Reply With Quote
He can’t care, neither side has the high ground on it, if the Dems picked an anti war candidate they’d have the high ground.
On Fox News not cnn or msnbc
Not Rachel Meadows
He can’t care, neither side has the high ground on it, if the Dems picked an anti war candidate they’d have the high ground.
Repubs have the high ground. War mongerer on the top of the Dem ticket.
Yea, you had your chance for solid ground with Tulsi.
We’ve already had this argument. All but 1 Republican in Congress voted to approve the war in Iraq.
That's not Trump.
Last I checked Trump was bragging tonight about how much money he’s pissing away on defense spending and how evil Biden is for wanting to cut defense spending.
If only Bidenn was who Trump says he is, a guy who supports cutting defense spending and implementing M4A.
Not using it on people though !
Yea, I'm not a fan of that. But Biden is the one who engaged in the sham wars, not Trump, who has not warmongered in his four years for a clear high ground.
Again, if you wanted better ground, you should've gotten behind Tulsi.
BLM activists are some of the most violent and racist people in America and they have tricked themselves in believing they are morally superior.
So which is it? Is Biden a neocon who wants to start senseless wars, or is he a puppet for the leftists who wants to cut defense spending? Trump has indicated he’s both.
Sanders and Tulsi have identical views on foreign policy. I backed the one who was polling above 2%. Would have definitely preferred Tulsi over Biden though.
Imagine supporting a violent group like BLM just because you like their Trojan horse name.
They're just a bunch of violent sociopaths running about. They're being used. That's the only trick.
How do you identify them as actual BLM members?
The two don't have to be mutually exclusive. Not at all. His neocon roots are there for all to see regardless.
You won't accept this; but there's something seriously not right about your system. No way Tulsi was standing out from all those puppets and coming in at 0-1 percent.
How many people have died at the hands of BLM activists?
(Hint: your boy Kyle beats them easily.)
I’ve said countless times there’s a lot wrong with the Democratic Party and everything about how it selects candidates, but keep pedaling the fake narrative.
Regardless, it’d be stupid for me to contribute money to a candidate polling at 1% with no shot at winning.
The sad thing is people on this forum push this moronic narrative. The left promotes this nonsense and then blames Trump.
It’s Trumps America and these riots are happening with him as commander and chief. Deal with it. Facts don’t care about your feelings.
Cite an article where Trump opposed it. Preferably one from the time this was going on, not 15 years into it.
Trump loves to play the revisionist card. He said we should go kill Gadaffi way back when, and when he was running he suddenly was against his overthrow. Must’ve forgotten he was on tape, eh?
Trump explicitly said in a Howard Stern interview that he supported the War in Iraq when it was happening. It’s pure revisionist history when Trump says he was always against the war.
Lol Jesus, I live several miles north of the White House but protesters are headed my way. These people aren’t ing around, hope they put on a show.
Yes, you can't create factually true yet moronic narrative. Similar to the mainstream media propagandists spewing "mostly peaceful protest".
You’re literally calling facts moronic
Kyle responded in self defense.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions