Spurtacular]

Already did.

Nope.

[ChumpDumper]

Nope.Yep.

derp folds

DOWN GOES DERP

[Spurtacular]

Yep.

Quote it or it never happened.

[ChumpDumper]

Quote it or it never happened.
You already quoted it several times.

I'm all for appointees' getting an up or down vote in a couple months' time, regardless of which party's president does the appointing.

Board Republicans fall silent when asked directly where they draw the line; probably because supporting the current Republican strategy will sound pretty absurd.

Where do you want the line drawn, derp?

Answer or fold again.

[Spurtacular]

You already quoted it several times.


You already came out with a 2020 position different from you 2016 position, BlakeBlaker.

Are you saying you care now? :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

You already came out with a 2020 position different from you 2016 position, BlakeBlaker.

Are you saying you care now? :lmaoI said I want a clear line, derp.

I think an actual deadline should be set in presidential election years but if you want to leave it up to Democrats, so be it.
Clearly.

You read it.

Where do you want the line, derp?

[Spurtacular]

I said I want a clear line, derp.

Clearly.

You read it.

Where do you want the line, derp?

You pouted like a teenaged girl that you don't care when the 2016 quote wasn't in play.

:lol Dat checkmate again.

[ChumpDumper]

You pouted like a teenaged girl that you don't care when the 2016 quote wasn't in play.

:lol Dat checkmate again.
I think an actual deadline should be set in presidential election years but if you want to leave it up to Democrats, so be it.Do you want a deadline, derp?

Yes or no.

derp folds

Checkmate.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Psycho Derp 2016

I'm all for appointees' getting an up or down vote in a couple months' time, regardless of which party's president does the appointing.

Board Republicans fall silent when asked directly where they draw the line; probably because supporting the current Republican strategy will sound pretty absurd.

Pscyho Derp 2020

:cry Don't really care. :cry

:cry Sorry.

koriwhat (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=10674) DMC (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20665) FrostKing (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=51741) tholdren (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=29395) ducks (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=13) Nathan89 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20260) hater (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7609) Mikeanaro (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=44789) Thread (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=19320) SnakeBoy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=12109) whottt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=171) rmt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=4593) Wild Cobra (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8523) Cosmored (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=18886) Galileo (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=9641) Nbadan (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=78) LnGrrrR (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14319) CosmicCowboy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=207) DarrinS (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2042) SA210 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2902) Yonivore (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=48) ObiwanGinobili (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1707) Chris (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1656)


Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper!

[ChumpDumper]

Board Republicans fall silent when asked directly where they draw the line; probably because supporting the current Republican strategy will sound pretty absurd.


derp is a board Republican

derp fell silent when asked directly where he draws the line

Checkmate.

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

derp is a board Republican

derp fell silent when asked directly where he draws the line

Checkmate.

lol derp

Not at all. After you've conceded that you conveniently changed your position, I shall be happy to advance the conversation.
But there's no point if you think you can just lie with impunity.

[ChumpDumper]

Not at all. After you've conceded that you conveniently changed your position, I shall be happy to advance the conversation.
But there's no point if you think you can just lie with impunity.:lmao muh conditions.

You're checkmated.

You will never advance.

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

:lmao muh conditions.

You're checkmated.

You will never advance.

lol derp

You have to take responsibility for your actions.

After you've admitted that you conveniently changed your position, this discussion shall move forward.

Otherwise, enjoy your checkmate.

[ChumpDumper]

You have to take responsibility for your actions.

After you've admitted that you conveniently changed your position, this discussion shall move forward.

Otherwise, enjoy your checkmate.derp folds

My position is the same. I want a deadline in presidential election years.

You can't say if you do or don't.

My W.:tu

derp will never speak of this again.

[Spurtacular]

derp folds

My W.:tu

derp will never speak of this again.

:lmao Psychopath thinks getting caught having two positions is a W. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao Psychopath thinks getting caught having two positions is a W. :lmao
My position is the same. I want a deadline in presidential election years.

You can't say if you do or don't.

That's checkmate.:tu

[Spurtacular]

My position is the same.
Psycho Derp 2016

I'm all for appointees' getting an up or down vote in a couple months' time, regardless of which party's president does the appointing.

Board Republicans fall silent when asked directly where they draw the line; probably because supporting the current Republican strategy will sound pretty absurd.

Pscyho Derp 2020

:cry Don't really care. :cry

:cry Sorry.


koriwhat (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=10674) DMC (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20665) FrostKing (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=51741) tholdren (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=29395) ducks (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=13) Nathan89 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20260) hater (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7609) Mikeanaro (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=44789) Thread (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=19320) SnakeBoy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=12109) whottt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=171) rmt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=4593) Wild Cobra (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8523) Cosmored (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=18886) Galileo (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=9641) Nbadan (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=78) LnGrrrR (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14319) CosmicCowboy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=207) DarrinS (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2042) SA210 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2902) Yonivore (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=48) ObiwanGinobili (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1707) Chris (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1656)

[ChumpDumper]

I'm all for appointees' getting an up or down vote in a couple months' time, regardless of which party's president does the appointing.

Board Republicans fall silent when asked directly where they draw the line; probably because supporting the current Republican strategy will sound pretty absurd.

I think an actual deadline should be set in presidential election years but if you want to leave it up to Democrats, so be it.
:lol derp can't say if he wants a line or not.

Checkmate.

[Mikeanaro]

Worldwide record loan from the IMF to try to prop up Macri and lost like it was nobody's business, tbh...

I've never been a fan of peronachos and the penguin came after I left, so it's not my role to defend anything there, I share your disgust, tbh... and I spoke plenty about it, including DAF, back when Kichiloff didn't want to pay the debt.

That said, Macri was an absolute epic fail. There's nobody else to blame for getting all the peronchos back in there.

The loan was to keep paying those lame welfare plans, all for nothing because when they have the chance always vote Peronism.

He was an epic fail, but at the same time my point is peronchos have no one to blame for this current situation.

They are used to govern with majority on both camaras, do what they please and this time there is no magical soja to save their asses.

Coca Cola and other big dick companies are leaving the country right now, thats 100% on them and their dictator market rules.
Also you cant blame loans or debts because they are not paying anyone a dime, they kicked everything to 2023/2024 so it can explode to the next idiot in charge, just like they did before 2015.

The arrange with bonists took 8 months, a total international shame, and the big problem was a Scioli/Kicillof 2015 debt so it was pre Macri, the main fund took really long to agree because these idiots tried to play smart with minuscule letters.

And you have a 36 year old economy guy with no experience whatsoever who doesnt have a plan, he doesnt talk about where are we going.
Thats why you have a 167 dollar, not because Macri gato.

They want everyone living on welfare, business closing because there is a 200 day quarantine, Justice reform that no one is asking for, people starving, 5000 prisioners on the streets, lots of insecurity everywhere, more taxes, retired people making pennies, cyber patrolling, ocupas, 6 tv news channels talking this is the best place ever and companies leaving.

Also they are supressing the police, did you see the police killed because tasers are not allowed?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGXRQQqx6gc


The problem is everything as I said, no just the economy as it used to be and they are making it worse, fuck them.

[ElNono]

The loan was to keep paying those lame welfare plans, all for nothing because when they have the chance always vote Peronism.

He was an epic fail, but at the same time my point is peronchos have no one to blame for this current situation.

They are used to govern with majority on both camaras, do what they please and this time there is no magical soja to save their asses.

Coca Cola and other big dick companies are leaving the country right now, thats 100% on them and their dictator market rules.
Also you cant blame loans or debts because they are not paying anyone a dime, they kicked everything to 2023/2024 so it can explode to the next idiot in charge, just like they did before 2015.

The arrange with bonists took 8 months, a total international shame, and the big problem was a Scioli/Kicillof 2015 debt so it was pre Macri, the main fund took really long to agree because these idiots tried to play smart with minuscule letters.

And you have a 36 year old economy guy with no experience whatsoever who doesnt have a plan, he doesnt talk about where are we going.
Thats why you have a 167 dollar, not because Macri gato.

They want everyone living on welfare, business closing because there is a 200 day quarantine, Justice reform that no one is asking for, people starving, 5000 prisioners on the streets, lots of insecurity everywhere, more taxes, retired people making pennies, cyber patrolling, ocupas, 6 tv news channels talking this is the best place ever and companies leaving.

Also they are supressing the police, did you see the police killed because tasers are not allowed?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGXRQQqx6gc

The problem is everything as I said, no just the economy as it used to be and they are making it worse, fuck them.

But that's the point. These guys sucked so bad for so long, Macri and his government of CEOs had an easy job, right? suck less? Instead they kept raising prices on everything, poverty kept going up and up, and then they're wondering why nobody elected them again?

The right in countries like Argentina is flat out stupid too, and they have nobody else to blame.

[Spurtacular]

:lol derp can't say if he wants a line or not.

Checkmate.

Sorry, derp. You don't get to psychopath it up and then move onto something else.
You'll not be rewarded for that. Admit you got caught having two different takes if you want to progress.

[Mikeanaro]

But that's the point. These guys sucked so bad for so long, Macri and his government of CEOs had an easy job, right? suck less? Instead they kept raising prices on everything, poverty kept going up and up, and then they're wondering why nobody elected them again?

The right in countries like Argentina is flat out stupid too, and they have nobody else to blame.
Nope, there was no easy job, they won an election after almost 13 years of Kirchnerism having majority on both cameras, with means he didnt have it so they spent all those 4 years blocking him, did you ever watch what happened when he wanted to reform the retired people checks?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zud64VRFqbM


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VK7KWVgWdCU

If that thing was approved today retired people will be earning more money, then that fat piece of shit said he would raise 20% up on the first day if he wins the election, that never happened.

Here you have another one from the 2019 budget, all those clowns playing victims are the one doing shit right now, the boo hoo ones.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVrJFuILXR8

Also the political stunts like that Maldonado hippie shit, now we had like 8 missing persons during democracy and they say nothing.

You cant have an easy job when they have majority on both cameras and they are doing strikes everywhere, they have the unions, read a little about the teachers union and Vidal, she offered them 45% raise and clausula gatillo (which means if inflations is too high they have a raise automatically) and they said no so kids missed 3 months of school.

Now with this government they agreed for 15% and no gatillo, inflation is 37%

Also dont forget how they manipulated INDEC, Macri had realistic numbers when he was in charge the opposition said there was 41% poverty in the country, now that they won and with 200 days of quarantine, 6 million people more without jobs, and a dying economy they say there is 40,9%, a total joke.

Also is not that nobody elected them again, they had more votes than when he won... almost 42%, the thing is lots of idiots voted the other side as a punishment and now they are eating shit and drinking piss.

You have peronism segregated on every state, and PRO was a new party without support everywhere, so I wouldnt say is so easy, you are battling mafias not an 80 year old bozo like Biden and dumbocrats crying like sissy girls.
When they dont govern all they do is stop the country via strikes, creating violence ETC, thats what they did to De La Rua and tried the same with Macri and it didnt work out.

[benefactor]

Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper!
Announcers introduce the fighters and announce the winner. Fight commentators call the fight and offer play by play.

Just thought you might like to know.
'

[Winehole23]

great definition of Borking


From Bork to Barrett, though, the Republican argument has been that to accurately describe a Republican nominee’s views on constitutional issues in a public forum is a uncivil dirty trick https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/republicans-aren-t-being-honest-about-why-amy-coney-barrett-ncna1242802

[Announcer]

Announcers introduce the fighters and announce the winner. Fight commentators call the fight and offer play by play.

Just thought you might like to know.


Psycho Derp 2016

I'm all for appointees' getting an up or down vote in a couple months' time, regardless of which party's president does the appointing.

Board Republicans fall silent when asked directly where they draw the line; probably because supporting the current Republican strategy will sound pretty absurd.

Pscyho Derp 2020

:cry Don't really care. :cry

:cry Sorry.

koriwhat (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=10674) DMC (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20665) FrostKing (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=51741) tholdren (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=29395) ducks (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=13) Nathan89 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20260) hater (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7609) Mikeanaro (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=44789) Thread (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=19320) SnakeBoy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=12109) whottt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=171) rmt (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=4593) Wild Cobra (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8523) Cosmored (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=18886) Galileo (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=9641) Nbadan (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=78) LnGrrrR (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14319) CosmicCowboy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=207) DarrinS (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2042) SA210 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2902) Yonivore (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=48) ObiwanGinobili (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1707) Chris (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1656)

Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper! Down goes ChumpDumper!

[Spurtacular]

That didn't go well for SnitchBitch Factor.

:rollin

[ChumpDumper]

Announcers introduce the fighters and announce the winner. Fight commentators call the fight and offer play by play.

Just thought you might like to know.
'HE TOOK A CLASS

[boutons_deux]

'It instilled such problems': ex-member of Amy Coney Barrett's faith group speaks out

Powers’ sister had shown a gift for speaking in tongues, a defining trait of the followers of the small charismatic Christian community, and Rebekah was expected to do the same (https://peopleofpraise.org/about/who-we-are/charismatic1/).

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/233f7cf99240f7da2db371ac6ab2aa3ccd917b79/0_0_5389_3234/master/5389.jpg?width=460&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&
(https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/07/mitch-mcconnell-amy-coney-barrett-media)But after what seemed like an eternity, she proved unable to produce a sound.

“I couldn’t get it, and I stayed there an hour and a half before they gave up and finally said, ‘You just have blockage. You need to just work on your sin and be more open,” she said.

So given the clear importance that McConnell and Trump have placed on confirming Barrett before the election ...

The 41-year-old had a rebellious spirit and left People of Praise when she turned 18.

It has taken decades of therapy and hard work to overcome the intense feelings of shame and fear of damnation that she said marked her childhood.

The Christian faith group, based in South Bend, Indiana, dominated every aspect of her early life,

Barrett’s membership in this specific religious community does raise legitimate questions.

They want to examine how views that are integral to the group’s core beliefs – from its treatment of women to the separation of church and state – might influence her.

They are also distinct from most mainstream Catholic faith.

In the bi-weekly and hours-long meetings that defined Powers’ childhood, intense prayer and discussions centered on obedience and driving out sin.

Powers ... frequently witnessed people speaking in tongues and

frenzied calls for evil spirits to be expelled,

episodes that usually led to exorcisms.

Powers’ parents were often asked to take in other members into their home, even though her own family were using food stamps to get by.

As a child and teenager, Powers’ father served as her spiritual “head” and worked multiple jobs, including being asked to tend to the lawns of the community’s properties, free of charge.

“The brainwashing and the groupthink, the female subjugation of being there to serve and listen to your spiritual head. It was so devaluing. To me, it instilled such problems.”

“Obedience to authority and submission to headship are active responses to the gifts of God.”

Although Barrett has not discussed the issue, there is evidence that the former Notre Dame law professor

served as a trustee for a school affiliated with the group;

lived in the home of (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/06/amy-coney-barrett-people-of-praise-home) a prominent co-founder when she was in law school;

and announced the birth of her children in People of Praise’s magazine,

which has removed references to Barrett and her family (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/30/people-of-praise-amy-coney-barrett-website) since she joined the federal bench in 2017. :lol hiding what? why?

Barrett served as a “handmaid” as late as 2010, a leadership position for women in the community

“intentional community” of People of Praise and its nature of being “conservative, authoritarian, hierarchical, and patriarchal”.

“I think they’re potentially more dangerous and much more sophisticated [than a cult],” he said.

they have to be lawyers and judges and submissive to men at the same time."

Being that far into the community means, no, she is going to be teaching other people.”

She already “knows” what to think because of the patriarchal structure she was raised in,

which mirrors conservative Catholic views and the views of her judicial mentor, Antonin Scalia.

People of Praise, he said, does reject a secular view of separation between church and state. :lol Christian supremacy/Sharia coming to USA, sooner or later.

the Catholic conservative legal movement is putting liberalism on trial.

They want to change a certain understanding of the liberal order of individual rights

A spokesman for People of Praise has said it would be inappropriate to discuss Barrett. :lol

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/10/people-of-praise-amy-coney-barrett-faith-group

brainwashed by super-fringe perverse "worse than a cult" Barrett has no place on SCOTUS

[Spurtacular]

1315393814161391619

[boutons_deux]

Baker, Sununu do not sign GOP governors’ letter

supporting Barrett nomination to Supreme Court

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/11/metro/baker-sununu-do-not-sign-gop-governors-letter-supporting-coney-barrett-nomination-supreme-court

[Winehole23]

Baker, Sununu do not sign GOP governors’ letter

supporting Barrett nomination to Supreme Court

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/11/metro/baker-sununu-do-not-sign-gop-governors-letter-supporting-coney-barrett-nomination-supreme-courtCoping post.

Barring dramatic COVIDening in the Senate, ACB will be confirmed on schedule. Worst case for the GOP, they'll get 'er done in the lame duck session.

[boutons_deux]

me coping? G F Y

[Will Hunting]

:lmao Mike Lee not even wearing a mask

Hopefully he douses Grassley with some COVID. Heck if he's able to douse Feinstein too I'll contribute to his next re-election campaign.

[Winehole23]

:lmao Mike Lee not even wearing a mask

Hopefully he douses Grassley with some COVID. Heck if he's able to douse Feinstein too I'll contribute to his next re-election campaign.Judiciary Committee this morning?

[Will Hunting]

Judiciary Committee this morning?
Yes.

[baseline bum]

:lmao Mike Lee not even wearing a mask

Hopefully he douses Grassley with some COVID. Heck if he's able to douse Feinstein too I'll contribute to his next re-election campaign.

What a fucking piece of shit and what a piece of shit party.

[Winehole23]

Yes.At this point, Team Trump are intentional spreaders.

[Winehole23]

(Except for Ted Cruz, who is in self-quarantine and appearing remotely, after coming into contact with Mike Lee)

[DarrinS]

:lmao Mike Lee not even wearing a mask

Hopefully he douses Grassley with some COVID. Heck if he's able to douse Feinstein too I'll contribute to his next re-election campaign.

How long do you think people are infectious?

[boutons_deux]

At this point, Team Trump are intentional spreaders.

don't stop there

50M - 60M POS American deplorables will vote for Trash and other Repugs.

Those Americans contribute to making America fucked and unfuckable.

[Winehole23]

How long do you think people are infectious?


Most people with coronavirus who have symptoms will no longer be contagious by 10 days after symptoms resolve. People who test positive for the virus but never develop symptoms over the following 10 days after testing are probably no longer contagious, but again there are documented exceptions. So some experts are still recommending 14 days of isolation.https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/if-youve-been-exposed-to-the-coronavirus



(Trump had a fever over the weekend.)

[Reck]

This Amy person is coming across like a cunt. She’s giving that bitch side eyes.

[Will Hunting]

The Republicans keep saying constitutional right to confirm Barrett. If the only boundaries a senate majority is supposed to govern by are what the constitution does and doesn't allow, don't complain about court packing if it happens.

[Will Hunting]

This Amy person is coming across like a cunt. She’s giving that bitch side eyes.
She reminds me of Michelle Bachmann.

[Winehole23]

-zing-


(he left out crushing voting rights and overturning Roe v. Wade.)

1315680311917899779

[CosmicCowboy]

'breaking all precedents" :lmao

[CosmicCowboy]

Twenty-nine times in American history there has been an open Supreme Court vacancy in a presidential election year, or in a lame-duck session before the next presidential inauguration. (This counts vacancies created by new seats on the Court, but not vacancies for which there was a nomination already pending when the year began, such as happened in 1835–36 and 1987–88.) The president made a nomination in all twenty-nine cases. George Washington did it three times. John Adams did it. Thomas Jefferson did it. Abraham Lincoln did it. Ulysses S. Grant did it. Franklin D. Roosevelt did it. Dwight Eisenhower did it. Barack Obama, of course, did it. Twenty-two of the 44 men to hold the office faced this situation, and all twenty-two made the decision to send up a nomination, whether or not they had the votes in the Senate.
...
Nineteen times between 1796 and 1968, presidents have sought to fill a Supreme Court vacancy in a presidential-election year while their party controlled the Senate. Ten of those nominations came before the election; nine of the ten were successful, the only failure being the bipartisan filibuster of the ethically challenged Abe Fortas as chief justice in 1968.
...
The bottom line: If a president and the Senate agree on a Supreme Court nominee, timing has never stopped them. By tradition, only when the voters have elected a president and a Senate majority from different parties has the fact of a looming presidential election mattered. When there is no dispute between the branches, there is no need to ask the voters to resolve one.

[Winehole23]

'breaking all precedents" :lmaoNorms or traditions would have been a better choice of words. The point stands that the GOP has been "packing the court" to do an end run around the will of the people to enact deeply unpopular policies from the bench.

[Winehole23]

For the record, I'm cool with the fight over this being political. The judicial branch is political right down to its toes. It's a coequal branch of government.

[baseline bum]

For the record, I'm cool with the fight over this being political. The judicial branch is political right down to its toes. It's a coequal branch of government.

Hard to call it coequal when it's about to overstep congress by invalidating the ACA.

[Winehole23]

Hard to call it coequal when it's about to overstep congress by invalidating the ACA.Checks and balances. The Supreme Court gets to say what the law is.

[Will Hunting]

:lol you can see the sweat dripping off Graham's face. Shocker that he didn't want to get tested.

[Winehole23]

Factoid:

Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts were all on George W. Bush‘s legal team during the Florida 2000 recount.

[Will Hunting]

God damn, Coney Barrett's voice is so shrill it makes Hillary Clinton's voice sound warm and likable.

[baseline bum]

Checks and balances. The Supreme Court gets to say what the law is.

I don't see any checks and balances. I see a conspiracy from the Republicans to change the law and then get Republican judges to invalidate it based on that bad faith argument.

[baseline bum]

COVID Barrett is now setting the precedent that any law you don't like, you go make a little change to it and it's gone if you have the court. What a joke, fuck this country. I hope DC gets burned down when COVID Barrett strikes down the ACA.

[Winehole23]

I don't see any checks and balances. I see a conspiracy from the Republicans to change the law and then get Republican judges to invalidate it based on that bad faith argument.I agree.

The solution is to fuck them right back.Expand SCOTUS and reorganize the federal bench.

(Undoing 40 years of GOP obstruction and court-packing by changing Senate rules and passing one or two laws would be pretty sweet.)

[Will Hunting]

I don't see any checks and balances. I see a conspiracy from the Republicans to change the law and then get Republican judges to invalidate it based on that bad faith argument.
At this point I'd like to see the ACA get overturned (assuming the Dems win a senate majority).

The Democrats only seem to have any balls to do stuff when the Republicans make power grabs. I'm worried that if SCOTUS upholds the ACA, Schumer uses that as an excuse for why the filibuster is fine and doesn't need to go away.

[baseline bum]

At this point I'd like to see the ACA get overturned (assuming the Dems win a senate majority).

The Democrats only seem to have any balls to do stuff when the Republicans make power grabs. I'm worried that if SCOTUS upholds the ACA, Schumer uses that as an excuse for why the filibuster is fine and doesn't need to go away.

ACA gets overturned and you're going to have a lot of people fucked for years while trying to set the new national healthcare up. It'll get torn down overnight but will take years to reimplement. If the COVID Barrett confirmation doesn't convince the DNC to play hardball then nothing will.

[boutons_deux]

I don't see any checks and balances. I see a conspiracy from the Republicans to change the law and then get Republican judges to invalidate it based on that bad faith argument.

The Repugs/oligarchy are post-truth, post-Constitution, anti-democracy

Repugs/oligarchy want an autocratic, dictatorial "unitary executive", an Exec (and all its agencies) immune to Congressional approvals and oversight.

objective? Bannon's "destruction of the administrative state"

Check and balances? Repugs go LOL LOL LOL LOL

[Will Hunting]

ACA gets overturned and you're going to have a lot of people fucked for years while trying to set the new national healthcare up. If the COVID Barrett confirmation doesn't convince the DNC to play hardball then nothing will.
The difference is I think the establishment Dems start losing primaries a lot more frequently in the scenario I'm talking about. If COVID Barrett guts the ACA and, even though he has a majority, Schumer can't get a new healthcare bill passed, he loses his primary to AOC in 2022.

[rmt]

God damn, Coney Barrett's voice is so shrill it makes Hillary Clinton's voice sound warm and likable.

Wonder what it really sounds like with the LA accent.

[baseline bum]

The difference is I think the establishment Dems start losing primaries a lot more frequently in the scenario I'm talking about. If COVID Barrett guts the ACA and, even though he has a majority, Schumer can't get a new healthcare bill passed, he loses his primary to AOC in 2022.

If that happens the Democrats will badly lose the senate in 2022 when there is no progressive energy to vote for the DNC, Uday Trump gets elected president in 2024, and then Uncle Thomas and Alito retire and we two more young federalist society shitbags.

[Will Hunting]

If that happens the Democrats will badly lose the senate in 2022 when there is no progressive energy to vote for the DNC, Uday Trump gets elected president in 2024, and then Uncle Thomas and Alito retire and we two more young federalist society shitbags.
Doubtful that they lose the senate in 2022 even without energy. The senate map that year is dreadful for Republicans. They have twice as many seats up and the Democrats really only have 2 incumbents who will have competitive races (Colorado & Nevada).

More likely though, Schumer is forced to nuke the filibuster if COVID Barrett kills the ACA, and there's tens of millions of people spitting mad about losing their healthcare before the new bill goes into effect who show up in 2022 to make sure the Dems keep the senate.

I actually don't think the ACA gets overturned though. IMO te argument to overturn it this time is so ridiculously bad faith and asinine that judges like Roberts and Gorsuch who are only semi-corrupt and not completely corrupt won't go for it.

[Reck]

:lmao

Chuck Grassley is completely blind at this point. Couldn't even read his little prepare remarks without stumbling his way through.

[baseline bum]

Doubtful that they lose the senate in 2022 even without energy. The senate map that year is dreadful for Republicans. They have twice as many seats up and the Democrats really only have 2 incumbents who will have competitive races (Colorado & Nevada).

More likely though, Schumer is forced to nuke the filibuster if COVID Barrett kills the ACA, and there's tens of millions of people spitting mad about losing their healthcare before the new bill goes into effect who show up in 2022 to make sure the Dems keep the senate.

I actually don't think the ACA gets overturned though. IMO te argument to overturn it this time is so ridiculously bad faith and asinine that judges like Roberts and Gorsuch who are only semi-corrupt and not completely corrupt won't go for it.

The Democrats lost a senate race in Massachusetts the last time they got bullied by Republican obstructionists fresh off winning a big election.

[boutons_deux]

https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/121473196_1058138724615721_5959436313048418933_n.j pg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=v54eyIPSWhEAX_eAznx&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=ad7da978c626b7c303576bb34d6ea551&oe=5FAA671D

[Will Hunting]

:lmao

Chuck Grassley is completely blind at this point. Couldn't even read his little prepare remarks without stumbling his way through.
IMO 85 should be the age limit for congress and the president. The senators who are over 85, Feinstein and Grassley can't see more than 3 inches in front of their face.

[Will Hunting]

:lmao

1315818921019289600

[Nathan89]

Damn racists adopting black kids.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/VenturaReport/status/1315722997290983424?s=20

Cult left is so strong that they have white women holding up racist signs against white women.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

1315818921019289600

What exactly is wrong with that picture besides the fact that all the kids look genuinely happy?

[Spurtacular]

https://twitter.com/VenturaReport/status/1315722997290983424?s=20

Cult left is so strong that they have white women holding up racist signs against white women.

Her and Blake surely have BBC in common. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

Damn racists adopting black kids.

:lol Kamala

[Will Hunting]

What exactly is wrong with that picture besides the fact that all the kids look genuinely happy?
They have the black kids off to the side of the picture, as if they're exotic pets the white parents can parade around to show how not racist they are.

[Spurtacular]

They have the black kids off to the side of the picture, as if they're exotic pets the white parents can parade around to show how not racist they are.

I didn't know it was racist to not ensure that darker skinned people are in the middle.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zmvt7yFTtt8

[Nathan89]

One could go with the shit take about the photo above or they can use their brain and figure out that they were trying to have symmetry/balance in the photo.

[Will Hunting]

One could go with the shit take about the photo above or they can use their brain and figure out that they were trying to have symmetry/balance in the photo.
What symmetry and balance are you referring to?

[Spurtacular]

What symmetry and balance are you referring to?

Heights in large part. Color too perhaps; but that would surely be racist.

[Reck]

This lady is incredibly shady.

Won't answer questions that really should be clear cut NOs. Won't say whether she'd favor Trump if a case were to go before the SC about the election.

Red flags all over the place.

[RD2191]

This lady is incredibly shady.

Won't answer questions that really should be clear cut NOs. Won't say whether she'd favor Trump if a case were to go before the SC about the election.

Red flags all over the place.
I try, I honestly try to give Republicans the benefit of the doubt. Eventually we have to work together ya know? They can't all be bad, right? But no, they're pieces of shit, all of them. Hypocritical liars that are only out to cause harm and protect their own self interest. Fuck em all tbh

[Will Hunting]

This lady is incredibly shady.

Won't answer questions that really should be clear cut NOs. Won't say whether she'd favor Trump if a case were to go before the SC about the election.

Red flags all over the place.
Even ignoring the content of what she's saying (which is awful), she has a horrible temperament a la Kavanaugh. A good SCOTUS candidate is unflappable even when he/she is getting grilled by senators on the other side, Gorsuch in 2017 is a great example of that, and Roberts was probably the GOAT at it, as he was able to calmly and smoothly make every Democrat questioning him look stupid during his confirmation. She's making snarky comments and responds to every Democrat with a condescending tone. I don't think there's even a chance she'll be another Gorsuch, she's got Alito/Thomas level extremist written all over her.

[RD2191]

Even ignoring the content of what she's saying (which is awful), she has a horrible temperament a la Kavanaugh. A good SCOTUS candidate is unflappable even when he/she is getting grilled by senators on the other side, Gorsuch in 2017 is a great example of that, and Roberts was probably the GOAT at it, as he was able to calmly and smoothly make every Democrat questioning him look stupid during his confirmation. She's making snarky comments and responds to every Democrat with a condescending tone. I don't think there's even a chance she'll be another Gorsuch, she's got Alito/Thomas level extremist written all over her.
TBH.

[RD2191]

I haven't even heard this lady speak but I can tell just by looking at pictures of her online that she's an angry person.

[Reck]

I haven't even heard this lady speak but I can tell just by looking at pictures of her online that she's an angry person.

:lol

She's a definite bitch. Probably into hate sex.

[RD2191]

:lol

She's a definite bitch. Probably into hate sex.
I'd anger bang her if she wanted it tbh. She can call me derogatory racial slurs to get the hate out while we're at it too.

[baseline bum]

I'd anger bang her if she wanted it tbh. She can call me derogatory racial slurs to get the hate out while we're at it too.

Why not if she didn't want it too?

[Will Hunting]

Why not if she didn't want it too?
Good point tbh. She’s even written opinions that were sympathetic to rape. A true handmaid.

[SnakeBoy]

I am enjoying this thread very much

[Reck]

I am enjoying this thread very much

Why?

She's very low energy. Trump like those now?

Honestly besides being a cunty bitch lady, she's also boring. Had to stop watching tbh.

[TimDunkem]

I bet she just lays there in bed.

[RD2191]

Why not if she didn't want it too?


Good point tbh. She’s even written opinions that were sympathetic to rape. A true handmaid.


I am enjoying this thread very much


Why?

She's very low energy. Trump like those now?

Honestly besides being a cunty bitch lady, she's also boring. Had to stop watching tbh.


I bet she just lays there in bed.
:rollin

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1316119549645926401?s=19

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1316119549645926401?s=19

Legit question to ask, imo.

[Spurtacular]

This lady is incredibly shady.

Won't answer questions that really should be clear cut NOs. Won't say whether she'd favor Trump if a case were to go before the SC about the election.

Red flags all over the place.

What should be clear cut no's?

[Spurtacular]

Legit question to ask, imo.

Rape a regular occurrence in your tranny realm?

[Chris]

9_fFm4E2fow

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

:lol The internet and real life are two different things.

[Winehole23]

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1316119549645926401?s=19Gender equality. Sen. Hirono asks this question to every nominee.

Do you think women are incapable of sexual harrassment and assault?

[Winehole23]

1316139629666463744

[Spurtacular]

Gender equality. Sen. Hirono asks this question to every nominee.

Do you think women are incapable of sexual harrassment and assault?

And it'd also a good idea to pat down ninety-year-old ladies at the airports, amirite?

[Spurtacular]

1316139629666463744

These types of questions reflect very poorly on the Democrats.

[Winehole23]

And it'd also a good idea to pat down ninety-year-old ladies at the airports, amirite?Senators get to use their time however they please, sorry you're going through this.

[Winehole23]

These types of questions reflect very poorly on the Democrats.You're going to say that no matter what anyone says.

[Spurtacular]

You're going to say that no matter what anyone says.

I could see how you'd think that. Democrats say so much stupid shit to which I've called out, you've just internalized that faulty logic.

[Spurtacular]

Senators get to use their time however they please, sorry you're going through this.

Crying out that they're entitled to be petulant isn't a W, blakehold.

You been watching David Pakman?

[Winehole23]

I could see how you'd think that. Democrats say so much stupid shit to which I've called out, you've just internalized that faulty logic.

To parry a hquestion about the transfer of presidential power after she gave us a detailed analysis of the ACA, raises questions that Barrett's blanket refusal to answer hypotheticals was meant to quell.

[Winehole23]

Crying out that they're entitled to be petulant isn't a W, blakehold.

You been watching David Pakman?Nope.

Wasn't trying to win, I was just responding to you.

[Spurtacular]

Nope.

Wasn't trying to win, I was just responding to you.

You been watching David Pakman?

[Spurtacular]

To parry a hquestion about the transfer of presidential power after she gave us a detailed analysis of the ACA, raises questions that Barrett's blanket refusal to answer hypotheticals was meant to quell.

Avoiding hypotheticals is a common tactic.
But I'm speaking to the absurd nature of that particular hypothetical.

[Winehole23]

You been watching David Pakman?Nope.

Who is David Pakman?

[Winehole23]

Avoiding hypotheticals is a common tactic.
But I'm speaking to the absurd nature of that particular hypothetical.Ok, speak to it.

[Reck]

You been watching David Pakman?

:lol what is a conservative doing watching this?

You also watch TYT and Jimmy Dore. Oh and Kyle Kulinski. :lol

[Spurtacular]

Nope.

Who is David Pakman?

Your kindred spirit brother.

You should be watching him daily, tbh.

[Spurtacular]

:lol what is a conservative doing watching this?

You also watch TYT and Jimmy Dore. Oh and Kyle Kulinski. :lol

I'm open to other people's p.o.v.

[Reck]

I'm open to other people's p.o.v.

Or you'll getting ready to come out.

[Spurtacular]

Or you'll getting ready to come out.

So, you're saying you watch all the lefty sh** cos you're gay?

:lolK.

[Reck]

So, you're saying you watch all the lefty sh** cos you're gay?

:lolK.

:lol derp always having gay sex on his mind.

You've been a closeted liberal and I've called you out on it before. Dont know if it's because your immediate family are democrats or if you like the bandwagon effect.

Probbaly a bit of both if we're been honest.

[Spurtacular]

:lol derp always having gay sex on his mind.

You've been a closeted liberal and I've called you out on it before. Dont know if it's because your immediate family are democrats or if you like the bandwagon effect.

Probbaly a bit of both if we're been honest.

:lol You're "calling me out" cos I've called you out on being a closet republican (among other closeted things :lol).
:lol Those never Trumper Republicans and the Kasichs and Cindy McCains of the world are totally your bag.

[Reck]

:lol You're "calling me out" cos I've called you out on being a closet republican (among other closeted things :lol).
:lol Those never Trumper Republicans and the Kasichs and Cindy McCains of the world are totally your bag.

That makes no sense.

I'm not out there watching conservative media like you do liberal outlets. You lose.

[Spurtacular]

That makes no sense.

I'm not out there watching conservative media like you do liberal outlets. You lose.

So, you're basically detailing how it's a supreme value for you to live in an echo chamber.

:lolK

[ElNono]

These types of questions reflect very poorly on the Democrats.

lol wat

[ElNono]

She's going to get confirmed, and then Biden will fold when it's time for him to pack the court... that's my call.

[ducks]

She's going to get confirmed, and then Biden will fold when it's time for him to pack the court... that's my call.

Private citizen has no right to pick a Supreme Court justice

[Reck]

She's going to get confirmed, and then Biden will fold when it's time for him to pack the court... that's my call.

Yeah he already said he's "not a fan" of the idea of court packing.

Hopefully he goes the statehood for PR and Washington DC route which he has already sponsored as wanting when the House passed a bill earlier this year giving the latter statehood.

Of course the senate laughed that shit off.

[Will Hunting]

Yeah he already said he's "not a fan" of the idea of court packing.

Hopefully he goes the statehood for PR and Washington DC route which he has already sponsored as wanting when the House passed a bill earlier this year giving the latter statehood.

Of course the senate laughed that shit off.
IMO he's going to play it off as "if congress puts a bill on my desk to expand the court, I'll support it."

[ElNono]

Yeah he already said he's "not a fan" of the idea of court packing.

Hopefully he goes the statehood for PR and Washington DC route which he has already sponsored as wanting when the House passed a bill earlier this year giving the latter statehood.

Of course the senate laughed that shit off.

If he has control of Congress, he better pack that shit or the DNC is done.

Plus, the Senate strategy is wrong-headed. Democrats will always have a handicap on the Senate due to it's system of representation. That's exactly why when you have the Senate, you don't hesitate. Mitch didn't.

[Reck]

IMO he's going to play it off as "if congress puts a bill on my desk to expand the court, I'll support it."


If he has control of Congress, he better pack that shit or the DNC is done.

Plus, the Senate strategy is wrong-headed. Democrats will always have a handicap on the Senate due to it's system of representation. That's exactly why when you have the Senate, you don't hesitate. Mitch didn't.

No arguements from me here. I'm fully onboard with whatever as long as consequences are borne out from this nomination.

[Will Hunting]

If he has control of Congress, he better pack that shit or the DNC is done.

Plus, the Senate strategy is wrong-headed. Democrats will always have a handicap on the Senate due to it's system of representation. That's exactly why when you have the Senate, you don't hesitate. Mitch didn't.
They need to use my 4-state DC strategy, tbh. Each DC quadrant becomes its own state :lol

[pgardn]

I'm open to other people's p.o.v.

open as in if they have a nutty you tube channel
Why dont you ever fckn read?
Can you even read?

[Spurtacular]

open as in if they have a nutty you tube channel
Why dont you ever fckn read?
Can you even read?

Moar lashing out.

[pgardn]

They need to use my 4-state DC strategy, tbh. Each DC quadrant becomes its own state :lol

Or he could just flat out lie.
Say no way Im expanding the SC, and then do everything in his power to expand it orange man style.

[pgardn]

Moar lashing out.

Use other words.

How about striking blindly, puching at air... something.
You watch way too much tube.

[Spurtacular]

Use other words.

How about striking blindly, puching at air... something.
You watch way too much tube.

I did use other words. When you learned that gun was at the rally because of the media, you spiraled out of control. :lol

[ducks]

She is smart no notes
She has more Smarts then all women in congress

[spurraider21]

pakman's interview of tim pool way back when was pretty hilarious

[ElNono]

:lmao Ted Cruz questions to Amy Covid...

How long have you played the piano?
Do the kids do piano lessons as well?
You and your husband have seven kids. How did you manage with the distance learning? What was that like in the Barrett household?
What advice would you give little girls?

this dude is trolling :lol

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Ted Cruz questions to Amy Covid...

How long have you played the piano?
Do the kids do piano lessons as well?
You and your husband have seven kids. How did you manage with the distance learning? What was that like in the Barrett household?
What advice would you give little girls?

this dude is trolling :lol

Good on him, tbh.

[Spurtacular]

pakman's interview of tim pool way back when was pretty hilarious

Why's that?

[Reck]

Good on him, tbh.

Trolling is not why people put him there.

[spurraider21]

Why's that?
because tim pool predictably made himself look like an idiot on multiple occasions.

i dont remember it verbatim but the moments i specifically recall was when tim pool started talking about how identity politics are very bad and immediately followed that with identity politics... something like "as a mixed race person, i felt __ way growing up and therefore my views are ___"

and he was oblivious as to the actual laws surrounding social media, section 230 protections, etc

he's a low-information grifter. all of his videos that i've seen are just him pulling up an article written by somebody else and slowly reading it to his audience with some marginal commentary. im astonished that people find him so captivating. such low effort content and he's raking in the views/money. good life

even if i think a pundit is stupid, i can usually understand what's to like about them. take steven crowder, another stupid blowhard... but yeah i guess if you have the sense of humor of a 14 year old and still think jokes with punchlines of "lol ur gay" are funny, then he's perfect for you. but tim pool? devoid of any entertainment value and he doesnt have any insight to offer

[Winehole23]

Are murder and robbery illegal?

(Barrett whiffed on a meatball, or didn't want to piss off her benefactor.)

1316082898244689920

[Spurtacular]

Trolling is not why people put him there.

Supporting qualified SC nominees is why they put him there. He'll be fine.

[Spurtacular]

because tim pool predictably made himself look like an idiot on multiple occasions.

i dont remember it verbatim but the moments i specifically recall was when tim pool started talking about how identity politics are very bad and immediately followed that with identity politics... something like "as a mixed race person, i felt __ way growing up and therefore my views are ___"

and he was oblivious as to the actual laws surrounding social media, section 230 protections, etc

he's a low-information grifter. all of his videos that i've seen are just him pulling up an article written by somebody else and slowly reading it to his audience with some marginal commentary. im astonished that people find him so captivating. such low effort content and he's raking in the views/money. good life

even if i think a pundit is stupid, i can usually understand what's to like about them. take steven crowder, another stupid blowhard... but yeah i guess if you have the sense of humor of a 14 year old and still think jokes with punchlines of "lol ur gay" are funny, then he's perfect for you. but tim pool? devoid of any entertainment value and he doesnt have any insight to offer

TP is largely grifter level. But I do have to :lol that you don't like that he's calling out a lot of BS on the left.

[boutons_deux]

Dozens of Barrett's Notre Dame colleagues ask her to call a halt to her nomination

Amy Coney Barrett has failed to disclose (https://www.dailykos.com/story/2020/10/9/1983723/-A-pattern-of-coverups-is-emerging-in-Barrett-nomination-by-the-nominee-and-by-Republican-senators) an awful lot of documents to the Senate in her nomination to the Supreme Court.

This is probably one of them: a letter from 88 of her Notre Dame colleagues (https://teacher-scholar-activist.org/2020/10/13/an-open-letter-to-judge-amy-coney-barrett-from-your-notre-dame-colleagues/), dated Oct. 10,

asking her to withdraw at least temporarily from consideration for the position. they clearly delineate and which all come down to the fact that

this seat is sullied by circumstance and will forever have an asterisk attached.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1986210

[spurraider21]

TP is largely grifter level. But I do have to :lol that you don't like that he's calling out a lot of BS on the left.
thats because he's right wing :lol

his grift is the "disaffected liberal" shtick just like dave rubin

[DarrinS]

Dems really hate when tribe members bail on the regressive left.

[DarrinS]

Lol "disaffected liberal".

[ChumpDumper]

lol "regressive left"

[spurraider21]

lol "i didnt leave the left, the left left me"

[spurraider21]

lol "classical liberal"

[Spurtacular]

Lol "disaffected liberal".

NPC Chumpettes will never be disaffected liberals; but there seems to be a record number of them nowadays. :lol

[spurraider21]

lol #walkaway

[Spurtacular]

thats because he's right wing :lol

his grift is the "disaffected liberal" shtick just like dave rubin

Good marketing, tbh.
There are a lot of disaffected liberals along with a good number
of conservatives who will be fooled into thinking he's a serious lookout.