Reply With Quote
admittedly this would be epic
Oh please, Roberts vote on Citizens United was as conservative as it gets. Who cares that he’s pro gay marriage, on the stuff that actually matters he’s conservative.
admittedly this would be epic
He decided Obamacare FFS. He's been the pivotal vote for liberals on a whole host of issues. I don't keep a list though. He's a Bush appointee. That shill wasn't going to appoint real conservatives, bro.
lgbt rights actually matter to a lot of people
That's dumb. That's a basic free speech issue that Psycho Hillary hated. The fact that four justice voted against free speech shows what a joke SCOTUS is, tbh.
i think a single 25-year term would suffice.
Was his ruling on Obamacare wrong? The fact he didn’t politicize a Supreme Court ruling doesn’t make him a liberal, there’s nothing about Obamacare that’s uncons utional.
Bush wasn’t going to appoint “real conservatives.” Sam Alito is the most conservative SCOTUS judge of all of them.
Yup roberts is another liberal niga
These nigas dont know what a convmservative judge is
The closest to it is the token negro
Well him and the fat soprano looking niga that died doing coke
Taxing people for not paying the government? Yes, he was wrong. There's no Cons utional justification for that.
Even if that's true; he still neutralized himself with Roberts. That was maybe the point. Bush (Rove) was great at throwing crumbs.
Roberts said that Obamacare was a tax, which the cons ution allows for.
So did Bush appoint a conservative judge or not? You just said he didn’t.
Soprano got murdered. He was real deal. Clarence Thomas, too. Chumpettes hate them hardcore.Yup roberts is another liberal niga
These nigas dont know what a convmservative judge is
The closest to it is the token negro
Well him and the fat soprano looking niga that died doing coke
Kavanaugh don't deserve to be compared to those two when it comes to character.
I tentatively gave you Alito. But I just told you that he neutralized it with Roberts. I don't recall him f*cking stuff up like Roberts in past cases.
Derp not wanting to touch this contradiction with a 10 foot pole
”Deep state is everywhere man, but being able to flood elections with special interest money is just freedom of speech!”
Soprano was in w the mob. He was a sick
Yup they cant talk about d negro cause hes black
Hes basically a black nazi
Yea, and that's bull . It's a fine. It's compulsory submission. It's un-American. This is why Roberts is a hack like the other four. Total ing shill.
”Deep state is everywhere man, but being able to flood elections with special interest money is just freedom of speech!”
10 years, with no chance for repeating
It’s a tax that you’re exempt from if you have healthcare. No different than taxes you can avoid or lower by having a mortgage, kids, etc. By your logic me paying FICA taxes so old people get free healthcare is compulsory submission as well.
Declaring something uncons utional isn’t supposed to be a remedy used to expunge any legislation you don’t like. The fact that Roberts and Gorsuch have integrity and are purists who look to avoid modifying legislation as much as possible no matter whether its conservative or liberal legislation doesn’t make them liberals, it makes them nonpartisan judges which is what they’re supposed to be.
I think you're seeing a pretend contradiction. Why should I be scared about people operating in the open if they're not infringing on other people's rights?
”Deep state is everywhere man, but being able to flood elections with special interest money is just freedom of speech!”
So, in other words not exempt. Nice philo.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions