Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 64
  1. #26
    Veteran Raven's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Post Count
    17,954
    meh, I thought the average is a c- with the poeltl operation being a flat F. Can't get how a team that has to buy players to get over the minimum threshold can't pay a good center, and then perhaps trade him the year after or whatever.

  2. #27
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    F.

    No problem with any of the trades, probably should have been done sooner. F because they let it be known they wanted so much more than they actually got. Now they're marked as a team that will completely fold for half their asking price. Not good for future. So, again I say...F.
    You're still on this stupid ? Have you never negotiated anything in your life?

  3. #28
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Oh Jesus, are we going to start with DPG's weird bull again?

  4. #29
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Overall they did really great. Sure, Poeltl will have pulled better in a better market, but they did great with the protections. I'm not bothered by the use of cap space. You fish or cut bait -- which means you can fish later, and the offseason is where they can try again.

    It sounds like Bassey gets some of the pot of money all the players will get for going up to the floor? That's a nifty bit of free negotiation. I like him and think cementing him for a few years is smart.

  5. #30
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    The Westbrook trade WAS made up. LJ saying the Spurs and Lakers talked isn't the same thing as the Lakers offering an unprotected pick to turn Westbrook into McD and Richardson without Poeltl. LAL got a much better deal than that. It's much more likely they weren't offering much or were asking for a lot more than you might assume. Earlier in the year, the Lakers were even more Kyrie-hopeful than they are now. They were not going to make a deal that borked their 2023 cap AND give up value for role-players any more than the Spurs were going to lock themselves out of using all of their cap space for a one-and-done moderately protected first. The two sides were really not good fits, but some posters wanted them to fit anyway.
    Well, all I can say is and timvp can confirm, there seems to have been a real offer. Don’t know if it was an unprotected first but even if it was protected thats still way better than Richardson deal IMO.

    I wrote at the time SA had little incentive to keep Richardson vs trade him in off season. It was something that was somewhat apparent early

  6. #31
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Oh Jesus, are we going to start with DPG's weird bull again?
    What’s weird? It’s pertinent to the thread. If you dont like it, keep it moving.

  7. #32
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Great, we're going to get more of how we should have traded five players and cap space for a draft pick.

  8. #33
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Great, we're going to get more of how we should have traded five players and cap space for a draft pick.
    You realize that my trade setup is basically exactly what UTA did so why are you acting like it was some outlandish thing lol? But for you, so you stop crying about people posting in a thread on subject, I will stop posting in this thread.

    Just for you. Don’t say I never did anything for you ok. Please regale us with your entertaining and beautiful basketball mind and always unique insights.

  9. #34
    Veteran spurs10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    10,797
    Nice write up - I agree with most of the grades but I would give Richardson deal a C with potential for B+ if things go well there…

    I love the other trades, especially the Jak deal and I more so love the fact Sa is clearly locked in on their vision, doing smart things to stay consistent there vs waffling in between and they are now a very active trade partner which was a huge part of the FO missing for a long while.

    I just feel pretty disappointed they let so much cap space go to waste; they did well overall and having the cap space left doesn’t harm them but it feels like a real missed opportunity and have to wonder if they learned a lesson regarding waiting too long vs taking deals maybe in off season since bird in hand you know?
    By going well are you talking about Graham or the four SRPs turning into something?

  10. #35
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Another losing season and Kelldon is gone. That giddy kid is not even smiling. Then Vassell. It will be a brutal downward spiral and finally you're Sacramento
    He’s extended for four years that start next season. He’s going nowhere any time soon.

  11. #36
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    By going well are you talking about Graham or the four SRPs turning into something?
    Graham turning into something…Im ok with the trade just dont think it was anything special. 4 2RP for Josh is good, but dont love Graham but if he turns into a + asset? Then it’s definitely a B+.

    C to B- for me as of now

  12. #37
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Keldon will probably be moved before long. He's doing the good soldier thing but he's not a cornerstone and would be better somewhere else. Vassell, I'm not sure. We need to actually see him play.

  13. #38
    Every game is game 1 Seventyniner's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    10,608
    Technically yes, but I don’t see it being a real factor because they have all the capspace again next year. Like if the spurs wanted to do a Ben Simmons trade, they could just do it next year. Would probably be different if we were in “buy” mode but that’s unlikely unless maybe the get Wemby.
    What I was trying to establish was whether all of this season's cap space will go to waste. It looks like there will be one last chance to use it, though I don't know how common it is for a team to carry that much cap space into a draft and absorb a bad contract in return for draft capital.

    The point would be to find a team who wants to dump salary at the last minute, most likely to reduce or eliminate the luxury tax bill just before it comes due in July. From what I can tell only the Nuggets ($14.2M) and Nets ($12.4M) are into the tax by a low enough amount for the Spurs to get them out single-handedly. But getting a share of the over $600M in tax expected to be paid by all taxpayers combined (a non-tax team's share will be around $30M if nothing changes), rather than having to forego that $30M and pay the tax, could be worth a first.

    Denver's outgoing firsts have so many protections and conditions that I don't know if they can trade any firsts on draft night (maybe their 2030, or 2029 with similar rolling protections as their 2027 outgoing first). Brooklyn has a bunch of extras from Phoenix; perhaps the 2023 Suns pick could be in play if the Suns finish the season hot and that pick is in the mid to late 20s.

    I'm just brainstorming here.

  14. #39
    Veteran offset formation's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,729
    You're still on this stupid ? Have you never negotiated anything in your life?
    Yeah and I learned from doing so at an early age, letting it be public what I want beforehand , then caving at the last minute portends poorly for the next negotiation. In fact I was an expert at this by the age of 8.

  15. #40
    Every game is game 1 Seventyniner's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    10,608
    Keldon will probably be moved before long. He's doing the good soldier thing but he's not a cornerstone and would be better somewhere else. Vassell, I'm not sure. We need to actually see him play.
    He's far from untouchable. Given how friendly his contract is, he could possibly fetch more than Derrick White did. Though White is a far better fit as a role player on a contender.

  16. #41
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    Keldon will probably be moved before long. He's doing the good soldier thing but he's not a cornerstone and would be better somewhere else. Vassell, I'm not sure. We need to actually see him play.
    Just watch, we’ll trade him back to Toronto too.

  17. #42
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    He's far from untouchable. Given how friendly his contract is, he could possibly fetch more than Derrick White did. Though White is a far better fit as a role player on a contender.
    Yeah, that's the thing. White is superior in a few departments that are really key -- and Boston sucked at. Keldon could be great as a third or fourth guy on a playoff team, but as we've seen no one has assets.

  18. #43
    Veteran spurs10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    10,797
    Graham turning into something…Im ok with the trade just dont think it was anything special. 4 2RP for Josh is good, but dont love Graham but if he turns into a + asset? Then it’s definitely a B+.

    C to B- for me as of now
    Understand.

  19. #44
    Veteran John B's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    12,402
    He’s extended for four years that start next season. He’s going nowhere any time soon.
    You know how PATFO cater to their players. I just hope they get 2 FRP’s unprotected for him

  20. #45
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    You realize that my trade setup is basically exactly what UTA did so why are you acting like it was some outlandish thing lol? But for you, so you stop crying about people posting in a thread on subject, I will stop posting in this thread.

    Just for you. Don’t say I never did anything for you ok. Please regale us with your entertaining and beautiful basketball mind and always unique insights.
    He is next level stupid. I mean how in the can you be here this long and still have zero insight into how anything works?

  21. #46
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    You realize that my trade setup is basically exactly what UTA did so why are you acting like it was some outlandish thing lol? But for you, so you stop crying about people posting in a thread on subject, I will stop posting in this thread.

    Just for you. Don’t say I never did anything for you ok. Please regale us with your entertaining and beautiful basketball mind and always unique insights.
    Your trade scenario was consistently jamming more and more players into some idiot trade for a single pick. We got more by just trading two of those players in separate trades. Then you started screaming that nobody understood you.

    Utah lost that trade pretty badly, btw.

  22. #47
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    He is next level stupid. I mean how in the can you be here this long and still have zero insight into how anything works?
    Lol, taking DPG's side on this one. Ouch.

  23. #48
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    What I was trying to establish was whether all of this season's cap space will go to waste. It looks like there will be one last chance to use it, though I don't know how common it is for a team to carry that much cap space into a draft and absorb a bad contract in return for draft capital.

    The point would be to find a team who wants to dump salary at the last minute, most likely to reduce or eliminate the luxury tax bill just before it comes due in July. From what I can tell only the Nuggets ($14.2M) and Nets ($12.4M) are into the tax by a low enough amount for the Spurs to get them out single-handedly. But getting a share of the over $600M in tax expected to be paid by all taxpayers combined (a non-tax team's share will be around $30M if nothing changes), rather than having to forego that $30M and pay the tax, could be worth a first.

    Denver's outgoing firsts have so many protections and conditions that I don't know if they can trade any firsts on draft night (maybe their 2030, or 2029 with similar rolling protections as their 2027 outgoing first). Brooklyn has a bunch of extras from Phoenix; perhaps the 2023 Suns pick could be in play if the Suns finish the season hot and that pick is in the mid to late 20s.

    I'm just brainstorming here.
    We can trade at the draft, but we can’t take ending contracts to lighten anyone’s tax load. That ship sailed at the deadline, so we’d just be getting a jump on next year’s cap space by taking extended salary.

  24. #49
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Your trade scenario was consistently jamming more and more players into some idiot trade for a single pick. We got more by just trading two of those players in separate trades. Then you started screaming that nobody understood you.

    Utah lost that trade pretty badly, btw.
    Yeah, that Laker one shot pick is pretty crappy. The pick we got from TOR is much better, because we get three shots at a 1-6 protected pick, versus one shot at a 1-4.

  25. #50
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Yeah, that Laker one shot pick is pretty crappy. The pick we got from TOR is much better, because we get three shots at a 1-6 protected pick, versus one shot at a 1-4.
    I want to leave aside DPG's nonsense aside. He's fine otherwise.

    Watching the LAL-GSW right now. Ainge gave the Lakers two starters, gave away a good PG in Conley, and got nothing but a distant FRP years from now after the Lakers will probably have reloaded. I can only guess he wanted to dump players?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •