The problem with that reasoning is that neither Dejounte, nor any of those picks (Atlanta, Chicago or Toronto) have the same value right now as they did then (Dejounte's value decreased, the picks' value increased). Being hyperbolic, it'd be like trying to convince Denver to take a FRP for Jokic, because no one would have turned down that offer in 2014 for a #41 pick.
My main problem is that the value of those picks don't match at all that of the picks returned in trades for players of similar value: Minnesota's picks for Gobert, Cleveland's picks for Donovan Mitc , etc. In a vacuum, 4 picks aren't too much, but here were talking 4 likely lottery picks & a swap, 3 of those with very high potential. The Spurs could move one of those higher potential picks for several less valuable ones (say, to OKC or NYK), if the goal is to match a given # of picks.
Another example is Pascal Siakam, a 2 time all star, 2 time all NBA (once 2nd team, once 3rd team). The situation isn't comparable, because he's a few years older (29 vs 24), on an expiring contract, and arguably a tier below. But he's a proven 2-way no. 2 guy on a championship team, and he went for a role player (Bruce Brown) and 3 projected late first rounders. I'm not suggesting this should be a fair valuation for Trae, but rather saying opportunities will arise like they do every year, and you should think twice before running out of ammo (both in terms of assets and salary cap).
Personally I'd probably try to sell Atlanta on a retool (rather than a rebuild) based on a high draft pick this year (the Spurs' own) plus one other pick (Toronto/Chicago), with the possibility of swapping the latter for their own '25 if they take Zach Collins as part of the package. Then include Keldon, and maybe Tre. If they want more picks, include Charlotte's first (kind of fake, but first after all for PR purposes) or use the Spurs #33 + #44 to land a late first rounder this year. That's a total of 4 first round picks, 2 of them high lottery, plus young players. That's the absolute most I'd go for Trae, and I don't think it's a low ball offer at all. Otherwise lets see what the market has to offer them and tell them to come back with a better offer.

Reply With Quote