The Weiner laptop: Hunter Biden addition

[SnakeBoy]

1316560006481928192

[Trainwreck2100]

To the people who had their family businesses burnt down - they tried to make an insurance claim and were told to go take a running leap...do you think they care that 93% of the protests were 'peaceful'?

That's called the media downplaying the significance to fit their own biased narrative.


That's called insurance being fuckwads and like i said the last time this was posted, that should be the real story.

[Trainwreck2100]

The NYT was content obtained without authorization, it was against Twitter’s policy.

But props for at least being honest about not caring about them being politically motivated.

so you know who gave it to them?

[Spurtacular]

I can recall when CNN was actually fairly moderate. Holding Pelosi's flithy feet to the fire like Wolf Blitzer just did the other day on a regular basis. My how they have let Trump derangment syndrome consume them.

Whatever that means. They were constantly lying by omission. And some big stories were even faked outright.
Sure there's been a rhetorical shift though.

[TSA]

so you know who gave it to them?

You think the NYT obtained Trump’s taxes with authorization?
:lol some of you lately are really outing yourselves as fucking retards.

[Spurtacular]

The shop owner gave the laptop to Rudy. Lol

It didn’t belong to him.

The shop owner was the legal owner of the laptop after it was not picked up in the required number of days.

[TSA]

1316560006481928192

RZasrHQeKiY

:rollin Rudy

[Winehole23]

To the people who had their family businesses burnt down - they tried to make an insurance claim and were told to go take a running leap...do you think they care that 93% of the protests were 'peaceful'?

That's called the media downplaying the significance to fit their own biased narrative.On the contrary, the MSM covered the violence extensively. Peaceful protests get very few clicks.

Hence your availability bias and everyone else's, totally out of joint with a much broader, notably peaceful political movement.

[Spurtacular]

Pity reply.

How long is it going to take you to realize that no one from either side even responds to you anymore?

Dabom never received an admittance letter from the Chumpettes. :lol

[Dirks_Finale]

"They need to be regulated now. They need to be made into a public utility, now. Facebook and google account for 70% of all the news people read in the United states. That's dangerous, that's unhealthy for a democracy."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJ-HIAY0DhE

[TSA]

Props to Will Hunting for at least being honest and instead of semen shielding the blatant political censorship meant to help Biden he instead cheers it on. The rest of you are fucking dishonest pussies.

[Dirks_Finale]

Whatever that means. They were constantly lying by omission. And some big stories were even faked outright.
Sure there's been a rhetorical shift though.

If you recall the Clinton impeachment, most of them turned on their darling Bill in the midst of all that.

[Trainwreck2100]

You think the NYT obtained Trump’s taxes with authorization?
:lol some of you lately are really outing yourselves as fucking retards.
You think Hillary was running an indoor sex cabal at a chuck e cheese. Just giving you what you been putting out there.
So you can't say it was without authorization, but okay has Trump ever acknowledged they were actually his? I don't think he has? So are they violating the ill gotten information clause if they aren't his taxes, which he hasn't acknowledged so therefore not against that particular TOS because he hasn't said they are his. He's alluded to them not being his. "I pay lot's of taxes" (paraphrasing)

[Spurminator]

To the people who had their family businesses burnt down - they tried to make an insurance claim and were told to go take a running leap...do you think they care that 93% of the protests were 'peaceful'?

That's called the media downplaying the significance to fit their own biased narrative.

Facts don't care about your feelings. 93% fits the requirements to say "most." By a long shot.

[Spurminator]

Props to Will Hunting for at least being honest and instead of semen shielding the blatant political censorship meant to help Biden he instead cheers it on. The rest of you are fucking dishonest pussies.

You reap what you sow, faggot.

By the way, hell of a productive day for you. Did you leave your computer at all?

:lmao Trump PR

[Will Hunting]

"They need to be regulated now. They need to be made into a public utility, now. Facebook and google account for 70% of all the news people read in the United states. That's dangerous, that's unhealthy for a democracy."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJ-HIAY0DhE
I’d be in favor of that but seriously, conservatives now want to nationalize private self sufficient companies?

[Trainwreck2100]

Props to Will Hunting for at least being honest and instead of semen shielding the blatant political censorship meant to help Biden he instead cheers it on. The rest of you are fucking dishonest pussies.

:cry hey you guys aren't being cool even though the last five year I've been an absolute tool seth rich, pizza, obamagate, don't act the same way I did because that's mean :cry

[Reck]

Props to Will Hunting (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=17032) for at least being honest and instead of semen shielding the blatant political censorship meant to help Biden he instead cheers it on. The rest of you are fucking dishonest pussies.

What are you going on about? This story is a rehash. It doesn’t help or hurt Biden, the guy actually running for president.

Stop flailing.

[Spurtacular]

If you recall the Clinton impeachment, most of them turned on their darling Bill in the midst of all that.

Recall The Persian Gulf War. Those guided missile videos were faked. CNN knowingly played them anyways.

[Spurs Homer]

:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol TSA



VALIANTLY defending his cult leaders honor!


hahahahahahahahaha!

[Winehole23]

Props to Will Hunting (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=17032) for at least being honest and instead of semen shielding the blatant political censorship meant to help Biden he instead cheers it on. The rest of you are fucking dishonest pussies.Nah, no one is required to run unsubstantiated partisan propaganda.

1st Amendment still applies to private companies.

[Dirks_Finale]

Facts don't care about your feelings. 93% fits the requirements to say "most." By a long shot.

Until it's your shop, or your friends or family's shop...that you have worked your whole life for and pumped all your savings into it. Then it because less than peaceful.

Even 7% is too high.

[Spurtacular]

What are you going on about? This story is a rehash. It doesn’t help or hurt Biden, the guy actually running for president.

Stop flailing.

Of course it hurts Sleepy Joe. He was supposedly maintaining a thin veneer of deniability. That's been shredded.

People weren't voting for death and destruction anyways; but whatever holdouts won't be voting for corruption either.

[Reck]

1st Amendment.

Btw, something the wannabe justice doesn’t even know. :lmao

Fucking failed so hard on this layup.

[Spurtacular]

Props to Will Hunting (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=17032) for at least being honest and instead of semen shielding the blatant political censorship meant to help Biden he instead cheers it on. The rest of you are fucking dishonest pussies.

I don't think cheering on censorship is exactly an honest position, tbh.

[Spurminator]

Until it's your shop, or your friends or family's shop...that you have worked your whole life for and pumped all your savings into it. Then it because less than peaceful.

Even 7% is too high.

Sure it's too much. That's a separate argument.

You want the media to claim that most protests are violent, but the numbers say they aren't. And it makes you mad to hear it. Even though it's empirical fact.

That's what a healthy dose of Fox News will get you.

[Dirks_Finale]

I’d be in favor of that but seriously, conservatives now want to nationalize private self sufficient companies?

I don't know, but it's getting a little ridiculous now. I would not like it if it were a left wing article being censored either.

[Trainwreck2100]

Until it's your shop, or your friends or family's shop...that you have worked your whole life for and pumped all your savings into it. Then it because less than peaceful.

Even 7% is too high.

or you know, imagine it's your shop or car or body, and paying a company a shit load of money and then when the thing you been paying to protect yourself from happens, they find a way to weasel out of paying you

[Will Hunting]

1st Amendment still applies to private companies.
Yep. Republican judges have made it abundantly clear that corporations have 1st amendment rights, which are as broad as being able to dump millions of dollars into elections.

If you don’t like it, take it up with Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas.

[Winehole23]

Until it's your shop, or your friends or family's shop...that you have worked your whole life for and pumped all your savings into it. Then it because less than peaceful.

Even 7% is too high.Maybe the police should stop murdering black folk willy nilly. People might settle down then.

Right to petiion for redress of grievances.

[Spurtacular]

The shop owner was the legal owner of the laptop after it was not picked up in the required number of days.

So apparently you didn't know, NPC Reck (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412). Let me know when your defense gets uploaded. :lol

[Dirks_Finale]

Sure it's too much. That's a separate argument.

You want the media to claim that most protests are violent, but the numbers say they aren't. And it makes you mad to hear it. Even though it's empirical fact.

That's what a healthy dose of Fox News will get you.

Any number seems arbitrary when you are surrounded by burning buildings.

So if it's 51/49 it's still cosnidered peaceful :lol

:lolk

[Will Hunting]

I don't think cheering on censorship is exactly an honest position, tbh.
Oh please, the religious right has been trying to censor stuff for the last 20+ years. Y’all were trying to get gangster rap completely banned in the early 2000s.

[Spurminator]

Social media companies are being overly cautious about election year disinformation because their ad revenues are at stake. Their carelessness and allowing disinformation to spread in 2016 put them in this predicament. I couldn't frankly care less if the people who pushed pizza pedophilia conspiracies to the breaking point four years ago get censored now, whether it's justified or not.

Fuck them. It's a makeup call.

[Spurminator]

Any number seems arbitrary when you are surrounded by burning buildings.

So if it's 51/49 it's still cosnidered peaceful :lol

:lolk

Technically yes but that's probably not the narrative if it's 49% and you know it.

7% is a long way from 49%. Use all the melodramatic language you want but it's pretty obvious that your perspective on the protests is shaped by a healthy intake of conservative garbage media and not the 93% reality.

[TSA]

You reap what you sow, faggot.

By the way, hell of a productive day for you. Did you leave your computer at all?

:lmao Trump PR

Had just under a half million in sales today and got 12 holes of golf in after work with my son. Getting dark here around 6:45 or would have finished 18. Even par through 12. Good day for me.

What’d you accomplish today faggot?

[Ef-man]

Russian disinformation.

RT preys on the stupid and gullible, just like derp.

Hate to see it.

[Reck]

So apparently you didn't know, NPC Reck (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412). Let me know when your defense gets uploaded. :lol

Even that is in contention.

The shop owner doesn’t even have his timeline straight.

:lol rich asshole goes to random computer shop owner to fix a computer and never shows up. That checks out..

[TSA]

You think Hillary was running an indoor sex cabal at a chuck e cheese. Just giving you what you been putting out there.
So you can't say it was without authorization, but okay has Trump ever acknowledged they were actually his? I don't think he has? So are they violating the ill gotten information clause if they aren't his taxes, which he hasn't acknowledged so therefore not against that particular TOS because he hasn't said they are his. He's alluded to them not being his. "I pay lot's of taxes" (paraphrasing)

If they weren’t his then they were falsified, again, against Twitter’s TOS.
:lol you done taking L’s?

[Spurtacular]

Oh please, the religious right has been trying to censor stuff for the last 20+ years. Y’all were trying to get gangster rap completely banned in the early 2000s.

:lol Grifter Will

[Will Hunting]

:lol Grifter Will
That's telling me.

[Winehole23]

Wonder why the Team Trump burned their source, who says he gave the laptop to the FBI first, and couldn't say how Rudy G ended up with it.

Not gonna go well for him, it's a pity those using his information for their own advantage didn't protect him or warn him he was going to be outed.

[Ef-man]

That's telling me.

Derp looking for a father figure so do not be surprised if he asks for your advice again.

[Spurtacular]

Even that is in contention.

The shop owner doesn’t even have his timeline straight.

:lol rich asshole goes to random computer shop owner to fix a computer and never shows up. That checks out..

:cry Muh suspicions :cry
:cry Cereal, something ain't right :cry

Controlled media doing what they do. Come to terms.

[Reck]

So apparently you didn't know, NPC Reck (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412). Let me know when your defense gets uploaded. :lol

Case and point.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-emails-computer-repair-store-owner-john-paul-mac-isaac.amp

:lol can’t be 100 percent sure it was Hunter
:lol admits to being half blind

Things just keep getting worse for you and TSA. Lol

[Trainwreck2100]

If they weren’t his then they were falsified, again, against Twitter’s TOS.
:lol you done taking L’s?

Completely ignored the pizza thing

just like you ignored this line

against that particular TOS
I'd ask that you read my posts with the same magnifying glass you give random shit you see on twitter about the people you disagree with so that you don't make that mistake again.


Now why did i include that throwaway line, and have a response queued up, you ask. Because I knew you'd reply with it's still against their TOS which like i said i took into account but I knew you'd jump on the contradiction that wasn't there because I accounted for it, but you're an idiot. The endgame was the gag about you reading a Dem email with the fucking hubble telescope, but missing one word because you don't put the same thought into things when it won't affirm your narrative.

[Reck]

Wonder why the Team Trump burned their source, who says he gave the laptop to the FBI first, and couldn't say how Rudy G ended up with it.

Not gonna go well for him, it's a pity those using his information for their own advantage didn't protect him or warn him he was going to be outed.

That man was done dirty. Outed within the day and it’s already coming up with excuses to distance himself from potential legal issues.

That excuse he wanted the laptop out of his shop sounds like weak sauce.

Just another victim of Trump’s wake.

[Spurminator]

Had just under a half million in sales today and got 12 holes of golf in after work with my son. Getting dark here around 6:45 or would have finished 18. Even par through 12. Good day for me.

What’d you accomplish today faggot?

I made you spin a hilarious tale about the life you wish you had so you could impress anonymous people on a basketball message board, I'd call that a win.

I had a pretty average day that in no way involved spending hours on a message board trying to peddle fake news in service to a shitty president that my life has revolved around for the past 4 years.

[Ef-man]

Why are they crying?

Biden announces record $383 million fundraising haul for September!

Dang...

[Trainwreck2100]

I made you spin a hilarious tale about the life you wish you had so you could impress anonymous people on a basketball message board, I'd call that a win.

I had a pretty average day that in no way involved spending hours on a message board trying to peddle fake news in service to a shitty president that my life has revolved around for the past 4 years.


if he's the same TSA as the decent kings fan who posted here initially then i can't see him lying. The tragedy is, let's say that's true, how can a decent guy like that turn into a fucking retard, just a fucking idiot what happened to that pretty cool guy that turned him into a fool. If it's not true, same question. I'm so disappointed in him.

[Reck]

I made you spin a hilarious tale about the life you wish you had so you could impress anonymous people on a basketball message board, I'd call that a win.

I had a pretty average day that in no way involved spending hours on a message board trying to peddle fake news in service to a shitty president that my life has revolved around for the past 4 years.

I made him go on a spiel a while ago about how he fucked miss California back in the 90s.

TSA gets nervous when he’s shook so he goes into a weird safe space where he’s mr. everything.

[TSA]

Completely ignored the pizza thing

just like you ignored this line

I'd ask that you read my posts with the same magnifying glass you give random shit you see on twitter about the people you disagree with so that you don't make that mistake again.


Now why did i include that throwaway line, and have a response queued up, you ask. Because I knew you'd reply with it's still against their TOS which like i said i took into account but I knew you'd jump on the contradiction that wasn't there because I accounted for it, but you're an idiot. The endgame was the gag about you reading a Dem email with the fucking hubble telescope, but missing one word because you don't put the same thought into things when it won't affirm your narrative.

All that effort in pursuit of a tiny w :rollin

[Reck]

All that effort in pursuit of a tiny w :rollin

Now you’re talking like derp.

Bad day. Bad night for you.

[Winehole23]

Now you’re talking like derp.

Bad day. Bad night for you.Hair of the dog, yesterday was rough too.

RIP Obamagate

[Trainwreck2100]

All that effort in pursuit of a tiny w :rollin




:lol you done taking L’s?


also :lol you of all people laughing at effort, you've been taking trump up the ass for literally nothing.

[TSA]

I made you spin a hilarious tale about the life you wish you had so you could impress anonymous people on a basketball message board, I'd call that a win.

I had a pretty average day that in no way involved spending hours on a message board trying to peddle fake news in service to a shitty president that my life has revolved around for the past 4 years.

That you think it’s a tale is hilarious. If I had claimed to have made commission on my sales today that’d be a hilarious tale, but I didn’t. And I’m a scratch golfer so even par through 12 holes is no outrageous feat.

I did spend an hour or two here today during work, but the Biden campaign didn’t even deny what today’s story was so I fail to see how you think I peddled fake news.

And I didn’t ask how your day was faggot I asked what you accomplished.

[TSA]

I made him go on a spiel a while ago about how he fucked miss California back in the 90s.

TSA gets nervous when he’s shook so he goes into a weird safe space where he’s mr. everything.

Fucking Miss Teen California doesn’t make me mr everything but it does make me someone who fucked a hot as fuck miss teen while you didn’t.

[Reck]

:lmao

[ElNono]

:lol Rudy being the source of this made everything way more clear, tbh... that was a terrible move by the campaign...

[TSA]

if he's the same TSA as the decent kings fan who posted here initially then i can't see him lying. The tragedy is, let's say that's true, how can a decent guy like that turn into a fucking retard, just a fucking idiot what happened to that pretty cool guy that turned him into a fool. If it's not true, same question. I'm so disappointed in him.

I’ve never lied here about my personal life and used to post pictures as proof back in the day before doxxing became an issue. I’m touched you found me to be a decent guy back in the day, I really am :lol

[TSA]

:lmao

dude you admitted to not even knowing how to cook yourself rice everyone here knows you can’t land good pussy.

[ElNono]

Had just under a half million in sales today and got 12 holes of golf in after work with my son. Getting dark here around 6:45 or would have finished 18. Even par through 12. Good day for me.

What’d you accomplish today faggot?

Not even the guy that made the most money or played the most golf in here today, tbh...

We all know that's CosmicCowboy :lol

[Trainwreck2100]

I’ve never lied here about my personal life and used to post pictures as proof back in the day before doxxing became an issue. I’m touched you found me to be a decent guy back in the day, I really am :lol

simpler times then though

[Trainwreck2100]

Not even the guy that made the most money or played the most golf in here today, tbh...

We all know that's CosmicCowboy :lol

I doubt he golfs

[Reck]

dude you admitted to not even knowing how to cook yourself rice everyone here knows you can’t land good pussy.

Nope.

Dont need to either. Only in your fantasy world is this an issue. You bring that up all the time like it’s a zinger. It’s not.

Keep living vicariously through others though if it helps you go through whatever this is.

[ElNono]

I doubt he golfs

He admitted having the Obama carts tho :lol

[Trainwreck2100]

He admitted having the Obama carts tho :lol

doesn't mean he used them for golfing

[Winehole23]

He admitted having the Obama carts tho :lolPerk of being rich. The more you got, the more you get.

[TSA]

Not even the guy that made the most money or played the most golf in here today, tbh...

We all know that's CosmicCowboy :lol:lol yeah he’s got me on cash flow but I’m able to play 4-7 days a week so I’ll take the pay cut and scratch handicap any day.

[ElNono]

doesn't mean he used them for golfing

Oh I know, I'm just messing around

[TSA]

simpler times then though

Back then I had the Chargers, Kings, and Padres to troll with :cry

[TSA]

Nope.

Dont need to either. Only in your fantasy world is this an issue. You bring that up all the time like it’s a zinger. It’s not.

Keep living vicariously through others though if it helps you go through whatever this is.

If you can’t cook for yourself or a woman and be a gamer and still land good pussy than props to you. I don’t buy it but props if true. It’s still pathetic you can’t cook rice.

And who exactly do you think I’m living vicariously through?

[ElNono]

:lol yeah he’s got me on cash flow but I’m able to play 4-7 days a week so I’ll take the pay cut and scratch handicap any day.

I have it pretty good, tbh, can't complain

[TSA]

ahh trainwreck you brought me back to the good ole days here back in the early 2000s. shit talk was shit talk and no one caught feelings. I miss those days. Times have changed here since y’alls girl lost, bunch of bitter bitches who don’t realize when they’re getting trolled. I look forward to when ya’ll finally get over it and we can get back to how it used to be.

:bobo

[Reck]

If you can’t cook for yourself or a woman and be a gamer and still land good pussy than props to you. I don’t buy it but props if true. It’s still pathetic you can’t cook rice.

And who exactly do you think I’m living vicariously through?

Way I see it, I can always learn to cook rice (why would I?) and be all the good for it. But can you unring that qtard bell, TSA?

A question to ponder for you, 4channity.

[ElNono]

ahh trainwreck you brought me back to the good ole days here back in the early 2000s. shit talk was shit talk and no one caught feelings. I miss those days. Times have changed here since y’alls girl lost, bunch of bitter bitches who don’t realize when they’re getting trolled. I look forward to when ya’ll finally get over it and we can get back to how it used to be.

:bobo

You picked the wrong president to stan, it happens, tbh... no hard feelings...

[Winehole23]

odd wrinkle, if true

1316594282573242370

[Spurminator]

ahh trainwreck you brought me back to the good ole days here back in the early 2000s. shit talk was shit talk and no one caught feelings. I miss those days. Times have changed here since y’alls girl lost, bunch of bitter bitches who don’t realize when they’re getting trolled. I look forward to when ya’ll finally get over it and we can get back to how it used to be.

:bobo

i'Ve bEeN tRoLLiNg yOu aLL fOr fOuR yEArS, tHaT mAkEs YOU tHe LoSErS lol

[Winehole23]

crocodile tears

1316539428563759104

[Nathan89]

crocodile tears

1316539428563759104

Yeah, that's not a good rebuttal.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1316510056591040513?s=20

Gotta love these assholes censoring Americans.

[Spurtacular]

Case and point.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-emails-computer-repair-store-owner-john-paul-mac-isaac.amp

:lol can’t be 100 percent sure it was Hunter
:lol admits to being half blind

Things just keep getting worse for you and TSA. Lol

Cat's out of the bag, tranny.

[TSA]

Way I see it, I can always learn to cook rice (why would I?) and be all the good for it. But can you unring that qtard bell, TSA?

A question to ponder for you, 4channity.


Nope, can’t and don’t plan on unringing that Q bell here on ST. The problem with your question is that you think I’m like this outside of this board. What would unringing a non-existent Q bell do for me in the real world? You on the other hand can’t cook for yourself and it was hilarious watching you discuss surviving during the initial lockdowns :lol

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1316536606405337088?s=20

There is no bias.:madrun

[Winehole23]

Yeah, that's not a good rebuttal.YMMV.

Legum's point is factually correct. The right wing rules FB -- it's not really a contest, tbh.

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/09/10/facebook-offers-a-distorted-view-of-american-news

[TSA]

i'Ve bEeN tRoLLiNg yOu aLL fOr fOuR yEArS, tHaT mAkEs YOU tHe LoSErS lol

Came here trolling 20 years ago and haven’t changed a bit.

[TSA]

You picked the wrong president to stan, it happens, tbh... no hard feelings...

Never gotten hard feelings here, and still sorry your girl lost.

[ElNono]

crocodile tears

1316539428563759104

Ben Shapiro is an idiot, regardless of what he says or does.

[ElNono]

Never gotten hard feelings here, and still sorry your girl lost.

Not my girl, I actually wanted the GOP to win. Which doesn't mean I have to stan the POTUS or anybody else for 4 years, tbh...

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1316536606405337088?s=20

There is no bias.:madrun

No one at this point can say there’s no bias. But at this point what can you do? Under current law their business their rules.

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1316510056591040513?s=20

Gotta love these assholes censoring Americans.

BREAKING: Private companies have terms of services and rules you have to comply with.

[TSA]

Not my girl, I actually wanted the GOP to win. Which doesn't mean I have to stan the POTUS or anybody else for 4 years, tbh...

Then you abstained from the Presidential vote like myself? I knew I liked you. :bobo

[Trainwreck2100]

ahh trainwreck you brought me back to the good ole days here back in the early 2000s. shit talk was shit talk and no one caught feelings. I miss those days. Times have changed here since y’alls girl lost, bunch of bitter bitches who don’t realize when they’re getting trolled. I look forward to when ya’ll finally get over it and we can get back to how it used to be.

:bobo

shit talk was shit talk but quality trolling was still a thinking man's game, none of this settle for low hanging fruit bullshit

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1316536606405337088?s=20

There is no bias.:madrun

Conservative posts tweet to demonstrate how he can't express himself on twitter.

[ElNono]

Then you abstained from the Presidential vote like myself? I knew I liked you. :bobo

In 2016? Yes, didn't vote for either.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/willchamberlain/status/1316551827689746436?s=20

Just weeks ahead of the election corrupt anti-american big tech companies decide to hold nothing back in their to manipulate our election.

[ElNono]

In a scale from 1 to 5, how much does it hurt, Nathan? :lol

[Spurtacular]

Conservative posts tweet to demonstrate how he can't express himself on twitter.

You don't want Joe Biden's slanderous claim censored?

[Trainwreck2100]

Not my girl, I actually wanted the GOP to win. Which doesn't mean I have to stan the POTUS or anybody else for 4 years, tbh...

can't fault a guy too hard 4 years ago we couldn't imagine all the brazen shit the GOP would let their boy get away with, like literally everything they've rallied against, Trump has just done most of that shit and they let him do whatever he wants. It's anyone seeing the last 4 years and still thinking this guy is on the level when he's clearly full of shit.

[Trainwreck2100]

In 2016? Yes, didn't vote for either.

i voted but today was the first time in years, i didn't write in a name for president.

[TSA]

shit talk was shit talk but quality trolling was still a thinking man's game, none of this settle for low hanging fruit bullshit

disagree. Trolling back in the day was pretty simple especially with the ease of any account you wanted to create. Nowadays you’ve got to be much more nuanced as most people here are posting from their regular account. I find it more entertaining now tbh.

Although I do miss rappin shaq tell me how my ass taste :cry

Was it ever revealed who that was by the way they had an impressive flow

[Nathan89]

Please tell me about how we should get the results of the election to "figure out what the people want" before selecting a justice. How about fuck you.

[Reck]

Nope, can’t and don’t plan on unringing that Q bell here on ST. The problem with your question is that you think I’m like this outside of this board. What would unringing a non-existent Q bell do for me in the real world? You on the other hand can’t cook for yourself and it was hilarious watching you discuss surviving during the initial lockdowns :lol

That makes no sense and the fact you insist on making this an issue is making you look kind of gay. You’re coming off like an aggrieved woman.

And there’s no way you’re not a real life looney tunes when you spend your waking hours peddling seriously fucked and insane conspiracies in here.

Between your conspiracies and your so call lavish style full of miss universe orgies, yeah it’s not far fetch you’re just not well adjusted.

Now, cap your night by begging for your 2000 dollars. :lol

[Winehole23]

Please tell me about how we should get the results of the election to "figure out what the people want" before selecting a justice. How about fuck you.Where were you four years ago? :lol

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1316583761954430978?s=20

Not related but on the issue of censorship.

[Winehole23]

https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1316583761954430978?s=20Where in the Constitution is the right to a Twitter account mentioned?

[Nathan89]

Feel free to post all the messages from Democrats that are outraged about big tech censorship.

[Reck]

Maybe don’t be a Qtard and a white supremacist lover and you may get a platform?

These insane people running for senate and house seats think they should be rewarded for being completely unhinged lunatics is something to behold.

This is where Trumpism has led us.

[Winehole23]

Coons (D)
Witzke (R)


SpreadUniversity of Delaware* (https://www.udel.edu/udaily/2020/october/poll--democrats-lead-by-big-margins-in-delaware/)9/21 - 9/27 Coons +30Not gonna make up that deficit in three weeks on TWITTER, tbh. Even if Coons keels over he'll probably win.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/senate/de/delaware_senate_witzke_vs_coons-7066.html

[Winehole23]

Feel free to post all the messages from Democrats that are outraged about big tech censorship.It's not censorship, but it does suck for Witzke.

[TSA]

That makes no sense and the fact you insist on making this an issue is making you look kind of gay. You’re coming off like an aggrieved woman.

And there’s no way you’re not a real life looney tunes when you spend your waking hours peddling seriously fucked and insane conspiracies in here.

Between your conspiracies and your so call lavish style full of miss universe orgies, yeah it’s not far fetch you’re just not well adjusted.

Now, cap your night by begging for your 2000 dollars. :lol
An aggrieved woman can still cook rice, and you can’t.

It was a miss teen not miss universe, and fucking one miss teen California is not an orgy.

I don’t consider golfing 4+ times a week to be a lavish lifestyle.

Watching that pussy djohn go into hiding whenever I tell him was worth it.

[Chumpette]

https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1316583761954430978?s=20

Not related but on the issue of censorship.

Good for democracy.

[Winehole23]

Yep. Republican judges have made it abundantly clear that corporations have 1st amendment rights, which are as broad as being able to dump millions of dollars into elections.

If you don’t like it, take it up with Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas.I'd like to. Citizens United is a big reason for the fecal political duopoly of the evil of two lessers in this country. In addition to public financing of elections and shortened campaigns with zero private contributions, I wouldn't mind a bit seeing the internet reclassified as a public utility, with all the rules attached.

(FAANG wouldn't sit still for that, though. Sadly, that ship may already have sailed.)

[Reck]

An aggrieved woman can still cook rice, and you can’t.

It was a miss teen not miss universe, and fucking one miss teen California is not an orgy.

I don’t consider golfing 4+ times a week to be a lavish lifestyle.

Watching that pussy djohn go into hiding whenever I tell him was worth it.

I’m not required to
That whole miss universe thing is in your head and no one believes you
Has time to golf and post on an online board 10 hours a day for the past 20 years :lol
Assuming that’s true, djohn has a moral trait while you show none and is Shameless about it

What a life. Hard pass

[Winehole23]

Very chummy with sources, the.tao.of.em will go far.

1316553496192258048

[ElNono]

You don't want Joe Biden's slanderous claim censored?

You're too emotional about this, tbh, calm down. I don't really care personally because I don't consume social media, and it's not like you can't find out what the allegations are.

[ElNono]

can't fault a guy too hard 4 years ago we couldn't imagine all the brazen shit the GOP would let their boy get away with, like literally everything they've rallied against, Trump has just done most of that shit and they let him do whatever he wants. It's anyone seeing the last 4 years and still thinking this guy is on the level when he's clearly full of shit.

I sometimes get the impression these guys don't realize how unpopular and unlikeable Dear Leader is, tbh, and it boggles the mind how much in a mental bubble you can be.

It's not new either, it started off with his dismal inauguration. His job approval has consistently underperformed compared to the last 8-9 presidents, and we had a bunch of corrupt (Nixon) and retards (dubya) in that span, tbh.

I get the whole team sport, want to believe, triggerin' dem libs, etc... but at some point the mental gymnastics have to be extenuating.

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1316583761954430978?s=20

:tu

[Spurtacular]

You're too emotional about this, tbh, calm down. I don't really care personally because I don't consume social media, and it's not like you can't find out what the allegations are.

I asked you a question on point. That hardly qualifies as emotional, let alone too emotional.

Should Biden's slanderous tweet be censored?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Reck

Oh, damn; Hunter wasn't hacked. So much for that.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/hunter-biden-was-not-hacked-agreed-to-transfer-ownership-of-mac-under-terms-of-repair-agreement/

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/HBidenInvoice.png

[ElNono]

I asked you a question on point. That hardly qualifies as emotional, let alone too emotional.

Should Biden's slanderous tweet be censored?

Yes or no.

It should not be censored. Government is not allowed to infringe on citizen's 1st Amendment rights, except for very few exceptions.

But that's not what happened here. What Twitter did is well within their rights, and not censorship.

With that out of the way, let's talk opinion.

I'm ambivalent on this. On one hand it does suck to an extent, even if this is ultimately a political stunt/fake news/fake outrage. There's plenty of those on twitter in general (and unfortunately we get to see them here fairly often).

On the other hand, we're dragging these social media companies to Congress, telling them to scrub fake news, not to allow interference with the election (especially considering we had a 3 year investigation confirming actual foreign interference in the previous election, through social media among other channels).

So if you put yourself in the shoes of the company for a minute, you just can't do both things.

In general, I have always preferred wider access to information. However, I do have concerns that there are people out there clearly being effective in targeting a small portion of very gullible and dumb people successfully, so it does give me pause sometimes (not talking about this particular case though, there's much more egregious examples).

[ElNono]

Reck

Oh, damn; Hunter wasn't hacked. So much for that.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/hunter-biden-was-not-hacked-agreed-to-transfer-ownership-of-mac-under-terms-of-repair-agreement/

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/HBidenInvoice.png

Technically, he did. The data isn't owned by the repairman because he salvaged it. Companies like Best Buy have had to pay a good chunk of money due to similar situations.

[Spurtacular]

It should not be censored. Government is not allowed to infringe on citizen's 1st Amendment rights, except for very few exceptions.

But that's not what happened here. What Twitter did is well within their rights, and not censorship.

With that out of the way, let's talk opinion.

I'm ambivalent on this. On one hand it does suck to an extent, even if this is ultimately a political stunt/fake news/fake outrage. There's plenty of those on twitter in general (and unfortunately we get to see them here fairly often).

On the other hand, we're dragging these social media companies to Congress, telling them to scrub fake news, not to allow interference with the election (especially considering we had a 3 year investigation confirming actual foreign interference in the previous election, through social media among other channels).

So if you put yourself in the shoes of the company for a minute, you just can't do both things.

In general, I have always preferred wider access to information. However, I do have concerns that there are people out there clearly being effective in targeting a small portion of very gullible and dumb people successfully, so it does give me pause sometimes (not talking about this particular case though, there's much more egregious examples).

1. I agree that Twitter should not autonomously take down the Tweet. That would make them a publisher, which they are not one, legally. That said, you can't have that standard for Biden and then not afford the same rights to every one else.
2. You just gave a blanket answer that it's okay to censor the NYP story. You give no justification because there is none and then you spend the rest of yourself blabbering on whatever.

[Spurtacular]

On the other hand, we're dragging these social media companies to Congress, telling them to scrub fake news

That's what the authoritarian left is doing. Yes. They are demanding censorship of the stuff they don't like; to which they have labeled it fake news.

[Spurtacular]

In general, I have always preferred wider access to information. However, I do have concerns that there are people out there clearly being effective in targeting a small portion of very gullible and dumb people successfully, so it does give me pause sometimes (not talking about this particular case though, there's much more egregious examples).

:cry People uh muh need to be protected from outlooks deemed harmful :cry

That's what banana republic dictators do.

Pass on your authoritarian left protection.

[ElNono]

1. I agree that Twitter should not autonomously take down the Tweet. That would make them a publisher, which they are not one, legally. That said, you can't have that standard for Biden and then not afford the same rights to every one else.

You're talking editorializing, not censorship. Legally they can be whatever they want to be, they're private business after all, and largely unregulated. The question is if they should keep certain advantageous legal protections if they become editors, and that's certainly debatable.

Even the notion that they're editorializing is debatable and would have to be tested in court, as they don't actually modify the user's content. That would be an interesting case.


2. You just gave a blanket answer that it's okay to censor the NYP story. You give no justification because there is none and then you spend the rest of yourself blabbering on whatever.

Sorry you have trouble with words like ambivalent. Look them up, you have internet after all.

It would cost me absolutely nothing to tell you that I agree or disagree with the measure they've taken, but I'm being honest here, and I think about the pro and cons of this quite a bit. We're not anymore at a time where somebody would publish some slander on a newspaper, and then they could be sued for libel, and go through that whole process.

Instead now we have a million things going on at any given time, everybody thinks they're a journo, and there's both a ton of bullshit flying around and plenty of customers for it. This is also largely why I don't consume it.

So this is quite a new terrain, and I'm not sure what I have such a firm position on this as I did in the past.

I used to be much more pro-information-disclosure, I admit to that. I also think these things eventually become public and known anyways (this one did regardless of what social media did or did not do). Same fate awaits the much less redacted Mueller report, for example.

[ElNono]

That's what the authoritarian left is doing. Yes. They are demanding censorship of the stuff they don't like; to which they have labeled it fake news.


:cry People uh muh need to be protected from outlooks deemed harmful :cry

That's what banana republic dictators do.

Pass on your authoritarian left protection.

Like I said, you're too emotionally invested in this. You skipped over the fact that, indeed, they were dragged into Congress because we had a 3 years investigation where we got to know that foreign countries actively tried to interfere with our democracy, especially through social media.

I think that's serious, but I also think it puts these companies in untenable positions.

[Spurtacular]

You're talking editorializing, not censorship. Legally they can be whatever they want to be, they're private business after all, and largely unregulated. The question is if they should keep certain advantageous legal protections if they become editors, and that's certainly debatable.

Even the notion that they're editorializing is debatable and would have to be tested in court, as they don't actually modify the user's content. That would be an interesting case.



Sorry you have trouble with words like ambivalent. Look them up, you have internet after all.

It would cost me absolutely nothing to tell you that I agree or disagree with the measure they've taken, but I'm being honest here, and I think about the pro and cons of this quite a bit. We're not anymore at a time where somebody would publish some slander on a newspaper, and then they could be sued for libel, and go through that whole process.

Instead now we have a million things going on at any given time, everybody thinks they're a journo, and there's both a ton of bullshit flying around and plenty of customers for it. This is also largely why I don't consume it.

So this is quite a new terrain, and I'm not sure what I have such a firm position on this as I did in the past.

I used to be much more pro-information-disclosure, I admit to that. I also think these things eventually become public and known anyways (this one did regardless of what social media did or did not do). Same fate awaits the much less redacted Mueller report, for example.

No gray zone about NYP being the press. Having what is essentially a public utility like Twitter suppressing freedom of the press is unAmerican. This is the shit they do in Communist China and in Islamo-fascist states.

[Spurtacular]

Like I said, you're too emotionally invested in this. You skipped over the fact that, indeed, they were dragged into Congress because we had a 3 years investigation where we got to know that foreign countries actively tried to interfere with our democracy, especially through social media.

I think that's serious, but I also think it puts these companies in untenable positions.

Stop pretending the Mueller report was anything groundbreaking.
That's just your huge emotional investment speaking.

[Spurtacular]

Technically, he did. The data isn't owned by the repairman because he salvaged it. Companies like Best Buy have had to pay a good chunk of money due to similar situations.

You'd have to cite the cases. Google yields sayings like this:



As a reminder, the US doesn't (yet) have a federal-level general consumer data
privacy law
, let alone a data
security law
.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1316696203543883776?s=20

Amazing how that works.

[Blake]

No gray zone about NYP being the press. Having what is essentially a public utility like Twitter suppressing freedom of the press is unAmerican. This is the shit they do in Communist China and in Islamo-fascist states.

Twitter isn't a public utility lol. You're just an idiot.

[Blake]

https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1316696203543883776?s=20

Amazing how that works.

The stupid times we live in?

Trump president.

[Spurtacular]

Total liar.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Czi3nah9taI

[Spurtacular]

Twitter isn't a public utility lol. You're just an idiot.

Thanks for the update, board cuckold.

[hater]

No it doesn't. The NYT didn't obtain Trump's tax returns either by hacking or otherwise illegally. They were provided by a confidential source.

:lmao so a leak is ok but a hack is not? How would twatter know which is which :lol

[Spurtacular]

:lmao so a leak is ok but a hack is not? How would twatter know which is which :lol

In the second place, what makes a leak better than a hack? Bot are (typically) illegal. :lol

[Winehole23]

In the second place, what makes a leak better than a hack? Bot are (typically) illegal. :lolIf the information is in the public interest, the leaker and the publisher are usually protected by the 1st Amendment, the hacker, not so much. Seems inconsistent to me, but there's no requirement that the law be consistent, it is what it is.

Write your congresscritter or start a a 501(c)(40) to get the law changed to furnish hackers 1st Amendment protection.

[hater]

If the information is in the public interest, the leaker and the publisher are usually protected by the 1st Amendment, the hacker, not so much. Seems inconsistent to me, but there's no requirement that the law be consistent, it is what it is.

Write your congresscritter or start a a 501(c)(40) to get the law changed to furnish hackers 1st Amendment protection.

How would twitter know if the info came from a hack or leak???

Are the Manning Collateral Damage tapes leaks or hacks?

[Spurminator]

Came here trolling 20 years ago and haven’t changed a bit.

Trolling is posting rapid fire shitposts like Chris.

Trolling is not doing hours of research a day on the nuances of FISA applications and posting 40 straight tweets from Techno_Frog.

You're all in on this stuff. But denial is the first step in showing that you realize you were fucking stupid. I'll take it.

[Spurtacular]

If the information is in the public interest, the leaker and the publisher are usually protected by the 1st Amendment, the hacker, not so much. Seems inconsistent to me, but there's no requirement that the law be consistent, it is what it is.

Write your congresscritter or start a a 501(c)(40) to get the law changed to furnish hackers 1st Amendment protection.

Bull shit. Leakers and hackers are both subject to prosecution. They're both (typically) breaking the law.

Moar convenience is all.

[Winehole23]

How would twitter know if the info came from a hack or leak???

Are the Manning Collateral Damage tapes leaks or hacks?Not sure why this question is important to you. What are you driving at?

[Winehole23]

Bull shit. Leakers and hackers are both subject to prosecution. They're both (typically) breaking the law.I didn't say leakers were immune to prosecution, just that the 1st Amendment affords some protection.

[Spurtacular]

I didn't say leakers were immune to prosecution, just that the 1st Amendment affords some protection.

That has really nothing to do with who is worse. That just means they might have a better safety net in some cases.

[hater]

Not sure why this question is important to you. What are you driving at?

Of course its important. Twitter says they dont allow "hacked" content yet they allow "leaked" content.

How do they know which is which?

[hater]

Were the hillary emails a hack or a leak?

[Winehole23]

That has really nothing to do with who is worse. That just means they might have a better safety net in some cases.I wasn't passing judgment about who's better or worse, just noting that the law treats them differently.

[Winehole23]

Of course its important. Twitter says they dont allow "hacked" content yet they allow "leaked" content.

How do they know which is which?I have no idea.

[Spurtacular]

I wasn't passing judgment about who's better or worse, just noting that the law treats them differently.

But the point in the first place is that neither is worse if they're "breaking the law".
Twitter can't pick and choose. They're going to have their asses handed to them.
But they're hoping to help steal an election in the meantime.

[hater]

I have no idea.

Exactly. Neither do they.

By their standards no hillary email, collateral damage, snowden files can possibly be posted as US says they are hacked.

Welcome to cherry picking land, 1984.

[spurraider21]

No gray zone about NYP being the press. Having what is essentially a public utility like Twitter suppressing freedom of the press is unAmerican. This is the shit they do in Communist China and in Islamo-fascist states.
New York Post has a website and a newspaper. It’s not twitters legal duty to host all their content.

[Spurminator]

Were the hillary emails a hack or a leak?

Standards change.

[Reck]

:lol derp getting worked up over Twitter while he cheers Trump’s naked attempts at actually suppressing democracy.

[Blake]

Thanks for the update, board cuckold.

Clearly you're still confused about it, board retard.

[Blake]

:lol derp getting worked up over Twitter while he cheers Trump’s naked attempts at actually suppressing democracy.

What's insane is the number of people in this country that do that also

[hater]

Standards change.

So by new standards. Are the hillary emails hacks or leaks?

[RandomGuy]

Of course its important. Twitter says they dont allow "hacked" content yet they allow "leaked" content.

How do they know which is which?

They don't really. But they can be made aware of the difference.

[RandomGuy]

But the point in the first place is that neither is worse if they're "breaking the law".
Twitter can't pick and choose. They're going to have their asses handed to them.
But they're hoping to help steal an election in the meantime.

If the president orders a murder of a foreign official, and that murder is against the law, then the president classifies everything about that murder, and someone decides to leak that information, should that leaker be prosecuted for revealing classified information?

[Spurminator]

So by new standards. Are the hillary emails hacks or leaks?

I don't care.

[Blake]

In the second place, what makes a leak better than a hack? Bot are (typically) illegal. :lol

What makes breaking tax law better than a leak or a hack?

[Blake]

If the president orders a murder of a foreign official, and that murder is against the law, then the president classifies everything about that murder, and someone decides to leak that information, should that leaker be prosecuted for revealing classified information?

:madrun murder the leaker :madrun

[hater]

I don't care.

You should. This is important stuff. Wake up

[Blake]

You should. This is important stuff. Wake up

Yeah I mean criminals should be able to keep their crimes secret

[Will Hunting]

I actually change my mind, I'm no longer OK with twitter blocking the URL. It should have tagged the URL with a warning message about possible disinformation, but blocking it completely was overboard imo.

It's still a private company so there's really no remedy here, but we're beginning to have a 21st century version of the problem we had 100 years ago in terms of monopolies, it's just tech monopolies now as opposed to oil/railroad monopolies. The issues we ran into during the industrial revolution are repeating themselves now during the digital revolution, we're just seeing them in different forms.

[DMC]

New York Post has a website and a newspaper. It’s not twitters legal duty to host all their content.

"Legal" .. lol

[Spurminator]

You should. This is important stuff. Wake up

Actually in hindsight Hillary's emails weren't important at all. The only thing "important" about them was they were being investigated.

Similarly, the Hunter Biden stuff isn't important either.

I support social media platforms setting and revising standards for the dissemination of certain content. I especially support them overcorrecting on their standards in order to prevent the abortion they created in 2016.

[spurraider21]

"Legal" .. lol
yes. legal. he's talking about censorship.

[DMC]

Standards change.

or they get doubled

[DMC]

yes. legal. he's talking about censorship.

still censorship legal or not.

[spurraider21]

still censorship legal or not.
when he's calling it a suppression of the freedom of press its absolutely a legal question.

i have no issue with a website having TOS and enforcing them. i dont think it needs to be a "free marketplace" where they're also obligated to keep up isis recruitment videos, etc

[Spurminator]

Conservatives are mad because they were hoping to use Twitter and other platforms to amplify a story that they hoped would sway the election in their favor. Period. They're not mad about standards or precedents. Twitter has no obligation to participate in their campaign.

As far as precedent, I doubt this changes much of anything moving forward. At worst, it's a bad call by a company trying to do the right thing.

[RandomGuy]

Conservatives are mad because they were hoping to use Twitter and other platforms to amplify a story that they hoped would sway the election in their favor. Period. They're not mad about standards or precedents. Twitter has no obligation to participate in their campaign.

As far as precedent, I doubt this changes much of anything moving forward. At worst, it's a bad call by a company trying to do the right thing.
Conservatives do not want honest, level playing fields.

They don't want neutral media.

They want ONLY media that pushes their views.

They want ONLY to get their way using any lie, any dishonest cheat they can. Power for power's sake, by any means necessary.

Some of them know this consciously, and act on it, and many don't know that is what they are advocating for.

[hater]

Actually in hindsight Hillary's emails weren't important at all. The only thing "important" about them was they were being investigated.

Similarly, the Hunter Biden stuff isn't important either.

I support social media platforms setting and revising standards for the dissemination of certain content. I especially support them overcorrecting on their standards in order to prevent the abortion they created in 2016.

Sure hillary emails were important. They were a big issue that affected 2016 elections.

[RandomGuy]

still censorship legal or not.

Censorship is generally the government doing that.

This is not the government.

This is a private company making a decision in a free market-ish system.

Suck it, or call for active regulation of a free-maket-ish system. Hell I would be all about breaking up some of these companies using anti-monopoly statutes. You and I might even agree on that.

[RandomGuy]

Sure hillary emails were important. They were a big issue that affected 2016 elections.

What about Jared and Ivanka's private email server? is that important? Why or why not?

[Spurminator]

Sure hillary emails were important. They were a big issue that affected 2016 elections.

Like I said, the investigation was important. Or rather, the reveal of the investigation was important. That's what impacted the election (allegedly).

The emails themselves weren't. They were a big nothingburger.

[Will Hunting]

Sure hillary emails were important. They were a big issue that affected 2016 elections.
Sure, and gay marriage was important in the sense that millions of retards voted to re-elect GWB in 2004 because he promised to keep gay marriage illegal. That doesn't mean it was rational behavior to view keeping gay marriage illegal as such a hot button issue that decides an election.

[Reck]

On other related but non Hunter Biden news, YouTube is banning the QAnon brigade on there.

Incoming TSA and derp thread on the mean globalist and their censorship.

[hater]

Like I said, the investigation was important. Or rather, the reveal of the investigation was important. That's what impacted the election (allegedly).

The emails themselves weren't. They were a big nothingburger.

By Hillary emails we mean the entire email scandal including investigations of course. It was a big deal and affected 2016 greatly.

[Reck]

By Hillary emails we mean the entire email scandal including investigations of course. It was a big deal and affected 2016 greatly.

Where's Comey these days?

Fucker getting rich making book deals and TV shows on the back of Hillary.

[hater]

I actually change my mind, I'm no longer OK with twitter blocking the URL. It should have tagged the URL with a warning message about possible disinformation, but blocking it completely was overboard imo.

It's still a private company so there's really no remedy here, but we're beginning to have a 21st century version of the problem we had 100 years ago in terms of monopolies, it's just tech monopolies now as opposed to oil/railroad monopolies. The issues we ran into during the industrial revolution are repeating themselves now during the digital revolution, we're just seeing them in different forms.

Damn. Just read that the Computer repairman found the emails. Then how is this a hack??

:lmao twitter. This does not even qualify as a hack :lol

[Spurminator]

By Hillary emails we mean the entire email scandal including investigations of course. It was a big deal and affected 2016 greatly.

Sure.

But whether they were a hack or a leak doesn't matter, as per my original point.

[hater]

Paging Ducks.

Hes a pc repairman :lol

Ducks is this a hack or a leak? Do you sometimes come accross your clients emails while performing your job?

And :lmao crackhead biden dropping his shit to a random repair dude :lmao fucking methhead retard

[hater]

Sure.

But whether they were a hack or a leak doesn't matter, as per my original point.

It matters to twitter apparently

[Reck]

Damn. Just read that the Computer repairman found the emails. Then how is this a hack??

:lmao twitter. This does not even qualify as a hack :lol

I assume it's because he kept the computer's content and then gave it to a publication where they posted pictures that dont belong to them. Computer might belong to the shop, but what's in it certainly doesn't.

Just apply the same logic if Hunter was some hot ass female celeb showing them hollywood tiddies. They would be getting sue to the moon.

[Spurminator]

Seems like the standard should be whether information was legally obtained, regardless of the means.

I don't know if PC repairmen have legal access to emails on a hardware job.

[Spurminator]

I assume it's because he kept the computer's content and then gave it to a publication where they posted pictures that dont belong to them. Computer might belong to the shop, but what's in it certainly doesn't.

Just apply the same logic if Hunter was some hot ass female celeb showing them hollywood tiddies. They would be getting sue to the moon.

Good point. Did Twitter block The Fappening?

[Spurminator]

It matters to twitter apparently

It didn't in 2016. Standards change.

[hater]

"A hacker is someone who explores methods for breaching defenses and exploiting weaknesses in a computer system or network."

Seems this is not a hack as Biden most likely gave the repairman his password :lmao

Paging ducks. Do your clients give you their passwords?

:lmao twitter.

[DMC]

when he's calling it a suppression of the freedom of press its absolutely a legal question.

i have no issue with a website having TOS and enforcing them. i dont think it needs to be a "free marketplace" where they're also obligated to keep up isis recruitment videos, etc

They should not be required to do anything unless they get special considerations as if they are anything more than a private business

[Reck]

Good point. Did Twitter block The Fappening?

As I recall, yes.

Reddit too.

[Will Hunting]

There's really no gray area to the QAnon shit. It's an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory that's already led to violence/threats of violence against innocent people. Movements QAnon and Pizzagate are dangerous and are what lead to fascist military coups.

It's clear that Hunter Biden had a cushy job with a Ukrainian energy company because of his dad, so imo Twitter went overboard in completely blocking the Hunter Biden story since it had enough smoke to say there might be fire, but I can't really say I blame them when their decision to leave other right wing fever dreams go unchecked ended up making said fever dreams look more credible. For over a decade, conservatives have demonstrated a willingness to peddle bad faith conspiracy theories without a shred of concern for real world implications they have or the violence said conspiracy theories might lead to. After QAnon, pizzagate, terrorist fistbump, PLANdemic, Obama is a Kenyan Muslim, etc., it's hard for me to believe the Hunter Biden story is suddenly a good faith attempt to expose wrongdoing.

[hater]

It didn't in 2016. Standards change.

This was not even a hack :lmao

Therefore there is no standard

[hater]

Wow

The Biden Crime family:

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/10/Archer-Biden-email-graphic.jpg?quality=90&strip=all

Despicable people

[Spurminator]

This was not even a hack :lmao

Therefore there is no standard

(Source required)

Were the emails legally obtained?

[Will Hunting]

So Devon Archer is conducting business affairs at both [email protected] or [email protected]? Sorry, but I'm not buying it.

If the NY Post and Rudy Giuliani were really interested in putting forth a verifiable story, they'd share .pst files with metadata that can be checked and verified. Instead they're using images and converted pdfs (ostensibly generated from Hunter Biden's emails) that are easily manipulated and forged.

[hater]

(Source required)

Were the emails legally obtained?

Sure theybwere. Hunter gave the guy his password and his laptop.

[RandomGuy]

There's really no gray area to the QAnon shit. It's an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory that's already led to violence/threats of violence against innocent people. Movements QAnon and Pizzagate are dangerous and are what lead to fascist military coups.

It's clear that Hunter Biden had a cushy job with a Ukrainian energy company because of his dad, so imo Twitter went overboard in completely blocking the Hunter Biden story since it had enough smoke to say there might be fire, but I can't really say I blame them when their decision to leave other right wing fever dreams go unchecked ended up making said fever dreams look more credible. For over a decade, conservatives have demonstrated a willingness to peddle bad faith conspiracy theories without a shred of concern for real world implications they have or the violence said conspiracy theories might lead to. After QAnon, pizzagate, terrorist fistbump, PLANdemic, Obama is a Kenyan Muslim, etc., it's hard for me to believe the Hunter Biden story is suddenly a good faith attempt to expose wrongdoing.

One thing to keep in mind is that the whole thing is simply re-packaged "blood libel".

Once you understand that, a LOT of it makes sense, especially when you look at where it started and how it spread. It is an opportunistic re-packaging of anti-semetism, that takes advantage of the "weakened immune system" of poor critical thinkers to spread. Modern gullibles, like the poor souls trapped in the right-wing media-o-sphere are easy targets for this virus.

[Reck]

Wow

The Biden Crime family:

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/10/Archer-Biden-email-graphic.jpg?quality=90&strip=all

Despicable people

Dude, we all have "a guy."

[spurraider21]

They should not be required to do anything unless they get special considerations as if they are anything more than a private business
if the government decides to treat them as a utility, that would certainly change a lot of things. i think there are pretty reasonable arguments either way on that, i dont have that strong an opinion. i just know at this time they arent.

they're not even regulating internet access as utility, let alone starting to do that with websites.

[ElNono]

No gray zone about NYP being the press. Having what is essentially a public utility like Twitter suppressing freedom of the press is unAmerican. This is the shit they do in Communist China and in Islamo-fascist states.

Not a public utility, sorry. Not the government either.

You're in this predicament because you don't understand the constitution you swear you're protecting.

[hater]

My conclusion: this is not good for Biden but not Hillary email level. It should be absorved by next week save more leaks.

And google and twatter actually made this a bigger than what it is by trying to hide it :lol

[ElNono]

Stop pretending the Mueller report was anything groundbreaking.
That's just your huge emotional investment speaking.

You're projecting.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/mikehahn_/status/1316716049946021888?s=20

Thanks big tech for interfering with our elections to push Democrats into office.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1316737851376140288?s=20

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/willchamberlain/status/1316761731079778305?s=20

It's not a slippery slope. It's a logical conclusion.

[Will Hunting]

https://twitter.com/mikehahn_/status/1316716049946021888?s=20

Thanks big tech for interfering with our elections to push Democrats into office.


https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1316737851376140288?s=20
Sorry, twitter isn't helping spread this year's version of pizzagate

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/FlimsyAchingAxolotl-small.gif

[benefactor]

https://twitter.com/mikehahn_/status/1316716049946021888?s=20

Thanks big tech for interfering with our elections to push Democrats into office.
They can do what they want. They own the company. Apparently you can't see this through your blurry, tear filled eyes

[Spurs Homer]

Is Biden in a jumpsuit yet?


crofl magatards

[Reck]

Does Nathan really think twitter bans impacts the election in some major or even minor way?

:lmao

[hater]

Does Nathan really think twitter bans impacts the election in some major or even minor way?

:lmao

Social media doesnt matter now

[Spurminator]

Does Nathan really think twitter bans impacts the election in some major or even minor way?

:lmao

Seniors and suburban women love to discuss Section 230.

[hater]

Seniors and suburban women love to discuss Section 230.

They should. It is important. :tu

[Will Hunting]

https://twitter.com/willchamberlain/status/1316761731079778305?s=20

It's not a slippery slope. It's a logical conclusion.
What that tweet fails to recognize is how much the ideological delta between Alex Jones and the White House Press Secretary/the NYPost has shrunk in the last 4 years.

[Ef-man]

Is Biden in a jumpsuit yet?


crofl magatards

:tu

We have heard and seen that before.

:cry but the emails, the emails :cry

Nathan must be on xanax right now!

[TSA]

So Devon Archer is conducting business affairs at both [email protected] or [email protected]? Sorry, but I'm not buying it.

If the NY Post and Rudy Giuliani were really interested in putting forth a verifiable story, they'd share .pst files with metadata that can be checked and verified. Instead they're using images and converted pdfs (ostensibly generated from Hunter Biden's emails) that are easily manipulated and forged.

Rosemont Capital has several branches...Rosemont Seneca Partners, Rosemont Seneca Technology, and Rosemont Realty.

[Will Hunting]

Rosemont Capital has several branches...Rosemont Seneca Partners, Rosemont Seneca Technology, and Rosemont Realty.
Blackstone has several business lines too. Real estate, healthcare, wealth management, etc. They don't each have a separate email domain.

[Trainwreck2100]

What that tweet fails to recognize is how much the ideological delta between Alex Jones and the White House Press Secretary/the NYPost has shrunk in the last 4 years.

the slippery slope is really how we dismissed this moonbat shit as nothing and ignored how much power these idiots ended up getting

[Spurminator]

Blackstone has several business lines too. Real estate, healthcare, wealth management, etc. They don't each have a separate email domain.

Relax, he only knows all of the branches of Rosemont Capital because he's trolling.

[Will Hunting]

Relax, he only knows all of the branches of Rosemont Capital because he's trolling.
he says Rosemont Capital "has several branches" as if it's some big conglomerate when RosemontCapital.com is a domain I can buy on GoDaddy right now for $500 :lmao

https://i.ibb.co/R9GGxpL/Rosemont.jpg

[ElNono]

You'd have to cite the cases.

https://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2013/08/14/march-best-buy.pdf

[ElNono]

I actually change my mind, I'm no longer OK with twitter blocking the URL. It should have tagged the URL with a warning message about possible disinformation, but blocking it completely was overboard imo.

It's still a private company so there's really no remedy here, but we're beginning to have a 21st century version of the problem we had 100 years ago in terms of monopolies, it's just tech monopolies now as opposed to oil/railroad monopolies. The issues we ran into during the industrial revolution are repeating themselves now during the digital revolution, we're just seeing them in different forms.

Definitely agree with this, and perhaps it's time to use anti-monopoly laws in that arena.

[clambake]

he says Rosemont Capital "has several branches" as if it's some big conglomerate when RosemontCapital.com is a domain I can buy on GoDaddy right now for $500 :lmao

https://i.ibb.co/R9GGxpL/Rosemont.jpg
Lol

[ElNono]

he says Rosemont Capital "has several branches" as if it's some big conglomerate when RosemontCapital.com is a domain I can buy on GoDaddy right now for $500 :lmao

https://i.ibb.co/R9GGxpL/Rosemont.jpg

:lol

They should have hired the ruskies again to make fake news, tbh... probably ran out of money and asked Rudy to come up with something :lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1316794504033251332?s=19

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1316794504033251332?s=19

Flying subpoenas before they lose that authority. :tu

[Spurs Homer]

Flying subpoenas before they lose that authority. :tu

Calling it now:

this will be one of those "things you really didn't want to know"

after the truth is revealed -

that basically - they are just policing russian propaganda unlike in 2016

because Congress asked them to!

[RD2191]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1316794504033251332?s=19
:lol

[Spurminator]

Republican priorities:

1. Shove new SCOTUS through at the last minute
2. Congressional hearings with the Twitter guy
.
.
.
.
.
?. Economic stimulus

This is gonna look great to voters. I'm all for it.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1316740922495971329?s=19
https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1316742581586472961?s=19

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1316740922495971329?s=19
https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1316742581586472961?s=19

This guy should shut the fuck up.

He himself has millions of followers and is able to get his own message accross. Grifter biting the hand that is feeding him.

I'd approve a good Shapiro twitter banning.

[Chris]

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/FrayedImpoliteDungenesscrab-small.gif

[spurraider21]

I actually change my mind, I'm no longer OK with twitter blocking the URL. It should have tagged the URL with a warning message about possible disinformation, but blocking it completely was overboard imo.
reasonable take

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1316740922495971329?s=19
https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1316742581586472961?s=19
imagine going to harvard law and then publicly claiming that twitter poses a first amendment threat

thats how you know he's a hack. he knows better and chooses to lie

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1316850501586219013?s=19

:wow

[RD2191]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1316740922495971329?s=19
https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1316742581586472961?s=19
Trump just admitted to ordering a hit on an American citizen using deputized US Marshals

[Winehole23]

:cry social media won't spread all the lies this time :cry

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1316850501586219013?s=19

:wow

Sounds good to me.

This dumb story will stay in the Fox echo chamber where it belongs and no one will care.

[RD2191]

Sounds good to me.

This dumb story will stay in the Fox echo chamber where it belongs and no one will care.
Another nothingburger. :lol

[DMC]

The only reason anyone gives a shit about either Facebook or Twitter is because many of you can't stop using those shitty platforms. If everybody wouldn't go so apeshit over them you could just stop giving them your business and capitalism would take over. You should not need government intervention in a capitalist society where the marketplace can regulate businesses based on desired outcome.

I mean if you want socialism, sure, ask for government regulation every time the market doesn't agree with you which means you don't have enough collective agreement to force the market to change directions.

[spurraider21]

The only reason anyone gives a shit about either Facebook or Twitter is because many of you can't stop using those shitty platforms. If everybody wouldn't go so apeshit over them you could just stop giving them your business and capitalism would take over. You should not need government intervention in a capitalist society where the marketplace can regulate businesses based on desired outcome.

I mean if you want socialism, sure, ask for government regulation every time the market doesn't agree with you which means you don't have enough collective agreement to force the market to change directions.
socialism doesnt mean you cant have market forces dictating decision-making of firms, nor does it inherently mean the government regulates them any more.

[hater]

The only reason anyone gives a shit about either Facebook or Twitter is because many of you can't stop using those shitty platforms. If everybody wouldn't go so apeshit over them you could just stop giving them your business and capitalism would take over. You should not need government intervention in a capitalist society where the marketplace can regulate businesses based on desired outcome.

I mean if you want socialism, sure, ask for government regulation every time the market doesn't agree with you which means you don't have enough collective agreement to force the market to change directions.

:lmao

Mad at twitter and facebook? Blame socialism!


Lol nancy

[DMC]

socialism doesnt mean you cant have market forces dictating decision-making of firms, nor does it inherently mean the government regulates them any more.

It certainly isn't capitalism.

[Nathan89]

What that tweet fails to recognize is how much the ideological delta between Alex Jones and the White House Press Secretary/the NYPost has shrunk in the last 4 years.

The justifications for censorship will never end. That's why it's not a "slippery slope" and is just a logical conclusion.

[DMC]

:lmao

Mad at twitter and facebook? Blame socialism!


Lol nancy
What's untrue about what I said? Twitter and Facebook are private businesses. If you're all about capitalism then you should be happy private businesses are making their own decisions based on profitability. If you want government regulations on private businesses are you really capitalist?

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/AjitPaiFCC/status/1316808733805236226?s=20

Let me see the day fire rains on these anti-american companies.

[Will Hunting]

:lol my burner account just got banned from twitter for tweeting a le happy merchant picture at Dianne Feinstein

[vy65]

https://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2013/08/14/march-best-buy.pdf

And then there's this:

18 U.S. Code § 1030.Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever—
(1)having knowingly accessed a computer without authorization or exceeding authorized access, and by means of such conduct having obtained information that has been determined by the United States Government pursuant to an Executive order or statute to require protection against unauthorized disclosure for reasons of national defense or foreign relations, or any restricted data, as defined in paragraph y. of section 11 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, with reason to believe that such information so obtained could be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation willfully communicates, delivers, transmits, or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;
(2)intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains—
(A)information contained in a financial record of a financial institution, or of a card issuer as defined in section 1602(n) [1] of title 15, or contained in a file of a consumer reporting agency on a consumer, as such terms are defined in the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.);
(B)information from any department or agency of the United States; or
(C)information from any protected computer;
(3)intentionally, without authorization to access any nonpublic computer of a department or agency of the United States, accesses such a computer of that department or agency that is exclusively for the use of the Government of the United States or, in the case of a computer not exclusively for such use, is used by or for the Government of the United States and such conduct affects that use by or for the Government of the United States;
(4)knowingly and with intent to defraud, accesses a protected computer without authorization, or exceeds authorized access, and by means of such conduct furthers the intended fraud and obtains anything of value, unless the object of the fraud and the thing obtained consists only of the use of the computer and the value of such use is not more than $5,000 in any 1-year period;

[hater]

What's untrue about what I said? Twitter and Facebook are private businesses. If you're all about capitalism then you should be happy private businesses are making their own decisions based on profitability. If you want government regulations on private businesses are you really capitalist?

Im a socialist. I still respect their decisions as long as they are unbiased and consistent. They are not.

Pretty simple. No need to drag socialism into the equation :lmao

Socialism doesnt mean government is involved in every business decision of private companies :lol

[spurraider21]

It certainly isn't capitalism.
sure. markets arent exclusive to capitalism.

distinction is whether the business is owned privately or otherwise (worker owned, or publicly/state owned)