Page 37 of 134 FirstFirst ... 273334353637383940414787 ... LastLast
Results 901 to 925 of 3333
  1. #901
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    I'm sure Lavine would've taken a paycut to join that squad, and other ring chasers. It's after waiver that you get the remaining pieces
    True. But could the Spurs then facilitate a trade for Durant. There's nothing the Spurs could offer outside of Murray and Lavine that would translate into any meaningful wins for Brooklyn that gets them out of the bottom 5 in the league and sends their high draft picks to Houston.

    I also don't want the Nets to be too bad as I don't want the Rockets to get loaded up on high draft picks over the next few years.

  2. #902
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Drummond to the Bulls. One less team interested in Jak.

  3. #903
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    Can you imagine Westbrook and Simmons on the court together....ghastly...
    Would be comedy gold.

  4. #904
    Veteran John B's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    12,402
    Drummond to the Bulls. One less team interested in Jak.
    Spurs FO demanding king's ramson for Jak??

  5. #905
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    Imagine if the Lakers put together a package for Kyrie and Durant, but it was LeBron + Westbrook instead of AD .

    That would actually the right move for the franchise, but we know Klutch is running the Lakers now.

  6. #906
    Veteran Degoat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    4,291
    Will teams ever learn that Drummond and Deandre Jordan are not good lol

  7. #907
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    Imagine if the Lakers put together a package for Kyrie and Durant, but it was LeBron + Westbrook instead of AD .

    That would actually the right move for the franchise, but we know Klutch is running the Lakers now.

  8. #908
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Why we sure Poeltl's getting traded?

  9. #909
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    Will teams ever learn that Drummond and Deandre Jordan are not good lol
    I couldn't believe the Nuggets when I saw the news. Jordan is literally the worst player in the NBA right now. He was taking the piss last season.

  10. #910
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455

  11. #911
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    If spurstalk wasn't run on Slovenian serves I could use the search function to find the most I made back in March that Durant would ask for a trade in the off season after the show he's endured the last 2 years.

  12. #912
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    , find the post** I made

  13. #913
    Don't stop believin' Dex's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    27,659
    Drummond to the Bulls. One less team interested in Jak.
    I'm still amazed people are still willing to give guys like Andre Drummond or DeAndre Jordan money, and people still talk around here like we overpaid for Poeltl

  14. #914
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Why we sure Poeltl's getting traded?
    I'm by no means sure we trade Jak. Seems like what a rebuilding team would do, but as others (maybe even you, I believe) I don't think the Spurs think they are in full rebuild mode. I think the Spurs think they just got a good deal for Murray but can still compete.

  15. #915
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    I'm by no means sure we trade Jak. Seems like what a rebuilding team would do, but as others (maybe even you, I believe) I don't think the Spurs think they are in full rebuild mode. I think the Spurs think they just got a good deal for Murray but can still compete.
    Like with Murray, the Spurs will (I believe) trade Poeltl if the right trade comes by. The team isn't in tear-down mode. They're not going to get rid of him for nothing.

  16. #916
    Veteran John B's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    12,402
    Why we sure Poeltl's getting traded?
    Do you question Timvp? He said so himself, the Spurs are trying hard to trade Poeltl.

  17. #917
    Veteran Degoat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    4,291
    I’m probably off but I still think Ayton makes sense for the spurs, we still wouldn’t be a good team with him but he’d be a major piece to the rebuild

  18. #918
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Do you question Timvp? He said so himself, the Spurs are trying hard to trade Poeltl.
    He could get traded. They won't get rid of him to get rid of him.

  19. #919
    GOATS of a feather the golden era's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Post Count
    79
    Why we sure Poeltl's getting traded?
    After the draft, i was texting with friends on this issue. I said at the time I could totally see them extending him now. Obviously if they get a great return you trade the dude, but he really does fit what we are likely to be running and is a spur. We always prioritize these guys. If we extend him on a fairly reasonable deal he could always be moved in the future. I think he ends up staying now.

  20. #920
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    After the draft, i was texting with friends on this issue. I said at the time I could totally see them extending him now. Obviously if they get a great return you trade the dude, but he really does fit what we are likely to be running and is a spur. We always prioritize these guys. If we extend him on a fairly reasonable deal he could always be moved in the future. I think he ends up staying now.
    Losing Landale is significant. I'm not sure they dump Poeltl when there's only Zollins left. Even bringing in Jalen Smith doesn't help. There's developing young players and then developing them when there's absolutely no center to back up their perimeter defense.

  21. #921
    GOATS of a feather the golden era's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Post Count
    79
    The more I think about it, yeah poodle is staying and will likely get extended IMO. Charlotte drafted their center, so unlikely to deal now. I’m not really sure who out there will want to give up capital for him right now. With AYTON showing the lack of market for centers, I bet Jak takes a reasonable extension now. It’s in his interest.

  22. #922
    GOATS of a feather the golden era's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Post Count
    79
    Losing Landale is significant. I'm not sure they dump Poeltl when there's only Zollins left. Even bringing in Jalen Smith doesn't help. There's developing young players and then developing them when there's absolutely no center to back up their perimeter defense.
    I don’t think landale has anything to do with it IMO. I just think it really boils down to how the draft fell and having the good fortune of Atlanta being willing to overpay for DJ. The slate is clear and the market for a center like poodle in todays game although broad, is not willing to overpay. I agree with you though he could really help all these young long wings/guards develop better than the value of whatever first round pick we could get. Development is going to be king now for the next 3 years, and he seems to be the type of non ball dominate big that is a vet and a good team player who could really help these kids elevate over the next few years. On a reasonable extension he could be moved in the future if necessary. I am on board honestly

  23. #923
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    If the Spurs don't get a deal they like (such as 1st with moderate protections) I can def see a scenario where the Spurs extend Jakob for 3/$45m.

    I think his trade value would actually go up in that scenario once he's trade eligible.

    When would he become trade eligible if he signed an extension this off-season? Somewhere around mid-season?

  24. #924
    Manu Mania lefty20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Post Count
    4,730
    If the Spurs don't get a deal they like (such as 1st with moderate protections) I can def see a scenario where the Spurs extend Jakob for 3/$45m.

    I think his trade value would actually go up in that scenario once he's trade eligible.

    When would he become trade eligible if he signed an extension this off-season? Somewhere around mid-season?
    December 15th.

  25. #925
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447

    Darren Wolfson @DWolfsonKSTP
    1m
    Former Roseville HS big Mike Muscala is re-signing with the Oklahoma City Thunder. He can help mentor Minneapolis native Chet Holmgren. 1-year deal for vet minimum.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •