Amy Coney Barrett Is A Breath Of Fresh Air

[Spurtacular]

Out: Goldbricker / subversive commie
In: Constitutional judge with real values


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D2A24zALOE

[ducks]

Democrat John F. Kennedy was elected president -- becoming the first and, to date, only Roman Catholic to hold that office.

[hombre]

Senate has already signaled that this is who they want, so this McConnell's pick, not Trump's.

Being that Trump is self-destruction mode so we'll see what happens.

[Spurtacular]

https://cdn.theindianalawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/barrett-senhearing-9-6-17-090617-rh1-529-450bp.jpg

FrostKing (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=51741)

After seven kids.
Dat thing you keep saying about conservative women being more attractive.

[SnakeBoy]

After seven kids.


Two adopted from Haiti

[Spurtacular]

Out: Fabreezed Norma-Ruth Bader-Bates Ginsburg

https://clickhole.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/yxwztriurcxeqky720lc.jpg

In: Breath Of Fresh Air Amy Coney Barrett

https://compote.slate.com/images/01342b7b-dfe5-4e17-af0f-c3fdc7300283.jpeg?width=780&height=520&rect=1560x1040&offset=0x0

[Spurtacular]

Two adopted from Haiti

Citizen Saint cleaning up Bill and Hillary's sh** to boot.

[Spurtacular]

https://pics.onsizzle.com/photos-nd-edu-amy-coney-barrett-age-46-mother-of-7-conservative-34406258.png

[spurraider21]

Another cope thread

[Spurtacular]

Another cope thread

You're the one who has to cope, idiot. :lol

[spurraider21]

You're the one who has to cope, idiot. :lol
meets the requirements to be considered a cope thread (threat you start where you make up of at least 50% of the comments)

https://i.gyazo.com/1a16cc74a4367cf4e5c681b92258d619.png

[Spurtacular]

meets the requirements to be considered a cope thread (threat you start where you make up of at least 50% of the comments)

https://i.gyazo.com/1a16cc74a4367cf4e5c681b92258d619.png

Bean counting is how you cope, tbh. :lol

[SnakeBoy]

Citizen Saint cleaning up Bill and Hillary's sh** to boot.

Sweet Amy is everything Hillary pretended to be

[Winehole23]

https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/09/profile-of-a-potential-nominee-amy-coney-barrett/

[pgardn]

https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/09/profile-of-a-potential-nominee-amy-coney-barrett/

this country should become white and Christian.

and I am very pretty. No ugly girl could hold this position.

[boutons_deux]

Yet another Catholic autocrat asshole hell-bent on imposing her personal ethics and morals on anybody who doesn't share those ethics and morals.

If AB has her way, along the 5 other rightwing assholes, there will be no Freedom FROM Religion.

AB is not strong supporter of 14th Amendment, maybe she will vote to deny education to females, a Christian Sharia.

[Winehole23]

Sweet Amy is everything Hillary pretended to behow so?

[boutons_deux]

The Top Contender for RBG’s Seat Has a Fundamentally Cruel Vision of the Law

Here’s what we can expect if Trump fills the late justice’s seat.

Faced with two plausible readings of a law, fact, or precedent,

Barrett always seems to choose the harsher, stingier interpretation.

Can job applicants sue employers whose policies have a disproportionately deleterious impact on older people? Barrett said no (http://hr.cch.com/ELD/KleberCareFusion012319.pdf).

Should courts halt the deportation of an immigrant who faced torture at home? Barrett said no (https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/17-2920/17-2920-2018-08-28.pdf?ts=1535493617).

Should they protect refugees denied asylum on the basis of xenophobic prejudice? Barrett said no (https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/17-2920/17-2920-2018-08-28.pdf?ts=1535493617).

Should they shield prisoners from unjustified violence by correctional officers? Barrett said no (http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2019/D07-29/C:17-2295:J:Rovner:aut:T:fnOp:N:2375824:S:0).

Should minors be allowed to terminate a pregnancy without telling their parents if a judge has found that they’re mature enough to make the decision? Barrett said no (https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Abortion.pdf).

Should women be permitted to obtain an abortion upon discovering a severe fetal abnormality? Barrett said no (http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2018/D06-25/C:17-3163:J:PerCuriam:aut:T:npDp:N:2176287:S:0).

There is no question that, if confirmed, Barrett would cast the fifth vote to either

hollow out Roe v. Wade or overturn it altogether.

Similarly, there is no doubt that Barrett would

dramatically expand the Second Amendment, invalidating gun control measures around the country.

It’s quite possible, perhaps even likely, that within a year of her confirmation,

Americans will be forbidden from terminating a pregnancy in 21 states (https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/abortion-policy-absence-roe)—

but permitted to purchase assault weapons (https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gun-laws/policy-areas/hardware-ammunition/assault-weapons/#:~:text=Seven%20states%20and%20the%20District,of% 20Columbia%20prohibit%20assault%20weapons.) and carry firearms in public (https://www.mic.com/articles/130029/which-states-allow-concealed-carry-this-map-shows-who-can-legally-carry-a-gun-and-where#:~:text=%22May%20issue%22%20states%3A%20The, New%20York%20and%20Rhode%20Island.) in every state.

Barrett’s confirmation would heighten the odds that the Supreme Court will

eradicate the entire Affordable Care Act in 2021,

stripping health insurance from more than 20 million people.

Barrett and her conservative colleagues would also take

a machete to the thicket of laws that protect the health and safety of millions of Americans.

The current conservative justices have already telegraphed (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/06/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-conservatives-gundy-sex-offender.html) their desire (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/11/kavanaugh-nondelegation-gundy-supreme-court.html) to invalidate federal statutes that direct executive agencies to

limit pollution,

guard against labor exploitation,

monitor Wall Street, and

protect consumers from predatory practices.

Barrett’s confirmation would be a catastrophe for the climate:

She may well overrule the landmark 5–4 decision (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/06pdf/05-1120.pdf), long despised by conservatives, that compels the federal government to regulate carbon emissions.

Many more precedents that have become ingrained in the fabric of American life would be

thrown into peril upon Barrett’s confirmation.

Affirmative action.

Miranda rights.

Marriage equality.

DACA (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/06/john-roberts-daca-dreamers-supreme-court-trump.html).

Independent agencies (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/06/supreme-court-seila-law-v-cfpb.html).

What remains (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/10/supreme-court-voting-rights-act-obliteration.html) of the Voting Rights Act.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/09/amy-coney-barrett-ginsburg-scotus-future.html

[boutons_deux]

Five Things You Should Know About 7th Circuit Nominee Amy Coney Barrett

1. Her writings reflect an originalist approach to the Constitution.

:lol the Constitution is a DEAD document, and the FFs intended that everybody everywhere should carry guns and own high-capacity automatic weapons.

This means that she would seek to interpret the Constitution according to its “original public meaning” – which, in Barrett’s own words, arguably calls into question

the constitutionality of the Fourteenth Amendment,
the validity of Brown v. Bd. Of Ed., and
the use of paper money.

2. She rejected the idea that Catholic judges should decide legal issues contrary to the church’s moral teachings.

3. Barrett wrote that, in her view, it is legitimate for Justices to overturn precedents

:lol Destroy faith in the law, all law is fungible

4. Barrett explicitly questioned the precedential force of Roe v. Wade and its progeny,

5. Barrett signed a letter criticizing the birth control benefit under the Affordable Care Act as a “grave infringement on religious liberty.” :lol Religious Freedom to hurt, persecute, discriminate against others

https://nwlc.org/blog/five-things-you-should-know-about-7th-circuit-nominee-amy-coney-barrett/

America is fucked and unfuckable by the anti-democratic, autocratic oligarchy, Capitalists, WHITE Christian nationalist supremacists, and their cheap Repug whores.

[Winehole23]

this country should become white and Christian.

and I am very pretty. No ugly girl could hold this position.Agree with the first sentence, disagree with the second.

The sexist fuckability quotient lies to the advantage and disadvantage of the target, I have zero doubt a less attractive woman who was about as professional and distinguished as Judge Barrett could serve as well or better. As always, YMMV.

[CosmicCowboy]

Agree with the first sentence, disagree with the second.

The sexist fuckability quotient lies to the advantage and disadvantage of the target, I have zero doubt a less attractive woman who was about as professional and distinguished as Judge Barrett could serve as well or better. As always, YMMV.

kind of proves your point

https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/media:826666e8b86947a6ad0034bf4420cf91/800.jpeg

[Bogie]

kind of proves your point

https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/media:826666e8b86947a6ad0034bf4420cf91/800.jpeg

It’s really no wonder none of your family will mourn your death.

[CosmicCowboy]

It’s really no wonder none of your family will mourn your death.

Jeffrey, go play with your plastic kiddie darts and leave the adults alone.

[Winehole23]

kind of proves your point

https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/media:826666e8b86947a6ad0034bf4420cf91/800.jpegstay classy, CC.


















(don't ever change)

[boutons_deux]

Sounds like sexist, lookist, racist pig CC hasn't read her opinions, nor heard on on Colbert.

[TimDunkem]

When was the last time Derp logged out and got a breath of fresh air?

[Reck]

When was the last time Derp logged out and got a breath of fresh air?

It's impressive tbh.

Guy hops off his main account and into an alt immediately. He's on the clock with just 1 hour of sleep....at the compputer.

[pgardn]

Agree with the first sentence, disagree with the second.

The sexist fuckability quotient lies to the advantage and disadvantage of the target, I have zero doubt a less attractive woman who was about as professional and distinguished as Judge Barrett could serve as well or better. As always, YMMV.

Fox news anchors vs. Rachel Madcow

She fits perfectly for the red team.

[CosmicCowboy]

stay classy, CC.


















(don't ever change)

WTF? My point was agreeing with Winehole that an unattractive woman can be an effective supreme court justice. Sotemayor proves his point.

[Spurtacular]

Agree with the first sentence, disagree with the second.

The sexist fuckability quotient lies to the advantage and disadvantage of the target, I have zero doubt a less attractive woman who was about as professional and distinguished as Judge Barrett could serve as well or better. As always, YMMV.

Poor blakehole can only get fat uggos.

[Spurtacular]

WTF? My point was agreeing with Winehole that an unattractive woman can be an effective supreme court justice. Sotemayor proves his point.

Sotemayor and Kagan were godawful picks. Their only qualifications were that they are women and that they would vote to uphold Obamacare.

[ChumpDumper]

Sotemayor and Kagan were godawful picks. Their only qualifications were that they are women and that they would vote to uphold Obamacare.What specifically made them "godawful picks"?

[Spurtacular]

What specifically made them "godawful picks"?

They're thoroughly unimpressive intellectually, and they're ideologues who have no commitment to the Constitution.

There's your bone. Won't be playing 20 questions. Make a point now if you have one.

[spurraider21]

What specifically made them "godawful picks"?
my issue with the kagan pick is she didnt have any judicial experience. i dont doubt that she was incredibly knowledgeable on the law, but i think having served as an appellate judge should be a pre-requisite.

the only other justice in recent history who didnt have any experience on the bench was Rehnquist

dont see how anybody could realistically object to sotomayor as being qualified... at that point its just about having purely political/partisan disagreement with her jurisprudence, and thats not really a legitimate ground to object to a nominee

[Spurtacular]

my issue with the kagan pick is she didnt have any judicial experience. i dont doubt that she was incredibly knowledgeable on the law, but i think having served as an appellate judge should be a pre-requisite.

Glaring. Agree.


Sotemayor and Kagan were godawful picks. Their only qualifications were that they are women and that they would vote to uphold Obamacare.

[ChumpDumper]

They're thoroughly unimpressive intellectuallyThat's not specific.

That's you folding, derp.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

dont see how anybody could realistically object to sotomayor as being qualified... at that point its just about having purely political/partisan disagreement with her jurisprudence, and thats not really a legitimate ground to object to a nominee

There's a reason she wrote a (lame) children's book and not a (valuable) law book.

[Spurtacular]

That's not specific.

That's you folding, derp.

:lol

You've been BlakeBlaking with regularity lately. You're relegating yourself. :lmao

[boutons_deux]

Trump's Supreme Court front-runner already let the cat of the bag,

says the court is us vs. them

Here’s Amy Coney Barrett playing pundit and defending McConnell’s decision to block President Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, after Justice Scalia’s death.

Bad enough, but note the big tell:

An Obama nominee would “dramatically flip the balance of power."

1308810730708381696

So much for those “balls and strikes” (http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/12/roberts.statement/) of Chief Justice John Roberts, huh?

She lays it all out there; it’s a “balance of power.”

So much for even respecting the pretense of not prejudging cases.

It’s all “us vs. them.”

Even Justice Neil Gorsuch, who got that stolen seat, hasn’t played that game (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/6/15/1953345/-Sex-discrimination-a-whimsical-addition-to-1964-s-Civil-Rights-Act-slaps-Trump-in-face).

I guess that’s why it’s likely to be Barrett.

She’s willing to go there, on the record.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/9/23/1980045/-Trump-s-Supreme-Court-front-runner-already-let-the-cat-of-the-bag-says-the-court-is-us-vs-them

[Spurtacular]

Trump's Supreme Court front-runner already let the cat of the bag,

says the court is us vs. them

Here’s Amy Coney Barrett playing pundit and defending McConnell’s decision to block President Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, after Justice Scalia’s death.

Bad enough, but note the big tell:

An Obama nominee would “dramatically flip the balance of power."

1308810730708381696

So much for those “balls and strikes” (http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/12/roberts.statement/) of Chief Justice John Roberts, huh?

She lays it all out there; it’s a “balance of power.”

So much for even respecting the pretense of not prejudging cases.

It’s all “us vs. them.”

Even Justice Neil Gorsuch, who got that stolen seat, hasn’t played that game (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/6/15/1953345/-Sex-discrimination-a-whimsical-addition-to-1964-s-Civil-Rights-Act-slaps-Trump-in-face).

I guess that’s why it’s likely to be Barrett.

She’s willing to go there, on the record.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/9/23/1980045/-Trump-s-Supreme-Court-front-runner-already-let-the-cat-of-the-bag-says-the-court-is-us-vs-them



"The arguments will be"

Desperate

[Reck]

Trump's Supreme Court front-runner already let the cat of the bag,

says the court is us vs. them

Here’s Amy Coney Barrett playing pundit and defending McConnell’s decision to block President Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, after Justice Scalia’s death.

Bad enough, but note the big tell:

An Obama nominee would “dramatically flip the balance of power."

1308810730708381696

So much for those “balls and strikes” (http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/12/roberts.statement/) of Chief Justice John Roberts, huh?

She lays it all out there; it’s a “balance of power.”

So much for even respecting the pretense of not prejudging cases.

It’s all “us vs. them.”

Even Justice Neil Gorsuch, who got that stolen seat, hasn’t played that game (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/6/15/1953345/-Sex-discrimination-a-whimsical-addition-to-1964-s-Civil-Rights-Act-slaps-Trump-in-face).

I guess that’s why it’s likely to be Barrett.

She’s willing to go there, on the record.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/9/23/1980045/-Trump-s-Supreme-Court-front-runner-already-let-the-cat-of-the-bag-says-the-court-is-us-vs-them



Soooo I guess according to Mitt Romney's standards, she's out.


"The Constitution gives the President the power to nominate and the Senate the authority to provide advice and consent on Supreme Court nominees. Accordingly, I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the President’s nominee. If the nominee reaches the Senate floor, I intend to vote based upon their qualifications," Romney wrote.

She pretty much disqualified herself by tilting her hands in an utterly bias way.

[SnakeBoy]

Soooo I guess according to Mitt Romney's standards, she's out.



She pretty much disqualified herself by tilting her hands in an utterly bias way.


"The arguments will be"

Desperate

[Reck]

Snakey boy, I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy.

I know Romney will vote for her regardless of her saying that. No desperation here. They will vote.

[Spurtacular]

Soooo I guess according to Mitt Romney's standards, she's out.



She pretty much disqualified herself by tilting her hands in an utterly bias way.

Another pep talk. :lol

The GOP doesn't need Romney, though it would be tighter without him.

He already sees what way the wind is blowing and is not going to blow his fleeting Repub credit on this Democrat L.

He would especially be stupid to make this his hill to die on while representing the most socially conservative state in the union.

[CosmicCowboy]

Trump gets three nominations to the court. :lmao

[CosmicCowboy]

You guys should direct your spittle at that to RBG and her cancer riddled hubris. Trump didn't have to get #3.

[DMC]

When was the last time Derp logged out and got a breath of fresh air?

Probably back when you were dying of COVID

[TimDunkem]

Probably back when you were dying of COVID
Was that after you doxed someone for making fun of your fat ass?

[Spurtacular]

Probably back when you were dying of COVID

:lmao

[Winehole23]

WTF? My point was agreeing with Winehole that an unattractive woman can be an effective supreme court justice. Sotemayor proves his point.You could at least spell her name right. I guess I've had my limit of discussion about judicial fuckability.

I find it inane and insulting. You?

[pgardn]

They're thoroughly unimpressive intellectually, and they're ideologues who have no commitment to the Constitution.

There's your bone. Won't be playing 20 questions. Make a point now if you have one.

When Kagan was confirmed, Scalia said he was delighted to work with her on an intellectual level, that she would present interesting arguments.
Guess you hated Scalia and thought he was stupid.

Derptoidal...

[ducks]

Trump gets three nominations to the court. :lmao

Election have consequestions
Says 44

[Spurtacular]

When Kagan was confirmed, Scalia said he was delighted to work with her on an intellectual level, that she would present interesting arguments.
Guess you hated Scalia and thought he was stupid.

Derptoidal...

Lip service even if true.

[CosmicCowboy]

You could at least spell her name right. I guess I've had my limit of discussion about judicial fuckability.

I find it inane and insulting. You?

You brought it up. I assumed you considered it relevant.

[Winehole23]

You brought it up. I assumed you considered it relevant.pgardn brought it up, I replied to him.

need new glasses?

[Millennial_Messiah]

https://cdn.theindianalawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/barrett-senhearing-9-6-17-090617-rh1-529-450bp.jpg

FrostKing (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=51741)

After seven kids.
Dat thing you keep saying about conservative women being more attractive.

Hey.... copyright alert... that was ME that said it first on SpursTalk, not FrostKing.
Millennial_Messiah

[Spurtacular]

Miss Ginsburg was making some sense on basic issues like this when she wasn't goldbricking.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiLuiQ2VcHo

[Spurtacular]

Hey.... copyright alert... that was ME that said it first on SpursTalk, not FrostKing.
Millennial_Messiah (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=50493)

Same difference.

[Winehole23]

Miss Ginsburg was making some sense on basic issues like this when she wasn't goldbricking.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiLuiQ2VcHoGoldbricking how? In what sense was Justice Ginsburg a loafer?

[Spurtacular]

Goldbricking how? In what sense was Justice Ginsburg a loafer?

She took a lot of time off and left the court down to eight, blakeold.

[hater]

:lmao americans thinking their supreme court matters :lol

[Winehole23]

She took a lot of time off and left the court down to eight, blakeold.Getting cancer treatment = Bad employee

Gotcha.

Do you recall when the Senate left the Supreme Court with eight justices starting 271 days before the election? So long ago, right?

[Spurtacular]

Getting cancer treatment = Bad employee

That was her problem, but she made it the American people's problem. She shouldn't have been so entitled and resigned. Instead, she goldbricked.

[Spurtacular]

Term limits good now.
Democrats getting desperate.

https://ca.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-termlimits-idUSKCN26F3L3

[Spurtacular]

Term limits good now.
Democrats getting desperate.

https://ca.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-termlimits-idUSKCN26F3L3

:lol Fake news


Some legal observers, including those who favor term limits, say they must be accomplished through an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which has been interpreted as requiring life tenure for federal judges and justices.

[Reck]

So she's point blank against Roe vs Wade and is in a cult.

:lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvK1mxaUp7I

[ChumpDumper]

She also opposes her own nomination....

1308769093865156611

[Will Hunting]

So she's point blank against Roe vs Wade and is in a cult.

:lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvK1mxaUp7I
In addition to the cult he's talking about, the federalist society is just as much of a right wing cult. Our country has just gotten so far to the right that said right wing cult now controls our courts.

[rmt]

To some of you, every group whose opinion you don't agree with is a cult and waaay out there. But go ahead and continue spreading misinformation even though Newsweek already posted a correction.

[Spurtacular]

So she's point blank against Roe vs Wade and is in a cult.

:lol Parroting the start of the video cos you can't think for yourself.

[Spurtacular]

In addition to the cult he's talking about, the federalist society is just as much of a right wing cult. Our country has just gotten so far to the right that said right wing cult now controls our courts.

Oh, the humanity! We might stop killing babies!

[Spurtacular]

She also opposes her own nomination....

1308769093865156611

"the arguments will be"

This has already been covered. Blakeblaking won't get you w's.

[Reck]

:lol Parroting the start of the video cos you can't think for yourself.

What about all the shitty Krystal Bal:lol videos you post without comment? Dumb derp.

[spurraider21]

What about all the shitty Krystal Bal:lol videos you post without comment? Dumb derp.
:lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6mw-Pod7MY&feature=youtu.be

[baseline bum]

Trump gets three nominations to the court. :lmao

Hopefully Biden gets five confirmed

[Will Hunting]

Trump gets three nominations to the court. :lmao
Odd that someone who claims to hate Trump finds this funny.

[ChumpDumper]

"the arguments will be"

This has already been covered. Blakeblaking won't get you w's.:lol you're melting down

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6mw-Pod7MY&feature=youtu.be:lmao

[Spurtacular]

:lol you're melting down

Throwing out inapplicable buzzwords not gonna get it done. Stop blakeblaking.

You're seriously embarrassing yourself more than usual.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6mw-Pod7MY&feature=youtu.be

Didn't know Saagar was Darth Vader's prodigy. I'm sure you found a lot of comfort in this skit at any rate.

[ChumpDumper]

Throwing out inapplicable buzzwords not gonna get it done. Stop blakeblaking.

You're seriously embarrassing yourself more than usual.:lmao your buzzwords

[ChumpDumper]

Didn't know Saagar was Darth Vader's prodigy. I'm sure you found a lot of comfort in this skit at any rate.That one hurt you badly, derp.:lol

[Spurtacular]

Moar blakeblaking

[Winehole23]

In addition to the cult he's talking about, the federalist society is just as much of a right wing cult. Our country has just gotten so far to the right that said right wing cult now controls our courts.are you familiar with Steven Calabresi?

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/30/opinion/trump-delay-election-coronavirus.html

[Winehole23]

That was her problem, but she made it the American people's problem. She shouldn't have been so entitled and resigned. Instead, she goldbricked.Your opinion is harsh as ever. It's one of your leading traits.

[Spurtacular]

Your opinion is harsh as ever. It's one of your leading traits.

Truth can be harsh. There was no understandable reason for her to not step down.
Miss Ginsburg was subversive trash and it's good she gave up the ghost because she was going to keep holding America hostage.

[Winehole23]

Truth can be harsh. There was no understandable reason for her to not step down.
Miss Ginsburg was subversive trash and it's good she gave up the ghost because she was going to keep holding America hostage.Dissing women seems to be a theme with you. Maybe you should try another tack.

[Spurtacular]

Dissing women seems to be a theme with you. Maybe you should try another tack.

I'm not supposed to call her out because she's a woman?

Also, I just made a thread calling a woman a breath of fresh air, so your narrative is a huge failure on it's face anyways.

Going full blaketard; you should really know better than that by now.

[ChumpDumper]

Moar blakeblakingWhat does that even mean, derp?

[ChumpDumper]

Dissing women seems to be a theme with you. Maybe you should try another tack.derp's afraid of women more than anything.

And he's afraid of everything.

[Spurtacular]

What does that even mean, derp?

This has been explained to you multiple times. You tell me what it means, or fail.

[ChumpDumper]

This has been explained to you multiple times.
No, you fold every time I ask, derp.

What does it mean?

[Spurtacular]

No, you fold every time I ask, derp.

What does it mean?

It's been answered. If I show you, what are you going to do for it?

If you take a month leave, I'll consider finding it for you.

[ChumpDumper]

It's been answered. If I show youYou won't.

You'll cry and whine about conditions but you'll fold like you always do.

All you have to do is answer now.

[Ef-man]

From observations, blakeblaking is something that he regularly uses and could mean any of the following:

1) derp fantasying about Blake (in dreams and reality) so please continue degrading him
2) derp does not like I women as he prefers alpha males to dominate him
3) derp has a Blake fetish and this is a coping mechanism in his basement of solitude

[Reck]

Derp has himself a nice business after he’s done treading ST waters. He can start selling folding chairs. The cheap kind.

[Ef-man]

There is even a news story on derp's folding skills. We even see his mom. Way to go derp!



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHmygTxPUec

[Spurtacular]

won't...

leave for a month if I show you. That's what I thought, BlakeBlaker.

Go cry to someone who cares.

[baseline bum]

Was that after you doxed someone for making fun of your fat ass?

lol what's the story on this?

[ChumpDumper]

leave for a month if I show you. That's what I thought, BlakeBlaker.

Go cry to someone who cares.


You won't.

You'll cry and whine about conditions but you'll fold like you always do.

All you have to do is answer now.
:lol derp

[Spurtacular]

:lol derp

It's not remotely impressive if you say it after the fact, derp.

I had already called you out on not putting your presence where your mouth is.

Fucking blaketard.

[Winehole23]

lol what's the story on this?I have been asking about this for years. In my mind, it has never been explained, but hell, I'm old, and tipsy.

Dear lazyweb: Who knows about this?

[ChumpDumper]

It's not remotely impressive if you say it after the fact, derp.

I had already called you out on not putting your presence where your mouth is.

Fucking blaketard.:lmao I don't care about muh conditions.

You never said what it meant and you never will.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao I don't care about muh conditions.

You never said what it meant and you never will.

I know. You care about pretending the question hasn't been answered and the pussing out.

Moar playing dumb. Par.

[ChumpDumper]

I know. You care about pretending the question hasn't been answered and the pussing out.

Moar playing dumb. Par.I hasn't been answered and you'll never answer it.:tu

[Spurtacular]

I hasn't been answered and you'll never answer it.:tu

Then put a month away on it.

[ChumpDumper]

Then put a month away on it.:lmao muh conditions

[Spurtacular]

^^^
:lol Weak man thinks he standing still.

[ChumpDumper]

^^^
:lol Weak man thinks he standing still.:lol you're the one not saying what it means.

[Spurtacular]

:lol you're the one not saying what it means.

I've said it. Put a month on it, weak man.

[ChumpDumper]

I've said it. Put a month on it, weak man.:lmao muh conditions

[Reck]

What would derp do without chump for a month? He's already crawling through glass without Blake.

[Spurtacular]

What would derp do without chump for a month? He's already crawling through glass without Blake.

:lol Thinking that gnat left.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao muh conditions

Step up. Put three months on it. I won't even give you a hard time if you use your Pavlov alt.

[Blake]

:lol Thinking that gnat left.

I've spent like ten minutes in here the past three weeks but good to see my rent is still free

[Spurtacular]

I've spent like ten minutes in here the past three weeks but good to see my rent is still free

And somehow knew to come here in the middle of the night right to this without a mention.

:lolK.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/MarkDice/status/1310003034643030018?s=19

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1310007626156118017?s=19

[TSA]

What would derp do without chump for a month? He's already crawling through glass without Blake.

What would chump do without derp? They both spend the majority of their time here playing closeted homosexual grab ass with each other. derp is the last poster here that gives chump the 24/7 attention he pathetically craves.

[benefactor]

What would chump do without derp? They both spend the majority of their time here playing closeted homosexual grab ass with each other. derp is the last poster here that gives chump the 24/7 attention he pathetically craves.
He actually ignored him once for like a month and derp flailed around, bumping his man love threads and following him everywhere begging for him to engage him.

[Blake]

And somehow knew to come here in the middle of the night right to this without a mention.

:lolK.

:lol this thread was at the top and yours was the last post in it, genius

[Ef-man]

He actually ignored him once for like a month and derp flailed around, bumping his man love threads and following him everywhere begging for him to engage him.

True, so you hate to see it.

Now he thinks everyone is Blake or he ends up calling you Blakeblaking with no explanation (ask ChumpDumper).

Derp cant quit Blake. He is as brokeback mountain as they come.

:cry muh blake

[Ef-man]

:lol this thread was at the top and yours was the last post in it, genius

Great observation Blake!

Cheers!

[rmt]

https://twitter.com/MarkDice/status/1310003034643030018?s=19

As ridiculous as these refs gifting the Lakers - Lebron just mowed over Murray.

I wish someone would tell me how to get pick up these tweets.

Oh, I guess it just takes time.

[Bogie]

As ridiculous as these refs gifting the Lakers - Lebron just mowed over Murray.

I wish someone would tell me how to get pick up these tweets.

Oh, I guess it just takes time.

so since you claim to be pro life, why do you support separating children from their parents and locking them in cages to be abused and neglected?

why would you support forced hysterectomies performed on women?

that doesn’t sound very Christian to me

[Ef-man]

As ridiculous as these refs gifting the Lakers - Lebron just mowed over Murray.

I wish someone would tell me how to get pick up these tweets.

Oh, I guess it just takes time.

Sorry, but the chance of Denver winning are the same as derp being a heterosexual. :lmao

Not that I like the lakers (FTLs).

[Spurtacular]

Stop recruiting, Blake.

[Ef-man]

:lmao

The ball dont lie.

Derp is brokeback, always was and always will be.

:cry muh closet sanctuary :cry

[Spurtacular]

You can't logout of being a cuckold, blake.

[Ef-man]

:lmao

The ball dont lie.

Derp is brokeback, always was and always will be.

:cry muh closet sanctuary :cry

[Chris]

As ridiculous as these refs gifting the Lakers - Lebron just mowed over Murray.

I wish someone would tell me how to get pick up these tweets.

Oh, I guess it just takes time.

[ tweet ] full link to tweet [ /tweet ]

no spaces in the brackets or link :tu

[SnakeBoy]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ei4RLTIUMAA8HtO?format=jpg&name=medium

[Reck]

Already posted snakey. Looks like you and Chris get your marching orders from the same source.

[Spurtacular]

Already posted snakey. Looks like you and Chris get your marching orders from the same source.

What's the marching order, Wreck?

[Ef-man]

You want marching orders derp?

Go back to your Brokeback mountain and stay there.

:tu

[SnakeBoy]

Already posted snakey. Looks like you and Chris get your marching orders from the same source.

Jesus often guides the righteous to the same tweets

[Ef-man]

Jesus often guides the righteous to the same tweets

And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.

[Chris]

And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1306753050623836161?s=19

[Ef-man]

And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.

https://d.ibtimes.co.uk/en/full/1585080/donald-trump-jesus-christ.png

[TSA]

He actually ignored him once for like a month and derp flailed around, bumping his man love threads and following him everywhere begging for him to engage him.

That’s funny. I’ve had chump on ignore for over a year and he’s done the same thing. Like I said, they need each other.

[Spurtacular]

And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.

Blake learned that at church the other day.

[Ef-man]

Blake learned that at church the other day.

Found that saying in a fortune cookie actually but is that something that comes up at your Church of Brokeback Mountain derp?

I hear the ball dont lie.

:tu

[Spurtacular]

Found that saying in a fortune cookie actually

You buy Christian fortune cookies?

:lolK Blake

[Spurtacular]

That’s funny. I’ve had chump on ignore for over a year and he’s done the same thing. Like I said, they need each other.

Dat wounded animal thing.

[Ef-man]

You buy Christian fortune cookies?

:lolK Blake

Nice try at a pivot Brokeback Derp.

Talk to your mama about it. Maybe she will accept you as your are or maybe not.

:cry muh closet sanctuary :cry

[ElNono]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ei4RLTIUMAA8HtO?format=jpg&name=medium

:lol

[DMC]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ei4RLTIUMAA8HtO?format=jpg&name=medium

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

Nice try at a pivot Brokeback Derp.

Talk to your mama about it. Maybe she will accept you as your are or maybe not.

:cry muh closet sanctuary :cry

You don't have hand, board cuckold.

Accept your own goal.

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_3ArkrtS6U

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh-mdVlm284

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8njvgGPd80

[FrostKing]

Dem conservative women

Trump's had a great last 30 days. Finishing strong.

[FrostKing]

https://i.ibb.co/HzmhdmB/20200927-032540.jpg

[Ef-man]

You don't have hand, board cuckold.

Accept your own goal.

The ball dont like.

Derp is brokeback.

Live with it.

:tu

[ducks]

CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin on Saturday blasted Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., for making Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett a "hero to religious conservatives" in 2017 — and said it was time the 87-year-old Senator "leave the committee."

"The dogma lives loudly within you," Feinstein declared at a Court of Appeals confirmation hearing for the Roman Catholic Barrett three years ago.

Toobin derided the comment from the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee as "so incompetent, so inept, so apparently religiously discriminatory that Amy Coney Barrett became a hero to religious conservatives."

"Dianne Feinstein was and is a distinguished public servant," he said. "She is now 87 years old and she has repeatedly engaged in behavior in recent months that seemed out of step with what Democrats want to do. She's going to be the leader. And all I can say is good luck with that, Democrats."

[Bogie]

Dem conservative women

Trump's had a great last 30 days. Finishing strong.


I meant to ask you, how did you find a Mexican girl and her parents in Poland of all places?

i meant there are literally less than .01% of Hispanic population, and 97% identify as polish.

Where were you at in Poland where you would one of a very few Hispanics with a father who committed voter fraud in a country you don’t even live in.

you guys are always so bad at logic. But i would be interested to know how you met her, in Poland, where you live.

[Bogie]

CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin on Saturday blasted Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., for making Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett a "hero to religious conservatives" in 2017 — and said it was time the 87-year-old Senator "leave the committee."

"The dogma lives loudly within you," Feinstein declared at a Court of Appeals confirmation hearing for the Roman Catholic Barrett three years ago.

Toobin derided the comment from the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee as "so incompetent, so inept, so apparently religiously discriminatory that Amy Coney Barrett became a hero to religious conservatives."

"Dianne Feinstein was and is a distinguished public servant," he said. "She is now 87 years old and she has repeatedly engaged in behavior in recent months that seemed out of step with what Democrats want to do. She's going to be the leader. And all I can say is good luck with that, Democrats."


post a link or video ducks you racist piece of shit

[Ef-man]

post a link or video ducks you racist piece of shit

Ducks’ English is like derp’s brokebackness, they are both horrible things that you hate to see.

[Blake]

Great observation Blake!

Cheers!

Thank me very much

[DMC]

The ball dont like.

Derp is brokeback.

Live with it.

:tu

the ball don't like?

:lmao RG level retarded

Read the whirlwind!

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/MarkDice/status/1310284524371079168?s=19

[Spurtacular]

https://twitter.com/MarkDice/status/1310284524371079168?s=19

Sh** worked on Tulsi. But that was just in the commie left circles.

[Winehole23]

the guy who went to church this morning and carries his son's Rosary beads with him is anti-Catholic.

right.

[Spurtacular]

1310211219970813953

:lmao Chumpettes wishing they could have their CIA guy again.

[Spurtacular]

https://i2.wp.com/politicallyincorrecthumor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/dday-gravestones-their-dying-wish-america-never-surrender-to-socialism-communism.jpg?resize=515%2C410&ssl=1

[Trainwreck2100]

https://i.ibb.co/HzmhdmB/20200927-032540.jpg

:lol Christians accepting a Catholic :lol

[Trainwreck2100]

https://i2.wp.com/politicallyincorrecthumor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/dday-gravestones-their-dying-wish-america-never-surrender-to-socialism-communism.jpg?resize=515%2C410&ssl=1

"libertarian"

[Spurtacular]

"libertarian"

That must've hurt your feelings.

[Trainwreck2100]

That must've hurt your feelings.


Real libertarians don't give a fuck about soldiers deaths because they are against using the military to intervene in foreign affairs. Any "libertarian" that plays the religion or military card is just a republican cosplaying as something they are not because they feel the Republican party isn't far right enough for them. But it is was a shitty meme that would validate you belief so you just decided to conveniently ignore it.

[Spurtacular]

Real libertarians don't give a fuck about soldiers deaths because they are against using the military to intervene in foreign affairs. Any "libertarian" that plays the religion or military card is just a republican cosplaying as something they are not because they feel the Republican party isn't far right enough for them. But it is was a shitty meme that would validate you belief so you just decided to conveniently ignore it.

Yea? Is that what you saw as one of their campaign slogans?

Even if I were to concede that you have a point. A couple things:

1. Just cos someone put libertarian on their calling card doesn't really mean sh**. Blakeline Bum called himself a libertarian at one point.
2. There's absolutely nothing shitty about the meme other than that it shits on snowflakes like you. I'll give credence to "the men who fought and died for freedom" over some commie plant judge a million times out of a million.

[Trainwreck2100]

Yea? Is that what you saw as one of their campaign slogans?

Even if I were to concede that you have a point. A couple things:

1. Just cos someone put libertarian on their calling card doesn't really mean sh**. Blakeline Bum called himself a libertarian at one point.
2. There's absolutely nothing shitty about the meme other than that it shits on snowflakes like you. I'll give credence to "the men who fought and died for freedom" over some commie plant judge a million times out of a million.

Which is literally why my post was "libertarian". It's a shitty meme because they call themselves "libertarian" when they are not.

:lol calling me a snowflake with no basis for that.

[spurraider21]

Yea? Is that what you saw as one of their campaign slogans?

Even if I were to concede that you have a point. A couple things:

1. Just cos someone put libertarian on their calling card doesn't really mean sh**. Blakeline Bum called himself a libertarian at one point.
2. There's absolutely nothing shitty about the meme other than that it shits on snowflakes like you. I'll give credence to "the men who fought and died for freedom" over some commie plant judge a million times out of a million.
neither communism nor socialism are antonyms of freedom

[Spurtacular]

Which is literally why my post was "libertarian". It's a shitty meme because they call themselves "libertarian" when they are not.

:lol calling me a snowflake with no basis for that.

You're much less snowflake than the run-of-the-mill chumpette on here. I'll give you that.

You really think I was going to not post the meme cos the sig wasn't in accordance with a pure libertarian? :lol

[Spurtacular]

neither communism nor socialism are antonyms of freedom

Communism in particular is. Socialism can diverge into suppression of freedom as well.

But thanks for the surface level wisdom, Lite. :lol

[ElNono]

Real libertarians don't give a fuck about soldiers deaths because they are against using the military to intervene in foreign affairs. Any "libertarian" that plays the religion or military card is just a republican cosplaying as something they are not because they feel the Republican party isn't far right enough for them. But it is was a shitty meme that would validate you belief so you just decided to conveniently ignore it.

A good portion of "libertarians" have no idea what libertarian thinking is. They're basically republicans that fell in love with that loser Ron Paul.

[spurraider21]

Communism in particular is. Socialism can diverge into suppression of freedom as well.

But thanks for the surface level wisdom, Lite. :lol
from the wiki. you might want to pay particular attention to the bolded

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_society

In Marxist thought, communist society or the communist system is the type of society and economic system postulated to emerge from technological advances in the productive forces, representing the ultimate goal of the political ideology of communism. A communist society is characterized by common ownership of the means of production with free access to the articles of consumption and is classless and stateless, implying the end of the exploitation of labour.

Communism is a specific stage of socioeconomic development predicated upon a superabundance of material wealth, which is postulated to arise from advances in production technology and corresponding changes in the social relations of production. This would allow for distribution based on need and social relations based on freely-associated individuals.

The term communist society should be distinguished from the Western concept of the communist state, the latter referring to a state ruled by a party which professes a variation of Marxism–Leninism.

[Spurtacular]

A good portion of "libertarians" have no idea what libertarian thinking is. They're basically republicans that fell in love with that loser Ron Paul.

They're such children who just don't know. Not nearly as enlightened as Democrats, amirite?

[ElNono]

They're such children who just don't know. Not nearly as enlightened as Democrats, amirite?

No, plenty of stupid democrats too. Though, you certainly are the poster child of republicans that hate to be called republican...

[Spurtacular]

from the wiki. you might want to pay particular attention to the bolded

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_society

In Marxist thought, communist society or the communist system is the type of society and economic system postulated to emerge from technological advances in the productive forces, representing the ultimate goal of the political ideology of communism. A communist society is characterized by common ownership of the means of production with free access to the articles of consumption and is classless and stateless, implying the end of the exploitation of labour.

Communism is a specific stage of socioeconomic development predicated upon a superabundance of material wealth, which is postulated to arise from advances in production technology and corresponding changes in the social relations of production. This would allow for distribution based on need and social relations based on freely-associated individuals.

The term communist society should be distinguished from the Western concept of the communist state, the latter referring to a state ruled by a party which professes a variation of Marxism–Leninism.

:lol Jewpedia gonna set me straight
:lol Differentiating between communism and communist state is like differentiating between HIV and AIDS.

[Spurtacular]

No, plenty of stupid democrats too. Though, you certainly are the poster child of republicans that hate to be called republican...

I don't care if you call me it. I'm just stating the fact that I'm not one. But I get that you need to cope with that somehow.

[Trainwreck2100]

You're much less snowflake than the run-of-the-mill chumpette on here. I'll give you that.

You really think I was going to not post the meme cos the sig wasn't in accordance with a pure libertarian? :lol

my post was just "libertarian", because it's not libertarian, you're the one that seemed to take issue with that one word in quotes

[spurraider21]

:lol Jewpedia gonna set me straight
:lol Differentiating between communism and communist state is like differentiating between HIV and AIDS.
well yeah. and if you read about "communist states" they talk about the single party rule states who's official objective is the implementation of socialism and communism.

so the USSR was undoubtedly run by a "communist party" which had a stated intention of actually implementing communism, but never reached that end. you could argue (and i'd almost certainly agree) that the concept of a communist society is an unrealistic/unpragmatic utopia with no shot at being successfully implemented, at least anytime in the foreseeable future, if ever

but that doesnt mean the USSR ever actually fostered a communist society. they didnt de-commodify their economy, they didnt abolish social class, they certainly didnt abolish the state. the primary function of public institutions didnt shift away from lawmaking and control of people.

[ElNono]

I don't care if you call me it. I'm just stating the fact that I'm not one. But I get that you need to cope with that somehow.

The only one on the defensive here is you, not me.

[ElNono]

well yeah. and if you read about "communist states" they talk about the single party rule states who's official objective is the implementation of socialism and communism.

so the USSR was undoubtedly run by a "communist party" which had a stated intention of actually implementing communism, but never reached that end. you could argue (and i'd almost certainly agree) that the concept of a communist society is an unrealistic/unpragmatic utopia with no shot at being successfully implemented, at least anytime in the foreseeable future, if ever

lol good luck with that

[Spurtacular]

The only one on the defensive here is you, not me.

Yea, you really got me on my heels.

[Spurtacular]

well yeah. and if you read about "communist states" they talk about the single party rule states who's official objective is the implementation of socialism and communism.

so the USSR was undoubtedly run by a "communist party" which had a stated intention of actually implementing communism, but never reached that end. you could argue (and i'd almost certainly agree) that the concept of a communist society is an unrealistic/unpragmatic utopia with no shot at being successfully implemented, at least anytime in the foreseeable future, if ever

In your own words in a line or two, what do you think communism is?

[spurraider21]

In your own words in a line or two, what do you think communism is?
to keep in very brief, communism is a theoretical organization of society that abolishes social class, money, and the state... made possible by technological advancement and industrialization to the point where there is a surplus of the goods, and there is no longer a need for people's lives to primarily be about trading labor for wages merely to meet subsistence levels

the shortest description would probably be a rejection of hierarchy. not far off from anarchism (not to be confused with the meme of anarcho-capitalism which is i guess libertarianism taken to its extreme... though i reject the contention that it is actually a type of anarchism, but its nevertheless the label)

[ElNono]

Yea, you really got me on my heels.

If you say do :tu

[Spurtacular]

to keep in very brief, communism is a theoretical organization of society that abolishes social class, money, and the state... made possible by technological advancement and industrialization to the point where there is a surplus of the goods, and there is no longer a need for people's lives to primarily be about trading labor for wages merely to meet subsistence levels

And yet it always comes down to the haves and have nots in terms of political class in breakneck speed. Also, even on it's face it ignores the value of wages for labor. Frankly, it ignores incentive and opportunity across the board. In other words, it's a scam, Lite.

Thanks for being honest and all. But :lol at dat "surface level political knowledge" you're putting on display.

[spurraider21]

And yet it always comes down to the haves and have nots in terms of political class in breakneck speed.
well yeah. from their perspective, we have a starting point (capitalism) that has unjust hierarchy between the haves and have-nots. thats kind of the point. its a rejection of capitalism. that's not a revelation


Also, even on it's face it ignores the value of wages for labor.
this literally couldn't be more wrong. marx's critique was that capitalism is inherently inequitable and ignores the true value of labor.

ie i am a business owner who manufactures chairs. i buy the raw materials for a chair worth $20. i pay a carpenter to turn those materials into a chair. i'm able to sell the chair for $50 due to his labor. therefore, his labor added $30 value to the product. however, by the very nature of capitalism, i could not profit, and thus the business would collapse, if i paid the carpenter the full $30 value of his wages. so i pay him $15 for his labor (pocket the other $15) while his labor was actually worth $30.

this is called the labor theory of value and is one of the central tenets of marxism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_theory_of_value). i'm not saying you have to subscribe to it... but to suggest that it ignores the value of labor literally couldnt be more wrong


Frankly, it ignores incentive and opportunity across the board. In other words, it's a scam, Lite.
not really. the idea behind communism is that it becomes viable when technological and industrial conditions are such that we already have a surplus of supply.

and dialing it back to socialism as opposed to communism, there is nothing inherently against the profit motive there. socialism just means that the means of production are either owned by the workers (ie rather than an owner who makes profits while employees make wages, the workers of a factory collectively own it... we already have those voluntarily, called worker cooperatives... look into the Mondragon Corporation) or socially by the general public (ie Norway nationalizing its oil production).


Thanks for being honest and all. But :lol at dat "surface level political knowledge" you're putting on display.
you specifically asked for my explanation to be "in a line or two" and the complain that the definition is simplistic or surface-level?

[Trainwreck2100]

lol good luck with that

Need a youtube video with a poster of the world behind a chair, maybe an American flag

[spurraider21]

im not a socialist or communist anyway (i find capitalism to be hyper-productive, and just think regulated capitalism with more redistribution and broader safety nets would adequately address most of the critiques of capitalism), and i particularly have no sympathies for leninism/maoism (the concept of a "vanguard party" to usher in the age of communism, etc)... but i'm at least read up on them enough to carry a discussion more nuanced that "communism = gulags and tyranny lolz"

admittedly havent done any academic reading on political theory since college, but brush up from time to time online. wikipedia is a solid starting point.

[boutons_deux]

There Should Be No Doubt Why Trump Nominated Amy Coney Barrett

a year before Barrett’s birth, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., then a prominent lawyer in Richmond, Virginia, and later a Supreme Court Justice himself,

wrote a now famous memorandum to the United States Chamber of Commerce, arguing that businesses needed to take a more aggressive hand in shaping public policy.

“The American economic system is under broad attack,” he wrote, from, specifically,

the consumer,

environmental, and

labor movements.

He added that “the campus is the single most dynamic source” of that attack.

To counter it, Powell suggested that business interests should make a major financial commitment to shaping universities,

so that the “bright young men” of tomorrow would hear messages of

support for the free-enterprise system. :lol

A little less than a decade later, a pair of law professors named Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/02/29/antonin-scalia-looking-backward) signed on as the first faculty advisers to a fledgling organization for conservative law students called the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies.

The efforts of the Federalist Society (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/17/the-conservative-pipeline-to-the-supreme-court) were lavishly funded by the business interests invoked by Powell, and

it has trained a generation or two of future leaders.

Barrett, and her confirmation would vindicate Powell’s plan and transform the Supreme Court.

She will probably do well in providing the artful non-answers

that are the currency of Supreme Court confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, just as she did in 2017.

her legal writings, and the views of some who know her, suggest that she would overturn Roe.

an animating passion of McConnell’s career has been

the deregulation of political campaigns.

The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision brought the issue to wide public attention,

but McConnell has been crusading about it for decades.

He wants the money spigot kept open, so that he can protect his Senate majority and the causes for which it stands.

The corporate interests funding the growth of the Federalist Society probably weren’t especially interested in abortion,

but they were almost certainly committed to crippling the regulatory state.

she has received about seven thousand dollars in honoraria from the Federalist Society and

went on ten trips funded by it.

But it’s not as if Barrett was bought; she was already sold.

In the real world, they operate as

an agenda

to crush labor unions,

curtail environmental regulation,

constrain the voting rights of minorities,

limit government support for health care, and

free the wealthy to buy political influence.

The war on abortion is just the start.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/there-should-be-no-doubt-why-trump-will-nominate-amy-coney-barrett

[Blake]

There Should Be No Doubt Why Trump Nominated Amy Coney Barrett

a year before Barrett’s birth, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., then a prominent lawyer in Richmond, Virginia, and later a Supreme Court Justice himself,

wrote a now famous memorandum to the United States Chamber of Commerce, arguing that businesses needed to take a more aggressive hand in shaping public policy.

“The American economic system is under broad attack,” he wrote, from, specifically,

the consumer,

environmental, and

labor movements.

He added that “the campus is the single most dynamic source” of that attack.

To counter it, Powell suggested that business interests should make a major financial commitment to shaping universities,

so that the “bright young men” of tomorrow would hear messages of

support for the free-enterprise system. :lol

A little less than a decade later, a pair of law professors named Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/02/29/antonin-scalia-looking-backward) signed on as the first faculty advisers to a fledgling organization for conservative law students called the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies.

The efforts of the Federalist Society (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/17/the-conservative-pipeline-to-the-supreme-court) were lavishly funded by the business interests invoked by Powell, and

it has trained a generation or two of future leaders.

Barrett, and her confirmation would vindicate Powell’s plan and transform the Supreme Court.

She will probably do well in providing the artful non-answers

that are the currency of Supreme Court confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, just as she did in 2017.

her legal writings, and the views of some who know her, suggest that she would overturn Roe.

an animating passion of McConnell’s career has been

the deregulation of political campaigns.

The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision brought the issue to wide public attention,

but McConnell has been crusading about it for decades.

He wants the money spigot kept open, so that he can protect his Senate majority and the causes for which it stands.

The corporate interests funding the growth of the Federalist Society probably weren’t especially interested in abortion,

but they were almost certainly committed to crippling the regulatory state.

she has received about seven thousand dollars in honoraria from the Federalist Society and

went on ten trips funded by it.

But it’s not as if Barrett was bought; she was already sold.

In the real world, they operate as

an agenda

to crush labor unions,

curtail environmental regulation,

constrain the voting rights of minorities,

limit government support for health care, and

free the wealthy to buy political influence.

The war on abortion is just the start.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/there-should-be-no-doubt-why-trump-will-nominate-amy-coney-barrett

I think it's as simple as Trump just pandering to his base

[BSfromTX]

A good portion of "libertarians" have no idea what libertarian thinking is. They're basically republicans that fell in love with that loser Ron Paul.


please elaborate

[ChumpDumper]

https://i2.wp.com/politicallyincorrecthumor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/dday-gravestones-their-dying-wish-america-never-surrender-to-socialism-communism.jpg?resize=515%2C410&ssl=1
I'm going to posit the dying wish for most was to not die.

[spurraider21]

A good portion of "libertarians" have no idea what libertarian thinking is. They're basically republicans that fell in love with that loser Ron Paul.
libertarians are republicans who dont actively hate gays and weed

or they're republicans who just dont want to call themselves republicans (ben shapiro)

[boutons_deux]

I think it's as simple as Trump just pandering to his base

His base didn't recommend Barrett, very probably Leonard Leo and/or Barr did

As a fringe Catholic cultist known to be anti-female, she satisfies the blood-thirst of Trash's base of forced-birthers and anti-contraceptive-ists. They are collateral, whose votes are valued, who not valued as people. Same with Blacks.

The oligarchy strategic game is as listed: fuck Labor, fuck the environment, enfeeble govt, destroy "the administrative state", destroy anything and everything for more Capital, and privatize everything that's left.

[Will Hunting]

libertarians are republicans who dont actively hate gays and weed

or they're republicans who just dont want to call themselves republicans (ben shapiro)
True libertarians are also pro choice. Ron Paul hijacked libertarianism and made it so people thought being libertarian meant pro life - Barry Goldwater was more or less the founding father of modern libertarianism and he was as pro choice as it gets.

Goldwater rejected everything about the religious right for that matter, he called them zealots who were impossible to deal with.

[spurraider21]

True libertarians are also pro choice. Ron Paul hijacked libertarianism and made it so people thought being libertarian meant pro life - Barry Goldwater was more or less the founding father of modern libertarianism and he was as pro choice as it gets.

Goldwater rejected everything about the religious right for that matter, he called them zealots who were impossible to deal with.
true

[boutons_deux]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ei3tsHWWsAoWJkv?format=jpg&name=900x900

[Spurtacular]

I'm going to posit the dying wish for most was to not die.

I'm going to post that Ruth's dying wish was to not die.

[ChumpDumper]

I'm going to post that Ruth's dying wish was to not die.Why say you're going to post it while you're posting it?

[Spurtacular]

Why say you're going to post it while you're posting it?

:lol Moar BlakeBlaking

[ChumpDumper]

:lol Moar BlakeBlaking:lol nobody knows what that's supposed to mean and you keep it secret.

[Spurtacular]

:lol nobody knows what that's supposed to mean and you keep it secret.

How much time you gonna put on whether you've been told?

[ChumpDumper]

How much time you gonna put on whether you've been told?I don't care whether you told me or not. No one knows what it means and it's your closely guarded secret you'll never tell.:lol

[Spurtacular]

I don't care whether you told me or not.

:lol You don't care if you've been told what you're demanding be told to you.

:lolK

[Spurtacular]

No one knows what it means and it's your closely guarded secret you'll never tell.

You know it's open knowledge. That's why you won't put time on it, bitch.

[ChumpDumper]

You know it's open knowledge.:lmao you'll never post it again in your entire life.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao you'll never post it again in your entire life.

You'll never man up in your entire life.

No laugh. You're a disgrace is all.

[SnakeBoy]

Giving thanks to God for delivering President Trump and Amy to us


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=164&v=aeoeWV2Z9_Y&feature=emb_logo

[Spurtacular]

Those people have their own wishes (granted).
Watch the pan out of the crowd at the end.

[FrostKing]

https://i.ibb.co/S6dcsnd/download.jpg

What was so great about this little shit

[Chris]

https://i2.wp.com/politicallyincorrecthumor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/dday-gravestones-their-dying-wish-america-never-surrender-to-socialism-communism.jpg?resize=515%2C410&ssl=1

:tu

[ElNono]

please elaborate

What's there to elaborate? he built a cult of disenfranchised republicans that couldn't add up to anything. Tried to run for prez a few times and realized he was part of a fringe minority. He got consistently exposed on the debates lacking a realistic view.

[ElNono]

True libertarians are also pro choice. Ron Paul hijacked libertarianism and made it so people thought being libertarian meant pro life - Barry Goldwater was more or less the founding father of modern libertarianism and he was as pro choice as it gets.

Goldwater rejected everything about the religious right for that matter, he called them zealots who were impossible to deal with.

That's why I said not every libertarian...

[Spurtacular]

What's there to elaborate? he built a cult of disenfranchised republicans that couldn't add up to anything. Tried to run for prez a few times and realized he was part of a fringe minority. He got consistently exposed on the debates lacking a realistic view.

:lol The people not supporting the neocon corporatists are the cultists in ElDoDo's world.

[ElNono]

:lol The people not supporting the neocon corporatists are the cultists in ElDoDo's world.

Just pointing out facts, I notice you went straight for the personal attack, so I'll take that as an admission you have no counter argument.

I wouldn't even disagree that neocon corporatists aren't good for America, but this is the world we all live in.

[Spurtacular]

Just pointing out facts, I notice you went straight for the personal attack, so I'll take that as an admission you have no counter argument.

I wouldn't even disagree that neocon corporatists aren't good for America, but this is the world we all live in.

Call it attack if it helps you to cope. I say I went straight for contrast.

[boutons_deux]

https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p526x296/120165174_3343781342334819_9192608999157519738_o.p ng?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=X2OanI02UmcAX_BEvf9&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=6f58140d4288e682f52bc986b315acdd&oe=5F9B3014

[boutons_deux]

Amy Coney Barrett’s membership in her controversial ‘covenant group’ should be probed by Democrats:

Catholic theologian

the Senate Democrats are within their rights to question Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett

about her religion with a focus on her specific beliefs that he asserted are out of the mainstream —

even within the church.

Barrett is part of a fringe “covenant” group within the Catholic religion that should be brought to light to understand how she views the world.

So the group she is a member of is known and — not her particular group but that family of groups for having certain kinds of hierarchal structures and –.”

“Again, it’s not her faith,” Faggioli replied.

“But she’s member of the group that is part of that family of groups called covenant groups.

So covenant means that you are part of an alliance that binds members of a group in a particular way.

That’s what’s a little different from being a Catholic in the pew, like myself or like John Kennedy or John Kerry or Antonin Scalia. that is different.”

“What kind of relationship she has between that covenant in her group and the fundamental values of the Constitution?”

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/09/amy-coney-barretts-membership-in-her-controversial-covenant-group-should-be-probed-by-democrats-catholic-theologian (https://www.rawstory.com/2020/09/amy-coney-barretts-membership-in-her-controversial-covenant-group-should-be-probed-by-democrats-catholic-theologian/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29)

[Spurtacular]

https://i.ibb.co/S6dcsnd/download.jpg

What was so great about this little shit

She liked killing babies. Important stuff to a lefty.

[Spurtacular]

https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p526x296/120165174_3343781342334819_9192608999157519738_o.p ng?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=X2OanI02UmcAX_BEvf9&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=6f58140d4288e682f52bc986b315acdd&oe=5F9B3014

These the same people turning off comments on articles claiming this?

:lolK

[ElNono]

Call it attack if it helps you to cope. I say I went straight for contrast.

You derailed from the topic at hand to guessing how I feel about things. I wasn't talking opinion, I was presenting facts.

If that's all you have, then you don't have anything.

[Spurtacular]

Boy, that mail-in voting fraud sounds like a catastrophe in the making. No wonder Democrats are so pissed off that ACB gonna judge against their sh** if it comes down to it.

Chris

[boutons_deux]

https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/120328829_192455805750761_4455125825289204505_n.pn g?_nc_cat=1&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=zJPimQeOpU0AX-92DZP&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=7ab2589e27971df15a3f36eeaac87e22&oe=5F9CB14A

[Will Hunting]

Probably won't make a difference, but first unexpected curveball Republicans will need to deal with here:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/01/politics/amy-coney-barrett-abortion-rights/index.html

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1311811782726610944?s=19

[Spurtacular]

https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/120328829_192455805750761_4455125825289204505_n.pn g?_nc_cat=1&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=zJPimQeOpU0AX-92DZP&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=7ab2589e27971df15a3f36eeaac87e22&oe=5F9CB14A


Technically, that would make her Rhodes Scholar, actually. :lol

[spurraider21]

Technically, that would make her Rhodes Scholar, actually. :lol
:lmao derp

[Spurtacular]

She also opposes her own nomination....

1308769093865156611

Are you for the Senate voting on the SCOTUS nomination of ACB before the election?

[boutons_deux]

More than 1K alumni from Amy Coney Barrett's undergrad college sign letter of concern

Over 1,500 alumni from U.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett (https://thehill.com/person/amy-coney-barrett)'s alma mater signed a letter of concern over the conservative lawyer and judge's pending appointment to become the next court justice.

alumni Rob Marus and Katherine Morgan Breslin wrote a critical letter over Barrett's stances on abortion law (https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/518318-gop-democrats-look-to-galvanize-women-with-scotus-fight), the LBGTQ community and the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

"We are likewise firmly and passionately opposed to Rhodes administrators' attempts to embrace Amy Coney Barrett as an alumna of our beloved alma mater,"

"We oppose this embrace because

we believe both her record and the process that has produced her nomination are

diametrically opposed to the values of truth, loyalty, and service that we learned at Rhodes."

https://thehill.com/homenews/news/519475-more-than-1k-alumni-from-amy-coney-barretts-ungrad-college-sign-letter-of

[boutons_deux]

Amy Coney Barrett’s environmental track record is sparse — but "concerning"

It remains to be seen whether Barrett’s nomination will truly be a "catastrophe for climate"

A sixth conservative justice could pit the Supreme Court against regulatory efforts (https://grist.org/politics/why-amy-coney-barrett-on-the-supreme-court-would-be-a-climate-disaster/) to curb greenhouse gas emissions, making it harder for federal agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency to act aggressively on climate.

A 6-3 conservative court majority could also make it more difficult (https://www.eenews.net/stories/1063714781) for the court to take up judicial challenges to the Trump administration's rules.

we don't know much about her views on climate and the environment.

The corps had designated the area off-limits for construction, using the Clean Water Act to argue that the wetlands counted as "waters of the United States."

Barrett didn't write the ruling on this case, but she signed onto a decision against the Army Corps of Engineers, forcing the agency to reconsider its determination.

it signals her "willingness to interpret environmental laws like the Clean Water Act narrowly in favor of industry interests."

Barrett's interpretation of "standing" and "injury," legal terms that determine one's power to sue. If you want to go to court, Hartl explained, you have to earn standing by demonstrating that you've been injured.

And like many conservatives, Barrett's track record suggests that she favors a narrow and literal interpretation of standing.

she found that a woman suing her debt collector for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act didn't have standing — according to Barrett, the woman failed to prove that the violation had caused her a tangible injury.

Adelman and the other plaintiffs argued that clearing trees and bird habitat to construct the presidential center would serve not the public interest, but rather private interests.

Barrett determined that the plaintiffs had no standing to sue the Chicago Parks District,

rejecting all three of their claims:

that they had standing as taxpayers,

that they would suffer injury from the center's construction, and —

notably — that the project would damage Jackson Park.

"The plaintiffs can't repackage an injury to the park as an injury to themselves,"

she wrote in her opinion, explicitly citing a precedent claiming that damage to the environment is not sufficient to prove standing.

What does this mean for any bigger, broader environmental cases that the court might hear?

"It is quite problematic," Hartl said, especially for environmentalists who might try to argue that they have been injured by things like climate change and biodiversity loss, whose effects are difficult to quantify.

the 48-year-old Barrett would be the Supreme Court's youngest justice, "poised to shape a generation of American law,"

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=287217&page=6&p=10285311#post10285311

The VRWC/BigCorp that has been packing SCOTUS to the extreme right knows EXACTLY what they want from Barrett, and they will get it.

6-3 rightwingnutjob ideologue SCOTUS is PRO-Business, PRO-Capitalism

which means

anti-citizen

anti-patient

anti-customer

anti-borrower

anti-employee

anti-environment

anti-regulations, any and all of them of the "administrative state" (esp annulling Congress' oversight of the autocratic "unitary" Exec's killing of rules and regs and hiring)

[boutons_deux]

ACB complies with the Biblical misogyny and Repug rape caucus

Amy Coney Barrett tied to far-right religious cult that believes women must ‘submit’ to their husbands

her connection to the extremist quasi-Catholic cult People of Praise (https://www.alternet.org/2020/09/meet-people-of-praise-heres-why-this-far-right-cult-shouldnt-be-allowed-anywhere-near-the-supreme-court/) is once again coming under scrutiny.

Trump's supporters are trying to paint criticism of Barrett as anti-Catholic, but in fact,

People of Praise is controversial within Catholicism and isn't exclusively Catholic.

One of the most controversial aspects of People of Praise is the severely patriarchal belief system it promotes.

People of Praise used to refer to female members as "handmaids."

women were expected to live in "total submission" to their husbands.

Theill told AP, "My husband at the time was very drawn to it because of the structure of the submission of women."

People of Praise, every consequential personal decision — whether to take a new job, buy a particular model car or choose where to live — went through the hierarchy of male leadership.

Members of the group who worked outside the community had to turn over their paystubs to church leaders to confirm they were tithing correctly."

her husband accompanied her to gynecological appointments to make sure she was not obtaining birth control.

People of Praise believe that wives must "submit in all things" to their husbands.

my mother saying a wife could never deny sex to her husband, because it was his right and her duty. Sex is not for pleasure. It's for as many babies as God chooses to give you.... Women had to be obedient. They had to be subservient."

https://www.alternet.org/2020/09/amy-coney-barrett-tied-to-far-right-religious-cult-that-believes-women-must-submit-to-their-husbands/

So PoP is just another White Male Supremacy / patriarchal scam behind front of religion,

that says superior men a privileged to have sex and

inferior women a obligated to provide it.

[boutons_deux]

https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/120844508_1051373301958930_8718318802216454577_n.j pg?_nc_cat=1&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=DO2nzWb1ecQAX_DDNUD&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=22f82ef2ba3c70cdf0f8c057ed016ed1&oe=5FA1AC58

[Spurtacular]

https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/120844508_1051373301958930_8718318802216454577_n.j pg?_nc_cat=1&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=DO2nzWb1ecQAX_DDNUD&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=22f82ef2ba3c70cdf0f8c057ed016ed1&oe=5FA1AC58

Oh, the humanity!

[rmt]

Technically, that would make her Rhodes Scholar, actually. :lol

hahaha - doesn't matter where she came from - it's where she ends up - and no matter what the Dems do/say - that's the top court in the land. Not that I should count my chickens before they hatch.

[Spurtacular]

hahaha - doesn't matter where she came from - it's where she ends up - and no matter what the Dems do/say - that's the top court in the land. Not that I should count my chickens before they hatch.

Chumpettes' overlords certainly bothered that she's not a Harvard/Yale graduate.

[rmt]

Chumpettes' overlords certainly bothered that she's not a Harvard/Yale graduate.

Didn't Biden say it's about time we had a state uni president? Rhodes College isn't a state uni but not Ivy League.

[boutons_deux]

McConnell won't pass COVID-19 relief for nation,

but will try to expedite Barrett confirmation

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1983673 (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1983673)

[boutons_deux]

fringe cult is PROUD to claim ACB as one of their cultist subservient handmaid baby makers

Religious group scrubs references to Amy Coney Barrett from its website (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/10/1/1982432/-Religious-group-scrubs-references-to-Amy-Coney-Barrett-from-its-website)

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/10/1/1982432/-Religious-group-scrubs-references-to-Amy-Coney-Barrett-from-its-website

[Spurtacular]

She also opposes her own nomination....

1308769093865156611

Are you for the Senate voting on the SCOTUS nomination of ACB before the election?

[Spurtacular]

Are you for the Senate voting on the SCOTUS nomination of ACB before the election?

Why you running, ChumpDumper?

[Spurtacular]

Are you for the Senate voting on the SCOTUS nomination of ACB before the election?

Too snake bit to answer, ChumpDumper?

[Reck]

Name of this thread aged so well. :lol derp

[Spurtacular]

Name of this thread aged so well.

You're trying.

[weebo]

Name of this thread aged so well. :lol derp

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

Are you for the Senate voting on the SCOTUS nomination of ACB before the election?
ChumpDumper (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=153) woke up today, saw this, and ran his ass off to try and get away. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Name of this thread aged so well. :lol derp:lmao