Reply With Quote
Yeah, no.. ding tho
I’m pretty sure Trump being a fatass has more to do with a McDonalds/Taco Bell/KFC diet than his age.
Yeah, no.. ding tho
lol 'only'. Should put a cap on candidacy at ~55 IMVHO
It really depends, IMO... like Joe is flat as , so the VP will have extra work to do.
Can't really compare to Trump or Obama, those two guys stood out on their own.
Dead with da beetus.
I feel like Kaine cost Hillary tbh. He came across as an asshole while Pence seemed more measured and respectful, and for a VP that the average American thinks doesn't do anything, being an asshole isn't a good thing.
Nope. Hillary will be officially dead politically if he doesnt pick her. I'm ok with that too. I laugh at you young guys that havent seen this play out decade after decade. That smokey backroom still exists, just without the smoke.
I couldn't even remember who Shillary's VP choice was... now that you said it, I still don't know anything about that guy.
Now, I think you did bring out a good point in Palin. She ended up being a show, but she had way more glare than McCain, and in this day and age, it's all about getting camera time.
Shillary is dead politically, period, IMO. Even if he picks her, odds are he's losing the election, that's both of their political deaths. (not a terrible thought)
The guys that will be pulling SleepyJoes strings are all Hillarys contemporaries. I could be way off base but she seems a safer alternative than Harris or Klobuchar who could get no run on their own.
It's not entirely about age, IMO, but it has everything to do with her being a . Now, you know I don't like Joe either, but I'll admit he looks much more approachable than loser Shillary.
Hillary would have won in 2016 if it hadn't been for Carlos Danger's laptop with her emails on it. That tripped the undecideds.
Nope. She lost when the Rust Belt ate up Trump's anti-globalist bull agenda, and her being a life-long globalist, had nothing to counter with.
Again, I cant stand Hillary but I'm attempting to predict how the smokey room will influence senile joe. The lightweights in here can call *ding* all they want but it is rational and would for sure get him elected.
And now the rust belt knows Trump is full of .
who, Shillary? lol, he'll lose this election, which, arguably, it's even easier to win than the last one they lost.
Yeah, that's why I said arguably this election should be an easier W for Democrats. However, I doubt Joe can really drive turnout, and that's always a big ing problem for Dems.
So who do you think the vp should be? Harris?
I know who it shouldn't be. Shillary definitely no. Klobuchar no (candidate is already right of center).
Then the rest is about the boxes he wants to check (color? female?). A good choice would probably be somebody that can make passionate speeches, something Joe can't do.
Btw, enjoyed the rational discussion. If you are ever in town hit me up. I'll buy lunch.
So a potential huge negative is safer than relative nothingburgers?
Makes no sense.
No need for the headaches.
No ones saying the smoke filled room doesn’t exist, but it’s not so ing stupid as to pick Hillary as the VP this time.
I think it’ll be Klobuchar, basically the closest there is to Hillary without it being Hillary.
Probably would have been Warren though if her senate seat wouldn't flip into GOP hands, as she's a pretty strong attack dog.
so hillary is exciting?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
