Reply With Quote
She has something the others don't: a brand. We'll see.
She'll lose by double digits.
She has something the others don't: a brand. We'll see.
Please keep electing sub IQErs like these, republicans. It’s a shame she’s in a blue district and a sure loser. We as democrats would like to take more seats so please give us more Roy Moore, QAnon types in the future.
Eunuch gonna feign gladness about this unwelcoming development for zer.Please keep electing sub IQErs like these, republicans. It’s a shame she’s in a blue district and a sure loser. We as democrats would like to take more seats so please give us more Roy Moore, QAnon types in the future.
Bruh the district was 20% in Hillary’s favor in 2016, and the Republicans haven’t even run a candidate in the race recently. She could be the best Republican candidate in the world and would have no chance in the district.
didn't watch, but isn't she an edgelord attention ?
yep, attention alright... thanks for confirming
She's a Zionist pro-Israel shill to hide the fact that Jews are behind mass migration. She's probably Mossad
She's is purposely censored on social media to give her more credibility and lead potential truth seekers into the "Muslims are bad" rabbithole diverting attention from the root cause of the problem - the Zionists and Jewish supremacists.
Mossad trains its agents to act with a lot more control and poise than this shows
In reality she’s your typical en led JAP.
Thread le: BANNED EVERYWHERE
Seriously though, how deranged are alt right millennials for thinking that being banned from social media is a resume builder for someone trying to run for Congress?
Trashy Loomer typifies the trashiness of the far rightwingnutjob low-ed, low-wage, ignorant mob
Did South FL Jews elect Loomer just because she is a Jew?
ok.
let's stipulate "mass migration"
what's wrong with it?
I know this question wasn't directed at me, but I'll bite.
As far as Murica is concerned, this country already has a bad supply/demand dynamic when it comes to unskilled/low skill labor. Too much not supply, not enough demand, which is a large driver behind why wages are stagnant (or even regressive in some instances) and why 80% of the country lives paycheck to paycheck. Adding more unskilled labor to the mix with mass immigration only makes the supply/demand imbalance worse.
Since it's most relevant for this thread, I'll take Muslim immigration as an example. We don't have the economy that can take scores of working class Muslim refugees with limited skills the way Germany might. A lot of (heck, probably most) of those Muslim immigrants would end up in minimum wage or near minimum wage jobs, and being poor in America ing sucks. I personally don't want millions of Muslim immigrants in this country who are poor and pissed off that the "land of opportunity" didn't provide as much opportunity as advertised. It's a recipe for disaster and radicalization.
Most immigrants to the US now are from Asia (particularly South Asia and up til recently, China) and have higher average educational attainment than Americans.
I guess it all depends on how you unpack mass migration, I was referring to actual immigration trends, not some caravan boogieman.
Yeah my at ude is different re: H1B visas for skilled immigrants, but I think we should have a program in place that makes it so we don't need to import people from Asia for tech jobs, it's ing embarrassing that we can produce enough home grown talent for our tech jobs. I'd be in favor of requiring H1B employers to finance a scholarship fund for STEM majors - the more H1B immigrants you employ, the more you need to contribute to the scholarship fund.
What ratio of asian immigrants are H1-B workers? I would guess many times more than that are students or legal residents, but honestly, I don't know.
no... he has a kindergarten level view of politics akin to charlie kirk, etc, but he was an effective rhetorician
eh, this isn't really backed by data though. most americans wages rise due to immigration (not talking about undo ented people who work for sub min-wage, dont pay into many taxes, etc), with the exception of one subset of the population (high school dropouts), and even then, it amount to something like a 2% drop in wages which alleviates over time (1% over 10 years). the assumption that uneducated foreigners directly compete with uneducated natives is a somewhat faulty one, as they gravitate towards different lines of work. really, its the previous wave of immigrants that face compe ion from newer waves. (first big paragraph of page 4)... https://www.nber.org/papers/w12497.pdf
the idea that immigrants "take up jobs" only holds if the economy was a zero sum game, but by adding more people into the economy who are making money, they also become consumers which drives up the demand for products, which only serves to expand the economy, create jobs, etc. there's probably a cap somewhere on how many immigrants we can take in at a particular time before the negatives begin outweighing the positives, but nothing indicates we are there yet, our unemployment figures have been on a steady decline for a decade despite steady population growth
there are also separate concerns associated with taking in a large group of people at one time, particularly where they move into the same area, as they make their own pocket communities and aren't really incentivized to assimilate... but that's separate from the economic impact, which is overwhelmingly positive.Since it's most relevant for this thread, I'll take Muslim immigration as an example. We don't have the economy that can take scores of working class Muslim refugees with limited skills the way Germany might. A lot of (heck, probably most) of those Muslim immigrants would end up in minimum wage or near minimum wage jobs, and being poor in America ing sucks. I personally don't want millions of Muslim immigrants in this country who are poor and pissed off that the "land of opportunity" didn't provide as much opportunity as advertised. It's a recipe for disaster and radicalization.
She is a ing looney.
but if she was just able to use twitter that would change everything, because conservatives are so honest and have so many well-thought out plans on how to run the country people would see how awesome she was and elect her
Hmm you seem to be talking about similar things yet praising one person but laughing at the other.
I'm wondering why...
The difference being "but it also made a point" as I stated. Chaining yourself to a mailbox isn't making a point. It's just pushing a conspiracy theory.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
