Reply With Quote
If misspoke is somehow worse than erred, you can have it.
You've taken a massive L on this one.
You're going to be on the defensive from here on.
If misspoke is somehow worse than erred, you can have it.
Not knowing the status of the gate caused you to misrepresent the whole scenario as well as other posters ITT.
You misspoke.
Happens to everyone, why can't you let it go?
Ankle humper
The use of misspeak is typically based on one errantly making a statement against one's knowledge.
Geez, all the chumpettes have to jump in for tiny w's.
your entire purpose on this board is to hand out w'sThe use of misspeak is typically based on one errantly making a statement against one's knowledge.
Geez, all the chumpettes have to jump in for tiny w's.
You can tell he's getting defensive when he breaks out his ten cent vocabulary.
Eh, your gloss is plausible. Carry on.The use of misspeak is typically based on one errantly making a statement against one's knowledge.
Geez, all the chumpettes have to jump in for tiny w's.
Chumpettes certainly crave them. Not enough w's in RL.
Prosecutors caught altering the wife's gun, then lied on the charging do ents. !!! lol.
But I'm sure all the defense lawyers on this board will now tell us that was perfectly fine..and in fact normal procedure...despite it going to the heart of an element of the crime.
It's almost like all you are dumbasses
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/lo...=snd-autopilot
If the prosecutors cheated -- and it looks like they did -- how does that make anyone here a dummy?
If the facts are borne out, that's the sort of prosecutors should go to jail for.
overzealous prosecutors have always been a thing. if they intentionally lied like that, they absolutely deserve to be punished.
i dont even think that claim in the charging docs would even have been necessary for finding them guilty.
Haven't seen the do ent with the charges though...
Mark and Patricia McCloskey had every legal right to stand in front of their home holding guns while a group of rowdy protesters trespassed on their property, legal analyst Alan Dershowitz
"It's completely legal. It's completely both under the Second Amendment and completely legal under the general right of self-defense under the Castle doctrine," Dershowitz told Wednesday's " er & Co."
See post #8
Holding guns sure. Pointing guns is the issue.
Did rioters point lighters?
Lol tholderp
deflection. Thanks
Do you think pointer a lighter at someone is against the law?
It has always been astonishing to me that people cheat when they don't really need to. Maybe that's what happens when you start to think you can get away with it.
Allowing law and order the opportunity to win.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
