Reply With Quote
Europe is recently deporting not only passport holders but even national born.
EU is building military. For the first time no excuses for Mediterranean migrants. These might be indirect solutions we all are seeking.
In the past we got sidetracked or even quit when met with the "racist" label. Now whatever it takes.
Europe is recently deporting not only passport holders but even national born.
EU is building military. For the first time no excuses for Mediterranean migrants. These might be indirect solutions we all are seeking.
You still can't answer the question
He's afraid of everything.
"But I'm President...and their not."
"social mores changed, so now we're doing a fascism"
Lol tsa"valid judicial orders"
The Supreme Court explicitly ruled in the 1948 Ludecke v. Watkins case that Alien Enemy Act removals by the president are non-justiciable.
Here are some key excerpts from the ruling, lest anyone think the SCOTUS opinion was in any way unclear: “The Alien Enemy Act precludes judicial review of the removal order.”
That line is literally the first sentence of the SCOTUS holding.
“The very nature of the President's power to order the removal of all enemy aliens rejects the notion that courts may pass judgment upon the exercise of his discretion.”
“[E]very judge before whom the question has since come has held that the statute barred judicial review.”
“A war power of the President not subject to judicial review is not transmuted into a judicially reviewable action because the President chooses to have that power exercised within narrower limits than Congress authorized.”
“These are matters of political judgment for which judges have neither technical competence nor official responsibility.”
“The Act is almost as old as the Cons ution, and it would savor of doctrinaire audacity now to find the statute offensive to some emanation of the Bill of Rights.”
“Accordingly, we hold that full responsibility for the just exercise of this great power may validly be left where the Congress has cons utionally placed it -- on the President of the United States. The Founders, in their wisdom, made him not only the Commander in Chief, but also the guiding organ in the conduct of our foreign affairs.”
There is no gray area or uncertainty here.
As the Supreme Court has made abundantly and explicitly clear, removals under the Alien Removal Act are non-justiciable. Because of this, it is the inferior and unelected district judge who is violating the law and the Cons ution today by purporting to have the authority to review what the Supreme Court—his superior—has prohibited him from reviewing.
The proper form for this case to take, based on the Cons ution, federal statutes, and 250 years of case law in this country, is for the judge to dismiss the plaintiffs’ case for lack of jurisdiction and standing. Plaintiffs can of course appeal that dismissal, at which point the appellate court would be required to reject the appeal. And if plaintiffs wished to do so at that point, they could apply for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, which would then decide whether it wished to overturn its own precedents. Only the Supreme Court has the authority to undertake such an action. And even if that were to happen, the president still retains inherent Article II authority, independent of federal statute, to remove foreign enemies from the United States.
That is how the legal system in this country actually works. It does not in any way empower an inferior trial court judge to unilaterally overturn controlling federal law or Supreme Court precedents.
"Tom Homan, President Donald Trump's border czar, vowed Sunday that the Trump administration would not defy court orders stemming from legal challenges over its invocation of the wartime Alien Enemies Act to deport undo ented migrants from the United States..."
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/homa...y?id=120058328
in Ludecke there was a board that received and reviewed information first
in this case the information was y
I’ll be tweeting here from Federal District Court in San Francisco as Judge Chen hears arguments in the case of National TPS Alliance v Noem which seeks to prevent Trump admin from de-do enting Venezuelans and Haitians w/ TPS.Judge Chen asks attorneys for Trump admin whether there is any evidence in the administrative record to support its claim that Venezuelans are members of so-called “Tren de Agua” gang. Their response: “We don’t have any specific answer to that…”Questions now from Judge Chen about difference between seeking a preliminary injunction and postponement/vacatur.Trump lawyers explicitly concede that Sec Noem didn’t examine country conditions before seeking to revoke TPS extensions.Lots of complicated jurisdictional arguments, but Trump lawyers seem to essentially be relying on an argument that it can do whatever it wants if it determines it is advancing “the national interest.”
After the judge issued an injunction ending the refugee resettlement funding freeze, Rubio cancelled the contracts
Sanc y of contract is really getting a workout in Trump 2.0
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...495.79.0_3.pdf"While the Government enjoys significant discretion in administering [the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program], that discretion does not extend to abandoning statutory obligations or rendering the program effectively inoperative."
Trump allowing his Jew masters to bring Israelis in illegally
Israel isn't "the Jews" man, it's a political state.
There's also a rumor out there that Russia offed her.
Between evidence free options, there's really no need to choose, unless you want to reveal your bias
Always Russia's fault.
America's official Boogeyman since Russia won WWII., for the entire world.
at this point foul play seems to be pure speculation
...which is SoP in America.
legit refugees targeted is disgraceful and dishonorable
any US agent or officer connected with this should go to prison
.E.M. and his girlfriend fled persecution in their native Venezuela in 2021 and dreamed of making a new life in the United States. The young couple spend two years in Colombia before applying for refugee status in 2023 to come to the U.S. Struggling to survive in Colombia, they worked tirelessly in informal jobs, selling food on the streets and making deliveries to make ends meet. On Jan. 8, after they were finally granted the coveted refugee status, E.M., 29, and his girlfriend, Daniela Palma, 30, finally arrived in the United States, flying into Houston. Upon arrival, an immigration officer asked the young man the question that changed his life in moments. “Do you have any tattoos?”
He had already been asked that by U.S. authorities in Colombia as part of an extensive background check, and he now gave the same answer. He lifted his shirt and pants and showed the immigration officer tattoos on his chest, legs and arms — a crown, a soccer ball and a palm tree. At that point, it no longer mattered that he had no criminal record, and that he had been granted refugee status, with the full legal right to enter the United States. Immigration officials decided the tattoos were evidence enough to suspect he might be a member of Tren de Aragua, a prison-born Venezuelan gang whose members have earned a reputation in Latin America as fearless and ruthless.
E.M., whom the Miami Herald is not identifying by his full name for his safety in case he is forced to return to Venezuela, was detained. His girlfriend, threatened with detention for months herself, agreed to be deported back to Colombia. E.M. spent the next couple of months in three different immigration detention centers in Texas, his girlfriend said. On March 15, the Trump administration deported him, along with over 200 other Venezuelans, to El Salvador, where they were promptly imprisoned in a maximum-security facility with a troubling history of violating human rights and where men sleep hundreds to a cell on steel beds with no mattresses or pillows
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/loc...#storylink=cpy
Everything's fascism to the fascists.
Bingo!!!
On Jan. 8, after they were finally granted the coveted refugee status, E.M., 29, and his girlfriend, Daniela Palma, 30, finally arrived in the United States, flying into Houston. Upon arrival, an immigration officer asked the young man the question that changed his life in moments. “Do you have any tattoos?”
On March 15, the Trump administration deported him, along with over 200 other Venezuelans, to El Salvador, where they were promptly imprisoned in a maximum-security facility with a troubling history of violating human rights and where men sleep hundreds to a cell on steel beds with no mattresses or pillows.
Tougheth lucketh.On March 15, the Trump administration deported him, along with over 200 other Venezuelans, to El Salvador, where they were promptly imprisoned in a maximum-security facility with a troubling history of violating human rights and where men sleep hundreds to a cell on steel beds with no mattresses or pillows.
I guess El Salvador drew the line at random women
- She had a pending asylum hearing
- ICE agents lied and told her she was being sent to Venezuela
- She was never given any opportunity to present evidence that she was falsely accused.
no, y'all are the fascists
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
