![]()
We need to understand Heisenberg as a precursor to understanding the NBA ing draft![]()
But how does that get us 400% odds at Cooper Flagg?
![]()
We need to understand Heisenberg as a precursor to understanding the NBA ing draft![]()
Look bro, I’ve read Eisenstein. I know Bohr. I tutored Penrose. I’ve watched Oppenheimer. Twice. I can tell you without a doubt we have 900% odds at the #1 pick.
Wow are you insecure. Hopefully the clique reassures you soon.
We are discussing probability. You are describing what happens over the course of the 2 hours that a lottery happens and insisting it matters. You are arguing against the view before the event happens outside of those two hours when trades actually happen.
I don't care if you understand it. Seems simple to me.
“God doesn’t play dice, but I know how to solve the 2025 NBA draft”
Schrdinger’s c
t
yes but it will be unprotected so its worth it
Insecure. Coward. Clique. References and analogies.
Allow me to stand back and let you through. Please continue.
In fact Pawpaw, isn't it about time to freshen up that coffee pot? Id hate for you to lose any of your edge.
My hope for 25' is to be able to trade as up as possible with 3 1RPs
Only a season ending injury will make us tank so let's forget about a direct lottery pick imo
We need 3 to get a top5 maybe
The collapse of the wave function has as much to do with the draft’s odds as knowing how to assemble a microchip has to do with the recipe for a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.
Now I understand why Trump will be our next president.
Humanity = ed
Walks like a duck, talks like a duck, quacks like a duck.
Like and thank your clique-mates some more while trying to stigmatize me.
If it's old to you that just means you haven't changed.
Got it. If we have our pick and Atlanta’s, we have 4% and 6.5% of getting #1 overall. That’s 40 balls for pick 9 and 65 balls for pick 8. There is another distinct position that has 105 balls in the hopper, position #5. The odds for that # of balls to hit top 4, according to the NBA home page on TaT is 42.1%, which would account for me missing the bolded part of your post.
Boomerspeak
Which one are you going to break out next? If my aunt had a she'd be my uncle?
Does the calculation for the wave function start before or after an event? Could said event be analogous to an event like the start of the lottery?
Of course it can.
If you need to categorize me to insult me that says quite a lot. I was going more for simple so you could more easily understand.
So what happens to those 65 balls if one of the 40 is selected? Do they still represent 6.5% of hitting #1 when they really have 0%.
Maybe this is like Schrodinger’s cat…
Pawpaw’s ozempic prescription not only cured his ‘beetus, but it learned him quantum field theory too. Move over black spurs gm, there’s a new sheriff in town.
No, but they have a 19.2% shot at 2-4, the odds of pick 8, positions 2,3,4.
Peanut butter jelly sandwiches is about your level.
Look out people.... It's the "I kept it simple because you aren't smart" insult.
Jesus abuelo you are digging deep aren't you![]()
I had just gotten hammered for bringing up Schrodingers's cat. You aren't going to like anything I do.
I am not sure what you are feeling good about.
in’ got rid of that black muslim prez-eh-dent, learned me how to solve for the amplitude in the wave function, got me a in new waterski and matchin tattoo, and now I’m cruisin on spurstalk clowning on fools and cruisin for babes. Life. Is. Good. #saltlife
all this blather because you do not understand intermediate probability.
Now that is taken care of, it is valid to add the probabilities by round when looking at FRP before the lottery begins.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)