I think every team made improvements except Spurs and New York
They will trade up into the top 10
They will trade down
They will stand pat with the 11th pick
They will trade the pick for player(s)
Everyone knows he’s a negative player but...Sa traded Kawhi for him?
I think every team made improvements except Spurs and New York
Sorry Zeus, I'm not trying to be funny
The trade market will be zero. But LMA will pout and bat his eyes at RC and BW, and they'll be like, "Aw shucks, LaMarcus, you're such a swell guy, we'll buy you out so you can sign with Portland now and not wait until the summer!"
LMA: "Really, honest and true? And I'll only have to give up $1 million, less than I'll get pro-rated with Portland?"
RC: "You got it buddy!"
Rinse and Repeat with Gay and DDR with other teams.
*paid for the privilege to trade kawhi for him
It's only a non-improvement for the Spurs if they keep Forbes.
! They're gonna keep Forbes, aren't they?
"And that's actually okay, there's value in buying them out."
Yea. So they suck.
I have my preference on what they should do but making horrendous FA decisions and not optimizing any assets and not picking any direction? GTFO with all that.
If other teams were doing same I get it. I’m upset because as I mentioned they are getting absolutely lapped. They aren’t good now, have no cornerstone and have nothing in their trove to show for it.
It’s flat out lazy and poor.
Of course Presti takes McDaniels.![]()
Sure. So grade them vs their division and the West now. Where do they rank in short term, mid term and long term?
I think he was moved to Minnesota...but presti is moving in so many directions its hard to keep up with..
Okay, see... I never expected to read the words, "rinse and repeat with gay" in a sports forum. No matter what happens from here on out, I've got that.
Sadly, I really can see nobody else wanting to over-pay for Forbes, and SA bidding against themselves to keep him.
Why? It's not worth it at this point.
Vassell will be fine; we can really apply pressure like Miami does but better!!
We upgraded over Forbes. Assuming the Devin guy can hit open 3s.
Gah what a depressing night.
Somebody earlier in the thread said Presti was in Minnesota. Maybe he got confused, I never heard of Presti leaving OKC, tbh. Anyways, whoever is picking for the Wolves, he's making a of a job.
That was a bad trade, no arguments here. I'd definitely pay to see what kind of packages were officially offered by Celtics & Lakers.
That being said, there is the caveat of nephew having taken away any leverage we should've had by threatening to sit out the year unless he's traded to LA and/or just walking away after playing out the year.
The other teams to have definitely learned form our mistake of hoping to make DD a + player.
Boston moving 30 please spurs
Gotcha... I think Rosas is the guy in Minnesota
It doesn't matter who we are. What matters is our plan
every draft night for ST Spurs fan
![]()
I agree long term they are probably only going to keep two. I strongly disagree with moving one in order to help two career losers like LMA and DDR, continue to lose and then leave next year.
There is no player in the nba you are going to trade who is good enough right now to "help" DDR and LMA, while also being better than murray, while also being as young or younger than murray, while also being on a deal that keeps him here at least 2 years or you know you can resign him.
The fact that it was phrased as helping two veterans players who are on one year deals, one who outright said he wants to end his career somewhere else and the other who you could not come to turns on a long term contract with is frightening.
Best available heading into the second round: Theo Maledon, Isaiah Joe, Robert Woodard II, Grant Riller, Xavier Tillman, Killian Tillie, Tyrell Terry and Nico Mannion
He is a + player. Spurs just refuse to hurt their quest for 40 wins unless they get a crazy package. Take any firsts and move on.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)