Again, Nuggets/Bucks never had picks from other teams, they were always the buyers.
Castle, Devin (if they want him), salary filler and 5 FRPs would be the fair asking price, imo.
Spurs would still have 4 picks left and then all the picks from 2032 onward. That's why I said I'd trade the near future picks, not the 20131 ones. Hawks picks are still the most valuable assets we have, especially if we get lucky again.
The key question here is do you think we could get more value from Castle staying and Hawks picks than from Giannis?
I'd say that Nuggets and Bucks got stuck in no man's land not because they failed big trades, but because they wasted too many assets on smaller trades and missed with most of their late FRPs.
Then there's the Wemby question. Are you really banking on a 7'4 player being healthy in his late 20s?
The goal is to win championships and having rookie contract Wemby and Giannis would be the best way to do it, especially with the parity in the league right now.
Again, I'm not 100% sold on this, but the line between blowing your load too early and being left with your in your hand is very thin and there isn't an obvious answer in this situation.
Giannis' contract situation kind of fits the timeline because he's got a player option for 27-28 season, the same summer Wemby's extension kicks in.
Another thing is that Spurs would have a huge advantage in free agency because every veteran's first choice would be playing with Giannis and Wemby.