Reply With Quote
They did. lol
They said there was no such meeting between Joe and this guy.
There's no dispute over whether Hunter Biden is a s bag who shopped his dad's name around for a cushy $50k/month job and did a lot of other bad stuff, which is basically what the Post article is about.
I promise you most senators on both sides of the aisle have kids who have profited the same way without it ever being an explicit quid pro quo.
They did. lol
They said there was no such meeting between Joe and this guy.
Twitter is the main medium for this cycle. The math isn't hard on this one. Good try though.
Surely their overwhelming market size will erode going forward though.
Surely it won't.
(Twitter is worldwide, it won't miss a few Republicans and alt-reich dead enders.)
the fact twitter has the most users doesn't create an obligations for it to create a platform for right wing fake news. It can censor and not censor whatever it sees fit.
Meanwhile Parler and all the other right wing altneratives to twitter will always suck because the best and brightest in Silicon Valley have no interest in working for a right wing social media platform
I pretty much picture a white version of Ian Miles Cheong.
Dementia Tom
Justifying the fascism.
If it goes vanilla / echo chamber, it'll be a slow death at best.
It's the free market system.
thats because any "conservative platform" that eases the censorship just gets overrun by neo nazis dropping n-bombs and posting le happy merchant memesMeanwhile Parler and all the other right wing altneratives to twitter will always suck because the best and brightest in Silicon Valley have no interest in working for a right wing social media platform
its not fascism. its just something you dont like.
im sorry those two concepts arent interchangeable
Umm that same article states the following:
They dispute the meeting ever took place.In a statement, Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates said, “we have reviewed Joe Biden's official schedules from the time and no meeting, as alleged by the New York Post, ever took place.”
But wait...
Maybe read more than a cherry picked highlighted portion of an article would you?Bates added that the Biden campaign could not immediately respond to the story’s allegations in the Post story when it ran on Wednesday morning, because the publication “never asked the Biden campaign about the critical elements of this story. They certainly never raised that Rudy Giuliani — whose discredited conspiracy theories and alliance with figures connected to Russian intelligence have been widely reported — claimed to have such materials.”
"informal interaction" is pretty vague... could refer to any number of things. could mean bumping into somebody at an event. far cry from confirmation of some sinister meeting
His campaign said there was no official meeting on his schedule. That doesn’t mean there wasn’t a meeting and they don’t deny that.Umm that same article states the following:
They dispute the meeting ever took place.
But wait...
Maybe read more than a cherry picked highlighted portion of an article would you?
“Biden’s campaign would not rule out the possibility that the former VP had some kind of informal interaction with Pozharskyi"
TSA running around looking for an october surprise cause his candidate is and can't win without it, how about hoping your guy's policies and procedures are enough to put him through?
Goalpost time. You never learn.His campaign said there was no official meeting on his schedule. That doesn’t mean there wasn’t a meeting and they don’t deny that.
“Biden’s campaign would not rule out the possibility that the former VP had some kind of informal interaction with Pozharskyi"
Trump
Trump
Trump
Trump
Trump
Trump
Trump
Trump
Trump
Trump
Trump
Trump
Unfortunately, after catching up in this thread, I have to admit that Hunter Biden political career is over, tbh
Trump running on his record is a losing strategy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
