Woke Spurs Coach Gregg Popovich at it Again Likens Second Amendment to ‘Myth’

[K...]

Why, Qhris?

Explain your conspiracy theory.

Because the parents didnt have guns. Dont you get it? Only good guys get guns. Blue font

[koriwhat]

Additionally there was a collection of child porn and abuse videos on the assailants phone and home computer. Remember. If you see something say something. It takes a whole community to stop guys like the Spursfan Shooter.

Yeah it'll be one of a news day when your ass gets caught you ing pedo!

[Barfunk]

They were told to stand down and arrested parents trying to rush in. You should ask yourself why.

So they thought it would be a great idea to stand pat and check their Facebooks while those children got massacred. Everyone saw what happened in the surveillance video released. The cops did ABSOLUTELY nothing when all this happened. They VERY CLEARLY pussied out, and it had nothing to do with "orders". Those es let those kids get murdered. Yes, "good guys with guns" did.

[ducks]

I think an actual duck probably has more critical thinking skills, but ducks is as shooters go.

Good times

[ducks]

you have no guns

Bull ing

[ducks]

You’re a horrible person and even worse parent.

You have no clue
Most love me in person
Not one person told me in person that I am a bad parent

[ducks]

Wonder if the pop is going to tell the Kerr to smoke some weed and drink wine so they can figure how to blame TRUMP for everything Bad in life and Biden for kissing China ass. Sending 10 billion to another country but no money for USA

[xellos88330]

Why tf do we need a militia for? Name one reason. And your own reasoning proves your counterpoint. It’s just funny that you’re too dumb to see it. There is a legal limit to the amount of fluid a lighter can have. Ergo the United States government has told your dumbass how much flammable liquid your lighter can contain. So by your words, the government should also limit the guns we can buy to something less dangerous than an AR.

Also yes it’s people buying and shooting the guns. No . I’m glad you figured that part out. Now also it’s people like you who are ok with supplying the guns who are also the problem. Strange you can’t make that connection. It wasn’t the meth dealers fault for the overdose, he just supplies the dangerous killer drug. We shouldn’t ban meth, it’s people who shoot it in their veins not the drugs fault

I can name a couple reasons for a militia. 1: One of the main reasons why the United States is difficult for another country to invade is because we have an armed population. 2: Should our own (or any other government) attempt to rule by force against the will of the people, then a civilian militia could create insurgency that the goverment cannot control. As far as the flammable liquid... jesus christ do you have no vision at all. The government has ALREADY regulated firearms. For example, you cannot own a fully automatic weapon, cannot have beyond a certain magazine size etc. Now as far as the drug issue you brought up... let me make this simple. If you don't do the drug, then there is no need to supply the damn thing. The dealers will disappear as well as the supply because nobody is ing buying it.

I would love to see you take out a pack of feral hogs with a revolver. How about a bear? How about a pack of dangerous stray dogs in your neighborhood? There are reasons far outside of self defense against people that these weapons are useful for. I would much rather have the AR than a revolver if I am faced with such cir stances. It may not be your reality... but it is someone elses. Learn to think beyond yourself and your cir stances and perhaps you can get the ing point of why people want these guns. I would rather have a gun and not need it, than to need a gun and not have it.

[Gibbz]

1: One of the main reasons why the United States is difficult for another country to invade is because we have an armed population. 2: Should our own (or any other government) attempt to rule by force against the will of the people, then a civilian militia could create insurgency that the goverment cannot control.

Non-invasion has to do with geographical isolation, along with annual military spending being higher than the next 10-highest combined, and the USD being the global standard--not an armed civilian population. Also, if you think a militia of heart-diseased Ameri-fats with a few guns could in any way challenge the US government or its military, you need to put down the Natty Daddy.

[Leetonidas]

You have no clue
Most love me in person
Not one person told me in person that I am a bad parent

[Joseph Kony]

I can name a couple reasons for a militia. 1: One of the main reasons why the United States is difficult for another country to invade is because we have an armed population. 2: Should our own (or any other government) attempt to rule by force against the will of the people, then a civilian militia could create insurgency that the goverment cannot control. As far as the flammable liquid... jesus christ do you have no vision at all. The government has ALREADY regulated firearms. For example, you cannot own a fully automatic weapon, cannot have beyond a certain magazine size etc. Now as far as the drug issue you brought up... let me make this simple. If you don't do the drug, then there is no need to supply the damn thing. The dealers will disappear as well as the supply because nobody is ing buying it.

I would love to see you take out a pack of feral hogs with a revolver. How about a bear? How about a pack of dangerous stray dogs in your neighborhood? There are reasons far outside of self defense against people that these weapons are useful for. I would much rather have the AR than a revolver if I am faced with such cir stances. It may not be your reality... but it is someone elses. Learn to think beyond yourself and your cir stances and perhaps you can get the ing point of why people want these guns. I would rather have a gun and not need it, than to need a gun and not have it.

this is one of the stupidest things ive read on here in awhile. Fox News level re ed talking points lmao. ROFL at America not being invaded because of "armed population." lmao at the idea that you can stop the US government's military with your guns from Academy. I also forgot that aggressive wildlife doesnt exist in the rest of the ing world. What a complete load of asinine, regurgitated bull . and you actually thought you were making a point before you posted this? lolololol

what if i get attacked by a bear ... how ing stupid are you?

[BacktoBasics]

this is one of the stupidest things ive read on here in awhile. Fox News level re ed talking points lmao. ROFL at America not being invaded because of "armed population." lmao at the idea that you can stop the US government's military with your guns from Academy. I also forgot that aggressive wildlife doesnt exist in the rest of the ing world. What a complete load of asinine, regurgitated bull . and you actually thought you were making a point before you posted this? lolololol

what if i get attacked by a bear ... how ing stupid are you?

These people used to be shamed and generally lived like hermits because even their own family got sick of hearing it.

Let’s never lose sight of who gave these s a voice.

[rjv]

I can name a couple reasons for a militia. 1: One of the main reasons why the United States is difficult for another country to invade is because we have an armed population. 2: Should our own (or any other government) attempt to rule by force against the will of the people, then a civilian militia could create insurgency that the goverment cannot control. As far as the flammable liquid... jesus christ do you have no vision at all. The government has ALREADY regulated firearms. For example, you cannot own a fully automatic weapon, cannot have beyond a certain magazine size etc. Now as far as the drug issue you brought up... let me make this simple. If you don't do the drug, then there is no need to supply the damn thing. The dealers will disappear as well as the supply because nobody is ing buying it.

I would love to see you take out a pack of feral hogs with a revolver. How about a bear? How about a pack of dangerous stray dogs in your neighborhood? There are reasons far outside of self defense against people that these weapons are useful for. I would much rather have the AR than a revolver if I am faced with such cir stances. It may not be your reality... but it is someone elses. Learn to think beyond yourself and your cir stances and perhaps you can get the ing point of why people want these guns. I would rather have a gun and not need it, than to need a gun and not have it.

did you mean to post this on 4 chan? or some other haven for paranoid dip s? now i know why people get shot for knocking on the wrong door.

[rjv]

You have no clue
Most love me in person
Not one person told me in person that I am a bad parent

worst tercet ever.

[ambchang]

The levels of stupid is just unbelievable in this thread .
countries not invading the States because some obese white man with no military training owns 20 guns.

[wildbill2u]

What Is Othering? I see a lot of this in this thread.

Othering is a phenomenon in which some individuals or groups are defined and labeled as not fitting in within the norms of a social group. It is an effect that influences how people perceive and treat those who are viewed as being part of the in-group versus those who are seen as being part of the out-group.

Othering also involves attributing negative characteristics to people or groups that differentiate them from the perceived normative social group.

It is an “us vs. them” way of thinking about human connections and relationships. This process essentially involves looking at others and saying "they are not like me" or "they are not one of us."

Othering is a way of negating another person's individual humanity and, consequently, those that are have been othered are seen as less worthy of dignity and respect.

On an individual level, othering plays a role in the formation of prejudices against people and groups. On a larger scale, it can also play a role in the dehumanization of entire groups of people which can then be exploited to drive changes in ins utions, governments, and societies. It can lead to the persecution of marginalized groups, the denial of rights based on group iden ies, or even acts of violence against others.

[cd98]

I'm sure Pop's speech changed a lot of minds.

[offset formation]

I hate Democrats and Republicans, conservatives, and liberals. If we could dump 10% from the far left and the far right, we might have a chance.

Both-sidesism at its best.

Both sides aren't active, gathering threats to humanity.

The far left wants you to have free Healthcare and paid family leave. The far right wants to forget about the last 150 years of social progress and science. They're the Christian taliban -- christ fascists. Given time, and no checks on their efforts, American women would be wearing burkas in 25 yrs or less. They're banning books, burning books, banning history, lowering age of consent, banning abortion, negating science, etc. Don't believe me? You've evidently haven't seen pictures of Afghan women dressing like Americans in the 1960s. Now you can only see their eyes.

These two groups are NOT the same. And conflating them only bolsters the narrative that both sides are problematic to getting solutions.

[baseline bum]

[baseline bum]

Both-sidesism at its best.

Both sides aren't active, gathering threats to humanity.

The far left wants you to have free Healthcare and paid family leave. The far right wants to forget about the last 150 years of social progress and science. They're the Christian taliban -- christ fascists. Given time, and no checks on their efforts, American women would be wearing burkas in 25 yrs or less. They're banning books, burning books, banning history, lowering age of consent, banning abortion, negating science, etc. Don't believe me? You've evidently haven't seen pictures of Afghan women dressing like Americans in the 1960s. Now you can only see their eyes.

These two groups are NOT the same. And conflating them only bolsters the narrative that both sides are problematic to getting solutions.

LOL these hate both sides guys are always the most hardcore Republicans. I remember that regurgitating a bunch of Fox News talking points about Obamacare being the reason healthcare is so insanely expensive in the US like it was law 20-25 years ago when our health system started spiraling out of control. Notice how that post was liked by two hardcore right wingers too.

[baseline bum]

The far left wants you to have free Healthcare and paid family leave.

Also that's not the far left, that's the center when you talk about the American people. It's the far left when you talk about American politicians because both parties have moved so far right since the late 1980s.

[offset formation]

LOL these hate both sides guys are always the most hardcore Republicans. I remember that regurgitating a bunch of Fox News talking points about Obamacare being the reason healthcare is so insanely expensive in the US like it was law 20-25 years ago when our health system started spiraling out of control.

Or Libertarians, yes. And they inevitably out themselves by being Republican voters without fail. Every anecdotal story I've ever heard about a Libertarian is that, like you say, they're the real hard-core conservative Republicans.

Yet they love ti talk about both-sidesism as though they aren't in the stink of our political process/system.

[baseline bum]

Or Libertarians, yes. And they inevitably out themselves by being Republican voters without fail. Every anecdotal story I've ever heard about a Libertarian is that, like you say, they're the real hard-core conservative Republicans.

Yet they love ti talk about both-sidesism as though they aren't in the stink of our political process/system.

Also LOL that there is any difference between the right and the far right when Trump is the guy they keep nominating for the presidency and it looks like they'll do it again in 2024. Always hilarious seeing ing about the far left when the left is completely powerless in Washington and has been ever since Bill Clinton rebranded the Democrats into a center right party.

[offset formation]

Also that's not the far left, that's the center when you talk about the American people. It's the far left when you talk about American politicians because both parties have moved so far right since the late 1980s.

Correct. Democratic presidents, like President Biden, don't even have the balls to campaign on it despite its popularity. Bernie gets crucified as a rabid left winger but in reality represents the individual political positions most Americans would unify behind.

[Proxy]

not sure who's dumber between american "libertarians" and american "liberals""

one thinks smaller government automatically means more freedoms and can't tell the difference between a centrist and leftist, and the other thinks the democratic party is progresssive and that bernie bros are problematic.

both categories are completely delusional and love to imagine themselves winning online arguments while capitalism continues to raw dawg us all