Reply With Quote
Crying out that they're en led to be petulant isn't a W, blakehold.
You been watching David Pakman?
I could see how you'd think that. Democrats say so much stupid to which I've called out, you've just internalized that faulty logic.
Crying out that they're en led to be petulant isn't a W, blakehold.
You been watching David Pakman?
To parry a hquestion about the transfer of presidential power after she gave us a detailed analysis of the ACA, raises questions that Barrett's blanket refusal to answer hypotheticals was meant to quell.
Nope.
Wasn't trying to win, I was just responding to you.
You been watching David Pakman?
Avoiding hypotheticals is a common tactic.
But I'm speaking to the absurd nature of that particular hypothetical.
Nope.
Who is David Pakman?
Ok, speak to it.
what is a conservative doing watching this?
You also watch TYT and Jimmy Dore. Oh and Kyle Kulinski.
Your kindred spirit brother.
You should be watching him daily, tbh.
I'm open to other people's p.o.v.
You also watch TYT and Jimmy Dore. Oh and Kyle Kulinski.
Or you'll getting ready to come out.
So, you're saying you watch all the lefty sh** cos you're gay?
So, you're saying you watch all the lefty sh** cos you're gay?
You've been a closeted liberal and I've called you out on it before. Dont know if it's because your immediate family are democrats or if you like the bandwagon effect.
Probbaly a bit of both if we're been honest.
You've been a closeted liberal and I've called you out on it before. Dont know if it's because your immediate family are democrats or if you like the bandwagon effect.
Probbaly a bit of both if we're been honest.
That makes no sense.
I'm not out there watching conservative media like you do liberal outlets. You lose.
So, you're basically detailing how it's a supreme value for you to live in an echo chamber.
lol wat
She's going to get confirmed, and then Biden will fold when it's time for him to pack the court... that's my call.
Private citizen has no right to pick a Supreme Court justice
Yeah he already said he's "not a fan" of the idea of court packing.
Hopefully he goes the statehood for PR and Washington DC route which he has already sponsored as wanting when the House passed a bill earlier this year giving the latter statehood.
Of course the senate laughed that off.
IMO he's going to play it off as "if congress puts a bill on my desk to expand the court, I'll support it."
If he has control of Congress, he better pack that or the DNC is done.
Plus, the Senate strategy is wrong-headed. Democrats will always have a handicap on the Senate due to it's system of representation. That's exactly why when you have the Senate, you don't hesitate. Mitch didn't.
No arguements from me here. I'm fully onboard with whatever as long as consequences are borne out from this nomination.
They need to use my 4-state DC strategy, tbh. Each DC quadrant becomes its own state
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions