completely obliterates the fantasy that white re Trump s are the most vaccine hesitant
https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/news/ne...hesitancy.html
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.20.21260795
by May PhD’s were the most hesitant group. While vaccine hesitancy decreased across virtually all racial groups, Black people and Pacific Islanders had the largest decreases, joining Hispanics and Asians at having lower vaccine hesitancy than white people in May.
The study also highlights key differences in hesitancy by race and age subgroups. For example, in May, younger Black people are more hesitant than younger white people, while the reverse is true in older populations. Generally, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was higher among young (ages 18-24), non-Asian people, and less educated (≤ high school diploma) adults, and those with PhDs, with a history of a positive COVID-19 test, not worried about serious illnes.
le should read:
”are ing idiot snowflakes”
/thread
Bidens blacks and PHDs more hesitant than Trumpers
Young black people don’t voteBidens blacks and PHDs more hesitant than Trumpers, they aren’t “Biden blacks”
Hi hater. Why did your post cut off that last sentence and exclude the bolded part?
https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/news/ne...hesitancy.html
The study also highlights key differences in hesitancy by race and age subgroups. For example, in May, younger Black people are more hesitant than younger white people, while the reverse is true in older populations. Generally, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was higher among young (ages 18-24), non-Asian people, and less educated (≤ high school diploma) adults, and those with PhDs, with a history of a positive COVID-19 test, not worried about serious illness from COVID-19 and living in regions with greater support to Donald Trump in the 2020 election.
it didn't fit the narrative, so he deliberately mischaracterized
Hi hater. From your same study. Which fantasy is this obliterating again?
Those from counties with higher Trump support in the 2020 presidential election showed higher hesitancy, and the difference in hesitancy between areas with high and low Trump support grew over the period studied. “This finding really highlights the politicization of public health recommendations,” said King.
So Trump supporting PhD’s put their stupid politics ahead of good sense. Sounds about right
The worst mistake dishonest actors make is when they reveal their sources. It’s why TSA would never link his quotes from AR15 forum or whatever
hater knows what's doing, his target audience pro and con seldom reads past the headline and the pull quote.
Read the full paper. PHDs more hesitant than Trump s
What is mischaracterized? Explain
Yes we know Trump s are vaccine hesitant.
Just that PHDs and Bidens blacks are more hesitant than them
Today’s friendly tip to OP’s:
When you self own yourself on page 1 - REGULARLY
STOP POSTING NEW THREADS!
you are welcome!
(oh yeah-almost forgot....)
Very specific PHDs: PhDs, with a history of a positive COVID-19 test, not worried about serious illness from COVID-19 and living in regions with greater support to Donald Trump in the 2020 election.Read the full paper. PHDs more hesitant than Trump s
No. They asked a bunch of PHDs. Not all were previously infected.
PHDs more hesitant than Trump s
Guess you have trouble with reading comprehension as that is noted in the report, all good.No. They asked a bunch of PHDs. Not all were previously infected.
PHDs more hesitant than Trump s
Its on the first paragraph of the study, dumboGuess you have trouble with reading comprehension as that is noted in the report, all good.
"Methods January 6 through May 31, 2021, 5,121,436 US adults completed an online COVID-19 survey. Weighted data was used to evaluate change in vaccine intent and correlates of May vaccine hesitancy."
hater's not even that smart, even the snippet he voluntarily posted contradicts his interpretation.The worst mistake dishonest actors make is when they reveal their sources. It’s why TSA would never link his quotes from AR15 forum or whatever
What part of this quote from the article did you not understand?Its on the first paragraph of the study, dumbo
"Methods January 6 through May 31, 2021, 5,121,436 US adults completed an online COVID-19 survey. Weighted data was used to evaluate change in vaccine intent and correlates of May vaccine hesitancy."
"PhDs, with a history of a positive COVID-19 test, not worried about serious illness from COVID-19 and living in regions with greater support to Donald Trump in the 2020 election."
I would ask how dense you are but I do not want to further insult ducks by comparing you to him.
You must be in Kindergarden?
"Phds with a history..." thats just a subset of all PHDs researched
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
