Reply With Quote
He was found not guilty. You really go off the rails when you cannot win an argument. It's evident by how you start posting silly memes and fallacious conclusions/sarcasm.
"BLM member murders two white people in racial hate crime."
He was found not guilty. You really go off the rails when you cannot win an argument. It's evident by how you start posting silly memes and fallacious conclusions/sarcasm.
racist remark
Do you think these people in the video support BLM? If so, how is that any different than being BLM? You have no problem considering Trump a racist because some white supremacists support him. Has BLM issued a statement denying their participation?Jesus, did you even watch the video?There aren't any "chants." There's nothing about this that resembles a protest or even an offshoot of a protest.
I'm sure this isn't the first time you've seen video of black guys talking to cops. You and Nathan just need these guys to be "BLM" and you're going to stretch logic beyond reason to do so.
Nope. Spooked (derived from the verb) doesn't have a racist origin. The meaning you're alluding to is derived from the noun, and is of relatively recent vintage.
spook (n.)
1801, "spectre, apparition, ghost," from Dutch spook, from Middle Dutch spooc "spook, ghost," from a common Germanic source (German Spuk "ghost, apparition," Middle Low German spok "spook," Swedish spok "scarecrow," Norwegian spjok "ghost, specter," Danish spøg "joke"), of unknown origin. According to Klein's sources, possible outside connections include Lettish spigana "dragon, witch," spiganis "will o' the wisp," Lithuanian spingu, spingėti "to shine," Old Prussian spanksti "spark."
Meaning "undercover agent" is attested from 1942. The derogatory racial sense of "black person" is attested from 1940s, perhaps from notion of dark skin being difficult to see at night. Black pilots trained at Tuskegee Ins ute during World War II called themselves the Spookwaffe.
spook (v.)
1867, "to walk or act like a ghost," from spook (n.). Meaning "to unnerve" is from 1935. Related: Spooked; spooking.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/spook
wow, you’re really stupid and cowardly
Jesus, did you even watch the video?
I'm sure this isn't the first time you've seen video of black guys talking to cops. You and Nathan just need these guys to be "BLM" and you're going to stretch logic beyond reason to do so.
you can’t seriously expect an honest conversation from trumper mc?
hes mad he’s been called out and he is lashing out at everyone now. He apparently realized everyone has figured out he’s liar and simpleton, so he no longer has to pretend he’s nothing more than ducks and spurtacular
nit-picking an OJ metaphor. You really need a win, don't you?
What a stupid standard. I have no idea if these guys support BLM, but so what if they do?
A lot of ty white people support law enforcement and the armed forces, that doesn't make them either of those things.
Every time you get backed into a corner, you have to invent some fiction to make your argument easier. It's pathetic.You have no problem considering Trump a racist because some white supremacists support him. Has BLM issued a statement denying their participation?
I have never said that any politician is a racist if he's supported by racists.
I don't know why BLM would need to issue a statement denying participation of every black person who does something offensive that gets posted online.
BLM should just call them "really fine people" instead
DMC would spend 4 pages defending Trump against the accusation that he's racist based on fringe racist supporters, but then he'll broadly associate BLM with a video of black guys posted by ing Nathan of all people.
Then he'll accuse you of doing the reverse so he can feel validated by his ty argument.
Just typical conservative projecting.What's funny is DMC would spend 4 pages defending Trump against the accusation that he's racist based on fringe racist supporters, but then he'll broadly associate BLM with a video of black guys posted by ing Nathan of all people.
Then he'll accuse you of doing the reverse so he can feel validated by his ty argument.
Complain about unproven Democrat voter fraud without any evidence as if they're the offenders, then hire a convicted felon to harvest and tamper with ballots in a close house race.
"Police brutality bonds" are big business
New York City issued more than $237 million for NYPD payouts on legal settlements and judgements in 2018 alone.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a...lice-brutalityWhen faced with big legal bills or settlements, cities have lots of ways to come up with cash. Some have dedicated funds, some have insurance policies. Others finance their legal obligations by selling bonds, just as they would to raise money for infrastructure or public parks. And that’s where Wall Street makes bank, with next to no risk.
Big banks compete to underwrite — or act as the middle men — on these “general obligation bonds” because they pay out millions in fees. Then, they sell the bonds to high-net-worth individuals and hedge funds, which collect interest as high as 7%. These so-called “police brutality bonds,” as they're colloquially known, “quite literally allow banks and wealthy investors to profit from police violence,” according to a 2018 report from the Action Center on Race and the Economy.
The bonds are also backed by the “full faith and credit” of the issuing municipality, which means the city can do just about anything to service that debt — including raising taxes. Since cities rarely default, the bonds are nearly risk-free for investors. And although taxpayers normally foot the bill for police settlements, the added interest on the bonds can nearly double the costs.
It’s a transfer of wealth from Main Street to Wall Street, and city officials are making it happen with almost no oversight from taxpayers.
Must be nice having propaganda outlets that murky reality for you.
It was a bad analogy because you went full tilt again and did the forum equivalent of this:
They are your standards. I can hold you to them, doesn't mean I have to accept them for myself. A bit like how many of you chastise Chris for his less-than Christian comments but you don't follow Christian values yourselves.DMC would spend 4 pages defending Trump against the accusation that he's racist based on fringe racist supporters, but then he'll broadly associate BLM with a video of black guys posted by ing Nathan of all people.
Then he'll accuse you of doing the reverse so he can feel validated by his ty argument.
Kori Ellis
Bonnerific has returned. FYI
^^^DMChad calls the manager
You were OK when Mono did it.
it has to be tough for you when you actually get called out for being who you really are when you’ve worked so tirelessly at creating some imaginary world where you aren’t just a lonely old tub that can’t stand his true existence.
You had better get over to shipleys so you can drown your self loathing in a couple dozen donuts.
It was a bad analogy because you went full tilt again and did the forum equivalent of this:
Those posts resembled a tantrum about as much as your video resembles a protest.
Can you refresh my memory? I'm not sure I saw that post, I don't keep tabs on your grudges here.
I'm sure he appreciates your defense in a completely unrelated topic, though. Take whatever friends you need.
DMC to the rescue for Qhris, Nathan and Derp.
Wouldn't know, tell us about it.
The most intolerant people in the country are leftists tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
