Reply With Quote
YOU LEARNED NOTHING FROM THE WIDESPREAD 2016 RIOTS
Just keeping with the thread theme.
Riots have done to shift this race.
YOU LEARNED NOTHING FROM THE WIDESPREAD 2016 RIOTS
She didn't have a shot of losing her gift-wrapped election until she, a noted anti-gay marriage racist known for having a giant hard-on for KKK wizards, opened her fat trap and called the majority of undecided voters "deplorable" and stated people are incapable of change.The positive of this poll is that it wakes Biden up 2 months before the election and reminds him that he has a real shot at losing. Shillary didn’t discover she had a shot at losing until <1 week before the election
In all her arrogance and hypocrisy, she thought people would forget her past while she thought the virtue signaling would wrangle in the minority vote to cruise past the most unqualified candidate in U.S history.
Democrats are exclusively responsible for Trump and will be if this monster is re-elected. Far-Leftists, as seen in California, are no different than Alt-Righties so far as bat- tery and selective bigotry goes.
Both parties are and need to go the way of the landline, phonebook and pager.
Shillary is responsible for Trump to some extent, but saying she's "exclusively responsible" is illogical. Pretty sure the party that nominated Trump and voted for him is more responsible for him than Shillary is
Define "shift". You can't deny the riots haven't correlated with Trumps recent rises in various polls. You can't be that deep in denial.
Circular reasoning - the polls are accurate because the polls say so.
Yet COVID isn't more responsible for the economy than Trump is.Shillary is responsible for Trump to some extent, but saying she's "exclusively responsible" is illogical. Pretty sure the party that nominated Trump and voted for him is more responsible for him than Shillary is
This gets twisted so much that people actually believe that this was what she said. Or what doomed her.
The quote was "half of Trump's supporters were a basket of deplorable" The other half is good and want change or whatever.
I dont disagree with that one bit. The stupid woman backtracking from it did more damage in my opinion.You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. (Laughter/applause) Right? (Laughter/applause) They're racist, sexist, phobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic – you name it. And unfortunately, there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people – now have 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks – they are irredeemable, but thankfully, they are not America.
But the "other" basket – the other basket – and I know because I look at this crowd I see friends from all over America here: I see friends from Florida and Georgia and South Carolina and Texas and – as well as, you know, New York and California – but that "other" basket of people are people who feel the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures; and they're just desperate for change. It doesn't really even matter where it comes from. They don't buy everything he says, but – he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different. They won't wake up and see their jobs disappear, lose a kid to heroin, feel like they're in a dead-end. Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well.
That statement implies the false premise that Trump has no responsibility for COVID.
I'm not.
Just going by polls done post riots. None of them show a correlation to them.
It had more to do with the actual conventions. Each netted a very small gain.
Biden got 1.5 points and Trump gained it back up. That's about it.
Shillary is responsible for Trump to some extent, but saying she's "exclusively responsible" is illogical. Pretty sure the party that nominated Trump and voted for him is more responsible for him than Shillary is
She choked a 10 point (or more) consensus lead 10 days or less to Election day.
Repubs are exclusively responsible for nominating this clown. Dems and the DNC are exclusively responsible for running a racist, white, establishment phobe who reminded everyone she was all of that when she said people can't change and tried to virtue signal to the fringe minority who wasn't going to vote more than likely.
Easily the stupidest thing said by a candidate in our lifetimes. And stupid to run a white supremacist, many Democrats weren't duped.
Yours implies the dems running Hillary has nothing to do with the fact that Trump won.
Her lead was at 5.5% on fivethirtyeight 10 days before election day, and that was with a load of undecided voters. The polls were off in 2016, but people are revising history and pretending the polls had her up by a lot more than she was actually up by.
I agree the Dems are responsible for running a ty candidate and losing to Trump, that's different than saying they're responsible for Trump.
I don't think that deplorables comment is what hurt her in the critical states (it was a dumb comment no question). What hurt her more than anything is that she symbolizes the Democratic Party's gradual 30 year shift away from being pro labor to being pro globalism. In the end people care more about jobs than anything else, and Trump convinced the right people he could create better jobs. She lost because undecided voters in the key midwest states swung heavily towards Trump in the final week of the election, and I doubt those voters made a decision based off her deplorables comment from months prior.
Romney's 47% comment was dumber IMO, he never recovered in the polls after that. Not a presidential election, but Elliott Engel saying "I wouldn't care about this if black people weren't in my district" this year is definitely dumber than anything a presidential candidate has ever said
I literally said "Shillary is responsible for Trump to some extent"
Your desperation to find flaws in something I say is hilarious to watch.
I literally said COVID isn't MORE responsible than Trump for the economy. That implies Trump is responsible for the economy to some extent.
My previous comment still stands regarding the false premise that the impact COVID and Trump have had on the economy are independent of one another.
So the sharp drop you showed was which exactly?
Nah the quote was "I wouldn't be here if I didn't have an election."but Elliott Engel saying "I wouldn't care about this if black people weren't in my district" this year is definitely dumber than anything a presidential candidate has ever said
That pissed me off to want to vote for Bowman. Would have done so if the primaries weren't held entirely by mail this year.
All of these politicians living permanently in Maryland and then making a trip to their home district every 2 years is ridiculous and should be highlighted every single time it happens.
This question assumes literally the same premise regarding Trump and COVID-19 having no relation to one another.
If your goal is to trick someone into agreeing that Trump has no control over COVID-19, you're wasting your time with me.
"if I didn't have a primary, I wouldn't care."
That's what he actually said.
You said they are independent of one another. Trump has no control over COVID-19. I'd like for you to explain how he possibly could. He only controls what's in his power to control which is his response to the virus. I already showed you that states have the authority to decide for themselves. Where does that leave Trump, what state does he control? Tough question I know, so you can just ignore it and pretend COVID never happened or that Trump released it himself.
He wasn't talking about the area only about having some air time on the mic.
I literally said the opposite, that they're not independent of one another.
He controls the funding that all 50 states get for PPE and other aid during a pandemic. He elected to intentionally starve blue states of any relief early on when he thought COVID-19 was only going to affect blue states.
The new conservative argument that Donald Trump is President of the United States but has no control over any of the states that make up the United States is a new one
He's powerless to do anything about anything! That's why I want him in control of everything!I literally said the opposite, that they're not independent of one another.
He controls the funding that all 50 states get for PPE and other aid during a pandemic. He elected to intentionally starve blue states of any relief early on when he thought COVID-19 was only going to affect blue states.
The new conservative argument that Donald Trump is President of the United States but has no control over any of the states that make up the United States is a new one
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
