Amy Coney Barrett Is A Breath Of Fresh Air

[Spurtacular]

lol #walkaway

Yea, it triggers you that that's actually happening.
That's what I was talking about. :lol

[DarrinS]

lol "i didnt leave the left, the left left me"

Left hasn't changed recently

Just bitter disaffected liberals

Dave Rubin is a fascist now

Lol

[ChumpDumper]

lol Trump supporters trying to lol anything about politics

[Spurtacular]

Left hasn't changed recently

Just bitter disaffected liberals

Dave Rubin is a fascist now

Lol

:cry But Democrats fought for gay marriage and killing babies; how dare he turn his back on that! :cry

[pgardn]

I did use other words. When you learned that gun was at the rally because of the media, you spiraled out of control. :lol

You think of the goofiest stories.
Do better.

The media is responsible for the death of a fat Trumptard because they had a security guard.

Again...

gtfoh trying to sway people to your tubes. Not THE MEDIA, look at MY tubes!

[Reck]

Yea, it triggers you that that's actually happening.
That's what I was talking about. :lol

It's really not.

[pgardn]

It's really not.

Dammit.

Let the "man" dream.

[Spurtacular]

You think of the goofiest stories.
Do better.

The media is responsible for the death of a fat Trumptard because they had a security guard.

Again...

gtfoh trying to sway people to your tubes. Not THE MEDIA, look at MY tubes!

Cuck Garden: This wouldn't have happened if there was no gun.

Me: Media brought the gun.

Cuck Garden: IT'S NOT THE MEDIA'S FAULT!!!

:lolK.

[pgardn]

Cuck Garden: This wouldn't have happened if there was no gun.

Me: Media brought the gun.

Cuck Garden: IT'S NOT THE MEDIA'S FAULT!!!

:lolK.

THE MEDIA hires Army of Pinkerton’s to kill Trumptards.

Its now reaches the private military stage...

[pgardn]

So derptoidal.

[spurraider21]

Left hasn't changed recently

Just bitter disaffected liberals

Dave Rubin is a fascist now

Lol
dave rubin presents himself as nothing more than a standard libertarian who is openly pro-trump. and i mean thats fine and all, but to pretend that he's just always been the same liberal and the dems have shifted radically left is nonsense. his conservatism will eventually come full circle when he ends up marrying a nice christian woman

[DarrinS]

dave rubin presents himself as nothing more than a standard libertarian who is openly pro-trump. and i mean thats fine and all, but to pretend that he's just always been the same liberal and the dems have shifted radically left is nonsense. his conservatism will eventually come full circle when he ends up marrying a nice christian woman

If an openly gay man marries a woman, I'll be skeptical of his views.

[Winehole23]

If an openly gay man marries a woman, I'll be skeptical of his views.Why?

People get married for all sorts of reasons.

(Security, money, social advancement, power, convenience, etc.)

[DarrinS]

Why?

People get married for all sorts of reasons.

(


DiBlasio is married to a lesbian. To each, their own.

[Winehole23]

DiBlasio is married to a lesbian. To each, their own.Why would you distrust someone who marries someone not of the same sexual orientation?

[spurraider21]

If an openly gay man marries a woman, I'll be skeptical of his views.
that was the joke

[DarrinS]

that was the joke

Ha ha?

[Spurtacular]

It's really not.

Yea, they're not having huge events or having people give testimonials or anything. :lol

[Spurtacular]

THE MEDIA hires Army of Pinkerton’s to kill Trumptards.

Its now reaches the private military stage...

Pinkerton already said they did not supply 9 News with Dolloff.

But that's no matter, there would be no gun there if not for the media either way.

[ChumpDumper]

Pinkerton already said they did not supply 9 News with Dolloff.

But that's no matter, there would be no gun there if not for the media either way.
Sure there would have. Chud was packing too. Just didn't have it out.

[Spurtacular]

Why?

People get married for all sorts of reasons.

(Security, money, social advancement, power, convenience, etc.)


Why would you distrust someone who marries someone not of the same sexual orientation?

Pakhole23 in da house!!!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bi1e-HprnJI

[Winehole23]

Pakhole23 in da house!!!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bi1e-HprnJII'm no longer a bachelor, but you're considerate to think of me.

(What's your deal with transwomen? You hardly go a day without teasing other posters about being trans or chasing transpeople. Why does it delight you so?)

[spurraider21]

:lmao 2015 videos

you've been talking about pakman quite a bit last couple of days. did you just hear about him? have a crush on him? do tell

[Spurtacular]

:lmao 2015 videos

you've been talking about pakman quite a bit last couple of days. did you just hear about him? have a crush on him? do tell

:lol Edits

I saw him somewhere along the way before. But then recently I caught the video making fun of him being an NPC and found striking similarities between how he and Blakehole conduct themselves and their associative outlooks.

[Spurtacular]

because tim pool

he's a low-information grifter. all of his videos that i've seen are just him pulling up an article written by somebody else and slowly reading it to his audience with some marginal commentary. im astonished that people find him so captivating. such low effort content and he's raking in the views/money. good life



Could be. I only watched him for a couple weeks to see what he was saying. Don't remember how on point that is; but it sounds right.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao :rollin :rollin :lmao

https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/058/886/772/original/28b51c758e3e2830.png?1602648478

[spurraider21]

:lol tim pool cant understand what the very purpose of advertisement is

1316085761939210244

[Spurtacular]

:lol tim pool cant understand what the very purpose of advertisement is

1316085761939210244

Would have to see more to know if he's going anywhere with that.
But he tends to prefer innocuous subject matter.

[CosmicCowboy]

:lmao :rollin :rollin :lmao

https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/058/886/772/original/28b51c758e3e2830.png?1602648478

:lmao

[Winehole23]

Aren't District Attorneys elected in California? How many votes did Willie Brown get?

[spurraider21]

Would have to see more to know if he's going anywhere with that.
But he tends to prefer innocuous subject matter.
He’s an idiot

[boutons_deux]

https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/121159554_3389868197726133_1115453486532363928_n.p ng?_nc_cat=1&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=bzp_3lWnPRYAX9xdFvk&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=d44584bcc16dcf10bdf74ffd7efbb89d&oe=5FAC08F8

[rmt]

Watched yesterday - she's one smart cookie - nice outfit too.

[SnakeBoy]

People are saying she's perhaps the greatest legal mind ever

[boutons_deux]

sez "No Man Is Above the Law"

but refuses to say, when "Trashman Is Above the Law", on Constitutional issues:

can the President pardon himself? no answer

can the President change the date of the Pres election? no answer

She's just another lying rightwing CATHOLIC POS

[boutons_deux]

https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/121243896_199325501730458_3217387307869793047_n.pn g?_nc_cat=111&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=u3J4P_ykh2EAX8RGCEq&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=cedeb096cf895063fdf5a01f98713305&oe=5FADFD4A

[rmt]

https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/121243896_199325501730458_3217387307869793047_n.pn g?_nc_cat=111&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=u3J4P_ykh2EAX8RGCEq&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=cedeb096cf895063fdf5a01f98713305&oe=5FADFD4A

Give up on this nominee, bou - she looks un-attackable - it's a lock.

[boutons_deux]

Give up on this nominee, bou - she looks un-attackable - it's a lock.

She's as attackable as Trash was convictable after impeachment.

The Repugs and People Like You are what's wrong with America.

[Trill Clinton]

Embarrassing

1316425454128070662

[boutons_deux]

Disturbing evidence emerges that Amy Coney Barrett is willing to bend the law to benefit Republicans

Amy Coney Barrett’s involvement in the court fight over the 2000 presidential election,

when she was a member of George W. Bush’s legal team, shows

she is willing to bend the law to benefit Republican candidates,

“That’s what’s so disturbing about Amy Coney Barrett,

because that’s exactly what President Trump wants to do right now,”

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/10/disturbing-evidence-emerges-that-amy-coney-barrett-is-willing-to-bend-the-law-to-benefit-republicans

Trash's "transaction":

"I put you on SCOTUS, you elect me for 2nd term"

[Will Hunting]

Embarrassing

1316425454128070662
:lmao

[DMC]

Embarrassing

1316425454128070662

Definitely disqualified, but we knew that based on the fact she's married to the opposite sex.

[Reck]

Embarrassing

1316425454128070662

She went full MAN CAMERA TV WOMEN but forgot the last part.

:lmao Even Trump managed his way through and she couldn’t.

[boutons_deux]

"Leahy got her to acknowledge that, in 2006, she signed a public letter from St. Joseph County Right to Life, an Indiana anti-abortion group, which, in some of its other literature, had taken the position that

in-vitro fertilization is equivalent to manslaughter.

Barrett said that she signed the letter, which she had failed to disclose

in the materials she sent to the committee,

“almost fifteen years ago quickly on my way out of church” :lol

and hadn’t been aware of the group’s other materials, a point she repeated later in the hearing.

Leahy also quizzed Barrett about a lecture she gave to the Blackstone Legal Fellowship, a Christian program run by an ultraconservative organization called Alliance Defending Freedom.

“Were you aware of the A.D.F.’s decades-long efforts to recriminalize homosexuality?” Leahy asked.

Barrett replied, “I am not aware of those efforts, no.” :lol

These

expressions of ignorance were jarringly at odds with the voluminous knowledge and instant recall she displayed in many of her other answers.


a lengthy dissent she wrote in a 2019 case, Kanter v. Barr, in which she argued that the state of Wisconsin didn’t necessarily have the right to issue a law banning someone who has committed a nonviolent felony from buying firearms

the individual concerned—in this case, Rickey Kanter, an entrepreneur who had been convicted of mail fraud for bilking Medicare out of millions of dollars—had a proclivity for violence.

“Absent evidence that he either belongs to a dangerous category or bears individual markers of risk,

permanently disqualifying Kanter from possessing a gun violates the Second Amendment,”

“But to the extent, Senator Durbin, that

you’re suggesting I have some sort of agenda
on felon voting rights,
or guns, or
campaign finance, or
anything else,

I can assure you, and the whole committee, that I do not.” :lol ASSURANCE FAIL! :lol


https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court-hearings-are-an-enlightening-sham

Lots of great shit on the "sham" testimony of fraud, liar Barret.

[boutons_deux]

Merrick Garland Sitting in Parked Car in Mitch McConnell’s Driveway

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5f6a559a84b5846dcaf79816/master/w_2560%2Cc_limit/Borowitz-GarlandOutsideMcConnellsHouse.jpg


LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY —Merrick Garland is sitting in a parked car in Mitch McConnell’s driveway, hoping for a meeting with the Senate Majority Leader, Garland has confirmed.

Garland, who has been sitting in his Nissan Sentra in McConnell’s driveway since Monday, said that

he is “encouraged” by recent developments indicating that

Republicans have changed their minds about confirming a Supreme Court Justice during an election year.

"Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham thought it was a terrible idea in 2016,

but for whatever reason they’ve really come around,” he said.

“All I can say is, playing the waiting game is about to pay off big time for one Merrick Garland.”

Garland, who has not seen McConnell enter or leave his home since the judge first parked his Sentra in the driveway, was baffled by

speculation that the Kentucky senator has been hiding in his kitchen to avoid an encounter with him.

“That makes zero sense to me,” Garland said.

“If I’m going to be confirmed before the election,

we’ve got to get going on this thing.”

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/merrick-garland-sitting-in-parked-car-in-mitch-mcconnells-driveway (https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/merrick-garland-sitting-in-parked-car-in-mitch-mcconnells-driveway?utm_source=nl&utm_brand=tny&utm_mailing=TNY_Borowitz_101420&utm_campaign=aud-dev&utm_medium=email&bxid=5bd6795524c17c1048022fcc&cndid=43758549&hasha=992d608214b505003aa04bf10a595031&hashb=542eb31d958e85ddd5a4c3ccf3faae18526a77bd&hashc=54b3612ab970ce13a64a16665b1987080ca5b72e2ee7 62b722fbba6ab378f2f5&esrc=bounceX&mbid=mbid%3DCRMNYR012019&utm_term=TNY_Borowitz)

[boutons_deux]

Barrett offers few views during hearing but her ruling on a case involving the N-word is going viral (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/10/14/1986413/-Barrett-offers-few-views-during-hearing-but-her-ruling-on-a-case-involving-the-N-word-is-going-viral)

in 2019 as a judge in the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,

she wrote a mind-boggling opinion on a workplace harassment lawsuit that came after an employee was terminated.

Barrett wrote on behalf of three judges on the panel who all agreed on the ruling.

In this case, Terry Smith, a Black Illinois transportation employee,

claimed he was called a racial slur (the N-word) by his white supervisor (https://thegrio.com/2020/10/14/barrett-workplace-discrimination/), Lloyd Colbert.

The judges upheld the original ruling, and, somehow,

Barrett

found a way to both close her eyes to the inherent hostility of racial slurs and

effectively blame the worker for being fired.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1986413

Yep, ACB'c pro-business means anti-employee, anti-customer

[boutons_deux]

Amy Coney Barrett gets defensive as Amy Klobuchar brings up nominee’s work in Bush v Gore

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/pjimage-8.jpg

Klobuchar pointed out that Barrett would be the third justice who had worked on the Republican legal case in the Bush v. Gore decision that halted the Florida recount,

joining Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh,

and the nominee squirmed.

“I did work on behalf of the Republican side,” Barrett said.

“To be totally honest, :lol that needs saying? :lol

can’t remember :lol of course not

exactly what piece of the case it was.”

Klobuchar told her not to worry, that she would remind her. :lol
“Many argue that Bush v. Gore, back to your earlier work, hurt the court’s legitimacy.

If you are confirmed, the Supreme Court will have not one, not two, but three justices — you, Justice Kavanaugh and Chief Justice Roberts, who worked on behalf of the Republican Party in matters related to the Bush v. Gore case.

Do you think that that’s a coincidence?”

Barrett balked.

“Sen. Klobuchar, if you’re asking me whether I was nominated for this seat because I worked on Bush v. Gore for a very brief period of time as a young associate, that doesn’t make sense to me.”

Klobuchar said she just wondered why that kept happening.

“I just think it’s such a coincidence to me, I actually didn’t know it until yesterday,” Klobuchar said.

“Will having justices with this background, two of whom are appointed by the current president, decide any cases related to the upcoming election,

do you think that will undermine the legitimacy of the court?”

you said you would announce your decision on recusal and wouldn’t commit to recusing,” Klobuchar said.

“Again, I think the public has a right to know that now three of these justices have worked on the Republican side on a major, major issue related to a presidential election.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/10/amy-coney-barrett-gets-defensive-as-amy-klobuchar-brings-up-nominees-work-in-bush-v-gore/

KloboKop hitting hard, esp in the context of Trash nominating a B v. G lawyer,

expecting ACB to "hanging chad" / stop-the-mail-in-ballot-counting-taking-"too"-long and re-elect Trash.

[boutons_deux]

Exactly like Scalia, ACB is textualist/originalist when ruling for her politics, but activist when ruling against other politics.

AMY CONEY BARRETT’S TAKE ON VOTING RIGHTS ACT EXPOSES HER ENTIRE LEGAL PHILOSOPHY AS A LIE


Barrett claims to defer to the original meaning of statutes,

but when it comes to the Voting Rights Act,

that deference is out the window.


She is, she has repeatedly said, a “textualist”

who believes that the plain meaning of a statute reigns supreme,

that the job of writing those laws belongs strictly to Congress, and not to the courts.

She’s lying —

and

the lie was exposed nakedly in her assessment of the Supreme Court’s 2013 gutting of the Voting Rights Act (https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/26/us/supreme-court-ruling.html).

Feinstein ... asked Barrett if she agreed with her mentor Justice Antonin Scalia’s conclusion that the act was a “perpetuation of racial entitlement.”

Barrett declined to answer,

instead repeatedly framing the case as one in which

the Supreme Court decided whether the law’s key provision,

which required states with a history of discrimination to clear their voting law changes with the Department of Justice,

was “outdated and needed to be updated from the 1960s.”

Feinstein did not press Barrett on

the wild discrepancy between her claim that

the court could decide to “update” a statute because a number of decades had passed and

her belief in the firmness of originalism and textualism,

legal philosophies she says define her approach.

"I interpret the Constitution as a law and that I interpret its text as text, and

I understand it to have the meaning that it had at the time people ratified it.

So that meaning doesn’t change over time,

and it’s not up to me to update it or infuse my own policy views into it.”

That discrepancy alone makes a stark contradiction between her stated approach and her actual approach to the law.

To make the Voting Rights Act look in need of a judicial update,

Barrett suggested that Congress hadn’t dealt with it since the 1960s.

That was a lie.

In 2006, a Republican Congress passed a reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act

after a yearslong series of negotiations between the parties.

it ultimately passed the House 390-33 and cleared the Senate 98-0.

It was then signed into law by President George W. Bush

https://theintercept.com/2020/10/14/amy-coney-barrett-hearing-voting-rights-act/

Feinstein might be old, but she sure bitch-slapped ACB as a liar

[DMC]

ACB may have slipped. When asked by the press how she planned on dealing with questions from Coons, she said she treats all races equally.

[Spurtacular]

Moar dictionary changes. I remember when potatoe used to be in it. :lmao

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/merriam-webster-changed-definition-sexual-preference-barrett-hearing

[pgardn]

She won’t comment on marital privacy extending to contraception?

Derp

Eventually Your breath of fresh air is going to make it illegal for you to waste your precious bodily fluid milt on thinking about Blake and Reck. You can’t waste your cells squirting in tree holes either.

[Winehole23]

:lol milt

[Spurtacular]

She won’t comment on marital privacy extending to contraception?

Derp

Eventually Your breath of fresh air is going to make it illegal for you to waste your precious bodily fluid milt on thinking about Blake and Reck. You can’t waste your cells squirting in tree holes either.

I doubt your wife can abort any more kids at this point.
Have heart, Cuck Garden.

[Reck]

Moar dictionary changes. I remember when potatoe used to be in it. :lmao

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/merriam-webster-changed-definition-sexual-preference-barrett-hearing

Welcome to the 21st century and into 2020, derp.

[Spurtacular]

:lol milt

Packhole23 undoubtedly turned on. :lol

[Reck]

She won’t comment on marital privacy extending to contraception?

Derp

Eventually Your breath of fresh air is going to make it illegal for you to waste your precious bodily fluid milt on thinking about Blake and Reck. You can’t waste your cells squirting in tree holes either.

Yes, this lady is short on a lot of answers. She’s not really even trying.

I wonder why the dems even show up to these hearings. Let them confirm her and give the people even more reasons to vote them all out.

[Republicrat]

Yes, this lady is short on a lot of answers. She’s not really even trying.

I wonder why the dems even show up to these hearings. Let them confirm her and give the people even more reasons to vote them all out.

Hear! Hear!

[Spurtacular]

Welcome to the 21st century and into 2020, derp.

Damn, you can't even use a tired cliche right. They were doing this in the 20th century. I just noted that, FFS.

[Winehole23]

Packhole23 undoubtedly turned on. :lolWhere does it hurt?

https://i.pinimg.com/474x/2d/17/02/2d1702ae85d7714b440479bbbc5ad201--frog-meme-the-frog.jpg

[Reck]

Will Hunting can you believe Feinstain?

https://media2.giphy.com/media/dtGwS2cDagGxPa1DP5/giphy.gif

Term limits should really be a thing.

[Will Hunting]

Will Hunting (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=17032) can you believe Feinstain?

https://media2.giphy.com/media/dtGwS2cDagGxPa1DP5/giphy.gif

Term limits should really be a thing.
#FeinsteinResign is trending on twitter :lol

I'm hopeful that the stunt she pulled today sparks enough outrage that Schumer picks a judiciary chair who's not her if he's majority leader.

[boutons_deux]

Amy Coney Barrett Wants to Decide If You’re Virtuous Enough to Vote

Less well known, however, is her belief that a person’s virtue should determine their eligibility for basic civil rights like the right to vote.

she also wants to drag voting and political rights back to the Jim Crow era.

, Barrett argued for limiting participation in political rights for people not deemed “virtuous.”

What Barrett conveniently left out of her argument is that

all of her historical legal examples were used to disenfranchise
women,
people with disabilities, and
people of color.

Barrett to argue for the application of “virtue” to other constitutional rights.

Rather than limit her dissent to the case in front of her, Barrett wrote an overreaching opinion that argued for limiting citizens’ rights to vote and serve on juries.

Barrett noted that historically, states deprived people of voting rights and jury service if they had certain “infamous crime” felony convictions, but

she failed to mention that this was a particular tool used to disenfranchise Black people in the Jim Crow South after the Civil War.

Although many states had “criminal disenfranchisement” laws in place before the war,

felon disenfranchisement was expanded after the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to include more crimes and therefore disenfranchise more people.

Barrett further argued that historically, voting and jury service could be limited based on a “mental fitness” requirement, essentially supporting able-ist restrictions on people’s voting rights based on mental disabilities.

White, Christian, able-bodied men were assumed to have sufficient moral virtue for political life,

while people of color, women, non-Christians, and people with disabilities, were required to prove their morality and mental fitness to access their political rights.

This is the ugly history of the sort of virtue jurisprudence that Barrett advocates.

Her focus on stripping rights from people who aren’t virtuous enough for her liking

ignores one of the critical questions noted by the majority in Kanter:

whether the state has a reasonable interest in denying people access to their Second Amendment rights.

what is the state’s interest in keeping “non-virtuous” people from voting or from serving on juries?

Except for discriminatory purposes, the state has no such interest.

According to Barrett, people serve on a jury and vote not because they have the right to do so but because it is for the collective good.

This argument might have worked in the 19th century, but it is now 2020, and

we have decades of legislation and jurisprudence that shows

such limitations result in discrimination, biased jury verdicts, and nondemocratic elections.

Barrett’s argument in favor of “virtue” requirements for participating in the political process is antithetical to an inclusive democracy.

A U.S. citizen shouldn’t be required to prove “virtue” in order to access their rights.

https://rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2020/10/13/amy-coney-barrett-wants-to-decide-if-youre-virtuous-enough-to-vote/

[pgardn]

I doubt your wife can abort any more kids at this point.
Have heart, Cuck Garden.

Did I say I like abortion derptard?

Do you know what contraception is?

No need for you to worry about it.
Wasting all those cells in various places that will not lead to a child; you are next cell waster.
Only produce sperm if it results in a child dont ya know. They will throw the law at your wacking off ass.

[Spurtacular]

Did I say I like abortion derptard?

Do you know what contraception is?

No need for you to worry about it.
Wasting all those cells in various places that will not lead to a child; you are next cell waster.
Only produce sperm if it results in a child dont ya know. They will throw the law at your wacking off ass.

How many mixed children do you have, then?

[pgardn]

How many mixed children do you have, then?

Yeah I would deflect too if I backed myself in a corner like you have Mr. Fresh Air.

How many good healthy reproductive cells have you offered up to tree holes?
Your good lady will make sure you stop that.

[boutons_deux]

autocratic, fascist Christian Sharia on the march

With Amy Coney Barrett, a once-fringe legal philosophy goes mainstream

The Blackstone fellowship, organized for 20 years by the nonprofit Alliance Defending Freedom, aims to train Christian lawyers to “foster legal systems that fully protect our God-given rights.”

If Judge Barrett is confirmed, it would represent a culmination of decadeslong efforts by the conservative Christian legal movement to move from the periphery of the legal world into the mainstream.

conservative Christian legal groups have always focused entirely on religious liberty issues.

“They have a longing for what religious liberty protections were before 1990,”

“They’re trying to have the courts reread the Constitution in a way that

elevates religious liberty rights over all other individual rights,

as well as the public interest.”

religious liberty claims has focused primarily on two issues:

religious institutions’ ability to access state funding, and

religious individuals’ ability to exercise their beliefs around sexual norms in public life and in their private business.

“By and large the president [has a strong] record of nominating originalist, constitutionalist judges.”

“Your legal career is but a means to an end,” she told the graduates. “That end is building the kingdom of God.”

what the “end” is, most say it’s for the free exercise of religion to have the protection and deference of a fundamental right.

But obligating someone to obey a law only when it coincides with their religious beliefs, wrote (https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/494/872) Justice Scalia,

“permit[s] him, by virtue of his beliefs, ‘to become a law unto himself.’”

it could be much easier for religious objectors to gain exemptions from laws.

“Some religious exemptions are appropriate and necessary,”

But “they need to be given sparingly, or else we really undermine democracy itself.”

Justice Ginsburg

The majority, she wrote,

“casts totally aside countervailing rights and interests in its zeal to secure religious rights to the nth degree,” allowing

“the religious beliefs of some to overwhelm the rights and interests of others who do not share those beliefs.”

“So long as

there are people who want to silence dissent and silence people with a religious belief they disagree with, :lol

we will always have work.”

https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2020/1006/With-Amy-Coney-Barrett-a-once-fringe-legal-philosophy-goes-mainstream?icid=rss

[boutons_deux]

18 hours of questions, few answers:

What we learned about Amy Coney Barrett

Barrett took a particularly rigorous approach to the strategy used by all modern Supreme Court nominees:

avoiding saying anything

about issues that could turn into court cases and almost nothing about cases that courts have already decided.

She would not say whether separating children from their parents to deter immigration was wrong,

whether President Donald Trump can delay the election or pardon himself, or even, in a series of particularly notable responses,

whether climate change is real.

Nor would she say whether a host of Supreme Court decisions, including ones on abortion and gay rights, were ripe for reconsideration.

“Though past nominees have also

avoided answering some of the senators’ questions, Barrett took this to a whole new level,”

“Having studied how forthcoming nominees have been since public confirmation hearings at which nominees testified began in 1939, I think

Barrett will rank as among the least responsive nominees in American history.”

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/10/bidens-campaign-is-prepping-for-trump-refusing-to-concede (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/10/bidens-campaign-is-prepping-for-trump-refusing-to-concede?utm_source=nl&utm_brand=vf&utm_mailing=VF_Hive_101620&utm_medium=email&bxid=5bd6795524c17c1048022fcc&cndid=43758549&hasha=992d608214b505003aa04bf10a595031&hashb=542eb31d958e85ddd5a4c3ccf3faae18526a77bd&hashc=54b3612ab970ce13a64a16665b1987080ca5b72e2ee7 62b722fbba6ab378f2f5&esrc=bounceX&mbid=CRMVYF092120&utm_campaign=VF_Hive_101620&utm_term=VYF_Hive)

"advise and consent"? FUCK IT!

[boutons_deux]

Amy Coney Barrett Is Not Pro-Life

Trump's Supreme Court nominee has no regard for Americans protected by the Affordable Care Act.

make no mistake, despite Barrett’s evasive answers on the ACA (and nearly every other topic), she is on the record opposing Obamacare.

In a 2017 law review article (https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2330&context=law_faculty_scholarship), Barrett questioned the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act and sided with Justice Antonin Scalia in his dissent

from Chief Justice John Roberts and the majority in a 2012 decision arguing that the ACA’s individual mandate is a constitutional tax.

"this Supreme Court nomination is being done in the name of the pro-life movement.

But it doesn’t really feel like they’re that concerned about my life or my family’s life.”

Barrett also represents the Trump Administration’s complete contempt for the lives and health of the American people during the pandemic.

https://www.commondreams.org/views/2020/10/16/amy-coney-barrett-not-pro-life

[boutons_deux]

Watchdog group accuses Amy Coney Barrett of 'unconscionable cruelty' in teen rape case

her role in an appellate court decision overturning a district court which found a Wisconsin county liable for millions in damages to

a woman who alleged she had been repeatedly raped by a jail guard.

After a 19-year old pregnant prison inmate was repeatedly raped by a prison guard, Amy Coney Barrett ruled that

the county responsible for the prison could not be held liable because

the sexual assaults fell outside of the guard's official duties. :lol

Her judgment demonstrates a level of unconscionable cruelty that has no place on the high court,"

he had raped her during and after her pregnancy

at a jail run by the controversial former Sheriff David Clarke (https://jezebel.com/woman-who-was-repeatedly-raped-in-a-sheriff-clarke-run-1795922240). :lol

unanimous opinion (https://www.wjiinc.org/blog/appeals-court-reverses-67-million-jail-rape-verdict) that the county was not responsible for the guard's conduc

https://www.alternet.org/2020/10/watchdog-group-accuses-amy-coney-barrett-of-unconscionable-cruelty-in-teen-rape-case/

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ7XXYUTQp4

[Spurtacular]

:lol "Mean Girls"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YNyTUOpM4M

[boutons_deux]

ACB and similar hate-driven Christian Taliban will continue to weaponize "free exercise" clause

New SHITHOLE Texas rule lets social workers turn away clients who are LGBTQ or have a disability

Social workers called the change "incredibly disheartening," while

Gov. Greg Abbott's office said it was necessary :lol

a state regulatory board's decision this week

to remove protections for LGBTQ clients and clients with disabilities who seek social work services.

The Texas State Board of Social Work Examiners voted unanimously Monday to change a section of its code of conduct (https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac%24ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=22&pt=34&ch=781&rl=201) that establishes when a social worker may refuse to serve someone.

The code will no longer prohibit social workers from turning away clients on the basis of

disability,

sexual orientation or

gender identity.

(DISABLED SHITBAG )Gov. Greg Abbott (https://www.texastribune.org/directory/greg-abbott/)'s office recommended the change

The Republican-led Texas Legislature has long opposed expanding nondiscrimination protections to LGBTQ Texans (https://www.texastribune.org/2020/06/17/lgbtq-texas-nondiscrimination-comprehensive/) in employment, housing and other areas of state law.

https://www.salon.com/2020/10/17/new-texas-rule-lets-social-workers-turn-away-clients-who-are-lgbtq-or-have-a-disability_partner/

[Spurtacular]

Poor Elena had her VP nomination stolen; now she's lamenting that she's not the Supreme Court nominee. :lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlchBfW036s

Will Hunting (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=17032)

[boutons_deux]

https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/121792637_3402643559781930_6707963912907249016_n.p ng?_nc_cat=104&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=M9OFX0082OsAX-ZEEOz&_nc_oc=AQmEj5vxbvYSlydvCK9GgTdIIVBBvUbinTq0rOjCJUO KB85HeZUE0rmMiY1GKf-aZvU&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=60d590abcb842eb17063e93562b4631a&oe=5FB37B90

[Ef-man]

Seriously messed up lady.

Guess divorced and remarried people would not be able to vote.

Derp would have a court order against him prohibiting him from being within 1 mile from a polling place.



Amy Coney Barrett Wants to Decide If You’re Virtuous Enough to Vote

Less well known, however, is her belief that a person’s virtue should determine their eligibility for basic civil rights like the right to vote.

she also wants to drag voting and political rights back to the Jim Crow era.

, Barrett argued for limiting participation in political rights for people not deemed “virtuous.”

What Barrett conveniently left out of her argument is that

all of her historical legal examples were used to disenfranchise
women,
people with disabilities, and
people of color.

Barrett to argue for the application of “virtue” to other constitutional rights.

Rather than limit her dissent to the case in front of her, Barrett wrote an overreaching opinion that argued for limiting citizens’ rights to vote and serve on juries.

Barrett noted that historically, states deprived people of voting rights and jury service if they had certain “infamous crime” felony convictions, but

she failed to mention that this was a particular tool used to disenfranchise Black people in the Jim Crow South after the Civil War.

Although many states had “criminal disenfranchisement” laws in place before the war,

felon disenfranchisement was expanded after the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to include more crimes and therefore disenfranchise more people.

Barrett further argued that historically, voting and jury service could be limited based on a “mental fitness” requirement, essentially supporting able-ist restrictions on people’s voting rights based on mental disabilities.

White, Christian, able-bodied men were assumed to have sufficient moral virtue for political life,

while people of color, women, non-Christians, and people with disabilities, were required to prove their morality and mental fitness to access their political rights.

This is the ugly history of the sort of virtue jurisprudence that Barrett advocates.

Her focus on stripping rights from people who aren’t virtuous enough for her liking

ignores one of the critical questions noted by the majority in Kanter:

whether the state has a reasonable interest in denying people access to their Second Amendment rights.

what is the state’s interest in keeping “non-virtuous” people from voting or from serving on juries?

Except for discriminatory purposes, the state has no such interest.

According to Barrett, people serve on a jury and vote not because they have the right to do so but because it is for the collective good.

This argument might have worked in the 19th century, but it is now 2020, and

we have decades of legislation and jurisprudence that shows

such limitations result in discrimination, biased jury verdicts, and nondemocratic elections.

Barrett’s argument in favor of “virtue” requirements for participating in the political process is antithetical to an inclusive democracy.

A U.S. citizen shouldn’t be required to prove “virtue” in order to access their rights.

https://rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2020/10/13/amy-coney-barrett-wants-to-decide-if-youre-virtuous-enough-to-vote/

[Winehole23]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EknyLZdWkAU8Lcp?format=jpg&name=medium

[Ef-man]

In other news, conservatives may inadvertently lose something they love - their porn:

Porn Stars Are Terrified of Amy Coney Barrett.

“Yes, if Trump nominee Amy Coney Barrett becomes the next Supreme Court justice, the future of the commercial sex industry could be in grave danger—as could the viewing entertainment of millions of Americans since, according to Pornhub statistics, the U.S. consistently outranks all other countries in maintaining the highest rate of daily traffic to Pornhub. Thus, as the Senate hearings to confirm Amy Coney Barrett draw to a close, her seemingly inevitable spot on the bench has sparked panic among the sex-worker community.”

https://news.yahoo.com/porn-stars-terrified-amy-coney-084734739.html

[Spurtacular]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EknyLZdWkAU8Lcp?format=jpg&name=medium

You're an odd duck, Packman.

[Spurtacular]

Did you cry when Miss Ginsburg died, Blake?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmZNcGCCdGg

[Spurtacular]

https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/059/062/643/original/5783447c7034d469.jpeg?1603294550

https://media0.giphy.com/media/x0kMYoT7J31i8/giphy.gif

[Reck]

https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/059/062/643/original/5783447c7034d469.jpeg?1603294550

https://media0.giphy.com/media/x0kMYoT7J31i8/giphy.gif

You're a shemale lover and a cock worshipper so you lose.

[rmt]

Did you cry when Miss Ginsburg died, Blake?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmZNcGCCdGg

Where does Maher get off saying:

This is why we cannot let a guy like Trump become President.

Duly elected president.

Who's to blame? No one but RBG herself - Trump is just fulfilling his constitutional duty.

[Spurtacular]

Where does Maher get off saying:

This is why we cannot let a guy like Trump become President.

Duly elected president.

Who's to blame? No one but RBG herself - Trump is just fulfilling his constitutional duty.

I think he's just a play actor more than anything. And I :lol when he has to suffer these soy boys literally crying about this sh**.

You just know he wants to smack the dude upside the head. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

You're a shemale lover and a cock worshipper so you lose.

Don't hit on me, tranny. You've been told.

[boutons_deux]

blaming a dead woman for doing and loving the job so well for decades,

was a better jurist than any of the 5, soon 6 rightwing shill whores working for the oligarchy

[spurraider21]

1313962403844026377

[Will Hunting]

1313962403844026377
Not to mention she didn't even go to a top 20 law school, and the only way she ever got that Scalia clerkship was through the Federalist Society. She's a Fedsoc plant who would have never made it to SCOTUS on merit alone.

[boutons_deux]

Il Papa sez civil same-sex marriages are OK with him, sez they are all children of God.

We'll see if the SCOTUS Catholics leave or annul Obergefell

My guess is the Christians' hate of LGBT is too deep, too engrained, the hate fucking defines them as "Christians"

[spurraider21]

Not to mention she didn't even go to a top 20 law school, and the only way she ever got that Scalia clerkship was through the Federalist Society. She's a Fedsoc plant who would have never made it to SCOTUS on merit alone.
that whole thread has a lot of good info and insight

points out that Kagan also had poor credentials but still more than barrett

[Trainwreck2100]

Il Papa sez civil same-sex marriages are OK with him, sez they are all children of God.

We'll see if the SCOTUS Catholics leave or annul Obergefell

It's gone and good fucking riddance, I want to go back to a time where gays were at the forefront and nobody gave a fuck about the trannies

[boutons_deux]

It's gone and good fucking riddance, I want to go back to a time where gays were at the forefront and nobody gave a fuck about the trannies

Obergefell is very probably doomed, along with ACA and R v W

[Will Hunting]

that whole thread has a lot of good info and insight

points out that Kagan also had poor credentials but still more than barrett
She was dean of Harvard Law School. That's a bit different than going back to be a professor at your law school alma mater after you couldn't make in private practice despite having a fucking SCOTUS clerkship on your resume.

She doesn't come off as articulate or as a skilled jurist. I think Gorsuch has a distorted interpretation of the constitution but I came away from his SCOTUS confirmation hearing knowing that he was clearly qualified for the court. Roberts is still the GOAT in terms of confirmation hearings go - he went into the hearing as someone viewed as a partisan pick and ended up getting confirmed with 78 votes. I have no idea how smart Kavanaugh is because he was flailing out of control during his hearing, his temperment alone should disqualify him from the court.

[spurraider21]

She was dean of Harvard Law School. That's a bit different than going back to be a professor at your law school alma mater after you couldn't make in private practice despite having a fucking SCOTUS clerkship on your resume.

She doesn't come off as articulate or as a skilled jurist. I think Gorsuch has a distorted interpretation of the constitution but I came away from his SCOTUS confirmation hearing knowing that he was clearly qualified for the court. Roberts is still the GOAT in terms of confirmation hearings go - he went into the hearing as someone viewed as a partisan pick and ended up getting confirmed with 78 votes. I have no idea how smart Kavanaugh is because he was flailing out of control during his hearing, his temperment alone should disqualify him from the court.
a lot of the animus toward gorsuch was due to the garland fallout. otherwise yeah people would be pissed that another conservative was taking the bench... but nothing particular to him. not only was kavanaugh unhinged, but i thought his previous positions made him too partisan a figure to be on the court. and if you really want to get into the meat and potatoes of the confirmation hearing, even though i dont think theres enough evidence to declare him a rapist or w/e, there were plenty of small inconsistencies within his own story, and seemed like he was lying at worst or being incredibly evasive and misleading at best.

[ElNono]

She was dean of Harvard Law School. That's a bit different than going back to be a professor at your law school alma mater after you couldn't make in private practice despite having a fucking SCOTUS clerkship on your resume.

She doesn't come off as articulate or as a skilled jurist. I think Gorsuch has a distorted interpretation of the constitution but I came away from his SCOTUS confirmation hearing knowing that he was clearly qualified for the court. Roberts is still the GOAT in terms of confirmation hearings go - he went into the hearing as someone viewed as a partisan pick and ended up getting confirmed with 78 votes. I have no idea how smart Kavanaugh is because he was flailing out of control during his hearing, his temperment alone should disqualify him from the court.

I came out of the Kavanaugh hearing knowing for a fact that he likes beer.. so there's that.

[Will Hunting]

I came out of the Kavanaugh hearing knowing for a fact that he likes beer.. so there's that.
He keeps meticulous calendars too.

[Th'Pusher]

I came out of the Kavanaugh hearing knowing for a fact that he likes beer.. so there's that.

Maybe I missed the thread where all this great discussion happened, but you were touting ACB as unquestionably qualified for SCOTUS. Is that still your opinion?

[ElNono]

Maybe I missed the thread where all this great discussion happened, but you were touting ACB as unquestionably qualified for SCOTUS. Is that still your opinion?

I do. I won't argue if somebody feels she's not, both Will and SR made good points here about it.

Generally speaking, I think the biggest gripe with her, at least from the confirmation hearings, had everything to do with her political ideology and position, which we all know what they are, and should never realistically be a disqualifying factor.

I look at it this way: this is an administration that has gone so far as to hire guys like Scott Atlas, completely unqualified to say or do anything about a pandemic response.

The fact that they picked this lady, who at least has some semblance of qualifications, is almost miraculous. I keep thinking you could have somebody like Ted Cruz in there, who could make Uncle Tom Thomas look like a moderate justice.

[Trainwreck2100]

I do. I won't argue if somebody feels she's not, both Will and SR made good points here about it.

Generally speaking, I think the biggest gripe with her, at least from the confirmation hearings, had everything to do with her political ideology and position, which we all know what they are, and should never realistically be a disqualifying factor.

I look at it this way: this is an administration that has gone so far as to hire guys like Scott Atlas, completely unqualified to say or do anything about a pandemic response.

The fact that they picked this lady, who at least has some semblance of qualifications, is almost miraculous. I keep thinking you could have somebody like Ted Cruz in there, who could make Uncle Tom Thomas look like a moderate justice.
they didn't pick her the federalist society did so that's why she looks better than an administration appointee

[ElNono]

they didn't pick her the federalist society did so that's why she looks better than an administration appointee

I get that. I also reserve the right to claim I'll likely despise her rulings in general, and will likely hate any attempt to embed religion into SCOTUS matters.

But this was a shit sandwich for the Dems no matter what largely thanks to RGB. Eventually, you reap what you sow.

[pgardn]

a lot of the animus toward gorsuch was due to the garland fallout. otherwise yeah people would be pissed that another conservative was taking the bench... but nothing particular to him. not only was kavanaugh unhinged, but i thought his previous positions made him too partisan a figure to be on the court. and if you really want to get into the meat and potatoes of the confirmation hearing, even though i dont think theres enough evidence to declare him a rapist or w/e, there were plenty of small inconsistencies within his own story, and seemed like he was lying at worst or being incredibly evasive and misleading at best.

he’s a liar and he’s not even good at it.
The fact that he was able to enrage himself over minor details makes it clear to me that he wanted nothing to do with the pertinent questions.

he purposely binged on stupid stuff like drinking to get himself enraged

do you like beer senator? gtfoh

alcohol is supposed to relieve one of inhibitions.
but grabbing women against their will and holding them down, that’s just pure bullshit.
that’s already in your behavior.

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/ComfortablySmug/status/1049041580429074432

tip of the hat from hater

[boutons_deux]

ACB and her 5 oligarchy whores will fuck up America and Americans for decades

Obergefell gone (Christian hateful Sharia)

ACA gone, ACA which she has history of trashing

R v. W gone (Christian hateful Sharia)

weaponized "freedom of religion" and "free exercise" to persecute, discriminate

etc

ACB also heavily LIED by omissions in her documents submitted to the Senate.

[boutons_deux]

The GOP Just Broke the Rules to Advance Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court Nomination

The Senate Judiciary Committee held the vote without any Democratic minority members present.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3veve/the-gop-just-broke-the-rules-to-advance-amy-coney-barretts-supreme-court-nomination (https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3veve/the-gop-just-broke-the-rules-to-advance-amy-coney-barretts-supreme-court-nomination?utm_source=Iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=curated_vice_daily_1023202)

[Reck]

https://mobile.twitter.com/ComfortablySmug/status/1049041580429074432

tip of the hat from hater (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7609)

So quit asking whether joe would pack the courts if he's elected and gets the senate.

Question answers itself when you break every rules in the book to fast track a non-qualified judge for a SC seat.

[Spurtacular]

So quit asking whether joe would pack the courts if he's elected and gets the senate.

Question answers itself when you break every rules in the book to fast track a non-qualified judge for a SC seat.

What rules were broken?

[TSA]

So quit asking whether joe would pack the courts if he's elected and gets the senate.

Question answers itself when you break every rules in the book to fast track a non-qualified judge for a SC seat.

The President and Senate are carrying out their constitutional and legal duties. You may not like it but there is nothing unconstitutional about it.

[SnakeBoy]

https://mobile.twitter.com/ComfortablySmug/status/1049041580429074432

tip of the hat from hater

Mitch is ruthless, like the Supreme Court

[boutons_deux]

There's nothing unConsitiutional about the Dems removing Kava-nought and seating 4 young progressive judges

[ElNono]

The President and Senate are carrying out their constitutional and legal duties. You may not like it but there is nothing unconstitutional about it.

yup..

[SnakeBoy]

Monday is Hillary's birthday

[Spurtacular]

Monday is Hillary's birthday

Chumpettes' favorite TOSB. :lol

[koriwhat]

What rules were broken?

no rules were broken... these commies are upset that the gop owns the senate and they don't. fucking crybabies!

[koriwhat]

So quit asking whether joe would pack the courts if he's elected and gets the senate.

Question answers itself when you break every rules in the book to fast track a non-qualified judge for a SC seat.

lmao breaking the rules and non-qualified judge?

you're a fucking retard trannyReck... :lmao

[boutons_deux]

AMY CONEY BARRETT, ABOUT TO BE CONFIRMED TO THE SUPREME COURT, SEES A SCENARIO IN WHICH

ABORTION SHOULD BE PUNISHABLE BY DEATH

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/10/amy-coney-barrett-abortion-capital-crime

[Spurtacular]

AMY CONEY BARRETT, ABOUT TO BE CONFIRMED TO THE SUPREME COURT, SEES A SCENARIO IN WHICH

ABORTION SHOULD BE PUNISHABLE BY DEATH

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/10/amy-coney-barrett-abortion-capital-crime

:tu

[SnakeBoy]

AMY CONEY BARRETT, ABOUT TO BE CONFIRMED TO THE SUPREME COURT, SEES A SCENARIO IN WHICH

ABORTION SHOULD BE PUNISHABLE BY DEATH

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/10/amy-coney-barrett-abortion-capital-crime

Public beheading hopefully

[ElNono]

Public beheading hopefully

there's no suffering in that. Burn them at the stake... we can even broadcast it on OAN... I bet the Catholic church would sponsor, tbh

[tholdren]

No wonder ChumpDumper hitting the claws again today. Drunk 2x

[Rummpd]

52-48 it is done

[LkrFan]

Expand. The. Court.

[SnakeBoy]

there's no suffering in that. Burn them at the stake... we can even broadcast it on OAN... I bet the Catholic church would sponsor, tbh

Yeah I like that better. Can we find them guilty of being a witch first? That would be cool.

[LkrFan]

there's no suffering in that. Burn them at the stake... we can even broadcast it on OAN... I bet the Catholic church would sponsor, tbh

:lmao

[SnakeBoy]

Expand. The. Court.

Hold yer horses pony soldier. Let's have a commission to study the issue first.

[LkrFan]

Hold yer horses pony soldier. Let's have a commission to study the issue first.

:lol

[weebo]

She just got socialist healthcare for her family and her special needs child in time to take it from million in a pandemic...just like Jesus would do.

[Will Hunting]

She just got socialist healthcare for her family and her special needs child in time to take it from million in a pandemic...just like Jesus would do.
She’s probably trying to figure out if there’s a way to deny that socialist healthcare to her adopted kids :lol

[tholdren]

She just got socialist healthcare for her family and her special needs child in time to take it from million in a pandemic...just like Jesus would do.

You said all Texas hospitals would collapse. You gossip

[baseline bum]

Expand. The. Court.

DC and Puerto Rico need to be states ASAP if Biden wins and the Democrats take the senate. And split them just like the Dakotas. Then pack the courts.

[ElNono]

Yeah I like that better. Can we find them guilty of being a witch first? That would be cool.

Non-binding... we burn even if inconclusive...

[SnakeBoy]

When Trump makes a promise you can take it to the bank
He's a business man
Not a politician

^ actual quote from a interview with a Michigan Trump supporter

[weebo]

She’s probably trying to figure out if there’s a way to deny that socialist healthcare to her adopted kids :lol

of course...they're just props for the white colonizer

[ElNono]

When Trump makes a promise you can take it to the bank
He's a business man
Not a politician

^ actual quote from a interview with a Michigan Trump supporter

:lol

[Will Hunting]

of course...they're just props for the white colonizer
:lol you just know the adopted kids have to clean the dishes after dinner and take out the trash a lot more frequently than her biological kids do

[weebo]

When Trump makes a promise you can take it to the bank
He's a business man
Not a politician

^ actual quote from a interview with a Michigan Trump supporter

Well he did promise to end American carnage....

[weebo]

:lol you just know the adopted kids have to clean the dishes after dinner and take out the trash a lot more frequently than her biological kids do

they're house negros bro...im sure Amy and massa Jesse got dem niglets washing the family's drawers by hand...got them entertaining guest Sunday after church with song and dance

[Will Hunting]

they're house negros bro...im sure Amy and massa Jesse got dem niglets washing the family's drawers by hand...got them entertaining guest Sunday after church with song and dance
You joke but there’s documented instances of evangelicals adopting orphans from Haiti and then using them as slaves. The world of evangelicals adopting Haitian/African orphans is a very strange place.

[weebo]

You joke but there’s documented instances of evangelicals adopting orphans from Haiti and then using them as slaves. The world of evangelicals adopting Haitian/African orphans is a very strange place.

these white evangelical assholes got "orphan fever"...they didn't save the receipts and got stuck with these kids they don't want...not gonna feed, shelter, and cloth them for free

[DMC]

It's a done deal

tee hee

[Extra Stout]

You joke but there’s documented instances of evangelicals adopting orphans from Haiti and then using them as slaves. The world of evangelicals adopting Haitian/African orphans is a very strange place.It is viewed as a very good deed to adopt the children of the “savages” into their homes and raise them in good clean White Christian ways. It’s like saving them twice.

[DMC]

It is viewed as a very good deed to adopt the children of the “savages” into their homes and raise them in good clean White Christian ways. It’s like saving them twice.

Angelina Jolie agrees.

[DMC]

they're house negros bro...im sure Amy and massa Jesse got dem niglets washing the family's drawers by hand...got them entertaining guest Sunday after church with song and dance

That ain't nothin but the old shuffle butt.

[FrostKing]

https://i.ibb.co/cccfD7R/White-Celebs-Who-Adopted-Black-Kids.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/bB2m51w/Pictured-Kristin-Davis-Gemma-Rose-Davis-Mandatory-Credit-Carlito-Maidana-Broadimage-Kristin-Davis-an.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/Q9x7BbD/5e1f47db32afbfd7eeed3e9c79712d16.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/V2ZGrwm/EXCLUSIVE-Ty-Burrell-was-spotted-enjoying-a-day-at-Disneyland-with-his-wife-Holly-and-two-adopted-da.jpg

The double standard. It is always weird, no matter the religious preference of the host.

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAI1LJcQkgQ


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TF1E0DNvhM0

Ya love to see it.

[Winehole23]

ACB was the kill shot to Biden if the Supreme Court awards the presidency to Trump.

1320875211844190209

[spurraider21]

https://i.ibb.co/cccfD7R/White-Celebs-Who-Adopted-Black-Kids.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/bB2m51w/Pictured-Kristin-Davis-Gemma-Rose-Davis-Mandatory-Credit-Carlito-Maidana-Broadimage-Kristin-Davis-an.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/Q9x7BbD/5e1f47db32afbfd7eeed3e9c79712d16.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/V2ZGrwm/EXCLUSIVE-Ty-Burrell-was-spotted-enjoying-a-day-at-Disneyland-with-his-wife-Holly-and-two-adopted-da.jpg

The double standard. It is always weird, no matter the religious preference of the host.
google "happy white woman" and then start crying about it

[ducks]

Happy birthday clinton

[ElNono]

ACB was the kill shot to Biden if the Supreme Court awards the presidency to Trump.

1320875211844190209

Sounds a bit hyperbolic, tbh

[ducks]

DC and Puerto Rico need to be states ASAP if Biden wins and the Democrats take the senate. And split them just like the Dakotas. Then pack the courts.

Sorry this is happening to you
When you have the senate you can get your Supreme Court judge voted in

[Winehole23]

https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2020/10/justice-bart-okavanaugh-counting-votes-is-theft

[baseline bum]

Sorry this is happening to you
When you have the senate you can get your Supreme Court judge voted in

No shit. Hence the point of adding new states.

[ducks]

Puerto Rico has to vote for it agin and have it pass

[ducks]

Do not 38 states have to allow it also ?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1320898189386489859?s=19
https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1320885011017584640?s=19

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1320885011017584640?s=19

:tu

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1320885011017584640?s=19:tu

[Will Hunting]

Do not 38 states have to allow it also ?
Nope. You don’t need a constitutional amendment to add a state to the union.

[Trainwreck2100]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1320898189386489859?s=19


Because she's going to set women back decades, I'm okay with that but the feminists aren't

[koriwhat]

Because she's going to set women back decades, I'm okay with that but the feminists aren't

hyperbole

women think onlyfans.com empowers them these days... maybe some morals for a change will help our nation out.

[Trainwreck2100]

hyperbole

women think onlyfans.com empowers them these days... maybe some morals for a change will help our nation out.

not hyperbole

also fuck onlyfans charging for what should be free, now every ho thinks they'll be millionaires off of idiots. Just an evolution of the TWITCH THOTery

[ducks]

So woman are ok killing baby girls ?

[pgardn]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1320898189386489859?s=19


Because she has no interest in empowering women.
Slaves sold slaves Benny.

This little twerp has no brain.

[pgardn]

So woman are ok killing baby girls ?

I was proud I knew the mallard dialect but now Im lost?

Little help ducks, wtf?

[ducks]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1320891508816519168?s=20

[ducks]

I was proud I knew the mallard dialect but now Im lost?

Little help ducks, wtf?

Woman are ok with abortions that kill baby girls?

[Winehole23]

1320900807718588422

[Winehole23]

1320874597617668098

[ducks]

Erick Erickson
@EWErickson
·
1h
I see a whole lot of people intentionally misreading Kavanaugh's opinion today, but he is right. Ballots that arrive after election day should not be counted. If you want your vote counted, make sure it gets in on or before Election Day


Postal service has issues last 5 presidents

[ElNono]

1320874597617668098

He likes beer tho... there's that

[ducks]

He likes beer tho... there's that

You not man enough or old enough to drink it ?

[ElNono]

You not man enough or old enough to drink it ?

I didn't say anything about me. I prefer whisky. what's your favorite libation?

[ducks]

Pussy

[ElNono]

Pussy

You're a pussy? that we know. What do you drink tho?

[DarrinS]

He likes beer tho... there's that

Same here. :lol

[ElNono]

Same here. :lol

How could we forget! :lol

[ducks]

You're a pussy? that we know. What do you drink tho?

I like coke and rum
Bud light
Wine once in awhile

[Spurtacular]

https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/059/087/819/original/5f57fa3978f870f3.jpeg?1603373883

[ElNono]

I like coke and rum
Bud light
Wine once in awhile

Cuba libre! Anything Rum is good in my book tbh :bobo

[DMC]

The court needs 538 judges.

[Winehole23]

Sounds a bit hyperbolic, tbhSure, but we live in unusual times. Using Bush v Gore as a precedent doesn't get your attention?

[Bogie]

So woman are ok killing baby girls ?


so you’re ok with raping little children in trump concentration camps?

[ElNono]

Sure, but we live in unusual times. Using Bush v Gore as a precedent doesn't get your attention?

Unless somebody can point me to some fatal flaw on that decision, I don't see why would it be disqualifying...

[Spurtacular]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ElCqoEKWAAAOddX.jpg:large

[Spurtacular]

https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/059/244/210/original/776c55244e8b9e30.jpeg?1603823773

[boutons_deux]

What Amy Coney Barrett Means for the Future of Voting Rights

Unless we act, I fear a return to Jim Crow regime under which my grandparents and tens of millions of Black people suffered is inevitable.

Barrett’s record as a judge on the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit makes this clear.

In one decision, she supported “virtue-based restrictions (http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2019/D03-15/C:18-1478:J:Flaum:aut:T:fnOp:N:2309276:S:0)” on voting.

In her view, voting is not a fundamental right guaranteed to every citizen of this country;

it is a privilege that states can revoke when they see fit.

Scalia notoriously denounced America’s civil rights legislation as a “perpetuation of racial entitlement (https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/12-96_7648.pdf).”

Asked in her recent confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee whether she agreed with her former boss’ characterization of civil rights legislation, Barrett refused (https://twitter.com/MikeSacksEsq/status/1316381438699331584) to say.

with Amy Coney Barrett in the fold, the conservative majority will succeed in dealing the Voting Right Act a final, fatal blow by making it effectively impossible for disempowered voters who challenge discriminatory rules to prevail in court.

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/barrett-voting-rights-act/

[boutons_deux]

The scary truth is many Senate Democrats share Amy Coney Barrett's corporate agenda

What this tells us is that the corporate donors who control the Democratic Party are happy with a Justice Barrett.

In her short time on the bench, she has ruled consistently in favor of corporations.

Just weeks before her nomination to the high court,

Judge Barrett delivered a key ruling blocking many gig workers from suing in court when tech companies cheat them out of overtime pay.

This and other business-friendly rulings are why

corporations have given millions to groups such as the

Judicial Crisis Network and

the U.S. Chamber of Commerce

to campaign for Barrett's appointment to the court.

Barrett also belongs to the business-backed Federalist Society and will join five other Federalists on the Supreme Court.

https://www.alternet.org/2020/10/amy-coney-barrett-2648539131/

[boutons_deux]

70+ Climate Journalists Pen Open Letter Condemning Barrett for Enabling the 'Ecological Crisis of Our Times'

"At the moment when the facts of the case were presented to her, this arbiter of justice freely chose to side with mistruths. Judge Coney Barrett's responses are factually inaccurate, scientifically unsound, and dangerous."

the right-wing judge insisted she has "no firm views" on the climate crisis and,

in later written responses, called (https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/10/21/pressed-climate-views-and-ties-shell-oil-barrett-once-again-calls-established) the science of climate change "controversial."

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/10/25/70-climate-journalists-pen-open-letter-condemning-barrett-enabling-ecological-crisis

[boutons_deux]

1316484989706526720

[boutons_deux]

Judges Are Already Testing How Far Amy Coney Barrett Will Go for Republicans

In a shocking opinion, two judges tried to hijack Minnesota’s election law to throw out mail ballots.


Over the last week, four conservative justices on the Supreme Court have signaled their desire to throw out mail ballots that arrive after Election Day.

The court will remain deadlocked on this momentous issue—

which could affect the outcome of countless races—

until Amy Coney Barrett casts her first vote.

And the lower courts are taking bets on which side she’ll take.


It is the Barrett effect:

Lower court judges are beginning to test the limits of the Supreme Court,

trying to figure out how far right they can go without getting reversed.

It is an especially dangerous time for federal courts to

fabricate a new rule that prevents states from counting lawful ballots.

But with no clear check to rein in the judiciary’s accelerating radicalism,

some judges have decided it’s time to go all-in for Donald Trump and dare SCOTUS to stop them.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/10/minnesota-judges-barrett-absentee-ballots.html

[Spurtacular]

https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/060/426/102/original/4cffe5681b854872.jpg

[boutons_deux]

In Harvard speech, Breyer speaks out against “court packing”

Breyer used a speech on Tuesday at Harvard Law School (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHxTQxDVTdU) to argue against efforts to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court.

“the court is guided by legal principle, not politics” and would therefore be eroded if the court’s structure were changed in response to concerns about the influence of politics on the Supreme Court.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/in-harvard-speech-breyer-speaks-out-against-court-packing

:lol

Repugs blocked Garland

Repug blocked vetting of Kavanaugh

That's not "court packing" for Breyer? :lol

He must assume his Harvard audience is fucking stupid and ignorant.

[spurraider21]

https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/060/426/102/original/4cffe5681b854872.jpg
"party of the working class" shitting on the working class per par (and in favor of ACB who cucked Trump :lmao)

[Spurtacular]

"party of the working class" shitting on the working class per par (and in favor of ACB who cucked Trump :lmao)

ACB is not a working class hero story. She's a piece of ass who was chosen to be a puppet is all.

[ElNono]

ACB is not a working class hero story. She's a piece of ass who was chosen to be a puppet is all.

Is this like when you guys were all for Mueller when he said Trump didn't collude, but then flipped on him cuz he didn't jail Shillary or something retarded like that?

[spurraider21]

ACB is not a working class hero story. She's a piece of ass who was chosen to be a puppet is all.
Your own meme referred to her bartending gig. If that ain’t working class i don’t know what is

[Spurtacular]

Your own meme referred to her bartending gig. If that ain’t working class i don’t know what is

I didn't say she wasn't working class, philo.

[spurraider21]

I didn't say she wasn't working class, philo.
And the meme is shitting on AOC for being working class

[Will Hunting]

1425928471218360325

Handmaid Barrett to Derp and all the other dipshit anti-vaxxers:
https://www.factsnotmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/acb-amy-coney-barrett.jpg

[Winehole23]

dumb as a rock or she thinks you are

1437387914061570049

[Winehole23]

wHy wOuLd AnYonE tHiNk wE'Re pArTisaN hAckS?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_Kt09-XEA8iv5b?format=jpg&name=small

[Thread]

dumb as a rock or she thinks you are

1437387914061570049


wHy wOuLd AnYonE tHiNk wE'Re pArTisaN hAckS?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_Kt09-XEA8iv5b?format=jpg&name=small

You're still pissed because we did wet work on the Garland affair.
tee, hee.

[Winehole23]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_LJQWdVQAILRp3?format=jpg&name=small

[Thread]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_LJQWdVQAILRp3?format=jpg&name=small

You're still angry that we put the boots to Garland. Stomped a good sized mudhole in him and walked it dry.
ha, ha.

[Winehole23]

Swept into office by a gust of dark money, tbh


A conservative dark money group led by former President Donald Trump’s judicial adviser Leonard Leo bankrolled Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court confirmation campaign with nearly $22 million in anonymous cash, while another nonprofit that Leo helps steer saw a fundraising bonanza and showered cash on other organizations boosting Barrett, according to tax returns obtained by The Daily Poster.


The new tax (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21164750-rule-of-law-trust-990-2020) returns (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21164749-the-85-fund-2020-990) shed light on how Barrett’s successful last-minute confirmation campaign was aided by a flood of dark money. They also reveal the rapid growth of Leo’s already highly successful dark money network and its tentacles in the broader conservative movement.
https://www.dailyposter.com/how-dark-money-bought-a-supreme-court-seat/

[Thread]

Swept into office by a gust of dark money, tbh

https://www.dailyposter.com/how-dark-money-bought-a-supreme-court-seat/

You taught us all this shit, Winester.

Stings, don't it?

[boutons_deux]

ACB again blocks the Repug effort to kill Biden's loan forgiveness