come and find out buddy. i mean you already told us your little fairytale about your fake consultation with me so make it reality homie!
Joey, you’re a tough fella aren’t you?
come and find out buddy. i mean you already told us your little fairytale about your fake consultation with me so make it reality homie!
why do you constantly cry so much you ing whale?
as well, it was expected that you'd overlook what i asked of you because you're spineless and made.
Gauntlet has been thrown down.
Ok, Joey, I’ll come and see you. Are you like this in real life? If you are, I’m going to have to bring a face shield because I bet you spit a lot when you’re raging
Pretty much.
Pics or it didn't happen
CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin on Saturday blasted Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., for making Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett a "hero to religious conservatives" in 2017 — and said it was time the 87-year-old Senator "leave the committee."
"The dogma lives loudly within you," Feinstein declared at a Court of Appeals confirmation hearing for the Roman Catholic Barrett three years ago.
Toobin derided the comment from the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee as "so incompetent, so inept, so apparently religiously discriminatory that Amy Coney Barrett became a hero to religious conservatives."
"Dianne Feinstein was and is a distinguished public servant," he said. "She is now 87 years old and she has repeatedly engaged in behavior in recent months that seemed out of step with what Democrats want to do. She's going to be the leader. And all I can say is good luck with that, Democrats."
She shouldn't even be in the senate anymore, let alone ranking member on the judiciary committee.
These old as Democrats who have been in Congress for decades (Pelosi, Feinstein, Schumer, etc.) are bad at everything other than fundraising. They're genuinely mediocre people who have no ing idea how to get anything done.
Last edited by Will Hunting; 09-27-2020 at 09:58 AM.
I'll give Pelosi credit for getting the ACA passed with a public option in her chamber. Hasn't done worthwhile since though.
Feinstein has already said she doesn't support nuking the filibuster because "it's used a lot less than when I first got elected" which is just an flagrantly false narrative. It's usage has increased exponentially since she was first elected.
Unfortunately she's 87 ing years old so she doesn't have to worry about re-election and can just use her last term as a way of joining with the Republicans and blocking tax reform or climate change reform.
Regarding Pelosi, she better replace Richie Neal as Ways & Means Chair next year.
she lost the House in 2010, and didn't really have 60 in Senate (Lieberman independent, and owned by CT insurance industry, so no public option)
she won the House in 2018, but had 400+ bills killed by Moscow Mitch.
very simply, w/o the Senate, House Dems can do nothing.
The Cons ution up of 2 Senators/state produces minority rule, same with many states, due to Repug partisan/racial gerrymandering where the Repugs choose their voters
Pelosi can't blame Republicans for making a Blackstone lobbyist chair of the Ways & Means Committee, then letting said lobbyist drag his feet on Trump's tax returns & blow up bipartisan legislation that would end surprise medical billing.
The Democrats lost the house in 2010 because they didn't get anything meaningful done - voters have no interest in hearing about how the filibuster made it so you had control of both houses but couldn't go beyond passing Bob Dole's healthcare plan. If they nuked the filibuster and then passed a multi-trillion dollar bailout plan that didn't only help banks, the 2010 midterms would have been a different story.
Party leaders have since admitted the Republicans caught them napping on 2010 redistricting. The Democrat Party simply failed in spectacular fashion during Obama's presidency in terms of midterm elections and state & local races.
so what happens then, when all of the sweeping changes you want all get overturned at federal judicial level?
i know DNC’s fault for not taking the feelings of a voting bloc that doesn’t participate and doing everything they demand
does the progressive left that has not participated in elections consistently have any culpability for their lack of participation? They scream the loudest, and will continue to do so when right after right is attacked, and all of the social legislation gets overturned. But not voting in 2000, 2004, 2010, and 2016 means nothing, right?
elections have consequences. When you don’t participate things you support are at best ignored, at worst overturned.
Pretty sure it's not only the progressive left that's against surprise medical billing, Jeff.
i can see why you would ignore the rest of the questions
The premise that Richie Neal reflects what all non-progressive Democrats want is so ing re ed I'm not going to waste time arguing with each point line by line. There are plenty of non-progressive House Democrats who could have been pegged as Ways and Means Chair, Pelosi chose the one who's even further to the right than Republicans are on healthcare.
what does richie neal have to do anything I asked?
You responded to a post about Richie Neal.
Regarding Feinstein - she was re-elected in 2018 (an election where progressives did turn out) because of a 9:1 cash advantage over her more progressive opponent. Your argument that everything comes back to progressives not voting enough is oversimplified boomer bull . She survived 2018 because of Citizens United opening the floodgates of money in election.
Dianne Feinstein when she refuses to nuke the filibuster to pass a bill that results in a higher capital gains tax:
Moscow Mitch and McCarthy snubbed RBG's funeral
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)