Official Stealing The 2020 Election For Harris/Biden Watch Thread

[spurraider21]

Then why do it?

i didnt say there's no purpose to it. i said it doesnt have anything to do with claims that the election results are fraudulent

[spurraider21]

Math hurts my feelings

Nonetheless, you have hard evidence. You have video footage. You have affidavits. Etc.

math doesnt hurt anybody's feelings. they're just stupid claims that assume every ballot counted from any specific precinct is a random sample. if a heavy blue county like Milwaukee reports ALL of its votes at one time, it's obviously not going to match the overall trends of the state. these analyses treat a 100k vote dump from a blue county showing heavy blue as an "anomaly" when its the expected result.

same with mail in ballots, which were always going to be heavy blue (outside of AZ). a random sample of 100 mail in ballots is not going to be comparable to a random sample of 100 in person ballots. pretending that its an anomaly when the mailed ballots skew blew is just shoddy reasoning

[BD24]

but you still post the same negative followed by "god bless you" at the end

Tbh

[Will Hunting]

Yeah no , parties that sue are going to make an argument that they have atanding. That one isn’t particularly convincing. Each state gets to pick its electors however it wants to, Texas doesn’t have standing just because the electors picked in PA are voting for the candidate Texas Electors are voting against.

[Winehole23]

(ORDER LIST: 592 U.S.)

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2020

ORDER IN PENDING CASE


KELLY, MIKE, ET AL. V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.

20A98

The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice
Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.

[Will Hunting]

doesn’t look like the SCOTUS decision re: PA has any dissents. Even Alito and Uncle Ruckus aren’t going to help Trump steal an election.

[Ef-man]

NO DISSENT!

[Leetonidas]

b-b-but all paths lead to SCOTUS

[Reck]

Chris how’s it feel to have the SCOTUS unanimously tell Trump to off?

[Trainwreck2100]

my question is how many

how many cases need to be thrown out

how many twitter videos purporting to show fraud need to be easily explained away

how many trump lawyers have to tell the court "we are not alleging fraud"

how many hand-recounts affirming the results (dispelling the notion that the machines rigged the results)

how many of these until people realize that it's not happening, and that biden kinda just won?

Fox news is on legal written record that they're not news and those idiots still watch them as news

How much fraud do you need to see? How much intimidation tactics do you need to see?

How much illegitimate electoral acts do you need to see?
First one will be firs
How much big tech censorship do you need to see?
Censorship protection applies to the government, even this site has censorship i ain't never heard you ing about it
How much fake news do you need to believe in?
Less than the average trumpstan probably by a factor of twenty
How many anomalies does there have to be?
Depends on the votes
How many mathematical impossibilities?
There are infinite mathmatical impossibilites, as well as infinite possibilities
How many impossible huge vote dumps?
LOL
How much voter machine fraud?
Zero proof besides heresay but you don't care because it validates your idiocy
How much until you realize Trump's second term is coming?
more time then it takes until you realize it's not coming in 2020

[Trainwreck2100]

doesn’t look like the SCOTUS decision re: PA has any dissents. Even Alito and Uncle Ruckus aren’t going to help Trump steal an election.

Trump showing his hand before the election helped PA to plan for this bull which again shows how he's a ing idiot, their only good argument was the ballots that came in post election day, and Pennsylvania segregated those and luckily they didn't end up making a difference.

[Joseph Kony]

the re s on this forum that actually thought SCOTUS was going to overturn the election for Trump based on nothing

[Joseph Kony]

"It's fine, the next appeal to SOCTUS by Texas is going to be the killshot! Tick tock!!"

[spurraider21]

a summary denial like that can be a tough pill to swallow tbh ... put all your work into a massive brief to get a one sentence " off" from the higher court.

we've had that happen and its no fun. but we also werent trying to upend democracy, so i have no pity for these s

[Spurminator]

Still amazed by the grift Mitch McConnell pulled on Trump convincing him to rush a justice through before the election on the assumption that it would help him in an election loss.

[Trainwreck2100]

the re s on this forum that actually thought SCOTUS was going to overturn the election for Trump based on nothing

NGL I assumed they would have if it was just one state

[spurraider21]

Still amazed by the grift Mitch McConnell pulled on Trump convincing him to rush a justice through before the election.

i dont get how it was a grift.

if trump hadnt nominated ACB before the election, then win or lose they still would have rammed her through during this lame duck period

[Trainwreck2100]

Still amazed by the grift Mitch McConnell pulled on Trump convincing him to rush a justice through before the election on the assumption that it would help him in an election loss.

You shouldn't be surprised, Trump's an idiot

[Reck]

Chris is frozen by the terrible news. Hate to see it..

[Spurtacular]

Still amazed by the grift Mitch McConnell pulled on Trump convincing him to rush a justice through before the election on the assumption that it would help him in an election loss.

[Spurminator]

i dont get how it was a grift.

if trump hadnt nominated ACB before the election, then win or lose they still would have rammed her through during this lame duck period

That assumes Trump plays ball and bothers to nominate anyone during lame duck.

I suppose he could just easily be convinced during the lame duck that a ninth justice would help overturn the election and his favor, but I'm not taking that risk if I'm Mitch and it's probably worse optics wise.

[Trainwreck2100]

That assumes Trump plays ball and bothers to nominate anyone during lame duck.

I suppose he could just easily be convinced during the lame duck that a ninth justice would help overturn the election and his favor, but I'm not taking that risk if I'm Mitch and it's probably worse optics wise.

No need to suppose, he loves putting his name on he doesnt have to work for.

[spurraider21]

That assumes Trump plays ball and bothers to nominate anyone during lame duck.

I suppose he could just easily be convinced during the lame duck that a ninth justice would help overturn the election and his favor, but I'm not taking that risk if I'm Mitch and it's probably worse optics wise.

you think trump would save a vacant SCOTUS seat for Biden?

[Spurminator]

you think trump would save a vacant SCOTUS seat for Biden?

I think he'd be an emo whiny little who doesn't want to do his job, just like he's doing right now.

[spurraider21]

old man yells at clouds