Sounds like exactly what the Russians would want to do. Not surprising, but par ioning the country...wow.
Still going to invite an insurgency. This is not 1949.
"bRaNdOn" lol that's funny
Why would he invade and put political pressure on his most powerful ally when he could already get anything he wanted?
He had no worry of Ukraine joining NATO when you voted his butt buddy into office.
(BTW he also invaded Georgia under W.)
nope.
But this isn't quite an intervention, is it?
We would definitely be taking military action if Mexico or Canada was becoming a puppet state for Russia, but it's still a re ed comparison. The countries that have joined / are considering joining NATO have free and fair elections (Ukraine, Finland, etc.)...the countries that remain loyal to Russia (Belarus) are authoritarian states where the people don't get to select their leader.
Putin is essentially mad because he's worried that the Ukrainian people will get to decide their own fate vs. be forced under the thumb of another pro-Russia dictator.
.
Last edited by Will Hunting; 02-25-2022 at 04:18 PM.
its bad/wrong when the US does it, too
what does that have to do with russia invading ukraine?
Ukraine is completely ed no matter who is President.
& because if he waits as he's been doing he'll have NATO on his border and then there is only the nuclear option. He goes now as he has he can delay that day perhaps indefinitely. He's warned Biden and the rest and if they take heed he'll get what he aimed for. If not, if they/NATO, U.S., get our backs up, then it's judgment day. Nobody likes to lose and lose face. Putin did and now he's dragging the aforementioned [/NATO, U.S.] thru that miserable ing experience>>>(we) don't like it and we're tempted, oh, daddy, are we ever tempted.
There was a U.S. General at the end of II., (name escapes me) who implored, absolutely begged Truman to let him head North with everything we had in the field and take out Russia.
& Truman considered it.
Guns good, armed militias good, when it's anywhere but the US, then it's "lulz, you think you can hold off the US Military with 'muh gunz'?"
you say you want gun control and yet you want an armed military during an invasion? lol hypocrites. checkmate liberals!
Neither was Iraq nor Afghanistan
DMC late to the party
Putin already has NATO on his border. Where do you think Latvia and Estonia are?
I have no idea what the rest of your incoherent gibberish says.
D M C
Agreed, and both of those conflicts were extremely re ed.
I'll just bet you have.
DMC would not fight against a Putin led invasion of the US either.
I don't speak uneducated boomer.
We had to act in Afghanistan but we completed botched it.
Ukraine is not completely ed???
You did before Putin cleaned Biden's plow, by God.
We had to find and kill Bin Laden. That's it. There was absolutely no reason to ever be there for 20 years, and if going into Afghanistan was really just about retribution for 9/11, then I'd love to hear an explanation about why Saudi Arabia didn't face any military action.
For over 21 years because we got hooked.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
