Page 11 of 21 FirstFirst ... 789101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 513
  1. #251
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    2,263
    CP + Vassell + Traded for 3D + Sochan + Wemby Tre + Castle + Keldon + Barnes or Julian battle + Collins
    Will be a good idea to have another wing but it will depends on what they think of champ imo they like him and the team will be the same as today plus mamu or another big. btw i really like the deal, a swap and a taking a good vet who's 38% carreer 3pt shooter is nice.

  2. #252
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    6,930
    Will be a good idea to have another wing but it will depends on what they think of champ imo they like him and the team will be the same as today plus mamu or another big. btw i really like the deal, a swap and a taking a good vet who's 38% carreer 3pt shooter is nice.
    Tbh, I wouldn't trade for any more role players except for Collins upgrade, would be just lateral moves.
    If we're to actually compete, we either need to get a legit second option like Markkanen or have some of the young guys take a big leap forward.

  3. #253
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    458
    I didn’t realize we got a 1st rd pick swap for this… turn it around and include it in the Lauri trade?
    Very possible. Because Utah will have to absorb both Keldon and Collins in order for us to extend Lauri. So, we definitely need to give Ainge one or two more high picks.

  4. #254
    ...a.k.a. mAtT!iC3 mudyez's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Post Count
    4,459
    Was Huerter ever really in the conversation? I like Barnes, but would have loved Huerter instead.

  5. #255
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Regarding the “touch” rule I would venture to guess SA sends the cash they got from CHA to CHI to satisfy that no?

  6. #256
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Pretty sure CHI25:2 is going from SA to Chicago

  7. #257
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    BTW, this trade, as reported, isn't legal CBA wise:
    http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q84



    There must have a "touch" link between Spurs and Bulls. It could be a second round pick or Spurs could trade Bassey to Bulls.
    Would trading Bassey out solve the cap space issue of being about to fit Paul?

  8. #258
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    Regarding the “touch” rule I would venture to guess SA sends the cash they got from CHA to CHI to satisfy that no?
    Or just some bull SRP.

  9. #259
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Regarding the “touch” rule I would venture to guess SA sends the cash they got from CHA to CHI to satisfy that no?
    That’s what I was thinking.

  10. #260
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Would trading Bassey out solve the cap space issue of being about to fit Paul?
    Only if you trade him into someone’s cap space, and there is a cost to that. Much easier to just cut him.

  11. #261
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Or just some bull SRP.
    I think we got $200K from CHA. Even a second rounder will return more than that.

  12. #262
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    The cash for the touch rule isn't the same amount than the cash a team must send in a two teams trade. It was, an maybe still is, $1.1M for the touch rule and $110K for a two teams trade.

    For the touch rule, Spurs can't send a protected second round pick (the usual top55 protected), they must send a pick that will convey. They might send a quite bad pick because they have a huge chest of second round pick.

    For example, in 2026, Spurs will have as second round picks:
    - worst of Thunder, Mavs and 76ers.
    - best of Spurs and worst of Pacers/Heat.
    - worst of Pels and Blazers.
    - Jazz
    - Hornets pick if Spurs don't get their 2025 first round pick.

    Spurs might send the worst of these 4/5 second round picks to satisfy the touch rule.

  13. #263
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    Would trading Bassey out solve the cap space issue of being about to fit Paul?
    Not enough, Spurs would still be about $2.5M shy of where they need to be.

  14. #264
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Pretty sure CHI25:2 is going from SA to Chicago
    What???? Spurs give up the ability to land CHI 25 first for this? I would be big time surprised.

  15. #265
    Veteran heyheymymy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    8,844
    What???? Spurs give up the ability to land CHI 25 first for this? I would be big time surprised.
    Spurs have CHI 2025 1st and 2nd

    I believe Chinook is referring to the second round pick. The Spurs would still keep the CHI 25 first.

  16. #266
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    What???? Spurs give up the ability to land CHI 25 first for this? I would be big time surprised.
    Not the first, the second. And that isn’t out in the NBAoSphere anywhere. Seems to just be conjecture.

  17. #267
    Veteran heyheymymy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    8,844
    But I hope it's not that CHI 25 second

    Take one of those ty ones, 26 best of Spurs and worst of Pacers/Heat. lol

  18. #268
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Spurs have CHI 2025 1st and 2nd

    I believe Chinook is referring to the second round pick. The Spurs would still keep the CHI 25 first.
    Ok - that would make sense. I thought he was saying CHI 25 first and 2nd

  19. #269
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    293
    On a scale of 1-10, I’d put this about a 7.5. This year is a simulator type of year in my eyes. Barnes serves a few purposes: 1) A floor spacing 4 who does not require high usage. He’s not a part of the future, but this player archetype very much is. 2) A contract that can be aggregated into a bigger deal. I suspect he’ll be kept this year so it won’t come into play, but a year from now his expiring contract could be very useful in a bigger deal. 3) Professionalism. The Spurs need some more adults on the floor who know where to be and when to be there.
    Last edited by Eaglenole2002; 07-07-2024 at 09:39 AM.

  20. #270
    Veteran Spurs9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    7,081
    Just woke up to see this, love this trade. Great move!

  21. #271
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    i find it really vomit inducing, how underrated champ is by the spurs fans.
    Not playing defense, having non-NBA athleticism and being immensely streaky will do that.

  22. #272
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    But I hope it's not that CHI 25 second

    Take one of those ty ones, 26 best of Spurs and worst of Pacers/Heat. lol
    Hope not, too, but the reality is they always sell/trade the first pick in the second round anyway.

  23. #273
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    On a scale of 1-10, I’d put this about a 7.5. This year is a simulator type of year in my eyes. Barnes serves a few purposes: 1) A floor spacing 4 who doesn’t not require high usage. He’s not a part of the future, but this player archetype very much is. 2) A contract that can be aggregated into a bigger deal. I suspect he’ll be kept this year so it won’t come into play, but a year from now his expiring contract could be very useful in a bigger deal. 3) Professionalism. The Spurs need some more adults on the floor who know where to be and when to be there.
    Well put. I think he's the perfect vet addition. Between him and CP, these kids are going to have a lot to learn if they decide they want to.

  24. #274
    Veteran Spurs9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    7,081
    So glad we didn't give up tons of picks for Lauri and sign him to a massive contract. This keeps things way more flexible for a solid player.

  25. #275
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    So glad we didn't give up tons of picks for Lauri and sign him to a massive contract. This keeps things way more flexible for a solid player.
    That’s not necessarily off the table. It would depend on him signing or not signing an extension. That will be known in a month or so.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •