Silver has gotten 144/150 states correct in the last 3 elections. Which poll aggregator/modeler has done better over the same period?
Should've did this two months ago before Hack Silver tightened his numbers to try and save some face. But even now, it's looking pretty bad for him for when Trump wins.
Hack Silver's Odds:
"States To Watch"
AZ Trump 32/100
CO Trump 4/100
FL Trump 32/100
GA Trump 41/100
IA Trump 61/100
ME Trump 10/100
MI Trump 5/100
MN Trump 4/100
NV Trump 13/100
NH Trump 11/100
NM Trump 2/100
NC Trump 35/100
OH Trump 55/100
PA Trump 15/100
TX Trump 61/100
VA Trump 1/100
WI Trump 6/100
Other States
AL Trump 98/100
AK Trump 85/100
AR Trump >99/100
CA Trump <1/100
CT Trump <1/100
DE Trump <1/100
DC Trump <1/100
HI Trump <1/100
ID Trump >99/100
IL Trump <1/100
IN Trump 96/100
KS Trump 97/100
KY Trump 98/100
LA Trump 97/100
ME 1st Trump 3/100
ME 2nd Trump 42/100
MA Trump <1/100
MD Trump <1/100
MS Trump 92/100
MO Trump 93/100
MT Trump 85/100
NE Trump >99/100
NE 1st Trump 96/100
NE 2nd Trump 26/100
NE 3rd Tump >99/100
NJ Trump <1/100
NY Trump <1/100
ND Trump 98/100
OK Trump >99/100
OR Trump 2/100
RI Trump <1/100
SC Trump 91/100
SD Trump 95/100
TN Trump 97/100
UT Trump 96/100
VT Trump <1/100
WA Trump <1/100
WV Trump >99/100
WY Trump >99/100
Silver has gotten 144/150 states correct in the last 3 elections. Which poll aggregator/modeler has done better over the same period?
More concerned with OP's supply of copium, tbh... I think Nate will be fine no matter what happens.
derp completely misses the entire idea of probability...
Based on what? A state being 51/100 or more?
What would you base it on, derp?
How was Nate Silver wrong, exactly?
If a baseball player has a batting average of .200, he's going to get a hit 20% of the time. You wouldn't call his batting average wrong if he got a hit on his next atbat.
You're trying.
derp folded instantly
No based on the projected winner of each state.
That's not an answer. You don't understand probability.
No surprise. Not sure why you try engaging an adult conversations, it's like watching a toddler try to hit a MLB fastball.
Originally Posted by spurraider21
so is steph curry what jimmer fans imagined jimmer would be likeWas it nate that gave you the inside information on jimmer?Originally Posted by drep
Pretty much.
Silver's model gives Dennison a 10% chance to win this year. That's the same probability that it rains in LA. Does it ever rain in LA?
Silver's model gave Dennison a 28% chance to win in 2016. That's the same probability a NFL kicker misses a 40 yarder. Do NFL kickers ever miss 40 yarders?
No he is exactly right.
You dont understand probability or AVERAGE.
Not a hack
![]()
pretty muchderp tries to talk big boy politics but he has about as much understanding of it as a dog has of classic literature
I think the confusion stems from derp thinking everybody else is doing his thing of throwing into the wall and hoping it sticks.
No you see you Silver cant do that... because hes playing it both ways, according to derp, by giving probabilities.
By derp's reckoning you call it or you dont. And derp actually invented quantum mechanics so he knows.
Hurricane paths with probability cones, they are out, call the exact lat and long or its useless.
So you took the prediction weeks before the election:
instead of the model's final prediction:
You're definitelynot a hack
![]()
Don't hate on Nate for his get out the vote efforts
![]()
lol you're cherry picking. You're taking probability from early october.
now show what he had the odds at on election day
derp s up every single time.
derp just flailing angrily at this point
Yea, they always tighten it to hedge on their potential humiliation.
Like I said, I should've made this poll two months ago; Chumpettes would've been doing cartwheels.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)