"athleticism and quickness don't matter if you don't have great character"
Anything is possible!
"athleticism and quickness don't matter if you don't have great character"
And it's always accompanied by the same phrases: this prospect has shown flashes, he has the physical tools, etc... meaning, that like 90% of all prospects, he kinda looks like a basketball player.
There’s no one at 9 you can look at and say, “they’re going to be a star”. You HAVE to project development, and you have to do it over and over. Drafting a Johnny Davis is going to glue you to the treadmill.
That, but maybe more concerning for me is that we're getting associated with players who are young, haven't shown that much yet, and have very mediocre athletic capabilities. I'm not loving that combination.
I'm more talking about people like Emoni Bates, Patrick Baldwin Jr, and the like. Imagine if it were permissible to draft 17 year olds-- in that case, some team very likely would've grabbed one of them as the "best" high school prospect in the country, and today would probably be feeling pretty disappointed.
This is far and away the most disappointing aspect of Primo's game tbh. His ceiling appears capped at shooting 3s (hopefully with much better efficiency than his first season) and perhaps a midrange game because he simply lacks the athleticism to beat players in a one-on-one, half game defense, with any regularity whatsoever. And if you're going to get on your high horse as an organization about drafting a player a year early because you think that he'll be taken high in the following year's draft, you damn well better be selecting a player whose game is immediately limited. Especially when other players that were more polished were available for selection then.
![]()
Wouldn’t hate taking this guy in the first if we traded back from 25 to say 29 or 30 and got another 2nd.
Improvement Areas: Everything
Beautiful jumper but not much else. I suppose he could give Lil Weezy some compe ion for a roster spot. Not entirely joking.
Looks like a taller Forbes.
Weiskamp was a top 5 in lane agility and max vert in the combine.
So you're telling me he has UNLIMITED UPSIDE???
![]()
31:30 - 34:00 mark, Raf. discusses Caleb Houstan working out Pre-Combine.
Said he's a fantastic kid, doesn't have social media - really nice person to talk to.
However, this should give people pause, he doesn't think he's nearly as good a shooter as what his reputation is/was. He saw him miss a tonne, in an open gym too.
If I knew I was going to be exposed at the combine and end up undrafted, I would skip the combine and float a rumor that I got a promise.
I'd just pull out and go back to school...
Caleb is a good size with good shooting mechanics, not very athletic and lacks 1st step burst. Honestly underwhelmimg
If Houstan is so bad, why was he considered a top recruit coming out of high school? Is it possible that his poor freshman showing was due to being in the wrong environment, and that if he had played for another team that could showcase his skillset, he would be ranked much higher?
They don't have a college combine. It's all done by buzz and hype.
He really should have showed up at the combine, measured, and then sat on the sidelines. His skill tests didn't help him at all. He probably would have been drafted higher without them.
That's not really how it works. Take a look at any year of ESPN's high school rankings and you'll see at the top of each board players that were highly coveted and you literally cannot remember even playing in college:
http://www.espn.com/college-sports/b...s/_/class/2015
http://www.espn.com/college-sports/b...s/_/class/2011
Some of them become good college players then suck in the NBA. Some make it all the way. But one thing I don't think ever happens is a ty college player suddenly becoming a good NBA player. This draft seems to have a lot of utter dreamers.
Stanley "6'8" Johnson baby
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)