Reply With Quote
oh my God she was able to win a campaign without the use of social media, has that even happened since Eisenhauer?
oh my God she was able to win a campaign without the use of social media, has that even happened since Eisenhauer?
Not a big fan of this broad. But being free speech makes her far right, apparently.
No. Her being far right makes her far right.
""Today I proved that Gavin Newsom, the governor of California who is also Nancy Pelosi's nephew, cares more about illegals than Americans," Loomer wrote on Facebook after live-streaming the demonstration. "I was arrested for hopping his fence and having a fiesta on his lawn.""
She put their "no human is illegal" propaganda to the test. They didn't like it.
She’s in an overwhelmingly blue district, but hope that her 15 minutes of fame makes it easier for incels like Nathan89 to get a hard on.
Btw she’s a QAnon re .
https://www.newsweek.com/paypal-bans...loomer-1319563
"Loomer went on to admit she has already been banned from "everywhere," including Twitter, Uber, Lyft, GoFundMe, Venmo and even Uber Eats."
Old article listed some of the companies and PayPal banning her was the article focus. This was a over 1.5 years ago so the list is surely much longer.
Yeah you don’t get banned from Uber or Lyft for any speech or expression they might disagree with, you get banned from them after you’re a complete to multiple drivers and they complain about you
getting banned from Uber Eats.
Yes, she is just that horrible.
Not sure why you want lying and spreading bull rewarded, but then again you are a Trump supporter.
I don't know much about her but the fact that she recognizes big tech as a major threat to country already puts her above nearly every politician.
The fact that she put the leftist propaganda "no human is illegal" to the test is another huge plus.
She had the uber deal or whatever that can be qualified as such by system bots like you.
My thought is she's a shock value grifter. Would be nice if she proves me wrong.
Big tech was only a threat when she was stupid enough to get herself demonetized.
Dems have been pushing hoaxes for years tbh. At least she has strong points.
In theory. My money is on her just being the repubs' version of AOC. Controlled opposition.
or whatever. As usual you don't know what you're talking about.
Nothing shocking about her grift.My thought is she's a shock value grifter. Would be nice if she proves me wrong.
Perhaps. I have no inside information on the matter.Yeah you don’t get banned from Uber or Lyft for any speech or expression they might disagree with, you get banned from them after you’re a complete to multiple drivers and they complain about you
I think she’s definitely a shock value grifter, but she’s targeting a right wing audience when she’s looking for shock value.
Shes like a significantly less articulate version of Milo. I’m pretty sure being a shock value grifter is her limit, Milo is actually smart and provided thought provoking commentary when he wasn’t just trying to trigger da libs.
Her getting arrested to test Dem propaganda indicates she's not just an AOC and is less likely to be "controlled opposition". But I understand the jump to AOC comparisons.
Yea, a person of conviction could conceivably make many of the same decisions. But those people tend to be ignored. It's a big club and they ain't in it, as George Carlin says.
I enjoyed some Milo back in the day. Haven't followed him enough to know if he went off the rails or not.
I dunno. It has the earmarks of a PR stunt. I'd say follow the money. How much of it is grass roots? Are their big money donors?
Sounds like she's in Democrat country. Won't be a good sign for chumpettes if she prevails.
https://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/2...uster-match-up
It certainly had something to do with attention seeking but it also made a point and she went outside the lines to make it.
He kinda fell off the rails after he made the comments about pedophilia.
IMO he was a smart guy with credible commentary but he made it way too easy for liberals to discredit him with all the intentionally off brand he said.
Yup, I am aware of this. Should be interesting.
It’s not going to be interesting. The GOP isn’t going to dump any money into her race, and she’ll lose in a landslide like any other Republican running in that district.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
