they booed competent driving
no, but I do find it funny that Elder was the moderator of the infamous lolbertarian debate about how drivers licenses are a slippery slope to needing a license to make toast IN YOUR OWN DAMN TOASTER!!!
they booed competent driving
Seriously though why are Republican state parties so ing crazy in states why they're a minority? The MA GOP is trying to primary Charlie Baker () and Larry Elder is seriously the best that the CA GOP can come up with.
dont forget last time CA GOP won a governors race it was Arnold
republicans have chances in CA because its a state full of NIMBYism
Right, but isn't Arnold about as much of a Rockefeller Republican as one can be? IIRC he's very pro immigration and socially liberal. That's what the CA GOP should try to model itself after.
EDIT: State Dem parties should be the same way, e.g. the Mississippi Democratic party should be pro-life and pro gun.
On top of being bat crazy, that's just factually inaccurate. The vast majority of the plantation owners got all their land back after the civil war, in fact most of them continued to own slaves via "apprenticeships" until federal troops were sent down there.
im just saying crazy has worked before
I wouldn't call Arnold crazy, just unconventional and inexperienced. He was objectively very moderate.
i guess unconventional was a better choice of words
Yeah, I was in CA for that weirdness. Arnold was a crazy choice but fortunately not a disaster as governor. Elder would be...wow....
I hope they're playing up dead Feinstein as a reason to vote against recall. We don't need to be Ginsburged out of the Senate too.
They are from what I've seen but fortunately the Dems have a super majority in the CA state leg so they could pass a law yanking power to pick Feinstein's replacement if Elder wins the same way the KY state leg passed a law so Beshear can't pick McConnell's replacement.
That's good but I'd rather not have to stoop to that level.
Agreed, esp since I don't trust the CA state leg to not that up.
I don't really think there's anything untoward about it though. Eg in Kentucky, the voters picked McConnell as their senator, the state leg passing a law to make sure he's replaced by someone from his own party really isn't an abuse of power imo.
That makes sense. It just reminds me of all the laws passed in WI, etc., to strip governors of their powers because they happen to be in a different party. We should be above that kind of but I guess we really can't be anymore.
Dumper & Will sittin' in a tree...k.i.s.s.i.n.g...
Yeah in WI it's different because you have a state legislature that's insanely gerrymandered and doesn't reflect the will of the voters. In both Kentucky and California, it's pretty obvious which party the voters prefer their senator belong to.
Hater should frame this picture and hang it in his living room, next to his Donald Trump picture.
muh called it
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)