I wouldn't presume to make your own point for you, or were you just clearing your throat?
1. Mississippi - 38.82%
2. Louisiana - 33.33%
3. Georgia - 32.06%
4. Maryland - 30.96%
5. South Carolina - 27.28%
6. Alabama - 26.59%
7. Delaware - 23.24%
8. North Carolina - 22.53%
9. Virginia - 20.56%
10. Tennessee - 17.2
- Mississippi 28.6
- Louisiana 26.3
- Wyoming 25.9
- Missouri 23.9
- Alabama 23.6
- Alaska 23.5
- New Mexico 22.7
- Arkansas 22.6
- South Carolina 22
- Tennessee 21.3
I'll let you ponder what these two sets represent in your cause vs correlation narrative. Magically you'll pretend there's none here.
I wouldn't presume to make your own point for you, or were you just clearing your throat?
Aw, derp wants to host a little mystery party.
Whre.
(dramatic caesura)
Obviously states listed as 1 and 2 (and other similar states in the top 10) in both categories?
So there's correlation.
For any point someone wants to make, the stats can be presented in ways that seem to support it. If you just say "correlation is not causation, but neither does it rule out causation." then you're basically trying to coax the reader to consider causation, and leave the door open for discussion on causation. I wonder if this is true for all correlation or only the ones that support your narratives?
The bottom set of stats are shooting fatality rate.
wonder away, profe
Once again you drop tweets with claims you won't even address.![]()
what is a bulletin board?
denying any connection between lax gun laws and gun violence is a weird hill to die on, but hey, you do you.
there are hundreds of excuses the NRA has come up with for derp to use to deny the connections
It's your correlation, you show causation. I haven't denied anything of the sort.
Are you denying connection between the firearm homicide rate in the states I listed vs the 2nd category where the states are ranked in the top 10 as well, even though you don't know yet what that category is? Do you need to know the category to know if there's causation? Shouldn't the fact that the rankings are the same hint at causation?
The term "connections" has been subs uted for "correlations". Correlation doesn't necessarily show connections but your attempt to shift the conversation to one with an already proven point (connection) is noted.
For further study on DMC's NRA arguments, please refer to the crime trend section here:
https://www.nraila.org/get-the-facts...minal-justice/
Thank you
cor·re·la·tion
/ˌkôrəˈlāSH(ə)n/
noun
a mutual relationship or connection between two or more things.
For further NRA conversation shifts, check this out too:
https://www.nraila.org/articles/2018...in-correlation
DMC: *time for some lawyerly parsing
Blake: *drops Merriam-Webster's
Chuncko getting owned!
Trying to word- the conversation
Correlation indicates a statistical relationship of two sets of data. This can be simply by chance, ergo no connection. So your request to change correlation to connection is denied. You've shown no connection, and it's questionable that you've shown even correlation. What's the other statistic that's being linked to road rage shootings?
When Bob eats breakfast, the sun is always in the east. Ergo the position of the sun is connected to bob eating breakfast.
DMC just really feels like ing himself over today more than usual
More posting without context thus the ellipses instead of the full quote.
What is the true meaning of connection?
1 : the act of connecting : the state of being connected: such as. a : causal or logical relation or sequence
Yeah but can BlaKKKe define CUCKOLD though? His picture is right there next to the definition tbh.
You're probably the IRL dumbest poster here.
Lol I can see the seething thru the screen. Now talk about my personal life. Go.
There's no doubt about it bro. He's a ing reject!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)