Word of electors in PA, GA, NV going for President Donald J Trump.
Those three alone are enough to send Beijing Biden's fraudulent electoral count under 270.
Word of AZ, WI, MI also casting electoral votes for President Donald J Trump.
sorry derp
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32717Receipt of Two Certificates from the Same StateInfluenced by its historical experience prior to 1887, Congress was particularly concerned in the statute of 1887 with the case of two lists of electors and votes being presented to Congress from the same state. Three different contingencies appear to be provided for in the statute for two lists being presented. In the first instance, two lists would be proffered, but the assumption presented in the law is that only one list would be from electors who were determined to be appointed pursuant to the state election contest statute (as provided for in 3 U.S.C. §5), and that in such case, only those electors should be counted. In the second case, when two lists were proffered as being from two different state authorities who arguably made determinations provided for under 3U.S.C. §5 (a state statutory election contest determined at least six days prior to December 14, the winner of the state presidential election), the question of which state authority is “the lawful tribunal of such State” to make the decision (and thus the acceptance of those electors’ votes)shall be decided only upon the concurrent agreement of both houses “supported by the decision of such State so authorized by its law.” In the third instance, if there is no determination by a state authority of the question of which slate was lawfully appointed, then the two chambers must agree concurrently to accept the votes of one set of electors; but the two chambers may also concurrently agree not to accept the votes of electors from that state.When the two houses disagree, then the statute states that the votes of the electors whose appointment was certified by the governor of the state shall be counted.
Nevada's six electors vote for Democrat Joe Biden for president
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nevada's six electors voted for Democrat Joe Biden for president on Monday, confirming the president-elect's victory in the state in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
Biden's win in the battleground state was challenged in Nevada district court by President Donald Trump's campaign but a judge dismissed the suit, ruling that the campaign had not supported its claims of fraud and wrongdoing with proof.
https://news.yahoo.com/nevadas-six-e...170134234.html
Derp.
Sad, pathetic, dead-ender. With der fuhrer in the bunker to the last.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 12-14-2020 at 03:48 PM.
Folding like foldren.
Word of electors in PA, GA, NV going for President Donald J Trump.
Those three alone are enough to send Beijing Biden's fraudulent electoral count under 270.
Word of AZ, WI, MI also casting electoral votes for President Donald J Trump.
https://www.marke ch.com/story/el...ts-11607961822Legal observers, however, say that such votes are no more than political theater. “These electors have neither been certified by state executives nor purportedly appointed by state legislators,” wrote Rick Hasen, an election-law expert at the University of California, Irvine, on his blog.
“They don’t have legal authority and so this does not affect the counting of Electoral College votes.”
None of them have been certified by any legislature in any quorum'ed vote.
wheee.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_Detachment_Steiner
Steiners attack will set everything in order.
doesn't work like that at all... in order for the legislature to cast legally binding votes for electors they would need to amend the electoral law.
OP turning in the dumbest mofo by the minute.
2 diff threads on the same topic and roughly 11 diff alts in both. Derp really has no life.
Epic derp meltdown.
You hate to see it
None of them have been certified by any legislature in any quorum'ed vote.
Same thread, different day
The Cons utional process is quite clear. Vice President Michael R Pence does not have to accept your fraudulent electors.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
