Reply With Quote
Not when conservatives are president
Unless there is Republican president, per your information.
Not when conservatives are president
JinxNot when conservatives are president
Derp, the gift that keeps on giving.
Obama's first five years were not conservative at all.Not when conservatives are president
They absolutely were. Tax cuts central. Once Obama said you to McConnell and let the conservative Bush tax cuts expire, median income skyrocketed.
What about GHWB and GWB? Were they not conservative either
Bush I raised taxes. Bush II was not financially conservative whatsoever. So, no. Clinton has a case for being more conservative than them.What about GHWB and GWB? Were they not conservative either
The old moving goal posts shtick.
He even said bin Laden was a CIA asset to argue Obama was bad for ordering his take down.
Say anything troll.
But get mightily spanked anyways.
Conservative measures tend to foster prosperity.
Last edited by Spurtacular; 08-21-2020 at 08:27 PM.
another comprehensive beclowning.
it is amazing how often Spurtacular wormholes become flamboyant self owns.
lol, spoken during the middle of the worst recession since the great depression.
That's fortune cookie wisdom. You've provided no evidence of it. Certainly voting for the conservative presidential candidate doesn't foster prosperity.
Adam Smith. Wealth Of Nations.
Yeah that's an author and a book, not an argument. It's flimsy economic theory from before the industrial revolution and digital age that doesn't contemplate the ramifications labor being replaced by capital over time.
Do you have any empirical evidence from the last 100 years where a society has had a prosperous middle class through conservative trickle down economics?
You conservatives really do fall apart quickly when asked to present an argument with evidence.
It was gold when it was published; it's gold now. Easily the most cited book on economics.
The Great Depression; that ERA OF LIBERAL OPPRESSION.
Yeah, I agree it's cited by rich people who need to appeal to an authority to justify their low taxes.
Still waiting for actual empirical evidence.
And like a cheap suit, derp folds.
Math, figures, statistics, all liberal hoax.
1+1 does not equal 2
I've yet to see the system that stops people from getting filthy rich.
lmao
The bot comes in to distract with some of his usual nonsense.
lol plagiarism.
It's probably one of the oldest economic books on capitalism, and was certainly very popular in it's heyday... stopped being relevant more or less about 150 years ago (which is not bad, it had a solid run for a century).
It's still a good read to get the basics of a capitalist economy. It just hasn't aged well considering how the economy has transformed, especially after the industrial revolution.
This is pure dogma... as such, it will be left unexplained.
All conservative economic theory is fortune cookie dogma that's never backed up by evidence.
"Conservatism fostures prosperity!"
"A rising tide lifts all the boats!"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions