Reply With Quote
the irony of this post... you can sum up Trumpism as "trigger da libs" and "democracy isn't working for us"...
lmao,,,this is exactly what you democrats have become. As long as you can troll a Trump supporter, you dont care that the country is burning to the ground right before our eyes. Its petty and stupid but knock yourself out. Its why i rarely stick around to debate anybody on here,,,,its childish now with you democrats. Just look at Chump suckers responses,,,it almost always involves Trump. if you bring up crime today,,,he'll say what about crime under trump? No substance. No debating,,,its just a cesspool of degrading people on here,,,,have fun with that. I can tell you this, if repubilicans win the White House in 2024, i wont be on here constantly posting and trolling like you democrats,,,,if you need proof of that,,,,just look at my post count and when i joined. i didnt do it when trump got elected and i wont do it in 2024 or any time after that,,,,its a waste of time.
Is this the Foldren?
This is silly. You couldn't be openly gay back in the day without some serious social repercussions.
I can understand people that think it's overdone today, but let's not pretend we were socially where we are now back in the 50's.
I'm not that old, cannot recall. I'll have to take your word for it, but Jenner won the decathlon. However Jenner waited until being old(er) to actually transition.
Last edited by DMC; 06-13-2022 at 12:26 AM.
I didn't know how destructive "puberty blockers" actually are.
Yes.
One of the "puberty blockers" they're giving boys is the drug Lupron. Lupron is literally the same drug used to chemically castrate sex offenders.
That's not opinion, it's just an objective fact. I'm not OK with giving 12 year old boys the same drug used to chemically castrate sex offenders but you do you.
"BiOlOiGiCaL mEn HaVe No AdVaNtAgE oVeR wOmEn In SpOrTs!!!"
tbh
Being trans should be exceptionally rare. Most of these people are probably just gay. Why up these kids with hormones and unnecessary surgeries?
Yeah, you should definitely have to wait until you’re 18 to make such life altering decisions (in terms of changing a child’s natural biology. If they want to identify as another gender without the hormone therapy, they should feel free and safe in that choice). Anything less is 100% child abuse.
You would never allow a 13 year old to get a tattoo, but you’ll let him take hormones to change his sex?
Yeah.
Maybe just fame of being an Olympic winner in a very difficult event.
Generally I agree and it wouldn't be my parenting style.Yeah, you should definitely have to wait until you’re 18 to make such life altering decisions (in terms of changing a child’s natural biology. If they want to identify as another gender without the hormone therapy, they should feel free and safe in that choice). Anything less is 100% child abuse.
You would never allow a 13 year old to get a tattoo, but you’ll let him take hormones to change his sex?
That said, I don't have a child experiencing any kind of gender frustration/confusion and, as such, I haven't spoken to any doctors or any other real experts about it. The fact that it's seemingly only a major concern in the alt-right troll webisphere is a pretty big red flag to me. There are plenty of other examples of gross parental negligence that far exceed this decision between parents and their doctors, imo.
What doctor is an expert at being a child?
I don't know enough about it. Seems like a separate issue from "what is a woman?" tho, imo.
Not really. The new gender ideology belief is that the concept of a woman is fluid and literally anybody can identify as a woman to the point where if a 12 year boy has a phase where his parents think he might be a woman, there are doctors out there ready to load him up with puberty blockers that with his hormone levels and weaken his bone density.
"im a classical liberal but also matt ing walsh is bae"
I don't know about child abuse, but I generally agree with the notion of postponing stuff like this until they're adults.Yeah, you should definitely have to wait until you’re 18 to make such life altering decisions (in terms of changing a child’s natural biology. If they want to identify as another gender without the hormone therapy, they should feel free and safe in that choice). Anything less is 100% child abuse.
You would never allow a 13 year old to get a tattoo, but you’ll let him take hormones to change his sex?
That said, stuff like this can easily escalate into something more serious and complicated than that. Once something like depression enters the picture, it can be life threatening.
While I do think there's some overdoing of this, there's also some trivialization of the problem as well. I think the former will die down as part of any social fad.
this is nonsense though. the implication of this clip is that they perform bottom surgery on children. they dont. its illegal to have it done before one turns 18. there are some childrens hospitals that will treat patients over the age of 18, and it can be done there, but thats a far cry from what the clip is implying, and i can only assume much of the rest of the film is the same
its like saying disney california adventure promotes underage drinking because its a theme park mostly for kids but they also serve beer
Last edited by spurraider21; 06-13-2022 at 11:25 AM.
what is the name of the school that allows students to purr instead of answering questions and teachers are literally not allowed to say anything about it? or is the interview subject just going with a "i heard about this school on a facebook post" type nonsense?
wonder what you think about latest dinesh dsouza movies too? or do those not allow for confirmation bias on your end?
What is the creature advocating?
Should have been led "what is a girl?"
Followed by sequel, "what is a boy?"
Still seems like a completely different discussion than when a trans wants to be known by a particular pronoun.
person with blue hair was very weird that means everything about gender is wrong
I'm fine with using people's preferred pronouns as long as it makes grammatical sense. I'm not going to refer to someone as "they/them" since they is a plural pronoun. The concept of "non-binary" also isn't buttressed by a shred of actual science and is 100% bull .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
