Pinche Pendejo, I’m not saying he was important to the hawks, I’m saying they were coming off an eastern conference championship appearance and viewed him as an important missing piece to building onto what they had already built. It’s a wasted roster spot that could be given to a guy to develop like a Robert Woodard, Isaiah Roby, Dominck Barlow
Barlow and I believe, Woodard can still be signed on a two way. This doesn’t impact those two. Roby… is not that impressive to begin with. The impact of signing Dieng is not seen through the individual itself but the team.
some of yall want to dig through the garbage bin thinking you’ll find a diamond, but most people would be happy if they found a dollar because people can use that dollar for practical purposes… that’s what this signing is.
That’s including Ca , Stewert and Woodard.
Ca , Stewert, Woodard, KBD, Weiskamp amd Langford. There are enough players at the end of the roster to cut and a good chance half of our remaining cap is used on guys who get bought out or waived immediately.
What a and uninspiring signing. Great job sa!
Barlow already has a two way deal so we have 1 slot left.
If this is a one-year vet min, no problem at all. He won't be signed until later this off-season because his salary exceeds the roster charge, but no change to overall cap room the Spurs have to work with.
His locker room fit should be great. He's a man of the world from what I remember of last year's thread, someone Pop will certainly get along with, along with being a hard worker. His on-court skillset is also useful, especially for a bench big.
I like the signing. There are enough young/project bigs for now.
hes used to playing on teams with young players. Hes perfect
How nice of Dieng to spend 2 years of his career with our sinking ship
We picked up a roster spot in the exchange with ATL, so any of them have the same chance they did before the draft. Woodard was on a 2 way last time I checked, Barlow has been signed to one, and Roby doesn't belong to us so we can't develop him.
It was like 6 weeks last time, and hopefully will be about one season minus 6 weeks or a bit more this time.
And if any contender needs a mobile big who can shoot 3 come trade deadline, he could be worth a SRP, who knows?
EXACTLY. He signs a one year deal, and has veto power over any trades.
Who knows, they could even pull off another Thad/Toronto special using our own 2023 SRP which should be fairly decent.
That’s more likely JRich.
Dieng has never been an impact player.
Spurs playing opportunistic right now just helps the end goal
The only concern I have is on the psyche of the players on the uncertainties. And not only if you’re over 25. Nobody’s really untouchables right now. And that could be on Keldon’s head also with the gloomy face on top of everything else, unless he’s been assured of next steps.
we stacked
Getting draft capital for Dieng is pretty optimistic. Thad Young was a very positive player with a good impact on the game. He had value (as displayed by his new contract). Dieng just doesn't ring that bell.
like never has in his career
lmao at anyone who thinks this signing will stop the tank. if there's a possible reason for this team to overachieve, it's gonna be because the young guys start to develop and have a breakout season. not because of gorgui dieng.
Lol leetonidas already pointed out the pendejo when u said u were basing the Hawks viewing him as important based off their fan site...the guys u listed got something to prove who could upset the tank...a benchwarming vet wont
just texted Pop, voiced yalls concerns about Dieng taking Sochan's minutes, how we just can't afford another Splitter situation. He understood.
wtf do you guys want tho, lmao. This team shouldn't be signing any FAs or making any moves besides getting more draft picks for Jakob, McDermott, and Richardson. One year rental of a vet to teach a specific skillset to the rookies is good
Looks like we got one of those guys I listed…. Lol
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
